User talk:Laughing100

Welcome!

Hello, Laughing100, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Instances in which isaiah uses the word servant to mean israel[edit]

Thee point of the article is to show why jews do not think the suffering servant of isaiah 53 is not jesus but instead themselves

Instances in which isaiah uses the word servant to mean israel[edit]

Although I welcome your interest in contributing to Wikipedia, there are two problems with this article. First, there's no indication why anyone would look for info about this narrow topic. Second, your selection of verses is original research, in that many of the verses do not use the word "servant" at all, and others equate "servant" with Jacob, not with the nation. I've proposed that the article be deleted for these reasons. If you believe you can address these concerns, please comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instances in which isaiah uses the word servant to mean israel. Gazpacho 23:20, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't remove the AfD notice, as it says. Gazpacho 23:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gazpacho--this topic is of interest because of Isaiah 53. However this must consist of more than just a list of passages, and any sentences or information that you add may not be original research. AdamBiswanger1_{R.I.P. Steve Irwin} 01:32, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recreated categories[edit]

Hi Laughing100,

Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 October 10#Counter missionary and Christian criticism

Unfortunately the two categories listed in the above are recreations without apparent consensus in support, something that sooner or later is picked up on Wikipedia. Please consider whether the articles they contain may be added to (or maybe are already within) an appropriate category; please don't recreate these particular categories again. Lists, as in [[List of {something}]] articles, may be a solution! Thanks, David Kernow (talk) 21:58, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]