User talk:Peoplelikeyoulikeme

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rachel Tashjian (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rachel Tashjian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:58, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 20:58, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Félix González-Torres - MOS edits

Hi! Thank you for adding to the Félix González-Torres article, grateful for more editors adding to it! I would just note that the Manual of Style for visual arts lays out some helpful guidelines for what to include in biographies of artists. Specifically, I think we may have passed the limit on the number of individual exhibitions the artist had both during his lifetime and posthumously. Obviously a lot of them are important and should be kept, but the general rule of thumb is to only include up to or around 5 solo exhibitions and the most widely known/historically notable group exhibitions in a dedicated exhibitions section (ie Whitney Biennial, Venice Biennale, etc.). Other notable exhibitions should be incorporated as sequential prose in the career section, with explanations about the subject's artistic style and evolution in the context those events.

Additionally, I think the extensive lists in the intro section are not useful and muddy up the introduction - all that information can be included in the body of the article as prose.

Thank you again for adding to the article! Just wanted to flag these edits before I execute them so you aren't surprised. 19h00s (talk) 20:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Also, just to follow up here - when adding information about an artist's past exhibitions, works, or career history, you a) need to have a source for every item you list and b) cannot rely on sources from an artist themself or their gallery. So, in this case, we cannot rely on the artist's gallery CV for information about exhibitions during his lifetime - you can use the CV to ascertain information, but you must then find a separate, citable source (i.e., a published catalogue, a review in a notable/reliable publication, a past exhibition listing on a museum/gallery's website, etc.). Don't want you to put in all the work to add things to articles just to have them taken right back out because they're not sourced properly.

Thanks! 19h00s (talk) 20:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Sorry for the number of follow-ups, but a final note. You seem to have removed the introductory language in the article regarding the artist's sexuality and its impact on his work - please look at the article's Talk page for past discussions about this issue, I'm re-adding it for posterity. 19h00s (talk) 20:24, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for these notes. The notes are really helpful. The page still reads a bit scattered and disorganized, especially when a reader compares his page to similar historical queer artists from the 80s and 90s. Shortening the individual exhibition list makes a ton of sense. I'll be sure to include external hyperlinks moving forward, too. I reviewed the Talk page as well as lots of online research on the artist and went through some of the artist's books, monographs, and interviews at my library this morning. It looks like the artist's sexuality was really important to his politics and sensibility, which does include his art practice, but not solely his art practice. I've moved the parts about being queer to his politics and community organizing. It looks like there's information about his partner and later works named after his partner that speak to his sexuality. Sounds like we can keep the sexuality for posterity as well as emphasize his conceptual, minimal, and "relational aesthetics" art practice for narrative accuracy. Thanks for the pointers. Peoplelikeyoulikeme (talk) 17:50, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Of course, happy to help! And I hope my notes didn't come as preachy or negative, I am really grateful for more editors to help flesh out this article, he's such a rad and important artist. Happy editing :) 19h00s (talk) 19:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angalis Field (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Angalis Field and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 21:37, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patrick Belaga has been accepted

Patrick Belaga, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

97198 (talk) 02:39, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

NYC Transgender Oral History Project moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, NYC Transgender Oral History Project, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:06, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Deluge Books—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:38, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Your addition to the New York Times page

Just wanna say, love it. Fantastically written and documented. Excellent stuff, couldn’t have done it better myself. Snokalok (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Whitney Mallett moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Whitney Mallett, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 21:33, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. Thank you for your work on Sean DeLear. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nice stub article. I actually met Sean a few times back in the scene in LA in the 80s.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Peoplelikeyoulikeme! Your additions to Dan Thawley have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Brock Colyar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brock Colyar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brock Colyar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 16:13, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Dan Thawley moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dan Thawley, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Bapari

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bapari, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Bapari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bapari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bapari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 21:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Jan Rattia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jan Rattia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Rattia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 00:23, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bitchcoin has been accepted

Bitchcoin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:39, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Fire Island Art Residency

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Fire Island Art Residency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:30, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rachel Tashjian

Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rachel Tashjian, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Amber Later moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Amber Later, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Ratajkowski

Why should this source not be used? In that she clearly states why she quit acting. Besides it seems you don't understand sentence cases. "Acting Career" and "Leaks and Image Ownership" show this. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Collina Strada (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Turnagra was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Collina Strada and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Turnagra (talk) 19:53, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Angalis Field

Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Angalis Field, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Bob Glück moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bob Glück, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources - most of the sources are minor websites or publisher sources (and Facebook is not a RS). (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). The article also appears very similar to text in one of the sources (the Poetry Foundation profile) - potentially a copyright issue. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paul W (talk) 09:39, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rachel Tashjian

Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rachel Tashjian".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of BoND for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BoND is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BoND until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 19:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Angalis Field

Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Angalis Field".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Whitney Mallett

Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Whitney Mallett, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Emily Ratajkowski

She has quit acting, please stop removing this. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:50, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:NYC Transgender Oral History Project

Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NYC Transgender Oral History Project, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dan Thawley

Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dan Thawley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:NYC Transgender Oral History Project

Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "NYC Transgender Oral History Project".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 20:13, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Dodie Bellamy, Kevin Killian and New Narrative. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Ok, good to know. Thank you! Finding it unusual that a page for Robert (Bob) Glück still hasn't been created, approved, and published whereas a book of his (Margery Kempe) and a movement he co-founded (New Narrative) both have pages. If you have any suggestions or pointers as to how I can show that he is more than ready for a page, do let me know. Thanks again! Peoplelikeyoulikeme (talk) 12:24, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Collina Strada (October 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Collina Strada and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 23:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Amber Later

Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amber Later, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan Thawley (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Milkk7 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dan Thawley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Milkk7 (talk) 03:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bob Glück has been accepted

Bob Glück, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans (talk) 20:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Zora (platform)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Zora (platform), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Zora (platform) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zora (platform) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zora (platform) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TLA (talk) 08:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 16:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the reminder! Peoplelikeyoulikeme (talk) 16:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi Peoplelikeyoulikeme! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Ser Serpas that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Geardona (talk to me?) 23:09, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the pointer. I was recently told by another moderator to always mark "Minor edit" when sharing small edits. The edit I did was not consistent with the Title of the section on her page and was an removed as an fact. Peoplelikeyoulikeme (talk) 23:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. Thank you for your work on Gherardo Felloni. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks so much! I've been working on fine arts and artists, galleries, art magazine pages for a bit and expanding into fashion stuff as I study and learn more. Hoping to start with contemporary designers and then build it labels/brands, maybe even have "Selected Show History" section added to all pages in the same way artist pages have "Selected Exhibition History." Peoplelikeyoulikeme (talk) 20:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whitney Mallett (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Whitney Mallett and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 19:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Bullock (writer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michael Bullock (writer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 04:57, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Collina Strada

Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Collina Strada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dan Thawley

Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dan Thawley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 13:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)