User talk:Gaarmyvet/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

Welcome!

Hello, Gaarmyvet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! WikiManOne 22:21, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

tnx

For looking further than a single word in the "Montenegro"-business. I was a bit revert-happy I guess... L.tak (talk) 14:18, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome; we're all in this together!--Gaarmyvet (talk) 18:28, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

I saw your question about sinebot

As per WP:SIG#NT, you're not permitted to transclude your signature using a template. If SineBot doesn't see 4 tildes, it will add the signature. Please ensure that you stop using a template as a signature. Let me know if you need help doing this dangerouspanda 11:40, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. I decided to crash in and do the fixes myself and I think I've got it right. I've flagged the two pages previously used in my signature for speedy deletion.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 14:53, 4 October 2012 (UTC)


Thanks

Whoops!

Thanks, ♠♥♣Shaun9876♠♥♣ Talk Email 00:46, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Thomas Meehan III

Saw your proposed deletion of Thomas_Meehan_III and, while my initial reaction would be to oppose such a move, I wanted to reach out to you directly and see what your ultimate concern is and why you'd propose deletion rather than trying to build-out the article...Azx2 21:07, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

What is it that you want to add? He joined, he was placed in command and he was killed before he could put his boots on the ground in enemy territory. Regardless of what you wrote at Talk:Thomas Meehan III#Non-notability and deletion, that is not disdainful; it is simply true. As far as his portrayal in the miniseries, there is no historical record of which I am aware of his and Winters's conversation in which they conclude that they are going to jump into Normandy; this was probably a scene constructed by the screenwriters to display Winters's acumen. He probably did notify his troopers that they would not be jumping on the night of 4-5 June. I am, however, looking forward to your improvement of the article.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 21:58, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Energia Vulkan dispute

Can you please tell me why have you taken into account my edit of Energia Vulkan rocket as disruptive? It is clear that this configuration of Energia rocket has never been built. I do not understand why are you blocking the improvement of Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.143.193.59 (talk) 21:28, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Apology

I´m truly sorry for deleting a content from your user page. There is not a reference that says "...never built...", but it can be concluded because there is no any image of Vulkan configuration, all sources say that that project was cancelled, and all sources say that "a large amount of project documentation was created, but work on this project was cancelled.". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.143.193.59 (talk) 22:34, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Vulkan

Ok, my mistake. As I said, it is clear that Vulkan configuration has never been constructed (built) because the project was cancelled. So, I just don´t understand why should I confirm this sentence with references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.143.193.59 (talk) 22:48, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the help

Hi Jim, Thanks for fixing the disambig note on Talk:Sunburst (film) and for your note at WP:FALSEPOS. I appreciate the help. Thanks. 64.40.57.72 (talk) 06:39, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

My pleasure, User names work!--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 13:52, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Gaarmyvet; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you

Hey, there! I've seen you participating in numerous miscellany for deletion discussions and just thought I'd thank you for your contributions. Keep up the great work! TCN7JM 02:56, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

My pleasure.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 12:38, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Silver Star

Hi-

Yes, i looked at the Obit and saw the Silver Star listed for Norman Dike, however, I was completely unable to find any other supporting evidence, and no other sources. I concluded the Obit was simply incorrect. There was other info about his BSMs, including a citation and an explanation, but nothing about a Silver Star. A Silver Star is a pretty big deal, so there would be more information about that than a BSM. I'm pretty sure a child, grandchild or friend of the family probably just mentioned it to a reporter, or perhaps even the obit reporter simply wrote it wrong. It's not a huge deal to me, and I won't change it again, but I really feel that it cheapens such an honor for those that really deserved it by making unsubstantiated claims.

Caesarmatty — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caesarmatty (talk • contribs) 11:32, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources revision

Hi Gaarmyvet, other than you've been a WP editor since 2010 and in consideration that I know nothing about you that isn't included on your user page, would you mind offering something more definable or concrete than your "humble opinion" for your revision? As you indicated in your edit summary, it's been owned by Amazon since 1998, IMO I don't see how they benefit from a site consisting of unreliable information. By the way, I realize that you're not alone in your opinion, but its one that has been perpetuated by those who are unaware of the existance or use of fact checkers in the media and throughout the Entertainment industry. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 04:57, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

ROAD

Moved all the actual relevant material years ago to History of the United States Army, but because my principle purpose today was adding to the 197th Infantry Brigade (United States), I didn't actually look up the correct subheader in HotUSA. Should be fixed now. Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 00:34, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Stockton Beach

Thanks for this edit. I've had no end of trouble with this editor removing citations just because they're dead (but fixable), as well as adding OR, removing valid cited content etc. --AussieLegend (✉) 23:15, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Creatures of Grimm

hi there,
thanks for the v/w.
but did you actually mean to undo all of the changes i made? if so, that's alright. but if not, is it okay if i redo them and correct the voge -> woge in addition to that? --Salanola Ortoluron (talk) 21:49, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

I probably overdid it when I reverted.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 23:11, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

No problem, i'll just redo it and change the voge. --Salanola Ortoluron (talk) 12:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Pmomentum

Thanks for participating to this discussion! Please note that I have added additional pages to the nomination, my edit conflicted with your delete all comment, so you might want to clarify if your vote is still valid/extends to the other pages. jni (delete)...just not interested 16:28, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Dude - give the world a chance to catch up and provide a reference

Sheesh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.1.60.39 (talk) 18:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Queen Elizabeth II revert

Hello. I assume you are very involved in the Queen Elizabeth I wiki article which is why you reverted me. This does not change the fact that, "Elizabeth set out to rule by good counsel, and she depended heavily on a group of trusted advisers led by William Cecil, Baron Burghley." is not a grammatical sentence. I did not change the wikilink that was included but merely the way the text appeared, so that it would read William Cecil AND Baron Burghley. And while we are on the subject, there was nothing about my edit that was a "test", I have been editing Wikipedia since 2005, I am not "testing" anything. FourTildes (talk) 01:32, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

See William Cecil, 1st Baron Burghley William Cecil was Baron Burghley.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 01:36, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your quick reply. If it had read William Cecil, the Baron Burghley, I wouldn't have thought anything of it, but maybe that is not how such titles are usually written when both names are used. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I'll be more careful in future. By the way, the usual protocol is that you reply to my Talk page so I don't have to come to your page to see if you've replied. I only checked back here on a whim to see if you'd already replied. FourTildes (talk) 05:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Kenneth Raymond Fleenor

Along the lines of what you also have been doing, I ran across this former Vietnam POW, Brigadier General and all-around community do-gooder while working on a DYK article for something at Randolph AFB. I figured he deserved his own article, so I created one. Feel free to edit if you run across anything else on him. I find more about how everybody liked him as a person than his military background. — Maile (talk) 22:07, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

I will poke around and see what I can find. It's harder to get archival stuff on Vietnam era vets, of course.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 22:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Added some medals. I'm unfamiliar with the image naming conventions. I'll work on it tomorrow.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 01:26, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the awards. Now I know how to do than. I have a picture of Fleenor from his official USAF bio. Sadly, no photo credit on the page although I know in my heart that it's an official photo. Those things have a certain "look" to them.<sigh>--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 17:33, 20 March 2014 (UTC)


DYK for Kenneth Raymond Fleenor

The DYK project (nominate) 10:52, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

This is a question to Jim in Georgia. I hope this is the right way to ask. If not, apologies.

I received a message from you that said you viewed an edit I had made as "destructive."

I only made one edit (at least only one intentional edit) recently, which was to delete the reference to Mesoamerica from an introductory sentence in an article about Cuba (I'm not sure right now if it was Cuba or Cuban history, because googling to find the article, both came up, and I see both contain virtually identical sentences. It said (and says again)"The island of Cuba was inhabited by numerous Mesoamerican tribes prior to the landing of Italian explorer Christopher Columbus in 1492, who claimed it for the Kingdom of Spain." (This is from the main Cuba article version).


I deleted the reference to Mesoamerica because it is wrong: Cuba is neither part of Mesoamerica [see the Wikipedia entry on Mesoamerica: "Mesoamerica is a region and cultural area in the Americas, extending approximately from central Mexico to Belize, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, and northern Costa Rica, within which a number of pre-Columbian societies flourished before the Spanish colonization of the Americas in the 15th and 16th centuries.[1][2] It is one of six areas in the world where ancient civilization arose independently, and the second in the Americas after Norte Chico (Caral-Supe) in present-day northern coastal Peru."] nor was that the dominant origin of the pre-Colombian Cuban natives, as far as is known.

I apologize for not citing sources as I thought the need for the edit was self-evident from the corresponding section of the article which, although very summary and general, makes clear these were not Mesoamerican tribes but primarily Arawak.

The primary source for what is known about these people are the accounts of Spanish colonizers, and especially Bartolome de las Casas, a priest of the Dominican order.

There were three different indigenous peoples or cultures in Cuba when Columbus arrived. The smallest and oldest are called in Spanish "guanajatabeyes." Their origin is unknown, and nothing is preserved of their language, except the word used for their name. At the time of Columbus, they had been been pushed by the Siboney (Western Taíno) population to the extreme western end of the Island, Pinar del Río, especially the swamplands and keys of the southern coast.

The Siboney or Western Taínos lived at the tip of the Southwestern peninsula of Haiti and in most of Cuba.

The Classical Taínos were the most recent arrivals and Bartolomé de las Casas says they had a more advanced culture.

The Taíno groups originated in South America, the region of Venezuela around the mouth of the Orinoco River, and spoke Arawak languages. They gradually expanded up the Caribbean island chain, assimilating or displacing earlier inhabitants.

There is evidence of trade and some Mayan influence in the Siboney culture, but this indigenous group was definitely NOT Mesoamerican.

Unfortunately some of the related English-language Wikipedia articles are not very helpful, but the ones in Spanish are pretty consistent and much more extensive and detailed, for example:

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siboney

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ta%C3%ADno (not sure why that URL copied like that: in my web address the word after the last slash is Taíno.

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenguas_arahuacas

Also useful are the (Spanish) articles, "Cuba," "Historia de Cuba," and "Aborigenes Cubanos."

The Cuban online wikipedia-style encyclopedia, EcuRed.cu, also has extensive material.

  • * *

The only other thing I did recently was not an edit but a comment; however, your message referred specifically to "unconstructive edits" that amount to "vandalism."

I you continue to believe the edits were "unconstructive" and "vandalism," I'd appreciate if you would explain why. If not, I will make the edit and remove the Mesoamerican reference from both the Cuba and History of Cuba articles.

Again, apologies of this is not the right way to communicate this concern; I am not familiar with the internal workings of wikipedia and a help page suggested this was best. jgperez Jgperez (talk) 19:42, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Editors much more experienced than I will quoter one of Wikipedia's catch phrases: It's not about truth; it's about verifiability. If MesoAmerica is wrong -- and I don't doubt your word -- give us a reference that other people can look up. That will make everyone happy.Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 20:13, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (send... over) 01:38, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the back-up

3RR doesn't really apply with vandalism, though; we can revert as much as we need to. Good thing I don't have anything better to do tonight. :) AIV is running a lot slower than the last time I did this sort of thing. Evan (talk|contribs) 02:24, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

That's good to know. I was just trying to think of something intelligence to type!--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 02:25, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
We made it.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 02:36, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
We did! Thanks again for your help. And, since my indelible American-ness won't let me avoid saying it when the opportunity presents itself, thank you for your service, sir! Evan (talk|contribs) 02:45, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

George Patton - Wilcox

In the article George S. Patton, I used the Wilcox source only to attribute Patton's quote, "How awful war is. Think of the waste." I didn't make a section that talked about the book itself and its views. Would that be fine? Llightex (talk) 01:41, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

The problem, I think from reading the archived discussion, is with Wilcox's reliability. We'd probably be better off asking other editors if there's another source for the quote.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 01:50, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
I added a "CN" tag to the quote.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 23:05, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Omar Bradley

You reverted my correction of "nine" to "eight" in the last sentence of the introduction to the Wikipedia article, Omar Bradley. Please correct the Wikipedia article, General of the Army (United States), which lists only eight. Either the Omar Bradley article is incorrect, or the General of the Army article is incorrect. They cannot both be right as they disagree as to the number of men to have ever held this rank. You obviously feel the Bradley article is correct. I do not know enough to decide, but the General of the Army article has more detail, unlike the Bradley article which just states the bare fact without a citation. All the best, Nick Beeson (talk) 15:51, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. General of the Army (United States) lists nine:
  1. George Marshall, USA
  2. Douglas MacArthur, USA
  3. Dwight D. Eisenhower, USA
  4. Henry H. "Hap" Arnold, USA
  5. Omar Bradley, USA
  6. William D. Leahy, USN
  7. Ernest J. King, USN
  8. Chester W. Nimitz, USN
  9. William F. Halsey, Jr., USN
--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 18:08, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Main Page News pic

Yeah big improvement. SlightSmile 20:55, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

List of capitals

At List of capitals in the United States I have wrestled with several edits trying to correct factual errors, eliminate blue-out from over linking, and moderate provocative phrasing. I added American Civil War links, though the last two paragraphs are a sort of history of the Confederacy which other sections do not have, as it is a list article. Much of the confusion of the previous write-up could be solved by reading into the article Confederate States of America. A lead editor there is Rjensen User:Rjensen, who was a professor of history at West Point, among other accomplishments. Thanks for your encouragement; I'd appreciate you taking a look at the progress to date at List of capitals. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 09:22, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Will do. I watch the page mostly because it seems to be a target for vandalism, but I'll check the improvements.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 12:29, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Regiment of Riflemen (United States) has been accepted

Regiment of Riflemen (United States), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 08:48, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Good catch

Thanks for your post at WT:MILHIST. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:17, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Regiment of Riflemen (United States), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Marys. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Fixed--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 13:00, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 3rd Regiment of Riflemen (United States), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William King. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

De-linked--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 13:00, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

WP:TVUPCOMING

Please note that WP:TVUPCOMING says that "years should not be added to said section heading until an episode actually airs in that calendar year". For Grimm, that means that "-15" should not be added until "Wesenrein" airs on January 9, 2015. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Persian, Arab and islamic vs Middle Eastern

On the Dune (novel) article I changed the section title to Middle Eastern from persian, arab and Islamic because the story also seems to be influenced by jewish/hebrew traditions as well. For example I believe the "bene" in Bene geseret is originally from a Jewish/hebrew source "bene yisrael" and similar organizations. Middle Eastern includes all collectively.--Taeyebaar (talk) 04:02, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

For everything on the AM articles. — Maile (talk) 12:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

List of capitals in the United States

Hi Gaarmy vet. It seems like 33 is actually the right number here. According to the history, Cluebot reverted the wrong person. 33 was the number before the edits today, and it appears to be correct. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 01:20, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for your helpful reply at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. --20yardsaway (talk) 16:13, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Swarming vs. Rushing (Battle of the Alamo)

Hi Gaarmyvet, thanks for your edit! A question: doesn't "swarming" make you think about insects? I don't think it fits in with the subject matter (military battle) and it's actually distracting (to me), since these are soldiers who are risking their lives to defend their country. I don't think the prose here should be "cute" or "snappy"--or overly creative, I guess is what I'm trying to say--just direct and to the point because I don't want to dehumanize them--on either side. I could be wrong, though... Here's the sentence again: "At his challenge, his men began swarming up the wall. Amador opened the postern in the north wall, allowing Mexican soldiers to pour into the complex." I also have a problem with "pour". Makes me think of like pouring milk from a carton or some other breakfast drink. It distracts me from the serious matter at hand... I could be wrong...What do I know? But what do you think about replacing "pour" with "stream?" MiztuhX (talk) 23:44, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

No, swarming can be applied to large groups. Saying it applies to insects is a very limited application of the word.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 23:47, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

McQueen

The last paragraph on Personal Life covers his conversion to Evangelicalism and is reliably sourced. Kindzmarauli (talk) 14:56, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ralph P. Cousins

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ralph P. Cousins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -©2015 Compassionate727(Talk)(Contributions) 14:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Solved. While I appreciate your dedication, you might try reading the guidance at WP:SOLDIER and giving another editor more than a couple of hours before acting.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 16:51, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ralph P. Cousins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forest Lawn Memorial Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Winfield Scott Edgerly

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Winfield Scott Edgerly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 20:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Did you read the new page box?--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 20:53, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Gaarmyvet. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Garlin Murl Conner

Jim,

Thank you. I understand your reasoning.

My thinking/logic is as follows. I based the 10 campaign credits on the information contained in the various references in the endnotes when juxtaposed against the data in DA Pamphlet 672-1 for the 7th Infantry Regiment. Various sources indicate he had 28 or 29 months/over 800 days combat zone service all of which was with the 7th Infantry Regiment. One source indicates his combat service began on 8 November 1942 in North Africa. Adding 28 or 29 months to that, we arrive at April or May 1945 which puts him within the timeframe for all 10 campaign credits awarded to the 7th Infantry Regiment. Absent a copy of his DD Form 214 (or equivalent) discharge paperwork, we're left to work off of second hand information about his combat service.

That said, do we know the eight specific campaigns for which he is currently credited on his Wiki page?

Regards,

Shade Ruff (talk) 22:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shade Ruff (talk • contribs) 16:25, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia calls that WP:SYNTHESIS if we try to put facts together and draw conclusions. We are, after all, a bunch of amateurs. What we need is a reliable reference that has had access to the official record, like Conner's DD Form 214. There's a lot of information on the page that;'s beginning to sound a little flaky. Conner's grave marker, frex, only indicates three Purple Hearts and NO Bronze Stars. A lot of the "facts" are based on the book by Randal Baxter, published by AuthorHouse, a vanity publisher. BTW, Baxter says Conner was in seven campaigns. This article, I think, is a more scholarly approach, but I can't get past the first page. I have asked a librarian friend to work on it for me. I recommend that you take a look at the awards section on some of the other military pages (Patton and Bradley are good starts). Regards, --Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 16:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Garlin Murl Conner

Jim,

Thank you. I agree with the premise that hard evidence should drive the entries.

In the two wartime images of Conner I've seen, the service ribbon for the Bronze Star Medal is present. No oak leaf clusters are visible although it's possible a V device is present on one of the two images - the image where LTG Alexander M. Patch is presenting him his DSC - it's difficult to discern.

As for the "V" device for his Bronze Star awards, I again was operating under the firm belief that one or more of his four Bronze Star awards was/were for heroism (as opposed to meritorious service) given what we know of his combat record. The Army authorized the V device in 1944 concurrent with the Bronze Star Medal. Copies of the orders awarding him his Bronze Stars will note the reason for the award i.e., "heroic achievement" or "meritorious service." If any of his Bronze Star awards are for heroism, the V device is authorized.

As a retired Army officer, I can tell you that many times the DD Form 214 will not include everything the veteran is entitled to/earned. As an example, I just received my late cousin's DD Form 214 (Vietnam service). It listed the Vietnam Service Medal but did not include the five campaign credits he was authorized. Also missing were two Meritorious Unit Commendations he earned while with his unit. Some of this is explained by the fact that oftentimes awards were not approved/authorized until after the veteran had ETSed or were simply overlooked in the haste to demobilize/separate the soldier.

Regards,

Shade Ruff (talk) 22:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shade Ruff (talk • contribs) 18:11, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

I agree that 214s can be a little problematic. I'm a CW4 (Ret), btw; it's good to know I can use some shorthand from time to time. The 3d Infantry Division (1947). Donald Taggart (ed.). History of the Third Infantry Division in World War II. 1115 17th Street NM, Washington 6, DC: Infantry Journal. p. 389. Retrieved 21 March 2014.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) lists Conner's DSC and SS w/ 3OLC but not the BSs. That doesn't mean that the work is 100% right, but I'm impressed with the amount of effort put into it. Have you scanned through this: Heitman, Francis B. (1903). Historical register and dictionary of the United States Army : from its organization, September 29, 1789, to March 2, 1903. Vol. 1 (1 ed.). p. 1. Retrieved 12 September 2014. This is the unofficial work of a private compiler, purchased and published by direction of Congress? Heitman won't do us any good here but it, too, is impressive. All in all, there's just too much stuff about Conner that comes off the Internet. Later, I'll be out of the net for a few hours.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 19:26, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Chief/Jim,

It's great to learn retired military like yourself are part of the Wikipedia editorial team. I agree with your take ref the somewhat shaky provenance associated with 1st Lt. Conner's page. We can only hope the process pushing his MH recommendation forward will result in firm intel regarding his awards and decs. As an example, the French Croix de Guerre is always awarded with a device attached (e.g., bronze, silver or gold star or bronze palm) to the medal's suspension ribbon indicating at which level the awardee was cited e.g., division, corps, army etc.. Unfortunately, we don't yet have that level of clarity for him. Audie Murphy's multiple Croix de Guerre awards are a good case in point of how Conner's Croix could/should be.

F.Y.I. I reached out to one of Conner's relatives who is a SFC in the U.S. Army Reserve. No guarantee I'll hear back from him, but if I do I'll let you know. I asked him whether he has any documentation regarding Conner's BSMs and whether any of them were for heroism - this ref a possible "V" device. I also asked whether he had access to any documentation regarding Conner's campaign credits. Absent that, I asked whether he could provide Conner's depart CONUS as well as return to CONUS dates to assist us in establishing Conner's campaign credits/true OCONUS timeline. As you know, the best we have at the moment is "28 or 29 months/over 800 days." In WWII, the foreign service clock commenced once you pushed away from the dock on the east coast and ended once you returned to port in CONUS.

No, I'm unfamiliar with the reference you cited. Thank you for the lead.

Regards,

Shade Ruff (talk) 22:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shade Ruff (talk • contribs) 19:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

I find myself a little unclear about whether the BS originally came in two flavors or if the the medal for service (sometimes a "thanks fer comin'" medal) came along later.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 20:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Jim,

From its establishment on 4 February 1944, the BSM could be awarded for either heroic achievement (V device) or meritorious service. See this DA GO from 1947 that includes examples of each for WWII-cited actions: http://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/pdf/go4702.pdf

As an example, one of Audie Murphy's two wartime BSMs was for heroic achievement (V device).

Regards,

Shade Ruff (talk) 22:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shade Ruff (talk • contribs) 21:14, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vernon Evans (US general), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World War I Victory Medal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Fixed.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 14:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Undoing of change

Hello, I was wondering why you removed the inclusion of "Announcers, Voice of the Old Guard" from the page. I am currently serving in this position and I can provide proof upon request of its authenticity. Just recently, the Current RSM made the decision to treat the Voice of the Old Guard/announcers as a specialty platoon on par with the Tomb Sentinels, Drill Team, and CCG. Considering that we have reached this position, I believe this information is relevant and important to the article. Thank you for your time and consideration. If you have any questions please feel free to ask. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VOTOG-2 (talk • contribs) 14:43, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I removed it because, basically, you don't get to write about yourself and because you didn't cite any kind of reference. I'm not sure that the position of "announcer" qualifies as notable.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 14:50, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

3d ID

Nope. No edit war. I already left a question about it an hour ago on the personal talk page of the user who removed the unit DUIs from the list and thats the end of it. I was expecting Buckshot to respond and either accept the edit or remove it himself. Mikeofv (talk) 15:13, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Omar Bradley

Hi. The problem with the note on the article directing people to a discussion on the article's talk page is that Wiki pages are not themselves reliable sources, as well as being against the MoS's guidelines avoiding self-references (at least in part because it's just not particularly encyclopaedic in style/tone). If there are any sources within that discussion that help clarify that situation, they should be included directly within the article, rather than directing readers to a discussion between editors which isn't by itself either encyclopaedic or a valid source. - Chrism would like to hear from you 14:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

I agree, but sometimes the talk pages explain how we found or how we decided what to include. A classic, imho, is Audie Murphy's birth date. People who only come to read will not be bothered by the remark; other editors may find it useful. And, yes, we still have people changing things in the face of notes/remarks asking that info be left alone. I should have left you more of a note than just the edit comment.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 14:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of William E. R. Covell

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on William E. R. Covell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 00:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

My apologies for tagging; the page was sitting empty for six hours, so I assumed it was going to stay that way. If you need time to write an article, consider using the draft namespace, where it won't be tagged for deletion. Anyway, sorry for any trouble. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 01:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gaarmyvet/Archive_1&oldid=1139315652"