User talk:Reppop
|
welcome |
|
2020 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
March 2020[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: Metro Charter Elementary School (April 18)[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Badal (May 2)[edit]
Translations[edit]Hi, if you translate sn article from another wiki, please place {{translated page}} on the talk page to give proper credit to the authors at that other wiki. Thanks, Renata (talk) 06:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Corey La Barrie (May 14)[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation (June 1)[edit]
Nomination for deletion of Template:Omega Tribe[edit]
Speedy deletion nomination of Navigator (1986 Omega Tribe album)[edit]Hello Reppop, I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Navigator (1986 Omega Tribe album) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article. If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks! Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Hughesdarren (talk) 10:03, 9 June 2020 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Omega Tribe (Japanese band) (June 10)[edit]
Nomination of Now That We're Human for deletion[edit] The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now That We're Human until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eostrix (🦉 hoot hoot🦉]) 07:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Navigator (1986 Omega Tribe album)[edit]
A tag has been placed on Navigator (1986 Omega Tribe album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ Amkgp 💬 04:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Night Tempo (July 6)[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: Shinichiro Yokota has been accepted[edit] Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Kaizenify (talk) 01:51, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Nomination of K.W. Miller for deletion[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K.W. Miller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:04, 2 August 2020 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Omega Tribe (Japanese band) has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 20:27, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Omega Tribe has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 20:27, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Orthopaedic Hospital Medical Magnet High School has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 16:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Category:Omega Tribe has been nominated for discussion[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
File:Kimiko Mohri 1981.jpg listed for discussion[edit] | ||||||
|
2021 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Nomination of Matthew Geary for deletion[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Geary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Your submission at Articles for creation: Night Tempo (July 19)[edit]
Disambiguation link notification for July 24[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Keizoh Kawano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keyboard. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 24 July 2021 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Night Tempo (July 24)[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: Night Tempo (July 28)[edit]
AfC notification: Draft:Night Tempo has a new comment[edit]I get your frustration[edit]@Reppop, I saw what you did there on the draft, but have you ever really read what I (on my talk page) or other editors wrote? What's the point of adding a bunch of refs in the draft? As if I take that you only think that we asked for more references? No. I addressed several points on my talk page including highlighting sentences that needed to be rewritten. And one user said, "Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Single low peak (170th) on minor music chart does not do enough for notability.". But you never seem to address any of these, but only the refs. As after my detailed response to you on my talk page, you just replied: So, I need more references? Cause he got viral cause of his remixes and not cause of TikTok cause that really wasn't a thing., avoiding all the other factors. The subject does not produce his own music (not saying that the subject has to produce his own music, his remixes just currently do not make him notable enough), just a bunch of remixes that don't seem to have any major outlet coverage (I already acknowledged on my talk page about refs from Billboard website, also you now added an NME ref, but then again they do not establish WP:MUSICBIO. Quantity of references is not the only thing. The kind of coverage that those refs do is also important.) I could point out many drafts to you that we declined even tho they had much more reliable references than yours. It's just even tho there are refs from reliable and independent sources, the coverage within those sources does not establish notability. We review a draft based on what's in it. So, just adding a bunch of refs after the draft is declined ain't gonna do anything. When I declined the draft there were a lot of Japanese random websites, and now you removed them? Only kept the good ones? Why didn't you do that in the first place? Even checking back on, I noticed Twitter and other social medias were used as source? You should have only used the good sources, but you used as many sources as your could. That's why I previously pointed you out to WP:THREE. As a reviewer, we don't seek for many refs, it's just the few good ones. Anyway, if you're so keen to believe that this draft should be accepted, then you should address the other issues (not just the refs), and resubmit. Let's see if other reviewers accepts it or not next time. If not, then I really recommend posting at WP:TEAHOUSE, it really helped one of the previous users whose draft I declined, and good people from teahouse pointed out the problem and helped him, and he got it approved next time. Tame (talk) 17:33, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
List of LAUSD superintendents moved to draftspace[edit]An article you recently created, List of LAUSD superintendents, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
Commented on Draft:List of LAUSD superintendents[edit]Hi, I've posted a comment on Draft:List of LAUSD superintendents -- essentially, I think it would be good for mainspace if there were references for the list itself, and that it might work better as a prose article rather than a list. I'm commenting on your talk page since it seems technically someone else submitted it so the notification went to their talk page. Thanks, eviolite (talk) 17:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Night Tempo[edit]
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC) | ||||
|
2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
Your draft article, Draft:Night Tempo[edit] Hello, Reppop. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Night Tempo". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 12[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Los Angeles City Council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Stevenson. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC) Feuer[edit]You could actually use the government photo here instead of Flickr images. Just fyi. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:42, 4 April 2022 (UTC) Nomination of Phil Washington for deletion[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nomination of Yucco Miller for deletion[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yucco Miller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]Hello, Reppop Thank you for creating 2019 Los Angeles special elections. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:40, 28 May 2022 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Umar Johnson has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Missvain (talk) 19:32, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Superintendent of the Los Angeles Unified School District has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Missvain (talk) 05:15, 9 July 2022 (UTC)A cheeseburger for you![edit]
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]Hello, Reppop Thank you for creating Bert L. Farmer. User:Curbon7, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) Curbon7 (talk) 02:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC) August 2022[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adin Ross until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Nonpartisan electrons[edit]hi reppop So all California elections are nonpartisan including governor there can be 2 candidate with the same political party's also when you add colors people will confuse it with political parties and will add political party's as a good deed so there no need to add colors or party's we don't want to re add political party's if you have questions please reply back thank you 2603:8001:2902:64F4:1983:15C9:68D4:88BC (talk) 00:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for October 22[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eunisses Hernandez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franklin High School. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC) AfC notification: Draft:Hugo Soto-Martinez has a new comment[edit]Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugo Soto-Martinez has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:05, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Acting president of Los Angeles City Council[edit]Can we Add All the Acting president of Los Angeles City Council 74.62.14.54 (talk) 18:16, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit] Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Alternative text for images#Captions and nearby text states, Where the caption is sufficiently descriptive or evocative of the image, or where it makes clear what the function of the image is, one option is to write Hopefully this explains the purpose of the "refer to caption" alt on the image at KLKN. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:23, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
| ||
|
2023 |
|---|
My sincere apology for irrational AfD[edit]I just wanted to write this to tell my deepest apology for a two-week gap within both AfDs involving Speaker Knockerz (noms. #2 and 3). It was just that the second nomination was ineligible due to a speedy delete without consensus. It seems why I have to nominate it again for the third time without reviewing the last votes. I hope you understand. Darrion "Beans" Brown 🙂 (my talk page / my sandbox) 03:49, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
March 2023[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: Katy Young Yaroslavsky has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! UtherSRG (talk) 11:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quadeca until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Disambiguation link notification for April 5[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alma Lloyd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Barbara. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Diane Papan has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:11, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Invitation[edit] Hello Reppop!
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around! Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC) Navigator (1986 Omega Tribe album)[edit]Hi, I reverted your redirect because it may be notable due to its charting quite high. If you disagree the correct procedure is to take it to WP:AFD, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:20, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Re: California Municipal Elections[edit]Hey - A little (lot) late but thanks for your comment [1]! Eteethan (talk) 04:57, 30 October 2023 (UTC) Concerns Regarding Potential Bias in Edits[edit]Dear User:Reppop, I've noticed your recent edit on the Konstantine Anthony page and your contributions to several other political figures' articles. While I appreciate your efforts in contributing to Wikipedia, I have some concerns that I would like to address in the spirit of maintaining the integrity and neutrality of Wikipedia. Your recent edit, which involved restoring a specific portrait of Konstantine Anthony, has prompted me to examine the pattern of your contributions. I see that you've created and edited articles on several political figures, predominantly from the Democratic Party. This observation leads me to wonder about the potential for an unintentional bias in your contributions, especially regarding the choice of images and content in these biographies. I would like to understand more about the reasoning behind your specific choice of the portrait for Konstantine Anthony. Are there specific guidelines or criteria you are following that might help clarify your decision? This is important to ensure that we adhere to Wikipedia's principles of neutral point of view and verifiability. I am not accusing you of wrongdoing, but I believe it is beneficial for both of us, and for the Wikipedia community, to discuss these concerns openly. It's essential to ensure that our contributions are free from potential conflicts of interest and maintain the objective standards that Wikipedia upholds. Looking forward to your response and a constructive dialogue on this matter. Best regards, User:Sleeplessmason --Sleeplessmason (talk) Sleeplessmason (talk) 20:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC) (Sleeplessmason (talk) 04:51, 13 December 2023 (UTC))]
Concerns Regarding Image Upload and Article Edits on Konstantine Anthony[edit]Dear User:Reppop, I've observed your recent activities on the Konstantine Anthony Wikipedia article and the related image upload titled "Konstantine Anthony, 2022.jpg" to Wikimedia Commons. I'm concerned about the copyright status of this image, which appears to be a work of the City of Burbank and was sourced from their official website. As you may be aware, images produced by municipal governments may not be in the public domain like those by federal agencies, raising questions about whether the image was uploaded and used without proper consent or release of copyright by the City. Furthermore, there seems to be a rapid series of edits on the Konstantine Anthony page, which might indicate a potential bias, possibly aligning with a political campaign. As Wikipedia editors, we strive to maintain neutrality and avoid any conflicts of interest. In light of these concerns, I've initiated a Request for Comments (RfC) on the article's Talk page to seek broader community input on these issues. Your participation in this discussion would be valuable to ensure a fair and balanced resolution. Best regards, Sleeplessmason (talk) 20:52, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
|
|
2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:41, 13 January 2024 (UTC) DYK nomination of Detroit Sign[edit]
Your GA nomination of Jackie Goldberg[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jackie Goldberg you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Jackie Goldberg[edit]The article Jackie Goldberg you nominated as a good article has failed DYK for Detroit Sign[edit] On 24 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Detroit Sign, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an AI rendering of the Detroit Sign misled people into thinking that it would be larger than it actually is? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Detroit Sign. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Detroit Sign), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Your GA nomination of Jackie Goldberg[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jackie Goldberg you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Jackie Goldberg[edit]The article Jackie Goldberg you nominated as a good article has passed Your contributed article, Userr:Reppop/omt[edit]
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Userr:Reppop/omt. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – One More Time (Daft Punk song). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at One More Time (Daft Punk song). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page. If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 05:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC) DYK for Gmac Cash[edit]On 9 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gmac Cash, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that rapper Gmac Cash attempted to gift a pair of Cartier glasses to Gretchen Whitmer, the governor of Michigan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gmac Cash. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gmac Cash), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Your GA nomination of Face to Face (Daft Punk song)[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Face to Face (Daft Punk song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Face to Face (Daft Punk song)[edit]The article Face to Face (Daft Punk song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Your GA nomination of Torristas and Molinistas[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Torristas and Molinistas you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Torristas and Molinistas[edit]The article Torristas and Molinistas you nominated as a good article has passed Your GA nomination of Face to Face (Daft Punk song)[edit]The article Face to Face (Daft Punk song) you nominated as a good article has passed Invitation to participate in a research[edit]Hello, The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey. You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement . Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. Kind Regards, BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]Hi Reppop. Thank you for your work on Sasha Renée Pérez. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research[edit]Hello, I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement. Take the survey here. Kind Regards, BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for November 24[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ysabel Jurado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fuck the police. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 24 November 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of People...Hold On[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article People...Hold On you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. | ||||
Your GA nomination of People...Hold On
[edit]The article People...Hold On you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:People...Hold On for comments about the article, and Talk:People...Hold On/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Locust member -- Locust member (talk) 22:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Daniel Vangarde
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Daniel Vangarde you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 01:46, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Daniel Vangarde
[edit]The article Daniel Vangarde you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Daniel Vangarde and Talk:Daniel Vangarde/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 03:41, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Daniel Vangarde
[edit]The article Daniel Vangarde you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Daniel Vangarde for comments about the article, and Talk:Daniel Vangarde/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 07:06, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Relocate named refs
[edit]Hello. When you removed a named reference, as you did here for the AmaLee quote box, AnomieBOT had to recover the citation data that was being used elsewhere in the article with the "CornerVTuber" ref name. If you plan to remove a citation that uses the <ref name="label"> tag, make sure you relocate the citation. Thank you. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 21:06, 1 February 2025 (UTC)