User talk:Ovaryian

Welcome!

Welcome	to	Wikipedia!
Ovaryian!

I've noticed some of your contributions and I want to say hello!
Have a look at the links below if you want to learn more about editing Wikipedia:
Introduction	Navigating Wikipedia	Editing Wikipedia articles
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia	Writing your very first article	HELP ME!
Here are some of the basic Wikipedia policies that you should be aware of:
Be BOLD!	Assume good faith	Be civil and polite
Don't infringe copyright	Vandals aren't nice	Don't get blocked
If you need any more help, visit the Teahouse for friendly help from other editors, or go on the Wikipedia Adventure for a fun and interactive way of learning about Wikipedia.
And if you still have unanswered questions, click this link to ask a question, and someone will come to help you soon.

Seagull123 Φ 16:57, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ovaryian, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ovaryian! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Hi there, I have written a draft page about an artists, but not sure what steps to take next to submit this for publication: Draft:Shari Diamond Ovaryian (talk) 19:45, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the appropriate information to allow you to submit your draft for review. 331dot (talk) 20:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I'd like to delete the example image on this page: Draft:Shari Diamond // https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Shari_Diamond Not sure how. Thank you. Ovaryian (talk) 16:44, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done with this edit. Seagull123 Φ 16:48, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me! (spaces)

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I've completed an article and submitted it for review, but I'm having persistent problems with spacing on the page. I made edits, but they don't seem to take. There are several places where there's an extra space before a punctuation mark which I'd like to eliminate. Even though I've gone through and made those changes several times, the page doesn't update.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Shari_Diamond As an example, you can look at the very end of the page "Secrets: An Invitational . 494 Gallery, New York, NY." I haven't been able to eliminate this space between the word "Invitational" and the period. You'll see this throughout the entire page - a lot of extra spaces next to punctuation and links. Thank you! Ovaryian (talk) 14:59, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why that is; it seemed to work okay for me. I suspect this is a bug in the Visual Editor, so I'll make a cross-post to WP:VPT and see if anyone can shed light on this. In the meantime, I might suggest switching to the "source" editor if you're overly concerned about those spaces. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 15:45, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shari Diamond (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Scope creep were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Massive amount of External links, in the body of the article. Remove them. Several sections are outsourced. Source them or remove them. You have stated Selected Exhibitions although it looks like all of them. Reduce to the most important/biggest/most impressive. Remove the WP:PUFF e.g. Artists in the exhibition included: Leonard Drindell, Hana Iverson, Rosy Martin, Robert McClintock, Randi Parker, collaborators Richard Renaldi and Eric Zechman, Jo Spence, Annie Sprinkle, Linda Troeller, Hannah Wilke, and Joe Ziolkowski.. An unstructured list of names provides no context, unless the context is present. Remove them as they are puff.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shari Diamond and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shari Diamond, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 17:01, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unionize Yoga (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at YogaWorks#Yoga_Teacher_Unionization instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It is unlikely that this is separately notable from YogaWorks. Your best bet would be to expand that article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Unionize Yoga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Unionize Yoga, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anarchyte (talk) 11:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sher Doruff (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sher Doruff and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sher Doruff, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 18:25, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sher Doruff (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sher Doruff and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sher Doruff, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shari Diamond (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

May be notable, but the referencing is inadequate, with several sections unsupported by any citations. Please ensure that every material statement is cited to a reliable source, especially anything that could be considered sensitive or contentious (see WP:BLP).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shari Diamond and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shari Diamond, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shari Diamond has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shari Diamond. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 12:59, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shari Diamond has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shari Diamond. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 13:01, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Unionize Yoga

Hello, Ovaryian. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Unionize Yoga, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shari Diamond

Hello, Ovaryian. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shari Diamond, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shari Diamond has been accepted

Shari Diamond, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 06:23, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Ovaryian (talk) 16:53, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Sherman

Much of your additions are unsourced. As they are on a wp:BLP, they can and probably should be removed immediately. See WP:BLPRS. For adding references, please see wp:citing sources. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 00:46, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Your recent editing history at Susan Sherman shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Theroadislong (talk) 18:38, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See MOS:CREDITS. Theroadislong (talk) 18:41, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. That's helpful. I don't want an edit war. I just want to credit a photographer correctly for their work. I am a relatively new editor and need help Ovaryian (talk) 19:54, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Sherman

As that is a shared reference wp:NAMEDREF and it is used multiple times, the page number should go in the {{rp}} template following the cite book or named ref e.g. <ref name="AmChild"/>{{rp|150-151}} for page 150-151. Including it in the cite book would be confusing.

If the date in the image is approximate, maybe use "c. 1987"? Adakiko (talk) 10:42, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's a template {{circa|2022}} which generates c. 2022 Adakiko (talk) 12:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]