User talk:FuzzyMagma

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your GA nomination of Bona Malwal[edit]

The article Bona Malwal you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bona Malwal and Talk:Bona Malwal/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Czarking0 -- Czarking0 (talk) 02:00, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

have a done an extensive editing. Kindly look to the Bona Malwal: Revision history or the Talk:Bona Malwal/GA2 for improvement FuzzyMagma (talk) 15:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Czarking0 thank you very much for reviewing the article, and its been a pleasure working with you. Take care FuzzyMagma (talk) 09:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Likewise, I am going to take a little break from Sudanese topics because I like to keep it diverse but I will probably review another of your articles in the future as you are a great contributor to the Sudan project. The materials science stuff is a little over my head but thanks for your work there too Czarking0 (talk) 15:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on an article please[edit]

I would be interested in your comments on Draft:Fiveling; there do not seem to be many active material scientists. I am still waiting for a couple of images from people before moving forward with a final version. Ldm1954 (talk) 05:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice work @Ldm1954. I will read it in details ASAP. If you feel like nominating the article to a GA, please do and I will review it by the end of April. I’m sure it will pass with some minor comments. Thanks for writing such a detailed article. FuzzyMagma (talk) 07:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
a very superficial look into a really excellent article
  • ... or a five-fold twin is a type of twinned particle should it be "twinned crystal".checkY
  • (They also observed single crys .., remove the bracket. checkY
  • (see later), make an internal link using #, as you did with large volumes -- see also checkYbelow.
  • cite some sources to avoid WP:weasel (as you did in different parts) for
  • While most of the details of the formation of fiveling nanoparticles are now understood,checkY
  • Many papers have suggested possible links to heterogeneous catalysts.checkY
  • In crystals the strains can be slightly different, the full details of which are still being debated., here it helps the reader (including myself) to find more detailscheckY text was changed
  • No experimental evidence has been found for this process.checkY I removed the sentence
  • The figure labelled Atomistic simulation of disclination movement in decahedral particles, showing .. can be made bigger.checkY
  • , hence the question of what is that you asking? Avoid editorialising as per MOS:EDITORIAL, the next sentence need sourcing if it is not from the Berry and Wales work. checkY
  • similar to While there are similarities, they are not the same and quasicrystals are now considered to be different from fivelings and the related icosahedral structures.checkY
  • Further reading section might be worth it and will compliment the External links section.  I will think about this one. Off hand there is nothing that is not already in the article. I may add in later weeks/months.
  • there is a space at the end of "See also" sectioncheckY
  • redlink Marks decahedron and Ino decahedron, I think they fit the Wikipedia:Red link or at least be bolden and redirect should be created to point to the section about them
  • for Formation at the nanoscale section, can you also upload some images from In Situ Atomic-Scale Observation of 5-Fold Twin Formation in Nanoscale Crystal under Mechanical Loading article, they are available under CC-BY 4.0.checkY
  • Do we need a section for Formation at the micro-scale (more than 100 nanometres), see this examplecheckY It is in there, since the drawing from Rose is (probably) mm in size, and the photograph of the gold particle later is 0.5cm. Multiple sources say that they just grow larger and are metastable (already mentioned and cited), we can't say more because transforming a mm size fiveling to a single crystal has never occurred.
  • How about a section about their effect: given my background, I understand they have a profound effect on the (micro)mechanical properties, e.g., 1 and 2. I added a bit, but I think it is a bit of a digression. In the process of hunting I found Nanomechanics which needs major work, no refs
  • last thing, the article name, it seems that "five-fold twin" is used widely than Fiveling. See WP:COMMONNAME   There are too many names! Fiveling was the original one, so I will stay with that. There are redirects

PS: it is really intimidating to review the work of someone with your in-depth knowledge about the topic. You have a a significant scientific phenomena named after you! so my review will be mostly about how we can get more from you :). Thank you for work. FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your suggestions, most of which I have incorporated. I just moved it to main space, and will add some links. I want to wait a week before doing a GA nomination, but I do think that is appropriate. Ldm1954 (talk) 00:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
nice work, do not forget to expand the lead FuzzyMagma (talk) 09:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lead expanded, and GA nomination done (why not). Ldm1954 (talk) 06:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
if it is not review by the end of May, I will give it go. Bit busy these days.. FuzzyMagma (talk) 20:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I will be in vacation May 30-June 25 so it might need to be later. Ldm1954 (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
will keep that in mind FuzzyMagma (talk) 20:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article National Public Health Laboratory (Sudan) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:National Public Health Laboratory (Sudan) for comments about the article, and Talk:National Public Health Laboratory (Sudan)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Snoteleks -- Snoteleks (talk) 14:42, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Child abuse in association football you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Child abuse in association football for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 17:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only briefly looked at the article, but it appears there are at least some issues with attribution, for instance, content copied from child abuse. Please see WP:COPYWITHIN. Schierbecker (talk) 17:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
you know a dummy edit can fix that? it is really an easy fix
as WP:COPYWITHIN states that dummy edit may be used to provide the edit summary attribution in either of the methods described above.
Not to shrug your comment off, but it is really unfair to brush off 149 edits and summarising of more than 100 articles on an easy fix.
No to dictate how you review articles, but the aim is to improve articles and not to put down genuine efforts.
if that was your only reason, considering the amount of work I put into this article, I have to disagree with you. FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Whitewashing in art[edit]

Information icon Hello, FuzzyMagma. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Whitewashing in art, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Sudan work! :D[edit]

Thank you for all your work and effort to help Sudan's relevancy and culture on Wikipedia :) Have a blessed day and here's the Sudan barnstar! Vamos Palmeiras (talk) 23:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks you very much and you too have a good day FuzzyMagma (talk) 06:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


April 2024[edit]

Information icon Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Warm Bodies (film), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the zombie comedy film, actress Analeigh Tipton plays Nora, who is depicted in the book as half-Ethiopian. 12 FuzzyMagma (talk) 22:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, but that needs to be discussed in the article and needs to be brought up as a whitewashing concern (which your sources may substantiate; I haven't checked). I have concerns about some of your other applications of this category as well, but in the other instances I saw the articles in question appeared to more directly discuss whitewashing issues. Thanks for your understanding! DonIago (talk) 03:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. I totally understand what you mean. Whenever I applied the category, I had a source but as you said, it need to be discussed in the article first. FuzzyMagma (talk) 06:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hi FuzzyMagma. Thank you for your work on Central Reserve Forces. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:46, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hi FuzzyMagma. Thank you for your work on Popular Resistance of Sudan. Another editor, Noorullah21, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Excellently detailed page, nice job!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noorullah21}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Noorullah (talk) 18:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C[edit]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kendrick and Drake[edit]

Taylor Made Freestyle and 6:16 in LA are not singles. You keep listing them like they are however. The two tracks are not singles, and were exclusively to Instagram. Unless they get an official release through streaming, they are not ever going to be singles. Please stop listing them like they are. Zvig47 (talk) 06:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan[edit]

Hello @FuzzyMagma, I just linked another article to Muhammad Muchlas Rowi. There are International Traditional Karate Federation, Jakarta International Stadium. Will Orphan notifications disappear by themselves? Thank You. Aruna Zahra (talk) 18:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing that. I removed the tag you could have done that too once you address the tag FuzzyMagma (talk) 20:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Aruna Zahra (talk) 01:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hi FuzzyMagma. Thank you for your work on Ibrahim Jabir. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please check his name, as per reference it should be Ibrahim Jaber https://sudantribune.com/article283773/

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 15:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will include this variation as a redirect FuzzyMagma (talk) 15:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anders Hagfeldt[edit]

Your addition to Anders Hagfeldt has been removed or altered, as it appears to closely paraphrase https://www.uu.se/en/contact-and-organisation/staff?query=XX3873, a copyrighted source. Limited close paraphrasing or quotation is appropriate within reason, so long as the material is clearly attributed in the text. However, longer paraphrases which are not attributed to their source may constitute copyright violation or plagiarism, and are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Such content cannot be hosted here for legal reasons; please do not post it on any page, even if you plan to fix it later. You may use external websites or printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If you own the copyright to the text, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the copyright but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. – Isochrone (talk) 19:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FuzzyMagma, you can't just copy stuff from non-free external sources into Wikipedia. It's a little worrying that an editor with your long history should still be doing so. Please confirm that you fully understand why the content you added to Anders Hagfeldt was unacceptable. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:Close paraphrase but if you look to the edit it is WP:LIMITED if you look to the text which is mostly scientific jargon FuzzyMagma (talk) 20:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
but yah fully understand FuzzyMagma (talk) 20:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Majak baai has been accepted[edit]

Majak baai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

FuzzyMagma (talk) 14:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]