User talk:Jax 0677/Archive 11
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jax 0677. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | → | Archive 15 |
Your note at my talk
Thanks for notifying me of the RFDs, but I was left confused — I wasn't particularly interested in any of the discussions, and the only thing I found interesting was that the C: interwiki link proposal has apparently been accepted. Please check the message you sent me: I think you either linked to the wrong day, or you sent the message to the wrong person. Nyttend (talk) 05:03, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - @Nyttend:, I sent you that message because you commented here. --Jax 0677 (talk) 05:19, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Stub templates
Please read Proposing New Stub Types before creating another stub template and category and follow the procedure. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - Will do! --Jax 0677 (talk) 05:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
WCW
You've heard of World Championship Wrestling, haven't you? And you still think Template:WCW is a good redirect to the country music project? I recommend you waiting on the outcome of the existing redirect discussions before creating more of them, especially poorly thought out ones like this. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:29, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for "fixing" the refs
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Immortal_%28For_Today_album%29&diff=602383650&oldid=602383545 You didn't have to. I broke them so I could really fix them: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Immortal_%28For_Today_album%29&diff=next&oldid=602383650 Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Notifications
Per WP:CANVASS, it is good practice to leave a note at the discussion about notifications which have been made to individual users. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Only Man for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Only Man is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Only Man until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 12:45, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Only Man may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:46, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Re: We Don't Care (Audio Bullys song)
Hi Jax - here is a song review by Drowned in Sound [1] and a much shorter one by NME [2]. Also, Music Week talks about some awards that the video won [3]. In print, CMJ offers some tidbits here, and Spin has a very short blurb here. The song also charted at number 15 in the UK [4], number 97 in the Netherlands [5], and number 5 on the US Dance/Electronic Singles Sales chart [6]. I think these sources should be enough to support an article. Hope this helps! Cheers, Gongshow talk 06:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Template:Wprg listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Wprg. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Wprg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Scott • talk 00:15, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Template:Wprok listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Wprok. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Wprok redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Scott • talk 00:26, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Shortcut templates
Thanks for the notification, but I am not sure I can really add anything at WP:RfD for it. I have added a short bit at the discussion you (or John Vandenburg) started. So it is not laziness but just I have nothing sensible to contribute, I really don't know what is best to do with these but will watch it. Not that that usually stops me! Si Trew (talk) 12:48, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Block
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2014 (UTC)Template:WPCM listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:WPCM. Since you had some involvement with the Template:WPCM redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. John Vandenberg (chat) 02:22, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
--Jax 0677 (talk) 19:28, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Unblock request
Jax 0677 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As a result of this block notification, I will refrain from relisting ANY XfD discussions for the next 48 hours. Additionally, for the foreseeable future, until I learn more about the process, I will refrain from relisting XfD discussions unless they have exactly one "Keep" response.
Decline reason:
You're correct - this block will indeed prevent such. During the block, please read WP:DELETE, WP:AFD, and all other process documents. Be surprised this block is this short DP 20:38, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
RfDs
It's pointless to keep sending you the template message. You'll know from your watchlist that I've filed more RfDs on your redirects at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 April 15. I have also asked the community to consider imposing some kind of restriction upon you from creating any further similar redirects to WikiProject templates. When your block expires, please participate in the discussion. — Scott • talk 18:50, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- I would second a ban on such creations of redirects to WikiProject templates by Jax. There is absolutely no point in creating so many, especially multiple ones to single projects. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:48, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
Hi Jax 0677,
Thanks for such a warm welcome, you deserve a cookie too! Sincerely, Rubik's Maniac (talk) 14:23, 24 April 2014 (UTC) |
Please take me off your list
re: THIS and other such canvasing posts for RFDs comments to my talk page. If you need bodies, post on the village pump. One or two votes hardly makes it may patrol or area of interest... While I appreciate your zeal, I hardly ever contribute to Wikipedia anymore unless something is shouting for attention. Redirects political discussion just have no importance to me. Best wishes, // FrankB 20:31, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- I'd like you to take me off your list too regarding notifications of XfDs. Thank you. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:43, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - Will do. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:32, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
For review
Can you review my article? And is this article appropriate for publication ? link :- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Veron_%28Software%29 Nip123 (talk) 15:06, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nip123 has also posted this same message to five other user talk pages.
I shall answer on my talk page, and I shall also let Nip123 know that posting the same message to numerous talk pages like this is not considered helpful.The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC) - I now see that Nip123 is a block-evading sockpuppet, and this account will be blocked too. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:38, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Erpert blah, blah, blah... 02:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Soliciting comment...
Hi! Would you care to review or comment at my FA nomination for Marquee Moon, an article about a rock music album? Information on reviewing an FA nomination's criteria is available at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 04:14, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Template:Hmm listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Hmm. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Hmm redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Banner talk 11:07, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Template:Wpuni listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Wpuni. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Wpuni redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Banner talk 11:23, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Template:Wpco listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Wpco. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Wpco redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Banner talk 11:23, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Template:Wphh listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Wphh. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Wphh redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Banner talk 11:24, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Template:Wpem listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Wpem. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Wpem redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Banner talk 11:25, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Template:Univ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Univ. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Univ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Banner talk 11:26, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Template:Jasmine Guy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:56, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Template:WPIN listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:WPIN. Since you had some involvement with the Template:WPIN redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 65.94.171.126 (talk) 07:29, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Template:Wptv listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Wptv. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Wptv redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 65.94.171.126 (talk) 07:42, 15 May 2014 (UTC) on their talk page.
Template:Wco listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Wco. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Wco redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 65.94.171.126 (talk) 07:48, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Htbah listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Htbah. Since you had some involvement with the Htbah redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 01:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Virtual Mom listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Virtual Mom. Since you had some involvement with the Virtual Mom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JDDJS (talk) 16:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Template:Slick Idiot has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Torchiest talkedits 09:46, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Template:PM5K listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:PM5K. Since you had some involvement with the Template:PM5K redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Banner talk 10:17, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Template Konica Minolta
Hi! I see that you are expanding the {{Konica Minolta}} template and adding it to many related articles. It's great that someone is organizing the Konica / Minolta / Konica Minolta stuff, however, I would like to suggest to split the template into three in order to reflect that we also have separate articles and categories for Konica, Minolta and Konica Minolta stuff (and for good reasons). Of course, the three templates can be crosslinked, but it is my own experience that carefully distinguishing between the companies helps alot to get an overview over their respective portfolios. It will also help to keep the templates manageable in size long-term - mind, that people, who don't use JavaScript, will see the templates in their expanded form. Greetings. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 17:34, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - Fixed! --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:50, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Redirects Are Cheap
Item 2 per WP:CHEAP: we should not preemptively create redirects for their own sake, which is what you are doing. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:51, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- And aren't you always the first to mention that WP:NENAN is just an essay? --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:59, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - WP:R#KEEP bullet 5 says "However, avoid deleting such redirects if:" "Someone finds them useful. You might not find it useful, but this may be because you browse Wikipedia in different ways." I do not understand what "WP:NENAN is just an essay" has to do with "WP:CHEAP", "htbah" or "Template:PM5K". --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- In many of your arguments against deletion of redirects you point to WP:CHEAP, an essay, yet when others would refer to WP:NENAN in Templates for Discussion debates, you would say it's just an essay. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 14:49, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - WP:R#KEEP bullet 5 says "However, avoid deleting such redirects if:" "Someone finds them useful. You might not find it useful, but this may be because you browse Wikipedia in different ways." I do not understand what "WP:NENAN is just an essay" has to do with "WP:CHEAP", "htbah" or "Template:PM5K". --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nigel Dupree Band may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:19, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Leaves' Eyes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- watch?v=Z6RxJGH-00k&list=HL1347901291&feature=mh_lolz |title=Interview with Liv Kristine [Leaves' Eyes |publisher=YouTube |date= |accessdate=2014-05-30}}</ref> On January 7, 2013 the band
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:30, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind welcome
Are you a real person or an automatic welcome message? If the former can you tell me how Wikipedia policy has changed since June 6th? I gather it has altered policy. Eruditer (talk) 05:41, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Death Grips template
Um there are no 'former' members to differentiate from, and bolding the names causes display issues. GiantSnowman 13:55, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I hope that this message finds you well! You contested my WP:PROD nomination for The Postmarks, but I still can not find sufficient breadth/depth of refs for them to pass WP:NMG. I hence have nominated the article for deletion, and you can find the review debate here. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 10:57, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Your proposed deletion of Template:Nina Sky songs
I have removed your proposed deletion of Template:Nina Sky songs, as the proposed deletion process does not apply to templates. However, I have opened a Templates for Merging discussion here, Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2014_July_22#Template:Nina_Sky_songs. You can comment at that link. Thanks. Safiel (talk) 19:10, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Didn't you read MOS:MUSIC#Discographies? According to #2, discography should be separate if the list is becoming larger. The list is small enough to fit in the Cutting Crew article. --George Ho (talk) 19:42, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - No, it says "becomes disproportionately large in relation to the rest of the article". 5FDP has a separate discography page for this same reason, even though the combined total of the sizes is under 100 kB. You may wish to take the issue to WP:AFD. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:01, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ZOMM LLC Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ZOMM LLC Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:07, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure she's notable enough to even be mentioned in Wikipedia, but a girl with this name has created quite a controversy with her Auschwitz selfie. I wanted to run it by you before I did anything since you created a redirect for this name.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:46, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Reply -Since she was involved in Ethan Couch's case, I created a redirect for her. I doubt, however, that she merits her own article, but I could be mistaken. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:54, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- I was referring to the Auschwitz selfie case. That probably isn't the same woman. I wasn't sure how to handle it if someone decided the Auschwitz selfie merited a section or even a paragraph in one of the articles.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:29, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - If your person is more notable, I have no problem with you changing my redirect... --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, but no thanks
You're not gaining anything from thanking me for that. From what I can tell, I'm only fixing your problems. —烏Γ (kaw), 02:32, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the intro
Thanks for welcoming me to the Wiki's large group of contributors and for the post you've made on my talk page. I hope I can grasp how to use it properly and can edit to help improve the accuracy of pages.
LucidityOfPower (talk) 11:12, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sunflower Dead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Long Beach. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rocky Votolato may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *'' A Brief History (Rocky Votolato album)|A Brief History]'' (2000) ([[Your Best Guess]])
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nebraska–Omaha Mavericks men's ice hockey may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *Most saves in a game: Dan Ellis, 53 (3/14/01 vs. [[Ohio State Buckeyes men's ice hockey|Ohio State]]
- {{DEFAULTSORT:Nebraska-Omaha Mavericks Men's Ice Hockey
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:38, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the welcome
Decibaltheo (talk) 02:41, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks
The warm welcome is much appreciated. You're a star. CulturalShock (talk) 13:06, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
See talk page
Talk:Opinion Polling for the 2012 Hong Kong legislative election in Hong Kong Island. --Lmmnhn (talk) 01:00, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
September 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Full Circle (FireHouse album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *{{official|http://www.firehousemusic.com/
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:42, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wrong Side of Heaven, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Memorial wall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of 2014 air traffic control facility fire
The article 2014 air traffic control facility fire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of being notable just a news event
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 09:15, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
The article Derek Jones (musician) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 04:32, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Unfinished Business (Loverboy album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Dean. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Honeywell Overview and Template Box
Hello...Can you take a look in my sandbox? I'm trying to collaborate with more experienced editors to update the Honeywell overview paragraphs as well as the template box. Any feedback and guidance would be very much appreciated. Thank you. Lgkkitkat (talk) 03:26, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- Reply -Not sure exactly what I should be looking at, since I don't see much related to Honeywell. --Jax 0677 (talk) 06:32, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Adamantium
Template:Adamantium has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Reflinks
Hi
I've gone over your reflinks edits and fixed the problem with the last one,
If you make an error in future you can go into revision history and undo your edit to revert the changes. Amortias (T)(C) 22:53, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- Reply -I know about the "Undo" function, the problem was that I got an error when I tried to do so. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:04, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I managed to revert it using rollback and that seemed to fix the problem, possibly a cached file or something temporary might have caused an editing error but if its not a reoccuring problem it might not be worth the investigation. Amortias (T)(C) 23:07, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Univ of New Orleans template
Jax,
I can tell the uno template is your baby and you don't want someone changing it. I get it. Know how you feel. I added all the sports to help with the profile of the entire athletic program which needs some attention w/ past budget issues. Under uno template wouldn't you like everyone to know offers more than just baseball and basketball?
I also removed Wes barrow and pan American b/c uno no longer plays at those facilities. You wouldn't want them listed, only the current ones. Please view other templates. I built pan American and Wes barrow pages so know something about them. I'll default to you but I'm trying to broaden the uno ath program overall. I don't think you would mind that? Please reply. Thanks, Spatms.
- Reply - @Spatms:, First things first, please sign your posts with four tildes. Second, WP:WTAF applies in this case. Once the articles are written, they can be linked in the navbox. I removed from the navbox the facilities that are no longer used. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:50, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
New section
Do you play mw3 if so join my clan here are so me ©₪® {unbound} — Preceding unsigned comment added by PuR3 -H4ckzZ (talk • contribs) 06:23, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Shakira laundry service/best selling album
hi, [7] this link shows shakiras "laundry service" sold 20 million , therefore to include on "best selling album" list, I have had problems putting it on the list, can you help?--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:19, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - @Ozzie10aaaa:, I recommend placing a message on the talk page of the article, and asking someone there to add the album. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:40, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Template:Krisiun
Hey just in case you hadn't noticed but the revision of Template:Krisiun you reverted to does not include their latest album The Great Execution which I added on my edit, may I suggest you bear that in mind and actually think before doing that again?--Jacoblikesmetal (talk) 09:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Page Error
Hello,
I'm not sure if I'm doing this right but I just wanted to point out the error on this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Knife_discography
The caption underneath the photograph states the woman in the photograph is Karin Dreijer Andersson but it's not her, it's one of the other performers in the 'Shaking the Habitual' Tour. I think either Anna Efraimsson or Halla Olafsdottir but I'm not sure. Here's a photo of the real Karin during the tour: http://www.losanjealous.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/The_Knife_Coachella_2014_W2_10.jpg
I'd edit it myself but I'd probably mess it up :) Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.171.218 (talk) 13:28, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you so much, Jax. Appreciate it buddy!
A Thank You & A Question
Hello, thanks for welcoming me to Wikipedia, I've been here a while but you were the first to send me any welcome message, so cheers for the olive branch. I think i've been getting on here alright, but need to ask my first question (if i've gone about this the wrong way i apologize) I recently cleared up a bit of vandalism where the user had basically blanked a page. I undid their edit but noticed they have a quite blatently offencesive user name. Not sure how to go about warnings etc. or who to report this to. Thanks for any help you can give. And16kmsouth (talk) 18:44, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - @And16kmsouth:, please see WP:U for more information. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:33, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Your contributed article, 2014 Buffalo blizzard
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2014 Buffalo blizzard. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – November 2014 Western New York snowstorm. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at November 2014 Western New York snowstorm – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Aerospeed (Talk) 16:10, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - I say redirect it ;) --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:46, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Categorization of November 2014 Western New York snowstorm
I've removed the 'blizzard' categorization of this weather event. Blizzard has a technical definition (see Blizzard#Definition) which this storm did not achieve. The definition has nothing to do with the amount of snow, but with the combination of snow and high winds. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 17:40, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Opinion polling for the 2012 Hong Kong legislative election in New Territories East
The article Opinion polling for the 2012 Hong Kong legislative election in New Territories East has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:Notability and WP:notability (events); also fails WP:IINFO
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. George Ho (talk) 07:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for creating this template. I was thinking about it too tonight, because after all with five albums there's now a sound base for a navbox. But then I got distracted somehow with cleaning up all the redirects after moving Skin and Bones (Foo Fighters album). De728631 (talk) 22:45, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Writing another article while waiting for one to be approved
Is it possible for me to write another article while I wait for approval of the first one? Thank you.
Urstadt (talk) 07:46, 27 November 2014 (UTC) Urstadt
- Reply - @Urstadt:, so long as you follow the rules, I imagine that it is. --Jax 0677 (talk) 08:23, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - @Jax 0677: How do I go about doing that while my current article is still in my sandbox? Forgive my ignorance, I didn't read every page explaining how to do things, but I read/skimmed/used the search function on several and didn't find my answer. Urstadt (talk) 09:39, 27 November 2014 (UTC) Urstadt
- Reply -Please read WP:SAA and WP:YFA. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:46, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - @Jax 0677:: Thank you. If I am understanding these pages correctly, then I want to move the draft in my sandbox to the draftspace. Is this correct? And if so, will it disrupt my draft awaiting review? Thanks for all your help. Urstadt (talk) 01:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC) Urstadt
- Reply - When I wrote my first few articles, I simply started them in article space with enough references and sentences to keep the article going. You may wish to ask the question at WP:HELPDESK, as I know very little about draft space. --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - @Jax 0677: Ok, thank you kindly, Sir. Urstadt (talk) 02:36, 28 November 2014 (UTC) Urstadt
- Reply - When I wrote my first few articles, I simply started them in article space with enough references and sentences to keep the article going. You may wish to ask the question at WP:HELPDESK, as I know very little about draft space. --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - @Jax 0677:: Thank you. If I am understanding these pages correctly, then I want to move the draft in my sandbox to the draftspace. Is this correct? And if so, will it disrupt my draft awaiting review? Thanks for all your help. Urstadt (talk) 01:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC) Urstadt
- Reply -Please read WP:SAA and WP:YFA. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:46, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - @Jax 0677: How do I go about doing that while my current article is still in my sandbox? Forgive my ignorance, I didn't read every page explaining how to do things, but I read/skimmed/used the search function on several and didn't find my answer. Urstadt (talk) 09:39, 27 November 2014 (UTC) Urstadt
Which portions of the list must be merged into 2012 Hong Kong legislative election in New Territories East? We must comply with WP:IINFO policy. --George Ho (talk) 11:28, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- Six articles including this one were split from Hong Kong legislative election, 2012. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:49, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- They still as separate pages violate the policies although WP:PRESERVE must be implemented if merge is needed for other articles except the one you mentioned. --George Ho (talk) 19:17, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - I split those articles off as Hong Kong legislative election, 2012 was becoming quite large. Let's review this article with the community at WP:AFD. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:54, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- I have done the merger proposal, but the target is not what you mentioned. --George Ho (talk) 08:05, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Reply - I split those articles off as Hong Kong legislative election, 2012 was becoming quite large. Let's review this article with the community at WP:AFD. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:54, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- They still as separate pages violate the policies although WP:PRESERVE must be implemented if merge is needed for other articles except the one you mentioned. --George Ho (talk) 19:17, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Life by Design?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Debut album. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Winter Storm Damon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Winter Storm Damon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winter Storm Damon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:12, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!!!
E-e-bayer_lover (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
And remember to keep the CHRIST in CHRISTmas! E-e-bayer_lover (talk) 22:33, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Stop Editing the Main Cast
Why do you continue editing the main cast out of the Degrassi season 14 page? Reliable sources?! None of the other seasons have them but they're still the same. I watch the show every Tuesday and I know who is and is NOT a main cast member and appears in the show. Plus, it was announced months ago! If you want "reliable sources", then go and find them yourself. The main cast of season 14 has been listed according to the shows crediting and announcements. The only one yet to appear is Cory Lee (who is said to only be in at least 1 to 3 episodes anyway). So please, revert the page back to the way it was originally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ijoshiexo (talk • contribs) 22:13, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Ijoshiexo:, please read WP:TRUE. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:17, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Jax 0677:, I went ahead and found some "sources" for you since you clearly don't understand. The only 3 not listed with them is Archie Simpson/Stephan Brogen (who is DEFINITELY still with the show as he's the Principal), Ms.Oh/Cory Lee (Stephen Stohn has said she appears in the season but not much, I'm not combing through all of his tweets for it so you can do that if you must), and Craig Arnold/Luke Baker (he has only been in one episode where his sister (Becky Baker) goes to visit him in a juvenile detention center, which she was reluctant to do since she can't forgive him -episode 5, "There's Your Trouble") Both Stehan Brogen and Craig Arnold were credited as "staring" in the episode(s) they appeared in. Here's your sources: [1] and for the new main cast members: [2]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ijoshiexo Ijoshiexo (talk) 22:38, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Jax 0677:, I went ahead and added them all back to the page since there are sources for them now.
--Jax 0677 (talk) 23:16, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Global account
Hi Jax 0677! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)