User talk:GhostStalker

Welcome!

Hello, GhostStalker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Dakota ~ ° 05:58, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Naruto articles

"Support - Although I'm more used to the FN-GN usage of Naruto character names, this is Wikipedia policy. I'll defer to the official policies. Theres probably going to be a bunch of bitching from new users/anons, but I guess we can point them towards WP:MOS-JA. --GhostStalker 20:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)"

But Naruto does NOT take place in modern day Japan. It takes place in a fictional world inspired by modern-day Japan. Since the characters are not in the MOS-JA name switching time period, let alone the same World, this argument goes out the window. (By the way the VIZ English manga uses Japanese order) WhisperToMe 21:27, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:American Empire

This is based largely on info from the 2nd GiG article (hence the resemblence to the material already here), but some of it came off of various websites I have seen for the Gits. As for the map, I do believe that the lines drawn on it represent the countries of the world. Gits material has mentioned the European Union, so it stands to reason they operate under that entity internationally. Also keep in the mind that world wars do change boundry lines. As I make it the US and AE are seperate entities, but I will see if I can find some conclusive evidence of this to cite; failing this, I will see about having the article retooled or axed. TomStar81 (Talk) 20:17, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a new section to discuss the in series evidence for and against an independent AE and US. With thanksgiving break nearly upon us I may have time to really dig into this over the weekend, other wise this may and up on the back burner until after finals week. TomStar81 (Talk) 06:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reaction

Eh, you're having a better reaction to us having roughly the same name then most people do. I had a kid stalk me in an online game cause of it. Ya ever need anything, lemme know. I'd be funny as hell for the 2 of us to get involved in the same conversation and having people getting the names screwed up. Cheap, but dirty :D

Ghostalker 21:03, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tainted poll?

Hi. Sorry to bother you. You participated in a television episode article naming poll which now lives at this location. Some feel that wording changes have compromised the results of that poll. If you don't mind, could you please take a look at what is there now and add a quick note at WT:TV-NC#Looking for anyone who objects to the last poll to say whether your feelings on the matter remain the same? Of course you can feel free to read over the entirety of both links for more information. Thanks. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ichigo edits

Please, feel free to correct any grammatical mistake you might see. You're right about english not being my first language, and that's the reason why I usually never rewrite entire paragraphs. But I know about Bleach, and that article was a mess. So correct my grammar, but please don't revert it as a whole, because that page will be a lot worse in terms of correct informations. Lord Air 00:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Barnes & Noble early manga releases

It seems... wrong, to me, that they'd be able to do that. I mean, isn't that what release dates are for? I know, it's a discussion for another time and place. Anyway, I've added comments to both volume counts in the Media section. Thanks for the suggestion! Nique talk 18:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hah

Yeah, it's me. I was pissed when I went to check out the forums, and the site was down. XD -- Trinexx ► 04:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
He won't. You know how he is. -- Trinexx ► 21:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Boss Noodle. And I -highly- doubt that he'll make it that far. Not very reliable, he is. -- Trinexx ► 01:27, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I already noticed. Not until around December or so, but still. Haven't been on wikipedia in awhile, so I didn't see your message. I was heartbroken when I noticed the lack of forums. UNRELATED NEWS: I got married and divorced in a one-month span. -- Trinexx ► 03:37, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Long story. Suffice to say that it seemed fun at the time. She turned out to be a gutter slut, lucky me. I don't appreciate being cuckolded. -- Trinexx ► 18:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, the channel that nobody is ever in? XD -- Trinexx ► 22:32, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Shiva sucks, though :/ -- Trinexx ► 03:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax articles

Sure. It'll probably get removed since it was prodded once already. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 02:06, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Please stop adding OR back to the articles. Provide sources before doing so. Also, things like the connection of the name's translation to the character is original research. TTN (talk) 20:25, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name

In short, this. Figured I might as well since I had been planning to at some point anyway. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 08:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours (from 23:31 yesterday) in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Vizard. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

This block was issued by User:ST47 and all enquiries should be made to that user. Stifle (talk) 13:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suigetsu > Muramasa_itachi

Easier to type and smaller. "Muramasa_itachi" was just... hard on the eyes, yknow? Suigetsu ( T | C ) 21:48, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Surprise!

Taken almost 2yrs to reply to you... man I'm behind. Coincidence, maybe... but the name kinda fits my style of living, and for that I'll allow your imagination to run wild. RIT is an excellent school, and I'm right across the Hudson from you (In fact, my father holds a masters in engineering from there and supports our entire family). Good luck to you in your studies, if you need anything, don't hesitate to ask. I stick by my fellow gamers. Ghostalker (talk) 04:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is considerably easier.

Thanks for that. I can't believe I've missed something that easy to use... Sui get su 18:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your rollback request

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/October 2008#GhostStalker. SoxBot X (talk) 19:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't feel too down. My latest one got denied too. Sui get su 15:18, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

/i/

Lol, you are right, I just checked ED's article on /i/, 4chan never had a /i/ board, the /i/ board was hosted on 7chan time ago. --Enric Naval (talk) 11:34, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SIRYESSIR

Hello, GhostStalker. You have new messages at Amorymeltzer's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Good to hear from ya! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 03:26, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BLP Discretionary sanctions notice

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Dreadstar ☥ 15:51, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This notice relates to Gamergate controversy, Zoe Quinn, Anita Sarkeesian, and related articles, talk pages and edits, but note this this alert applies to all edits related to the area identified above. Dreadstar ☥ 15:52, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

--

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi GhostStalker! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 13:57, Thursday, May 14, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your signature and linter errors

Just a reminder that your signature contains obsolete font tags. They create Linter errors, and it is advised that you change your signature to [[User:GhostStalker|'''Ghost''''''Stalker''']]([[User talk:GhostStalker|Got a present for ya!]] / [[Special:Contributions/GhostStalker|Mission Log]]) ASAP.

The purpose of this message is because Linter errors affect the way the page looks, and with a lot of errors, the page may render badly. To reduce Linter errors, please change your signature.

If the software doesn't accept my replacement signature, let me know, and if that's the case, unfortunately you may have to change it to something else. Sheep (talk) 17:18, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you! GhostStalker (Got a present for ya! / Mission Log) 18:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tsubaki's crush

Please stop the edit war. Questions should be asked in a separate discussion, not in the comments on rollbacks. Tsubaki's crush on Aoi is literally the running gag in the franchise, even VA openly comment on it. This is repeatedly discussed in the game when Hiro teases Tsubaki about her wanting to make cookies for Aoi once she mentioned that she likes homemade or in the anime when Tsubaki offered Aoi a cocktail and Hiro mentions its romantic meaning. Moreover, the first or one of the first Valentine's events is dedicated to her trying to make chocolate for Aoi. It's more than open. Solaire the knight (talk) 17:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Started a section on the Talk page. Would rather continue the discussion there. Noting your examples, I'm rather not sure whether said crush is so notable a character detail to be mentioned, as it seems more fancruft-y to me. GhostStalker (Got a present for ya! / Mission Log) 17:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The fact is that this crush is actually one of the main features of her personality as a character, since she is "just don't think that ..." tsundere. Just like Aoi's handsome "ikemen" who doesn't realize why girls are interested in her. Solaire the knight (talk) 17:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I again admit that I haven't been very deep into RONDO's storyline (even if one of Tsubaki's initial 4*s is one of my highest bond units), so I can see where you're coming from. However, the way you worded it makes it seem like you're shoehorning a speculative character detail into the article. Cleaned up your comment a little bit in the Unichord section for the same reason, and that's a lot more easily cited. GhostStalker (Got a present for ya! / Mission Log) 17:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the question is in the wording, then I will have no problem if you, as a native English speaker, correct it. Though I do think her sexuality is still vague, given Aoi's androgyny and personality, it's hard to tell if her ikemen image played a role here. Haruna is more explicit in this regard, as she clearly implies that she likes Aoi due to the reminiscent of bishonens in the shoujo manga (card where she strokes her head and Haruna quotes tropes from the manga with this thing). Solaire the knight (talk) 17:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would change around the grammar, but I don't want to be accused of 3RR, so I'll let someone else tackle the wording, unless no one else has an opinion by the time the 3RR timer runs out. GhostStalker (Got a present for ya! / Mission Log) 17:40, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Richard Ravitch

On 27 June 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Richard Ravitch, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 17:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not everything well-cited needs to be in an article

Not everything well-cited needs to be in an article. The article Shake Shack is supposed to be an overview of the whole topic. 50 or 100 years from now, this little not-incident is so silly, and will certainly not be there. It shouldn't even be in the history section, it has no place there, and does not inform readers about the company or brand in any way. Totally over-blown non-incident. Even other miniscule happenings don't make their way into the more-specific article History of the New York City Police Department, so why should they be here? $ɱ$ (talk) 15:54, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I readily admit I'm biased because of where I live. If you get a consensus to remove the material, I won't contest it. GhostStalker (Got a present for ya! / Mission Log) 20:29, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to open a talk page discussion about it, go ahead. Otherwise I'm just gonna remove it again. It clearly doesn't fit.

ɱ

(talk) 02:52, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's on you to get consensus as per WP:BRD. But I respect that you haven't removed it until I replied. If a talk page hasn't been started by tomorrow, I'll go ahead and make one. GhostStalker (Got a present for ya! / Mission Log) 13:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aqours and Mori Calliope

Hi, two things. If Aqours wasn't at Anime NYC or only parts were, you want to report that to animecons.com. They're the de facto anime convention information site for guest lists and 99% of the time that's what anime convention articles will go by. We also list guests in English alphabetical order, if Mori Calliope's name is in the wrong order and needs to be switched, I'd reach out again to animecons.com to get it fixed. I try to keep the same standards across all the anime convention articles, and that's why it gets changed. Esw01407 (talk) 01:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported it to Animecons.com; they haven’t changed it. I was at that AnimeNYC, I worked that concert as Crew, I know it was only Guilty Kiss there. Yes, that’s OR, but the 2019 guest list on the AnimeNYC.com website (https://animenyc.com/archives/guests-2019/) also only lists GK as a guest, not all of Aqours. I can source that to the Anime NYC website instead of animecons.com if you’d like.

As for Mori, her own page on Wikipedia Mori Calliope has a note up top where it mentions her surname name as Mori. I know this is inconsistent with the rest of Wikipedia where we do Western name order for article names most of the time, but I guess vtubers are an exception for whatever reason?

Also, seeing your most recent revert to the ANYC page, Acky Bright as a guest in 2023 can also be cited to the ANYC 2023 guests page as he’s listed there (https://animenyc.com/archives/guests-2023/). I was working Autographing that day and remember handing out wristbands to attend his signing as well. (Again, OR; but that’s why I brought a source as well).GhostStalker (Got a present for ya! / Mission Log) 01:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, the primary source website isn't much better then original research. That note has no citation on the Mori page, but having to check OR (YouTube intereview), she pronounces it Calliope Mori. I'll find a way to note it. I'll try to find sources that aren't primary source for Acky Bright, so far I have them for 2022. Esw01407 (talk) 04:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, according to WP:PRIMARY we’re allowed to use primary sources for statements of fact, which guests at an anime con would be, yeah? GhostStalker (Got a present for ya! / Mission Log) 04:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]