User talk:Pahlevun/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

WP:coatrack

Hi Pahlevun! I noticed you did a series of edits which you justified using WP:COATRACK but it doesn’t appear that you understand what that essay is talking about. All three of your edits are to the "see also" section of the page, where tangentially related context is expected to be, rather than to the body which is what coatrack is talking about. I’ve reverted your edits. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 17:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, User:Horse Eye Jack. I do understand WP:COATRACK. Linking Hostage diplomacy in the article of every foreigner arrested in Iran is an edit to make a point, just like that essay describes, and it makes a NPOV problem. If a reliable source has described the arrest as part of a hostage diplomacy, please don't hesitate to add it in the body of article, or else, adding it in the see also section, when no source is provided, is subject to COATRACK. Please consider reverting yourself. Pahlevun (talk) 17:24, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

I had made my point earlier here, it should not be up to editors to determine "see also" unless it does not violate NPOV. Pahlevun (talk) 17:26, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Your edit summary there "(WP:COAT. For every Zahra Kazemi, there's a Stewart Nozette.)” suggests that its you who is pushing a POV... What in the world did you mean by that? Horse Eye Jack (talk) 17:28, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

You did a bit more than that in this one [1], does the same argument apply? Horse Eye Jack (talk) 17:28, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Absolutely. The two Iranian-British dual citizens linked there were not directly connected to this person, and linking them is judging that their cases were connected. We can already link Shahrzad Mirgholikhan and Masoud Soleimani interchangeably. Is that correct? Do you think linking Humanitarian exchange bellow those articles is correct? Either way, the existence of a "hook" in a given article is not a good reason to "hang" irrelevant, undue or biased material there., per WP:COAT. Pahlevun (talk) 17:38, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Coatrack is an WP:essay whose spirit and letter you are abusing... Its not about the see also section at all. The MOS (Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout) is clear on this "Whether a link belongs in the "See also" section is ultimately a matter of editorial judgment and common sense.” There doesn’t have to be a direct connection BTW, they just have to be related in some way. If they were directly related to the article then they would be mentioned in the article and thus not be part of the see also section... no? Horse Eye Jack (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Also just fyi the page Humanitarian exchange is specific to the Colombian context whereas Hostage diplomacy covers all contexts. If you meant Prisoner exchange we cant do that because its already linked in the text, if it wasn’t of course we could. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Everyone should refrain from actions such as accusing other editors of "abuse". Adding these articles bellow each other is against NPOV. Pahlevun (talk) 18:03, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

I understand that is your opinion but can you specifically back it up with guidelines or policy? Also below not bellow. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 18:18, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

WP:NPOV is not my opinion, it is Wikipedia policy. Pahlevun (talk) 18:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Yes thats perfect! Now all we need from you is a specific quote which tells us what portion of the massive WP:NPOV you are invoking. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 18:43, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

We don't need a specific quote for Wikilawyering, what we need is to understand what NPOV is. Stewart Nozette should not be linked to suggest that Kylie Moore-Gilbert was a spy, just like Hostage diplomacy which makes a judgement that she was innocent. It is not for us to decide, we should only describe. Pahlevun (talk) 18:50, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

We do actually need a specific quote or at least a specific section you’re invoking, thats not Wikilawyering. I don’t think that linking either of those articles implies what you think it does. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 19:28, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

The reason that I linked WP:COAT, was for you to understand what I mean and you clearly got me. You want to mention that arrest of Kylie Moore-Gilbert and others is part of a hostage diplomacy campaign? Find a reliable source and cite it in the body of article right away. You don't have one? You cannot link hostage diplomacy in 'see also' section, when you have no source. This is you connecting the dots. Pahlevun (talk) 19:41, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

I’m confused, how are the coatrack argument and the NPOV argument related? Just FYI if something is linked in the body of the article it shouldn’t be linked in the see also section, you appear to be suggesting that no-one should ever use the see also section. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 19:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

I am suggesting that see also section should only link articles that are coherently related and do not push a POV, it is not a "coat rack" to hang unrelated articles or those making a point. This section can be used to evade Wikipedia policies WP:VER, WP:RELIABLE and WP:NPOV; what we are witnessing here. LGBT people in prison or List of people pardoned or granted clemency by the president of the United States are good links for Chelsea Manning; while Guy Burgess, Oscar López Rivera or Edward Snowden are not. Pahlevun (talk) 20:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

I believe that they are coherently related, please WP:AGF. Just FYI Edward Snowden would be an excellent link to add to the see also section of Chelsea Manning if he wasn’t already linked in the article. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 20:49, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Shahram Jazayeri

Hi, I working in that article for a few days but you removed anything I do! for example, according to his birth certificate which published on his Facebook account, he was born on 11 September 1972 in Tehran, his mother and father name also children names were correct also his real name is Shahram Jazaery Arab!. he has studied dentistry in Kerman and I have enough proof for everything I wrote on that article and YOU MUST BE RESPONSIBLE and undo your edits

https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1346606285368741&set=a.1071053882923984

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexMawi (talk • contribs) 21:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi User:AlexMawi. I see that you are new to Wikipedia. Welcome aboard and try to learn more about Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. We should follow policies such as Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources, and per those two policies, Facebook and other social media are not sources. I saw that you used Persian Wikipedia as a source. That is not a source either. Choose your sources among reliable WP:NEWSORG sources. Pahlevun (talk) 21:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

But you must be published correct information on Wikipedia and you providing false information for more than 10 years! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexMawi (talk • contribs) 21:40, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Please consider reading Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. That article is a very poor one in my opinion, and I really welcome its improvement, but with reliable WP:NEWSORG. We don't want to make it worse with blog posts or Facebook profiles. Pahlevun (talk) 21:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

I wrote the truth according to documents which I have, YOU CAN'T find any BIRTH CERTIFICATE or any identify card on the NEWS!!!! so it should be correct and stop providing false information to the people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexMawi (talk • contribs) 21:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

If there is no source for something, then it does not belong in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Pahlevun (talk) 21:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

proof for their children also you can found his children name on his google knowledge panel. https://faraanegar.ir/incidents/1564307007.495891 — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexMawi (talk • contribs) 21:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

This is not a reliable source. Pahlevun (talk) 21:56, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Ok Look bellow links I have a proof for any single word I wrote also for his net worth I have a court letter

IRIB https://www.iribnews.ir/fa/news/2489149/%DA%A9%D8%B3%D8%A8-%DB%B3%DB%B7-%D9%85%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%84-%D8%AC%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C-%D8%AA%DA%A9%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%88%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86-%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%86%DA%AF

https://donya-e-eqtesad.com/%D8%A8%D8%AE%D8%B4-%D8%B3%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%AA-%D8%AE%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86-62/2953688-%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%AA%DB%8C-%D8%A7%D8%B2-%D9%82%D9%87%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C-%D9%BE%D8%B3%D8%B1-%D8%B4%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%AC%D8%B2%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%DB%8C ROKNA https://www.rokna.net/%D8%A8%D8%AE%D8%B4-%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%B2%D8%B4%DB%8C-8/494291-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%82%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%84-%D9%BE%D8%B1%D8%B4%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D8%B2-%D8%AC%D8%B2%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%DB%8C-%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A8-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%AF%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%87-%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%AE%D9%85%DB%8C%D9%86%DB%8C-%D8%B1%D9%87-%D9%81%DB%8C%D9%84%D9%85 — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexMawi (talk • contribs) 22:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

The first source proves nothing and the other two are not so good. Please ask for help in Wikipedia:Teahouse. Pahlevun (talk) 22:06, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

heh!so to according to which source the title is " who was involved in a high-profile corruption case."?! I advise you to search "Rokna" on the internet and watch his interviews with IRIB and Reza Rashid pour (Did dar shab) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexMawi (talk • contribs) 22:09, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Where and how I can upload my legal documents? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexMawi (talk • contribs) 22:13, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

I added a reliable source (Reuters) for the part you asked, and I urge you to use sources of that kind in English, instead of questionable sources like Rokna. You cannot upload legal documents here. Pahlevun (talk) 22:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Ok, so why the born place is Ahvaz? according to which source?! also I researching on this case for more than 2 years I will update this Article with sources tomorrow. but for his personal information, there are not any sources on the internet, So what must we do? only birth certificate is our source

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/jul/2/could-the-mullahs-fall/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexMawi (talk • contribs) 22:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Feel free to remove the birthplace or any other information if there is no source for it on the article. I suggest you to do your edits on your sandbox (here: User:AlexMawi/sandbox) and refrain from editing mainspace until you are familiarized enough with Wikipedia. Pahlevun (talk) 22:26, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

How about his net worth? I have court letter which mentioned 1.5 billion in 2005 — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexMawi (talk • contribs) 22:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

While I am surprised with your claimed access to such a thing, I'm afraid that's original research and not allowed on Wikipedia. Pahlevun (talk) 22:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

As I told you before I researched on that guy for more than 2 years and for each sentence I wrote I have proof. But luckily or unfortunately most of them not published on the internet but they are facts and from legal places! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexMawi (talk • contribs) 22:40, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Can every noble "researcher" like you access that in a country like Iran? Anyway, you may consider publishing your findings in places other than Wikipedia, your personal blog or whatever. If you are here to contribute to this encyclopedia, you should stick to the rules. I think I have provided enough material to familiarize yourself with guidelines, and I urge you once more to edit your sandbox beforehand. Pahlevun (talk) 22:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

because I'm living in Iran I have better access to news than you First of all His real name is Shahram Jazaery Arab (however not mentioned in any news) he knows as 2 names 1. Shahram Jazayeri and 2.shahram Jazayeri Arab (according to Washingtontimes and other news) secondly, YJC news is one of the most reliable sources in Iran and you should research more about that. finally, the title must be changed "because reuters source is for at least 12 years ago and after he got "full innocence of the alleged disruption of the economic system by branches of the Supreme Court" and covered that news by Tasnim (which related to Iran government) in 2015, that title and the charge is invalid" — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexMawi (talk • contribs) 21:32, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

First of all, please sign your posts on talk pages, using four tildes (~~~~), or clicking the signature icon signature icon on the edit toolbar. Secondly, If you have anything about the article, please write on its talkpage, not mine, until other can see it in the future. Pahlevun (talk) 21:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

The title must be changed "because reuters source is for at least 12 years ago and after he got "full innocence of the alleged disruption of the economic system by branches of the Supreme Court" and covered that news by Tasnim (which related to Iran government) in 2015, that title and the charge is invalid" That means he wasn't involved in a high-profile corruption case. and you must focus on the latest news and the decision of the Supreme Court of Iran. AlexMawi (talk) 21:50, 4 May 2020 (UTC)AlexmaviAlexMawi (talk) 21:50, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Write in the talkpage of the article please. Pahlevun (talk) 21:51, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Can you please explain what is the reason that you revert sourced edits in Komala page

Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan, as can be seen in several sources (like their own words, Sabah Mofidi's article [which uses mostly Persian and Kurdish sources] etc.), is not communist party and it doesn't upholds M-L or Maoism in any way. What is your explanation for this?
Beyaz Deriili (talk) 05:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi. I will respond to you in the article's talkpage. Pahlevun (talk) 20:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_May_14#Ayatollahs_and_grand_ayatollahs

Hi there, just as a note for next time, if you nominate categories for CFD, you have to make sure that all of them have a {{subst:cfd}} tag so that people know they're under discussion. I've had to relist the whole discussion because only two of the nominated categories were actually tagged. bibliomaniac15 03:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi User:Bibliomaniac15, Thank you. I forgot to do that. Pahlevun (talk) 23:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quds Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classified (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello, I'm Lexy iris. I noticed that you recently removed content from Iran without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lexy iris (talk) 15:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Lexy iris. Which content do you mean exactly? Pahlevun (talk) 15:33, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

@Lexy iris: Is this message from you? Pahlevun (talk) 15:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

You already know. Dont use undo again. This is a big (In my opinion, incorrect.) change for Iran. and no, its not me. Lexy iris (talk) 15:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

@Lexy iris: You need to understand that here in Wikipedia verification is a policy and based on the framework defined by reliable sources guideline, academic sources do determine that Iran is unicameral or bicameral, not worthless personal opinions expressed by commentators, pundits or politicians. Stop adding those institutions as the upper house of Iran, or anything like that, unless you can provide a quality source (by quality source, I mean something like Oxford University Press book which you persistently remove). Pahlevun (talk) 15:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

But this is a mistake. What about other resources? Lexy iris (talk) 15:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Which sources? Pahlevun (talk) 15:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Iran is not just Tehran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iran is not just Tehran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iran is not just Tehran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lexy iris (talk) 16:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Iranian warships

Please stop moving these articles to "IRIS Foo" titles. This is totally against the naming convention on ship articles where made-up prefixes are deprecated. Mjroots (talk) 19:03, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

@Mjroots: IRIS is not made-up, it is officially in use by the Iranian navy. I have posted sources at Template talk:Infobox ship begin#Adding prefixes for Iranian warships. Pahlevun (talk) 19:06, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

History of Iranian navy

Moved to Talk:Afsharid navy § History of Iranian navy

 – Benyamin (talk) 10:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello Pahlevun. Afsharid navy is very good. Thank you. Are you planned for Imperial Iranian Navy? Did exist Qajari navy? Benyamin (talk) 21:04, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Benyamin, thank you for your complement, I think that article is worth more expansion in #History. Shah's navy would be a good choice to work on, I am going to make List of Imperial Iranian Navy vessels in 1979 better for the time being (and after that, maybe I will create List of Imperial Iranian Navy vessels active in 1941 that the World War II aggressor British navy almost destroyed completely). During Qajar era, three notable warships existed in the south: Mozaffari, Susa and the flagship Persepolis. However, as far as I know, there was no niruye daryayi with a robust command hierarchy (maybe the ships acted coordinately, for their mainly anti-smuggling missions). Meanwhile in the north, there was no fleet and Russians dominated the Caspian. Plus, the British had forcibly taken every vessel Iran had during the so-called Persian Campaign of World War I, leaving Iran with no effective vessels. Reza Shah is usually credited with creating the modern navy (and reviving the northern fleet) by historians. Pahlevun (talk) 21:35, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Great Ideas. I hope they done as soon as possible.

I think that article maybe need a rename to "Iranian navy (17th century)" (as Floor 1987 and Axworthy 2000), because it established in 1734, which is the Safavid age and Nader was regent. In addition, Samuel Gottlieb Gmelin wrote about the Gilan fleet in 1773, which Iran was under Zand rule at that time. Hence this rename is not necessary now, but we can think for it. Benyamin (talk) 17:29, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

@Benyamin: The period between 1701 and 1800 would be the 18th century and what we know today as Iran, during that century was ruled by the Safavids, the Hotaks, the Afsharids, the Durranis, the Zandis and the Qajars (some ruled parts of the country at the same time). Each of them had their own military and some did not posses navies. I suggest you to bring the matter to the talkpage until others can comment on it. Regards. Pahlevun (talk) 17:33, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

I moved it. Benyamin (talk) 10:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

By the way, Gmelin's book is a primary source. Have you seen any other source about the northern fleet? Pahlevun (talk) 17:35, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Marine Industries Organization

Content you included in the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/industry-mig.htm, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 16:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

List of the Iranian Warship

Hello Pahlevun...please do the correction for list of current Iranian Navy ship... because it's incomplete...and Moudge class and Alvand class is a frigate not corvette...and your wikitable is not suitable for the page...please change it Klueng (talk) 23:19, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Klueng: The source for that table is the 2020 edition of The Military Balance published by the International Institute for Strategic Studies, and it is mentioned that those two classes are considered frigates by other sources (such as Jane's). Pahlevun (talk) 10:45, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Pahlevun: please write back the original pages for list of current ship of Iranian navy. First you do many mistake in wikitable. Please correct for the type of ship. Example: frigate for frigate.and your list is not complete.We cannot believe only the IISS...because they are lacking information about it..ok.thank you Klueng (talk) 11:43, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Or we can do a cooperation for creating the page.. because many condemned you about the page... but I'm not condemned you because you are the best. Klueng (talk) 11:50, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Dear Klueng, which mistakes did you find exactly? I'm not saying IISS is perfect, but it is a reliable source. Since we should contribure with regards to WP:RS and WP:V, we cannot just put information on articles like this or that. Please provide reliable sources for your edits, WP:OR is prohibited. Pahlevun (talk) 13:42, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Helper template for partially italicizing redirects of ship names

I saw you created several redirects of ships. Some were added to the category Category:Pages with disallowed DISPLAYTITLE modifications‎‎ because the parameter for {{italic title prefixed}} was "17," which was longer than the page name.

Rather than just "fix it" by changing the number to 4, I created a wrapper template for the ship name format function of Module:WPSHIPS utilities called {{ship name format}}. It takes the same parameters as the module. I replaced {{italic title prefixed|17}} with {{DISPLAYTITLE:{{ship name format|name={{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}} in several of those pages.

Please check that category for any redirects you've created and make any necessary changes to get the page out of that category. If a page is in that category, the page title will NOT be changed anyway.

Also, I'm taking it on good faith that the redirects you created are not going to get you or me into trouble over the "General sanctions" listed at the top of your user talk page. I wasn't aware of them, or had long-ago forgotten about them, when I started this cleanup of Category:Pages with disallowed DISPLAYTITLE modifications‎‎. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:57, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for notifying me, I actually copied that from this redirect created in 2009 while not being aware of this. I will try to check if I had made such a redirect before and fix them. By the way, I don't think that there would be a problem with that GS, because neither the subject is relevant nor any misconduct has been made by anyone. Pahlevun (talk) 20:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

"IRIN" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect IRIN. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 2#IRIN until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you Shhhnotsoloud, I was looking forward to open a discussion. Pahlevun (talk) 18:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Sadeq Tabatabaei

Hi. During the work on List of prime ministers of Iran in fawiki, we had faced with some contradictions in the sources. the interim government had not a Prime minister, but who was headed the cabinet and preceded Rajai in the Prime ministership authorities? 1, 2, 3 and 4 are some sources that named Tabatabaei which is surprising for me. Also, this book named Tabatabaei as the Sarparast-e Nokhost-vaziri. These sources may not meet the WP:EXCEPTIONAL, however I can't find a reliable one which had described the situation. In my opinion, the head of the revolution council (Ayatollah Beheshti, who was succeeded by the President-elect Banisadr on February 1980) was the head of the government. What is your opinion about Tabatabaei's authorities? I remember that you made a revert on Sadeq Tabatabaei. Benyamin (talk) 12:18, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Benyamin. The book you linked seems a reliable source to me, as it is based on official records. I think Tabatabaei's Sarparast-e Nokhost-vaziri (on page 452) does not mean "Acting Prime Minister" however. He was the acting head of the center of government or Nokhost-vaziri, today's riasat-e-jomhouri (on page 448, it is mentioned that after resignation of Bazargan, "omur-e-mamlekat" –the duties of the prime minister– has been passed to the Revolutionary Council). Note that in the same table acting positions were indicated with the word kafil –Vaezi's title is also sarparast– and how Mahdavi Kani (who was the acting PM of the next interim government) is named as nokhost-vazir (page 464). So to speak, the Revolutionary Council were collectively responsible for leading the cabinet (instead of the prime minister) and existence of an acting prime minister would have been meaningless in my opinion. I think it would be fair to either say Rajai was preceded by the vacant office of Bazargan, or the Revolutionary Council. Pahlevun (talk) 13:15, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Are these enough for wiki to reject the Shargh and others? Did you seen any related explanation on peer-reviewed works? I think same as you about differences of kafil and sarparast and was brought same reasons, but the dispute is going on.

That book, especially in the first edition, has many deficiencies and faults. Benyamin (talk) 13:40, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

I think the WP:BURDEN here lies with those who claim that Tabatabai held office as the "acting prime minister" and frankly speaking, the fact that you couldn't find anything on this, speaks for itself: there is no explanation because there has not been such a misunderstanding up to now, when this is history for people who were born years after it. Anyway, pointing out some sources may be helpful:

• A good (English) source is the CIA's reference aid 'Chiefs of State and Cabinet Members of Foreign Governments' (in public domain). In September/October 1979 version, Tabatabai is listed as the "Vice Prime Minister for Executive Affairs" (page 37), meaning that just before the resignation he was actually in charge of the same job, so it would be reasonable to assume that he was reinstated as Sarparast-e Nokhst-vaziri especially when others have been reinstated in that cabinet. In January 1980, there is no mention of an acting prime minister (page 37) nor Tabatabai himself.
• There are day-to-day chronologies published by peer-reviewed sources available, but none of them mention Tabatabai as the acting prime minister even once and clearly say that the Revolutionary Council was put in charge of prime minster's duties:

November 6: Proclaiming that "it has become impossible for me and my colleagues to perform our duty," Mr. Bazargan and his cabinet resigned. The Revolutionary Council was ordered by Khomeini to take charge of the government.

— JSTOR 4310346

Nov. 6: Bazargan's provisional revolutionary government was dissolved and the Ayat Allah ordered the Revolutionary Council to take over the government. The Revolutionary Council issued a request that all Ministers continue in their posts until "a final resolution of their position" could be reach.

— JSTOR 4325970

• Shargh article you linked does not need rejection, because it does not say anything supporting that he was the acting prime minister, in contrary it says "سرپرستی نخست وزیری و نهادهای وابسته" which implies otherwise. In case Persian sources are more welcome, these two make good clarifications:

بعد از استعفای دولت یعنی از ۱۵ آبان ۱۳۵۸ خورشیدی تا زمان آغاز به کار دولت محمدعلی رجایی با رأی شورای انقلاب، سرپرستی نهادهای وابسته به نخست وزیری را بر عهده گرفت

— IRNA

پس از استعفای بازرگان، خمینی او را به سرپرستی موقت دفتر نخست‌وزیری منصوب کرد

— Radio Zamaneh

That would be very bizarre for CIA and scholarly chronologies to ignore that an "acting prime minister" was in office in Iran. Pahlevun (talk) 16:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Great, as always. Even if I had a little doubt, it went away. Thank you for your kind response.

I think the exaggeration of his sarparasti was in purpose of propagation for him during the 1980 presidential election. Benyamin (talk) 21:35, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

You're welcome, Benyamin. Pahlevun (talk) 11:06, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Updating Organization of Iranian Kurdistan Struggle

Hello, I'm updating the Wikipedia article of Organization of Iranian Kurdistan Struggle because it's outdated. Specially the ideology and religion section. The Informations that I'm adding are up to date, please do not revert my changes.

Best regards Sarohusaini (talk) 19:48, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

@Sarohusaini: Hi, your additions must comply with WP:RS and WP:V, or else you should expect being reverted. Pahlevun (talk) 19:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Dear @Pahlevun, Old sources are not reliable any more, please check https://www.sazmanixebat.com/english/item_detail.php?id=6697#.X2ZiUR6xUQY which is their official announcement. We can't ignore the real reliable informations and sources.

Best regards Sarohusaini (talk) 19:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

@Sarohusaini:. Self-published sources such as that website are not reliable, and you cannot remove content on the grounds that it was published some years ago. If you have a reliable source that says something has changed, you can consider adding it instead of removing older sources. Pahlevun (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Dear @Pahlevun This article is made after third Congress of Organization of Iranian Kurdistan Struggle in 2004 and those wrong informations are referring to before 2004. I don't know why somebody would add wrong informations and for what purpose. I think it's bad for Wikipedia and it's users to consume misleading informations and it's bad for reputation of the Organization which is mentioned in the article. We can keep the background of the Organization and even add more informations. But the old ideology and aim of the mentioned Organization can't be displayed as it's current position, but it can be displayed in the history section. Sir you for years prevent anyone to add more informations to this article and you revert any changed informations. Please consider this discussion.

Best regards Sarohusaini (talk) 20:19, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

@Sarohusaini: What you want to remove is backed by an scholarly paper published in 2010, which is considered a reliable source per WP:RS. You need to provide reliable sources for what you want to add, or else it is called original researchm which is prohibited per WP:OR. Pahlevun (talk) 21:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

NPOV ISFAHAN TODAY

• hello i named you in npov for a recheck question https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Recheck
• Baratiiman (talk) 15:08, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Baratiiman (talk) 05:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

@Baratiiman: You have been asked multiple times by other users to change your behavior to no avail. These filings are Wikipedia:Harassment and you are making me report you. Please stop. Pahlevun (talk) 13:17, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

You are just scared because what you done is censorship.Baratiiman (talk) 13:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

@Baratiiman: I won't tolerate such a blatant personal attack. Stop it. This is your last warning. Pahlevun (talk) 13:25, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Where is the personal attack? I wrote "what you done" not "what you are " Baratiiman (talk) 14:01, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Idealigic (talk) 21:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Succession of Ali Khamenei

Hello, Pahlevun. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Succession of Ali Khamenei".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 20:22, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Farsi

I have seen your edits on Iran related articles. Are you able to read and translate Farsi sources? VR _talk 14:53, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Vice regent:. Yes, I can. Pahlevun (talk) 15:15, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Khalij-e Fars or Kharg?

This may be interesting for you. I'd surprised! Benyamin (talk) 11:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

@Benyamin: Thanks for the notification. It seems that Iranian navy has decided to use the name Khalij-e Fars for another ship other than the training ship currently under construction. We should wait until November 28th to see what this 'Navbandar' really is. Pahlevun (talk) 15:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

That's right. Benyamin (talk) 16:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 4th Naval Region (Islamic Republic of Iran Navy), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anzali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Idealigic (talk) 08:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Freedom of the press

Hello. Almost every country have "freedom of the press" article... but we can't found freedom of the press in Iran article. Please create one about Iran. Thanks. Hamid00087 (talk) 12:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

@Hamid00087: I find it very strange that a user's first ever edit is on my talkpage, asking for creation of an article. Anyway, you can ask at Wikipedia:WikiProject Iran for requested articles. Pahlevun (talk) 13:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Privacy

Hi Pahlevun - I'm not accusing you of harassment, but you should read Wikipedia's policy on posting or linking to personal information of other users that you found with a web search. Doing so usually leads to an immediate block. I hope you understand, and that nothing more needs to be said. Thank you. --IamNotU (talk) 23:10, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi @IamNotU:, that's fine because I have no intend to do that. Actually, I'm very concerned about COI at this particular article because a few months ago, media reported that the party has penned a contract with a company for paid edits on Wikipedia (please see here for evidence). Pahlevun (talk) 13:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

I believe you are correct to be concerned about COI editors on that page. Most of them have been blocked now, but not all. It's a good idea to warn editors that you suspect, for example using the Template:Uw-coi or possibly use the WP:COIN notice board. I'm only saying that you should be careful not to post links to external websites, like social media pages, of other users on talk pages. You already did it once, and if you do it again you'll probably be blocked. I don't want to go into details publicly, if you still don't know what I'm talking about, you can e-mail me. Thanks. --IamNotU (talk) 17:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. I will keep that in mind to be careful in the future. Pahlevun (talk) 18:00, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Questions for you

On the Talk page of the article Naval history of Iran. It would be helpful if you reply. --Dreddmoto (talk) 19:01, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mahmoud Alamir

The article Mahmoud Alamir has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. MB 05:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

@MB: Hi. I think the article was wrongly flagged for deletion, right?

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Baratiiman (talk) 17:12, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

@Baratiiman: You have been warned (by others, not me) to stop filing irrelevant discussions almost on every noticeboard. Is this another episode or are you going to stop? Pahlevun (talk) 17:20, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, I hope you're well and healthy. Sorry for coming to you again, I hope you're in the mood now. --Mhhossein ^talk 07:05, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Mhhossein. Thank you, I wish the same for you. It's been a while that I'm not following the article, and as I understand more than 30 pages of discussion is archived in the talkpage (I do not remember more than a handful actually). I should take the time to update myself and If I had an input, I will write on the talkpage. Pahlevun (talk) 13:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

You're welcome Pahlevun. I think you're editing experience along with your historical knowledge may help us with enhancing the quality of the page. Actually you don't need to review all the previous discussions. Looking forward to your comments. --Mhhossein ^talk 05:27, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Iranian Kurdistan

Was this [2] appropriate? --HistoryofIran (talk) 04:09, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Iranian Kurdistan

Was this [3] appropriate? --HistoryofIran (talk) 04:09, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

@HistoryofIran: I don't think so. It is now changed. Pahlevun (talk) 21:21, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Meidaan logos comparision.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Meidaan logos comparision.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Recipients of the Order of Nasr has been nominated for listification

Category:Recipients of the Order of Nasr has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Election Headquarters.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Election Headquarters.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Recipients of the Excellent Order of Independence has been nominated for listification

Category:Recipients of the Excellent Order of Independence has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Recipients of the Order of Education and Pedagogy has been nominated for listification

Category:Recipients of the Order of Education and Pedagogy has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:25, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Recipients of the Order of Merit and Management has been nominated for listification

Category:Recipients of the Order of Merit and Management has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 10:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for identifying award recipients

I know I've posted several notices regarding award categories and I wanted to thank you for grouping the award recipients together. Since the WP:OCAWARD editing guideline was tightened, I've been working to move this information into the article space. Before nominating award categories, I always copy the contents into a list within the main article so no work is lost.

If my CFD notices ever are cluttering your talk page, just let me know and I'll start omitting them. - RevelationDirect (talk) 10:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of IRIS Kharg

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article IRIS Kharg you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Avishai11 -- Avishai11 (talk) 05:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:Recipients of the Order of Construction has been nominated for listification

Category:Recipients of the Order of Construction has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Create a wiki

Hello Create a wiki for Saeed Ganji? I will give the text to you Amr.ataeii (talk) 09:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Your discussion

Recently a proposal you made was archived at Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran. I think the proposal you made was a good one and should be unarchived. Hope you can come back and discuss it further.VR _talk 21:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of IRIS Kharg

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article IRIS Kharg you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 (talk) 13:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of IRIS Kharg

The article IRIS Kharg you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:IRIS Kharg for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 (talk) 14:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of IRIS Kharg

The article IRIS Kharg you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:IRIS Kharg for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 (talk) 18:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of IRIS Kharg

The article IRIS Kharg you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:IRIS Kharg for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 (talk) 22:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

AfD: Arab-Iranian conflict

As you are one of the main editors of Arab-Iranian conflict, I hope you can give a message on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arab–Iranian conflict (2nd nomination),if you don't mind -- Wendylove (talk) 08:20, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kia-football-academy-1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kia-football-academy-1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of IRIS Kharg

The article IRIS Kharg you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:IRIS Kharg for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 (talk) 17:21, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Category:Recipients of the Order of Service has been nominated for listification

Category:Recipients of the Order of Service has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:08, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:Iranian military personnel posthumously promoted to the rank of brigadier general has been nominated for upmerging

Category:Iranian military personnel posthumously promoted to the rank of brigadier general has been nominated for upmerging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:58, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Hope you're fine

Hi, you haven't been around for a while. I hope you're fine and healthy. Stay safe. --Mhhossein ^talk 13:39, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Morteza Kazemian for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Morteza Kazemian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morteza Kazemian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Islamic Iran Solidarity Party.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Islamic Iran Solidarity Party.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Takavar Separate Brigades of Ground Forces of Islamic Republic of Iran Army

A tag has been placed on Category:Takavar Separate Brigades of Ground Forces of Islamic Republic of Iran Army indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

rahim pour

what is your problem?M.Nadian (talk) 13:58, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

@M.Nadian: Read WP:RS and WP:V once. Fars News Agency is not a reliable source. You have not only removed scholarly sources published by Taylor & Francis, Cambridge University Press, Routledge and the Middle Eastern Studies, but also have given the impression that the subject of that article is a prominent "scholar", while he is not, according to reliable sources mentioned. Stop edit warring and undo yourself. Pahlevun (talk) 14:05, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Authentic sources are an exception. It is valid in the subject of Fars News. In the Persian article, I also refer to Fars News about the news and no one has had a problem so far. Did Cambridge say anything about him? I used Fars News instead of its own site about its positions.

My whole edition is not just that and more than that, Fars News is only one section.M.Nadian (talk) 14:13, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

@M.Nadian: What is an "authentic source" and where in the WP:RS or WP:V exactly says so? English Wikipedia is an independent project and it is irrelevant to say that on another Wiki you did so and it was OK. No other project sets a standard for this project, especially one that allows mass creation of machine translations with portions of the content left in English. Pahlevun (talk) 14:19, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Where in the English wiki is what Fars News said is not valid?If Fars is not valid, what about Radio Farda? Fars is a news agency like the rest. In any case, these are not all my edits. I can exchange resources with another news agency tomorrow. thanks.M.Nadian (talk) 14:27, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

@M.Nadian: The WP:BURDEN lies with yourself. Fars is not what WP:NEWSORG calls "well-established", and is rather notorious for publishing falsehoods. You cannot remove reliable scholarly sources, bring them back right now. Pahlevun (talk) 14:32, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

I think you did not understand the reason for my use.

1. I did not delete anything specific

2. I used Fars News as his own speech. Excerpts from the biography Yes, but not lectures. I mean, what did he talk about that I said I will put another news agency tomorrow.

3. I fixed Infobox and "See Also" so I will not cancel the edit.you Can wait for me to change resources tomorrow, can you?M.Nadian (talk) 14:42, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

@M.Nadian: You did actually remove several sources, including those I mentioned above. You should bring the content backed by those sources immediately, but you can add content SUPPORTED BY RELIABLE SOURCES anytime you want. Pahlevun (talk) 14:45, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

They had the wrong information, like Al Monitor, which wrote he was born in '95.

if they true i wrote again but tomorrow not now.M.Nadian (talk) 15:06, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

@M.Nadian: I am going to make this straightforward. Are you going to bring back Taylor & Francis, Cambridge University Press, Routledge and the Middle Eastern Studies or should I do it? Pahlevun (talk) 15:08, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

I haven't time today. you can do it but not by undoing or deleting my edit.

Of course, if their information is not incorrect. The fact that they are valid is not a reason for being 100% correct.M.Nadian (talk) 15:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

@M.Nadian: Now that you refuse to undo yourself, I will restore the previous version. Please be notified that I will report another and revert. Pahlevun (talk) 15:19, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

.واقعا خستم کردی. گفتم خودت اضافه کن ویرایش های من رو هم لغو نکن سختته؟ از چی میخوای شکایت کنی؟ اگه ویرایش هام رو لغو کنی شکایت می کنم

M.Nadian (talk) 15:27, 2 October 2021 (UTC)فقط بخشی که میخوای اضافه کن

@M.Nadian: You have to write in English on English Wikipedia if you want to be answered. Pahlevun (talk) 15:31, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

No need. Especially for someone who knows Persian.

You are really tired. I said add it yourself, do not cancel my edits, is it difficult? What do you want to complain about? I will complain if you cancel my edit.

Just add the part you want.

Do it and finish it. This is the best work.M.Nadian (talk) 15:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

@M.Nadian: You don't own the article, other users are entitled to make changes in accordance with policies and guidlines. And be advised that Wikipedia is not your WP:SOAPBOX to a present conspiracy theorist as a "scholar", based on sources like Fars News. When content clearly contradicts with reliable sources, the "best work" is to throw it into garbage. Pahlevun (talk) 15:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your words are meaningless. There is no reason to cancel my edit because it contains multiple sections. This is spoiling the article.

Because wiki is for everyone, you can edit it yourself, I did not stop you.

There are many people on Wikipedia who are conspiracy theorists. In my opinion, Rahimpour or Fars News are not in this group.

If we complain, we will both be closed for at least 48 hours.

This is my last message on your page about Rahimpour.M.Nadian (talk) 15:47, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 17:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Missing cites in Radical Islam: The Iranian Mojahedin

The article cites several short Harvard-style citations but no corresponding sources are listed in bibliography. Can you please add? The short citations are:

• Kellas 1990
• Menashri 1992
• Leaman 1990
• Hyman 1990
• Darrow 1992

Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata•3 19:48, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

@Renata3: Thank you for pointing that out, I have fixed the problem. Pahlevun (talk) 11:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muslim Union Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranshahr.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:AbbasSheybani.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AbbasSheybani.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.majlesekhobregan.ir/fa/images/tadvin_qaanoon_asaasi/sheybani.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sex scandals in Iran

A tag has been placed on Category:Sex scandals in Iran indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:55, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Shariati family tree

Template:Shariati family tree has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:46, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:Australian politicians of Iranian descent has been nominated for deletion

Category:Australian politicians of Iranian descent has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 12:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Morteza Kazemian

Hello, Pahlevun. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Morteza Kazemian, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Islamic Nations Party Flag.jpg

The file File:Islamic Nations Party Flag.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:Islamic Nations Party Flag.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Morteza Kazemian

Hello, Pahlevun. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Morteza Kazemian".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:35, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Some falafel for you!

welcome back! Benyamin (talk) 12:55, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! Pahlevun (talk) 12:56, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Edits on Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict and vandalism

Hello Pahlevun,

I have realized your edits done on this article. Your edits are considered as WP:VANDALISM, WP:OR, and WP:SPAM. Please refrain from spam editing and original research. You will be threatened with a topic ban or block next time. Don't disrupt. Cheers, Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 22:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) Per WP:VANDAL: "On Wikipedia, vandalism has a very specific meaning: editing (or other behavior) deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose, which is to create a free encyclopedia, in a variety of languages, presenting the sum of all human knowledge." Their edit, although certainly a bit too WP:BOLD (they should've opened a talk page section), does not constitute vandalism. - LouisAragon (talk) 08:17, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

@Mausebru the Peruvian: I am going to ignore the uncivil part of your message that blatantly tags me as something that I am not. Actually, WP:OR applies to the current situation of the article. I opened a thread at Talk:Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict/Archive 1#Infobox, and I expect you can answer my question. Pahlevun (talk) 08:44, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your efforts in working on ME/Iran-related articles. Your hard work does not go unnoticed. Keep it up! - LouisAragon (talk) 08:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

@LouisAragon: Thank you! Pahlevun (talk) 08:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome! You've been fixing a lot of important and/or neglected stuff. Btw, given your area of interest, you might be interested in this[4] - LouisAragon (talk) 10:29, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

I am currently on something else but will definitely keep an eye on that article. At first sight, it is weird that a user with less than 500 edits has been able to create such an article. Pahlevun (talk) 11:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marxist Mojahedin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peykar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Your "Mojahedin offshoots" articles

Why did you create so many new articles about "Mojahedin offshoots"? I have not gone through all of them but some look like duplicates, for example Marxist Mojahedin and Organization of Struggle for the Emancipation of the Working Class? Fad Ariff (talk) 12:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

I hope you are not hounding. In case you are just curious to know, there are no duplicates. Peykar is itself an offshoot of the Marxist faction, whose members diverged in their career after the revolution and founded new groups. Pahlevun (talk) 14:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Ahwazi Arabs

Hi Pahlevun. You've added the short ref "Shahibzadeh 2015", but haven't added a full cite to the Sources section to define what that means. Could you do so, or let me know what work this is? - LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 19:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi @ActivelyDisinterested:. The book is 'The Iranian Political Language: From the Late Nineteenth Century to the Present', I am currently adding content to the article and will definitely include it in the bibliography. Pahlevun (talk) 19:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Pahlevun. - LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 19:15, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome. Pahlevun (talk) 19:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your "Mojahedin offshoots" articles

Why did you create so many new articles about "Mojahedin offshoots"? I have not gone through all of them but some look like duplicates, for example Marxist Mojahedin and Organization of Struggle for the Emancipation of the Working Class? Fad Ariff (talk) 12:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

I hope you are not hounding. In case you are just curious to know, there are no duplicates. Peykar is itself an offshoot of the Marxist faction, whose members diverged in their career after the revolution and founded new groups. Pahlevun (talk) 14:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

This is a topic I am familiar about and edit here, so I am not hounding you. See for example

“It might be worth noting that Peykar had its origins within the Mojahedin. It once constituted the Marxist wing of the organization. At one point in the mid-1970s it carried out an internal "coup" in an attempt to transform the organization into a Marxist Leninist organization. The coup included execution of an opponent from the Islamic wing. This action ultimately failed, and the Marxist-Mojahedin were expelled, later forming Peykar.”

[5] Where does it say that Peykar and the Marxist wing of the Mojahedin were two different groups? Fad Ariff (talk) 11:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

It says: "It once constituted the Marxist wing of the organization" (constitute = be (a part) of a whole). Also, "later forming Peykar" (so they were not the same).

P.S.: Neither Amirahmadi nor Parvin are experts on the subject, having studied regional planning and economics respectively. That's why they wrongly write that "Marxist-Mojahedin were expelled". They were never expelled, they continued to operate under the name of Mojahedin until late 1978. Pahlevun (talk) 16:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Pahlevun, academia seems to disagree with your assessment that the “Marxist Mojahedin” wasn’t the same group that later came to be known as Peykar. for example:

“The Marxist branch was to name itself as the Paykar Group following the Iranian revolution”

Dr. Kaveh Farrokh is an award-winning scholar with expertise in Iranian military history.

“Paykar, the Neo-Marxist splinter group which broke away from the Mojahedin prior to the revolution.”

“James A. Piazza is Liberal Arts Professor of Political Science. His areas of research and teaching specialization include Terrorism, Counterterrorism, Political Violence, Intrastate Conflict, and the Politics of the Middle East and Islamic World.”[6]

"While the remaining primary members of MEK, including Masoud Rajavi, were imprisoned, some of the early members of MEK ... formed a new Marxist organization, later known as Organization of Struggle for the Emancipation of the Working Class or simply Peykar."

Dr. Arash Reisinezhad “is a research fellow at the Middle East Studies Center and an adjunct professor at the School of International and Public Affairs at Florida International University.”[7]

"The Marxist offshoot from the Sazman-i Mojahedin-i Khalq-i Iran. From 1975 to 1979, this organization was known as the Marxist Mojahedin. After the revolution, it adopted the title of Sazman-i Paykar dar Rah-i Azad-i Tabaqeh-i Kargar (The Fighting Organisation of the Road to Liberating the Working Class). It is now known simply as Kaykar (Battle)”

. (I will stop providing author's resumes from here since I don't think it is necessary)

"Converting to Marxism in the mid-1970s, he had led the Mojahedin's Marxist offshoot, which, after the revolution, adopted the name Sazeman-e Paykar dar Rah-e Azadi-ye Tabaqeh-ye Kargar (Combat organization on the road to the emancipation of the working class) - better known as Paykar."

.

"Immediately after the revolution, when the Marxist Mojahedin renamed itself Peykar"

"In 1976, the Mojaedin split into two opposing sections. A group of Mojahedin denounced hte path of armed struggle and the reference to Islam, and split to set up a secular guerilla organisation by the name of Peykar Khalgh. This split served to strenghen the Islamic identity of the original Mojahedin Khalgh Organisation."

"Marxist-Leninist Mujahedin. Soon after the revolution it acquired a new name: Sazman-e Paykar dar Rah-e Azadi-e Tabaqah-e Kargar (The Combat Organisation on the Road to the Liberation of the Working Class), commonly known as Paykar, Combat"

"It might be worth noting that Peykar had its origins within the Mojahedin. It once constituted the Marxist wing of the organization."

"The Islamic wingo f the Mojahedin refused to give up the name, and eventually the Marxist Mojahedin adopted the name Peykar (Struggle)"

"However, when the imprisoned cadres faithful to the original orientation of the organization were released after the revolution, the Marxist branch dropped the name Mojahedin-Khalq and chose the new name The Fighting Organization on the Road for the Liberation of the Working Class (Peykar dar Rah-e Azadi-e Tabaghey-e Kargar, hereafter Peykar)"

"The Marxist faction staged a coup and purged the non-Marxist elements. In 1978, the Marxist faction renamed itself Peykar and resumed its activities, and the Moslem members recaptured the leadership of the Mojahedin"

"a splinter organization from the People's Mojahedin of Iran (MEK). Peykar was a Marxist-Leninist organisation founded in 1975, and in the post-revolutionary era it moved its activities to Kurdistan"

"This organization split into a Marxist faction and the original Islamic group in 1974. The Marxist group was later renamed Sazman-e Peykar dar Rah-e Azadi Tabagheh Kargar or simply Peykar (The Organization for the Liberation of the Working Class), but the Islamic Mojahedin retained the original name."

"By 1975 the Mojahedin had in turn subdivided, and a breakaway group called the Peykar began to concentrate on the working class struggle"

"sided with the Marxist faction during the schism that produced two groups - one that stayed ture to its original Islamic worldview and the other, the Marxist Mujahedin, which eventually became Paykar"

Fad Ariff (talk) 11:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

No. An Iranica entry written by Torab Haghsehnas (a prominent member of the MEK in the wake of establishment, later a senior member of the Marxist faction and one of the leaders of Peykar) perfectly explains the offshoots of the Marxist faction, and even mentions the failed unity conference after the revolution. Abrahamian's Radical Islam: The Iranian Mojahedin (which is by far the best monograph on the MEK written in English) also stresses the distinction between the Marxist faction and Peykar on pages 145 and 146. There are other reliable sources available, which I leave out for this discussion. A glimpse of the sources you have labored to quote shows that some are bad scholarships that include gross mistakes (like wrongly mentioning the schism in 1974 or 1976, while 1975 is right. That's because many of the authors are not experts on the MEK or the Iranian Left), and that you have not been careful enough to not include Amirahmadi's book (which we discussed above) or another one that is actually harming your own argument because it says "[members of the Marxist Mojahedin] formed a new Marxist organization".

Anyway, these sources do not support your claim. Do you claim that Nabard, Arman or Worker's Way did not exist or were not offshoots of the MEK's Marxist faction? Do you claim that Peykar was not a result of merger with some other Maoist groups? There is no evidence of absence because there are multiple sources written by subject-matter experts on the MEK that say otherwise. This is not a matter of academic dispute, it is simply a matter of subject-matter expert vs. non-expert scholar. Pahlevun (talk) 15:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

::I moved this conversation to Talk:Organization of Struggle for the Emancipation of the Working Class since I see your talk page posts get archived very quickly and this conversation may be more relevant there.  Fad Ariff (talk) 11:58, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Extended content
References

Nomination of Marxist Mojahedin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marxist Mojahedin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marxist Mojahedin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fad Ariff (talk) 12:27, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of United Campaign for Fulfillment of the Working Class Aspirations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United Campaign for Fulfillment of the Working Class Aspirations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Campaign for Fulfillment of the Working Class Aspirations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fad Ariff (talk) 11:56, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Group for the Combat for Emancipation of the Working Class for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Group for the Combat for Emancipation of the Working Class is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Group for the Combat for Emancipation of the Working Class until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fad Ariff (talk) 11:58, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People assassinated by the Islamic Coalition of Mourning Groups

A tag has been placed on Category:People assassinated by the Islamic Coalition of Mourning Groups indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:42, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran – Followers of Musa's Way for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran – Followers of Musa's Way is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran – Followers of Musa's Way until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fad Ariff (talk) 12:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of People's Mohajerin Organization of Iran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article People's Mohajerin Organization of Iran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People's Mohajerin Organization of Iran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fad Ariff (talk) 12:15, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (Parviz Yaghoubi faction) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (Parviz Yaghoubi faction) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (Parviz Yaghoubi faction) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fad Ariff (talk) 11:52, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Muslim Mojahedin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Muslim Mojahedin. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fad Ariff (talk) 12:02, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Order of Nasr.png

The file File:Order of Nasr.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Order of Nasr Ribbon.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of People's Mojahedin Movement of Iran

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on People's Mojahedin Movement of Iran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fad Ariff (talk) 11:59, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of People's Mojahedin Movement of Iran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article People's Mojahedin Movement of Iran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People's Mojahedin Movement of Iran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fad Ariff (talk) 11:59, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Muslim Mojahedin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muslim Mojahedin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Mojahedin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fad Ariff (talk) 11:59, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NAAS.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NAAS.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Rastakhiz Party.png

The file File:Rastakhiz Party.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Logo of Rastakhiz Party.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:58, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fadayeen Islam.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fadayeen Islam.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Emad Khatami for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emad Khatami is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emad Khatami until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

NameGame (talk) 11:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mojahedin offshoots

Template:Mojahedin offshoots has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Iran hospitals 1920

Template:Iran hospitals 1920 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Recruit training centres of Iranian Police

A tag has been placed on Category:Recruit training centres of Iranian Police indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Recruit training centres of Ground Forces of Islamic Republic of Iran Army

A tag has been placed on Category:Recruit training centres of Ground Forces of Islamic Republic of Iran Army indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Recruit training centres of Islamic Republic of Iran Army

A tag has been placed on Category:Recruit training centres of Islamic Republic of Iran Army indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Recruit training centres of Iranian Armed Forces

A tag has been placed on Category:Recruit training centres of Iranian Armed Forces indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Shia clergy honorific titles

Template:Shia clergy honorific titles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:51, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Khebat.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Khebat.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you!

You are the only person so far who has thanked me on any of my edits, so I would like to extend a thank you for for kindness! UsersLikeYou (talk) 10:23, 10 December 2023 (UTC)