User talk:ImperatorExercitus/Archives/2009/April
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
WikiProject Films March 2009 Newsletter
The March 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Response re: And then there were none
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I saw the changes that you'd made to the formatting of this page and it looks very good. Congrats.--Jtomlin1uk (talk) 07:54, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Response: From the "misleading Username" fellow
Hi there, thank you for the welcome note. and I don't think you are unfriendly. In factyou're helping me to learn this site. I guess it's pretty obviouse that I am not much of an expert in this whole service or the internet for that matter. I only had chosen that user id since the article is about an afghan politician.. and quite honestly I was too lazy to think of another user id. But as per your command I read the wikipedia Username policy and have changed mine in accordance to that policy. I appoligize for asking this, but are you the System Administrator of this site?
Once again my appologies for the "misleading" username.
Best Regards P.S: As I said I am new so I wasn't sure if one is to respond to a discussion remark on their own page where the remark addressed to them is; or on the talk page of the person that has remarked them. Sorry --AfghanGov (talk) 20:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- User:Beano/done Problem resolved :) Cheers. I'mperator 13:46, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Re:Possible GA Nomination
I didn't do a thorough copy edit, but at a glance it looks like it's either ready, or very nearly there. There are a few minor things that could get fixed in the nomination process (like for example, info on the Nielsen Ratings hsould be in the lead, and the Production section should come before the Cultural references section) but otherwise it looks consistent with other Simpsons articles I've reviewed, and even other television episodes I've previously nominated. (It has the same structure as two of the Office noms I have out there now.)
One thing I'd suggest is taking a look here: http://books.google.com/books?q=%22bart+the+fink%22&btnG=Search+Books There are a number of books listed here that refer to the episode, and it looks like their content could really improve the article if you add them in. Once you do that, I'd say go ahead and nominate it, and if you like let me know when you do and I'd be happy to review it. — Hunter Kahn (contribs) 00:44, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, maybe not right this second. lol. But I'll definitely review it, if not later today or tomorrow, then definitely the day after. — Hunter Kahn (contribs) 01:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Three Men and a Comic Book
Congratulations, the article has passed! View the talkpage for details. Thanks, and good work! CarpetCrawlermessage me 01:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated the article for GA. —TheLeftorium 20:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Since you suggested a merge, I closed the nomination. AFD is only for deletion debates, and a WP:MERGE does not need the involvement of an administrator to delete anything (see Wikipedia:Merge and delete for more details). If you want further consensus for a merge, you can try WP:MRFD. - Mgm|(talk) 22:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Principal Charming
I passed Principal Charming's GAN. The only problem I found with it was that the plot summary was cited, which isn't necessary through WP:MOSTV, so I dropped those. Nice work! — Hunter Kahn (contribs) 02:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
CSD tagging
Hi, sorry your RFA didn't work out, but I'm sure if you go back to the bits of the wiki you most enjoy for a couple of months, then reread the RFA and learn from the examples given you'll be an admin before the summer ends. In the meantime there's a thread at WT:RFA#CSD tagging which would really benefit from the views of CSD taggers such as yourself. ϢereSpielChequers 12:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks for the encouragement! But I really don't plan to run for another 6 months or so, mainly to beef up my article work. I'll take a look at the thread now. Cheers. I'mperator 12:33, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Would you mind confirming it's good to go? It's on April 12 [1]. Thanks in advance. --Leifern (talk) 20:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Grey Goose Island
Hey IE... Thanks for your comment about this island over at DYK. Yes, it has an interesting history! --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Re:GA
Thanks for the review! I plan on pushing that one for an FA after Damien (South Park) makes it through, so I really appreciate the GA! — Hunter Kahn (contribs) 17:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of Yevenes
I have reverted your promotion of the article to B-class, as I feel that it doesn't meet B1, as many whole paragraphs are uncited, and there are only 8 inline citations in total. I am in the process of trying to find additional sources. Feel free to comment at Talk:Battle of Yevenes. Thanks, --Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Re:Question
I just thought I'd try less detailed summaries and see how it went over. If there are any important details you feel are missing, feel free to add them. They don't necessarily have to be short, but all of the summaries should be roughly the same length. -- Scorpion0422 20:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
I felt that your early closure of this discussion was not appropriate. The nominator said that the content was redundant to Merchandising, not that he wanted it redirected there. In accordance with WP:DPR#NAC, I have reverted the AFD closure and relisted it. Stifle (talk) 17:56, 30 April 2009 (UTC)