User talk:Moheen/Archive 2022

Archives

2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023

Orphaned non-free image File:Bhaktivedanta Book Trust logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bhaktivedanta Book Trust logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Contact kijiye mujhe ek Article banwana hai ek Actor ke baare mein. Email - [email protected] 2409:4060:E80:85C1:0:0:58C8:B30E (talk) 12:09, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chetna- The Excitement.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chetna- The Excitement.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Minsk Square

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Minsk Square requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/others/minsk-square-a-tribute-to-east-europe-in-the-middle-of-bengaluru-city-101638040859368.html and https://bangaloremirror.indiatimes.com/bangalore/others/the-minsk-ultimatum/articleshow/79518270.cms. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Moneytrees^Talk🏝️ 18:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for copyright violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moneytrees^Talk🏝️ 18:39, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've previously received 1 2 3 4 5 6 warnings for copyright violations/unattributed copies. After I nominated the above article for G12 today, I looked through more of your edits and found further issues; your re-creation of Chittagong Boat Club after it was deleted under G12 was still mostly copied from https://web.archive.org/web/20181020051751/http://chittagongboatclub.com/index.php/about_cbc/history, and your edits to Shahidul Zahir are closely phrased to sources you cite like [1] and [2] (which I assume you wrote yourself, but the content there does not appear to be under a compatible license with Wikipedia, so it cannot be copied over). This is concerning, as you have over 10,000 edits here and you're a VRT agent- you should know all content you add to Wikipedia must be your own words, or compatible with our creative commons license. If you want to be unblocked, you must commit to no longer copying from sources and demonstrate a better understanding of licenses. Moneytrees^Talk🏝️ 19:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moheen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK. I understand the current situation and make my apology. It's not a big deal, I can re-right the copyvio words and lines. Please unblock me. Lastly, every problem has a solution, please go with a solution not to destroy anyone's mind. Thanks in advance. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 06:25, 3 April 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Decline reason:

You have persistently ignored messages about your blatant copyright infringements over the course of six years, and now you cavalierly dismiss the matter with "It's not a big deal". I don't think it would be constructive to remove the block until you give a convincing reason why we should believe that you will now take copyright more seriously than you have in the past, and saying that you don't think it's a "big deal" does nothing to suggest that you will. It is a "big deal". JBW (talk) 08:11, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

JBW (talk) 08:11, 3 April 2022 (UTC)}}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moheen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@JBW: Sometimes mistakes can happen to a human being, but it doesn't mean I am a useless user. I have created 200+ articles with 10K edits, and here I am for over ten years. Some of my last edits revoked the copyvio rules, I understand that. Please don't find myself wrong, make me free for editing again. I committed I will be more careful in future and it will never happen again. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:41, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Some mistakes we cannot tolerate for legal reasons, like copyright violations. Copyright violations potentially put the entire project in legal jeopardy. I don't see any progress here since your last request. I think you are lucky the block was not sitewide. 331dot (talk) 19:12, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:331dot, I have been blocked in the Article and Draft namespaces, and since my last request, I couldn't make changes there. But I realised and keep all the words seriously and make a commitment to never doing that kind of mistake again. But If I get a chance I can prove myself. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:35, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved your post, you shouldn't use the reply function to respond to a declined unblock request message. We cannot just take your word that you will do better when copyright violations are involved. You must do as JBW asked in his decline message. 331dot (talk) 19:52, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: Please don't get me wrong. I commit to no longer copying from sources and will review all of my previous edits to respect copyvio rules. Please consider my apology. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:02, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manelly Zepeda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manelly Zepeda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manelly Zepeda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Clarityfiend (talk) 19:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Warina Hussain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Warina Hussain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warina Hussain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bengali Wikivoyage

The article Bengali Wikivoyage has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable enough to have its own article. Do you see French Wikivoyage or German Wikivoyage, which both have more pages, having their own article on Wikipedia?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lizardcreator (talk) 00:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of J. P. Shaw

The article J. P. Shaw has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the GNG. My WP:BEFORE search found only articles that briefly mention or quote Shaw—there are no independent reliable sources that discuss him in detail.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:33, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join/orginize Wikipedia Asain Month 2022 !

Hi WAM organizers and participants!

Hope you are all doing well! Now is the time to sign up for Wikipedia Asian Month 2022, which will take place in this November.

For organizers:

Here are the basic guidance and regulations for organizers. Please remember to:

use Wikipedia Asian Month 2022 Programs & Events Dashboard. , or else you and your participants’ will not be able to receive the prize from WAM team.
Add your language projects and organizer list to the meta page 1 week before your campaign start date.
Inform your community members WAM 2022 is coming!!!
If you want WAM team to share your event information on Facebook / twitter, or you want to share your WAM experience/ achievements on our blog, feel free to send an email to [email protected].

If you want to hold a thematic event that is related to WAM, a.k.a. WAM sub-contest. The process is the same as the language one.

For participants:

Here are the event regulations and Q&A information. Just join us! Let’s edit articles and win the prizes!

Here are some updates from WAM team:

Based on the COVID-19 pandemic situation in different region, this year we still suggest all the Edit-a-thons are online, but you are more then welcome to organize local offline events.
The international postal systems are not stable, WAM team have decided to send all the qualified participants/ organizers a digital Barnstars.

If you have any suggestions or thoughts, feel free to reach out the WAM team via emailing [email protected] or discuss on the meta talk page. If it’s urgent, please contact the leader directly ([email protected]).

Hope you all have fun in Wikipedia Asian Month 2022

Sincerely yours,

Wikipedia Asian Month International Team 2022.10

Nomination of Ezaz Yusufi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ezaz Yusufi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ezaz Yusufi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 14:50, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]