User talk:Izotz Aro

Welcome to my talk page!

Personal messages go on this page.
I make errors, and if you are here to comment on an edit of mine or revert, please assume good faith.
If I have made an error, don't hesitate to tell me, but being rude will get you nowhere.
If I left you message on your talk page, please answer it on your talk page as I am watching it.
If you left me a message on my talk page, I will answer it on my talk page.
Please click here to leave a new message.
If you wish to discuss or inform me of a sensitive or private matter, you can send an email to me at Special:EmailUser/Izotz Aro.

Online now? It is 1:39 PM where this user lives in Florida.

March 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 07:32, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Izotz Aro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What am I being blocked for? All I have done is contribute constructively. Please point out what exactly I have done that violates policy, since previous sysops have been unable to. Ice Age ^(talk) 7:37 am, Today (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

Pretty much exactly what Bbb23 says below ↓ Yunshui 雲‍水 08:21, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were blocked as a sock puppet. You were unhappy with the response to your unblock request, so you created another sock account. That's not the way it works. You're not entitled to a response that satisfies you. If you're given another chance, then you get to demonstrate that you can edit constructively. You have it backwards. I should also note that contary to your statement at the SPI that this new sock is the only account you use, you saw fit to archive the other puppet account. Talk about raising a red flag. You appear to think that you can do whatever you want here as long as you think it's okay. Again, not the way it works. Take six months off and then come back and request to be unblocked, not because you did nothing wrong, but because you promise to edit constructively despite your past misconduct. If an administrator finds your request reasonable, you might be given a second chance. Another administrator may come be to review your current request, but it's extraordinarily rare to grant an unblock request of a user who was just blocked as a confirmed puppet.--Bbb23 (talk) 07:47, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]