User talk:MackenzieBailey

Myrna pearman moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Myrna pearman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 22:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Myrna pearman[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Myrna pearman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 15:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, MackenzieBailey. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Myrna pearman, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 15:55, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you edit Ellis Bird Farm again, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 03:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bbb23

I hope you're well. :)

I want to be clear on a few things.

1) I've never worked at Ellis Brid Farm, nor do I know anyone that works there.

(Should you like to verify my lack of connection to Ellis Bird Farm, I'll happily provide you with my LinkedIn URL, resume, or a sworn oath. And, if it were appropriate, I'd gladly send you a photo of my bank statements to prove these are unpaid contributions.)

2) I've not expressed an opinion on the Ellis Bird Farm Wikipedia page. Every piece of information I added to the page is cited by external sources (the vast majority were news outlets).

I spent an entire day working on the Ellis Bird Farm article. And everything (and I mean everything) was cited in my work. Each sentence had a source, and I actively used an extensive range of source material. I combed all of Google News for "Ellis Bird Farm" and skimmed or read every article, using as wide a range of sources as possible. It's with energy and goodwill that I invite you (or anyone else) to review the source material and weigh that against my work.

It may be worthwhile to note the original stub was short and had no citations at all. To me, it seems like an extreme decision to revert to a page with no third-party material rather than 1) accept, 2) edit, or 3) cut components of a significant contribution linking to ~25 third-party sources.

However, I respect your authority. I'm explaining my position and opinion, not challenging you. :) While allegations against me are unfounded, I will not edit Ellis Bird Farm again. MackenzieBailey (talk) 21:57, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

per Bbb23's warning as well as the COI notice, you cannot edit in directly in the main space areas where you have the COI. This includes having to submit potential articles as a draft so that it can be reviewed. GPL93 (talk) 15:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Myrna Pearman moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Myrna Pearman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 15:20, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Myrna Pearman[edit]

Hello, MackenzieBailey. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Myrna Pearman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Myrna Pearman[edit]

Hello, MackenzieBailey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Myrna Pearman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]