Hello, O Correto. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:House of Corsi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An editor tagged this as a CSD G3, blatant hoax, but I thought it needed more review than a speedy deletion page normally gets so I'm PRODding it instead. The page creator was blocked for creating hoax articles but I think this article warrants a review.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bardo Corsi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hii @Atchom: and @Vladimir.copic:, how are you? thank you so much for your comments in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bardo Corsi and for having a time to look at the sources i had put in all my articles! I was banned as a Hoax, but the guy who banned me blocked me without a chance of having a proper defense. i'm even unable to comment outside my discussion page and i don't know many people out here, what makes me an eternal banned person for a reason that's not true, at all. All the articles ive created where people that actually exists and that ive studied a lot to do them in wikipedia (because the articles about this family where really poor). The most recent members had only a few sources, but it still had it, but the guy who banned me even didn't check it. Even when he said it only had a few sources, i decided to ask the deletion of the articles until i had more realible sources and more quantity, which you can see in here. [1] and [2]. If you can, please, revert this. Im banned for almost a year now! for something thats is not true! all these people he's trying to delete actually exist. Jacopo Corsi, even, was the co-writer of the first world Opera, called Daphne, but also was the patronous of a diverse range of famous sculptures as "Orpheu" by Cirstofano Stati, which is in the Metropolitan Museum in New York. Another thing is, he have put some boxes saying that all these articles aren't realiable cause was wroten by a Hoax; that obvs destroy all the work ive done so far, what can be easly checked by all the books ive put in the articles, and what makes me feel so sad about it all. (O Correto (talk) 13:25, 4 April 2022 (UTC))[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Hii!! I was banned on suspicion of hoaxing! even saying all the time that my articles had sources who I asked people to read them! Well, when they sent those articles for deletion, they were kept, and the users who evaluated the request concluded that none of the articles were hoaxing and that my sources were true, and that my ban was unfair and that it happened only because I'm not a native speaker of the English language. What can be checked here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bardo Corsi. That's why I urge, please, you to remove the restriction, because I assiduously contribute to wikipedia and I'm very dedicated and love what I do. Im banned for months!!! O Correto (talk) 10:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
Almost all of your articles were deleted. Yamla (talk) 10:43, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I placed an unblock request this morning, which was refused on an implausible justification again "most of your articles were deleted". As I explained before, they were deleted because people suspected they were hoaxing, however, when they were reanalyzed, their reliability was proven Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bardo Corsi, and what I ask now is the fairest unban, given that it has been proven that I am not a hoaxer. Could anyone really analyze this fairly, without a three-word judgment? Like, really looking at the evidence and what am I claiming? Tahnk you so much. O Correto (talk) 13:51, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
That's not what the AFD discussion said. I concur with Yamla's assessment. 331dot (talk) 14:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Side note, it's very hard to read your talk page with the centering of the text. 331dot (talk) 14:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio Corsi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nera Corsi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
