User talk:Kartigang038885

Kartigang038885, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kartigang038885! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lonzo Ball has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lonzo Ball was changed by Kartigang038885 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927954 on 2020-10-15T23:48:49+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bagumba. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Evan Mobley, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 23:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kartigang038885! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Evan Mobley that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 00:00, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kyle Lowry, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 01:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to LiAngelo Ball, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 02:14, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Lonzo Ball. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Bagumba (talk) 16:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at D'Angelo Russell. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 09:18, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at LaMelo Ball, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 01:44, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Greg Oden, you may be blocked from editing. —Bagumba (talk) 17:23, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Hakeem Olajuwon. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

Please also refer to MOS:WEASEL about your use of "regarded". You are also reminded about your continued unsourced addtitions. —Bagumba (talk) 11:28, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 20:02, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Obi Toppin. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 02:48, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3rd block for BLP violations

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 10 days for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You have been blocked from editing for persistent disruptive editing and copyright violations. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:10, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]