User talk:Infointhismoment

In This Moment

Hello, can you please stop undo it? You are causing an edit war and there is a reason why I revert it. First, the term "Hellpop" doesn't exist. Second, you are using copyright photos of the band that you claimed that is your own work, which is unacceptable. Third, all your updates don't help in any way and the previous version was still better. And finally, most of your edits don't have reliable sources which is another unacceptable thing. So stop it or I will have to report you. Thanks. --Tobi999tomas (talk) 19:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Enjoy your outdated page Tobi999tomas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Infointhismoment (talk • contribs)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Infointhismoment. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page In This Moment, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:50, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consider some of my edits, I'm a good source. The person blocking me is unreasonable. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Infointhismoment (talk • contribs) 20:15, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to follow conflict of interest guidelines when editing and you should be OK. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Infointhismoment (talk • contribs)

You have no right of ownership or control over your band's article. Ignoring Wikipedia's consensus-based editorial model, and wilfully defying community norms and policies is a very fast way to being sanctioned. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 00:33, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

lol k — Preceding unsigned comment added by Infointhismoment (talk • contribs)

SLAAAAYER!!!

February 2020

Your recent editing history at In This Moment shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:52, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 09:20, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hahahahahaha