User talk:Sarvcrm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sarvcrm, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sarveno Business Solutions, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Non-Dropframe talk 04:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sarveno Business Solutions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Non-Dropframe talk 04:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Dirk Beetstra T C 03:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sarvcrm (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Greetings - we received an email saying our account has been blocked. we have not used our account or have had any activities in Wikipedia for the last few years. Can you please provide a bit insight on what caused such a block so that we can address it promptly. thanks in advance.

Decline reason:

Per below.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Beetstra: Perhaps you can provide the insight they seek for being blocked after 5 years of no editing?
Sarvcrm, I must caution: accounts are single use only, and if you are making paid edits, that requires disclosure. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 08:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed; how was this account discovered with no edits in five years? 331dot (talk) 08:49, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • To this user, you will need to designate a single individual to exclusively operate this account, and no one else may be granted access to it. It was blocked for promotional editing and the username. Please follow the instructions above to propose a new username and explain what it is that you want to edit about. Before you do, please review conflict of interest and paid editing. 331dot (talk) 08:49, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For years now, IPs have been spamming this. This account, another clear COI account and a massive list of IPs have been spamming this. Until someone noticed it this week (last diff May 13) and reported it to the spam blacklist. Warnings have been issued in the past but ignored, or did not arrive. I proceeded to block related accounts and blacklisted the domain. —Dirk Beetstra T C 10:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@beetstra - we have reviewed all the spammed pages and are ashamed on what has happened. We have terminated our contract with the third party digital services. Needless to say, some of the changes and mass edits were done by competitors with the purpose of getting our domain banned, which they were successful. sorry for all the headache this has caused.