Jump to content

User talk:Pretzelles/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Hi, I was wondering why you removed the author-link for Robert McCrum on Vivian Grey in this edit. I can understand removing the publisher info since I've now realised since I added it that that's just extraneous unneeded info and I can sorta understand removing the link to The Guardian to remove some blue text even if personally I prefer every source to have it's own wiki-link. But I'm not clear on the reasons for removing the author-link since I would have presumed you'd always want that so users can quickly see who wrote it to see if it's reputable and unbiased. If you could clear this up for me it'd be much appreciated. Mesidast (talk) (contribs) 20:33, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Ahh hi! It was mainly that I just didn't realise I removed the author-link, feel free to put it back in :) Pretzelles (talk) 20:39, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Ah no that's grand. I've re-added it there now :) Mesidast (talk) (contribs) 22:14, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Berry (entertainer) has been accepted

James Berry (entertainer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

voorts (talk/contributions) 01:29, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Excellent work. One suggestion would be to link to the archives.org upload of the articles cited. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ni'isjoohl totem pole has been accepted

Ni'isjoohl totem pole, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 23:50, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Ni'isjoohl totem pole

On 4 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ni'isjoohl totem pole, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Ni'isjoohl totem pole was once fed a diet of vacuum-packed food? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ni'isjoohl totem pole. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ni'isjoohl totem pole), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Hook update
Your hook reached 14,643 views (610.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Jim Rich

On 15 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jim Rich, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jim Rich served as editor-in-chief of the Daily News twice? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jim Rich. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jim Rich), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Comment

The biographical articles you write are outstanding, exemplary, and amazing. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 14:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC).

+1 QueenofHearts 21:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks both for the lovely comments! <3 Pretzelles (talk) 02:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Logan McCree

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Logan McCree you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tamzin -- Tamzin (talk) 03:44, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Logan McCree

The article Logan McCree you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Logan McCree and Talk:Logan McCree/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tamzin -- Tamzin (talk) 05:04, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Philipp Tanzer

The article Philipp Tanzer you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Philipp Tanzer and Talk:Philipp Tanzer/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tamzin -- Tamzin (talk) 03:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Resilient Barnstar
It was great getting to review your nomination of Philipp Tanzer. Sorry for putting you through the ringer on it, and to be clear the article was in pretty good condition even at time of nomination—but for a politically controversial living gay porn star, one sort of has to demand a very high level of compliance. I'm really glad that you rose to the challenge and got this article where it needs to be. Happy editing; I hope to see more interesting, colorful articles like this from you in the future. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 04:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you so much! It's been great working with you on this, I'm sure you'll see a lot more fun stuff from me in the future! :) Pretzelles (talk) 17:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Philipp Tanzer

The article Philipp Tanzer you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Philipp Tanzer for comments about the article, and Talk:Philipp Tanzer/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tamzin -- Tamzin (talk) 04:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Logan McCree

The article Logan McCree you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Logan McCree for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tamzin -- Tamzin (talk) 03:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Well that's an interesting edge case... Moved the GA page and the bot counted it as a fail. (@Mike Christie) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 04:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 February newsletter

The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Philipp Tanzer

On 24 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Philipp Tanzer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Philipp Tanzer has been an army medic, artist, firefighter, hairdresser, massage therapist, festival organiser, political candidate and gay porn star? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Philipp Tanzer. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Philipp Tanzer), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), Schwede66, and Kusma (talk) 00:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 March newsletter

The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.

The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:

In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.

Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

Citation Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to Pretzelles for collecting more than 50 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:39, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Colin MacKay (journalist, born 1944)

On 1 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Colin MacKay (journalist, born 1944), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Colin Mackay, the political editor at Scottish Television, was "very sad" when Colin MacKay, the political editor at Scottish Television, died? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Colin MacKay (journalist, born 1944). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Colin MacKay (journalist, born 1944)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 April newsletter

We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter

The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Ballot spoiling

This has a venerable history, but I wonder why you would do it in this instance? Is it about this specific RfA, RfA in general, or something else? (I ask partly because I'm sure the candidate wonders, too, and because RfA is a blend of vote and discussion, rather than a situation where the ballot response is the only opportunity to make one's opinions heard. Yngvadottir (talk) 22:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for asking! I've explained this elsewhere off-wiki, but will expand a bit here. I've looked at various RfAs in the past since joining (but not all of them) - and this is the first one I've actually commented on. In this instance, I wanted a way to acknowledge that I had read the RfA and questions/answers/some of the discussions below, but not vote in it.
Some parts of the discussion process in RfAs still feel to me to have a "student union politics" kind of feel - with arguing and people taking others' answers to the extreme - and I just don't have the desire to get involved with that. Although, I have seen some good chances being implemented with the discussion period before voting opens.
But to me, spoiling the ballot in this instance made the most sense in acknowledging that I had read the RfA but did not wish to participate. Let me know if that makes sense! Pretzelles (talk) 18:08, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Charles Hamilton Owens

Information icon Hello, Pretzelles. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charles Hamilton Owens, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 July newsletter

The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Richard Beale Davis

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Richard Beale Davis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 17:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Richard Beale Davis

The article Richard Beale Davis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Richard Beale Davis for comments about the article, and Talk:Richard Beale Davis/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 00:42, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Charles Hamilton Owens

Hello, Pretzelles. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Charles Hamilton Owens".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Law Union

There were two Law Unions- or at least two incarnations of it. See this article. The current Law Union dates its foundation as 1974. Wellington Bay (talk) 18:10, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Hey! It would be good if you could add that to the article, I was going by the sources I could find at a quick glance. Pretzelles (talk) 18:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chivers' Life of Poe

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chivers' Life of Poe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:43, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Richard Beale Davis

Hello! Your submission of Richard Beale Davis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Skyshiftertalk 23:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Richard Beale Davis

On 10 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Richard Beale Davis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Richard Beale Davis first published Chivers' Life of Poe almost 100 years after it was written? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Richard Beale Davis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Richard Beale Davis), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Chivers' Life of Poe

On 10 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chivers' Life of Poe, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Richard Beale Davis first published Chivers' Life of Poe almost 100 years after it was written? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Richard Beale Davis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chivers' Life of Poe), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:This is Rigged

Information icon Hello, Pretzelles. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:This is Rigged, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chivers' Life of Poe

The article Chivers' Life of Poe you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chivers' Life of Poe and Talk:Chivers' Life of Poe/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:03, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

I see you've not edited since posting this to GAN on 13 July. If you're on holiday, it'd be appreciated if you'd indicate when you're back. If you've given up editing, which I'll have to assume if there's still no sign of life, I'll have to close the GAN. Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi yes, sorry! I had some off-wiki issues come up that I had to deal with, but should be able to get on with this soon! Pretzelles (talk) 07:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Great, looking forward to it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Hey! I've decided to leave the GAN for now as things have gotten too hectic irl for a big task like that. Many thanks for looking over it though, hopefully I can make some of the changes in the near future. Pretzelles (talk) 09:53, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
OK, I guess I have to close it in that case. If you do come back to it, you can renominate it, and feel free to ping me that it's ready for a second look. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:30, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chivers' Life of Poe

The article Chivers' Life of Poe you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Chivers' Life of Poe for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:45, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 August newsletter

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:This is Rigged

Hello, Pretzelles. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "This is Rigged".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Circus Ministry

Information icon Hello, Pretzelles. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Circus Ministry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Arthur Kyle Davis Jr.

Information icon Hello, Pretzelles. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arthur Kyle Davis Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Arthur Kyle Davis

Information icon Hello, Pretzelles. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arthur Kyle Davis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pretzelles/Archive_1&oldid=1258675933"