User talk:Perpetual motion machine

Welcome!

Hello, Perpetual motion machine, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --M e rovingian {T C @} 13:34, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

I like 'em. Did User:Omegatron really revert one of these, or was that a goof? ---CH 14:45, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV of Philosophus

Template:Perpetual motion machine

Please stop changing this template without discussing the changes first. I don't understand why you keep doing this. Perpetual motion machine is by far the more commonly used term. --Philosophus ^T 13:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop POVing this template (See Wikipedia:Neutral point of view). This is a neutral term. Perpetual motion machine is by far from a neutral term. Perpetual motion machine 13:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Free energy machine is a far from unambiguous name (Gibbs?, Helmholtz?...) and not suitable. --Michael C. Price ^talk 16:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reversions and 3RR

Please stop making your usual reversions (like Cox's timepiece). If you continue doing so, you may be blocked for WP:3RR violation. Please note that changes advancing NPOV are not exempt from 3RR. --Philosophus ^T 14:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You continue doing so (making "your usual reversions").

You also may be blocked for WP:3RR violation.

I have edited it today to NPOV it and reverted you 3 times for POV pushing, as your User: page states "Much of my editing is involved with keeping crank theories out". Perpetual motion machine

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

abakharev 01:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

Please review the specific uses of talk pages. I have reverted to a previous readable version. You are certainly allowed to remove content from your talk page, but please don't use your talk page for other things. Kingturtle (talk) 17:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Your user and user talk pages are being discussed here. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 17:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you appear to have been inactive for more than a year and a half. I have add the {{noindex}} template to your user page, which will keep it from showing up in search engine results. You are free to revert this action, but I hope that you will choose to participate in the discussion mentioned previously. Thanks, Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 18:13, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your userpage

Please review WP:User page for proper uses. Your current use is creating some confusion. It would be better for Wikipedia if you did not have a Content fork on your userpage. Can you find something else to place on your user page? And if you have ideas on how to edit the article Perpetual motion, make those edits or make suggestions at Talk:Perpetual motion. Kingturtle (talk) 17:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox perpetual motion machine

Template:Infobox perpetual motion machine has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox controversial invention. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:13, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]