User talk:Pakli1988

Speedy deletion of Natsumi Harada

A tag has been placed on Natsumi Harada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironho lds 23:56, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Natsumi Harada

A tag has been placed on Natsumi Harada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 16:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please Stop

Please do not keep recreating the list of ADV film titles. The list was removed from the article per project consensus as Wikipedia is not a directory and such lists are better served with categories. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:57, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Typo redirect List of titles licensed by ADV Films

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on List of titles licensed by ADV Films, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because List of titles licensed by ADV Films is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting List of titles licensed by ADV Films, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:10, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Natsumi Harada. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 13:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Natsumi Harada, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 13:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Natsumi Harada, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 22:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Natsumi Harada, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing. --DAJF (talk) 23:39, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you again remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles, as you did to Natsumi Harada, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you will be blocked from editing. --DAJF (talk) 23:40, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Natsumi Harada

An article that you have been involved in editing, Natsumi Harada, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natsumi Harada. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? DAJF (talk) 03:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tsubasa Otomiya

An article that you have been involved in editing, Tsubasa Otomiya, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsubasa Otomiya. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Schuym1 (talk) 12:58, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Choi Jin-sil, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Caspian blue (talk) 12:26, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Noel Leung

A tag has been placed on Noel Leung requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --smurdah (talk) 00:06, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yuka Aimoto

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Yuka Aimoto, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

nn person no major roles article fails wp:bio

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 (talk) 18:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Yuka Aimoto

I have nominated Yuka Aimoto, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuka Aimoto. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. – iride scent 22:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of La Paloma (telenovela)

I have nominated La Paloma (telenovela), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Paloma (telenovela). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. HJMitchell You rang? 08:54, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Milagros de Amor

A tag has been placed on Milagros de Amor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Falcon8765 (talk) 02:59, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alma Rebelde

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Alma Rebelde, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.alma-latina.net/AlmaRebelde/AlmaRebelde.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:06, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Your recent edit to the page New York Yankees appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. It's not over! Muboshgu (talk) 04:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Pakli1988! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 121 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Katsuhiko Nishijima - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tsubasa Otomiya - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Noel Leung - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Yuka Aimoto - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 American League Division Series

It's way premature for an article on 2010 American League Division Series. All we can say at this spot is "it will probably happen".--Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:43, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1976 TVB

Template:1976 TVB has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 01:41, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rencor apasionado

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rencor apasionado, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.alma-latina.net/RencorApasionado/RencorApasionado.shtml.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:39, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Your addition to Rencor apasionado has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:30, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

YLOD

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of YLOD, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wikibin.org/articles/yellow-light-of-death.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gerardo Hemmer

The article Gerardo Hemmer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NACTOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayJay^{What did I do?} 16:58, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pakli1988. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jorge Russek

The article Jorge Russek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:ACTOR; all roles are minor or "uncredited". Significant RS coverage not found. Article lists no sources and tagged for notability since 2008.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:50, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hotel (1976 TV series)

The article Hotel (1976 TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article unsourced for 10(!) years – no notability demonstrated so fails to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:38, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1992 TVB

Template:1992 TVB has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 20:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1993 TVB

Template:1993 TVB has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 20:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1994 TVB

Template:1994 TVB has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 20:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1995 TVB

Template:1995 TVB has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 20:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1996 TVB

Template:1996 TVB has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 20:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1997 TVB

Template:1997 TVB has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 20:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1998 TVB

Template:1998 TVB has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 20:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1999 TVB

Template:1999 TVB has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 20:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2000 TVB

Template:2000 TVB has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 20:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vanity Fair (1978 TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vanity Fair (1978 TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanity Fair (1978 TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 12:26, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A House Is Not a Home (TV series)

The article A House Is Not a Home (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 19:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of TVB series (1977) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of TVB series (1977) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of TVB series (1977) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

// Timothy :: talk 01:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Over the Rainbow (1979 TV series)

The article Over the Rainbow (1979 TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. Article was created in 2008.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoeNMLC (talk) 17:57, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]