User talk:FormalDude/Archive/ 9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Skip to top
Skip to bottom


The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Jason Miller (communications strategist)

Hi FormalDude. The change that you reversed amplifies a salacious gossip-style allegation that was denied under oath in federal court by all allegedly involved parties, and that was made by a third party without any apparent basis besides other gossip. The defamation lawsuits regarding those claims ended because the lawsuits were against a publication and reporter who had cited the third party's court filings (in a separate dispute) in which the third party (not either of the alleged participants) had made the claim (which, again, was denied under oath by both participants). By reversing the change (which is not necessary because the claims are still described in great detail in the "suits" section), we are not promoting neutral point of view, but actually re-introducing bias about a highly damaging claim never proven to be true. I think it would be best to reverse the reversal, to promote NPOV, to avoid promoting gossip, and to avoid "coatracking" (which is what this is, and which is definitely forbidden in BLPs, especially in introductions). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Copernicus43728 (talk • contribs) 03:12, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Further, please take a closer look at what you are reversing, I kindly ask. You are reviving extremely intimate narratives which do not further any public interest or newsworthiness and almost certainly cause harm (including to a child). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Copernicus43728 (talk • contribs) 03:14, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

@Copernicus43728: I suggest you raise these concerns on the article's talk page. ––FormalDude talk 05:22, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi FormalDude -- I'm open to discussing further, but the problem is that this matter involves a child (actually, three children) whose privacy and intimate details are being rather inappropriately impacted by this, without any newsworthiness being involved. By discussing this further on the Talk page for that Wikipedia BLP, we would only be reviving and highlighting a salacious aspect of a personal situation that would be quite harmful for these kids. Please *carefully* review the impact of your reversion, specifically as it relates to these *children*. Please read the changes in question closely. If there is a good dispute resolution or discussion method that can avoid causing more harm to these children, I would be quite open to it (somewhere other than the Talk page, if at all possible). Please let me know what you think the best way forward is. Before we do that though, can you maybe explain to me here why you think your reversion is necessary? (Is there an exception to the Talk pages expectation when the discussion (which would be public, obviously) regards minors? I'd hope so.) I honestly don't understand, and it seems quite harmful to private individuals who are minors. Please that the public aspects of the situation that are newsworthy (including, but not limited to, the court cases) are already described clearly later in the article. The impact of the reversions, on the bio and on the section about children, seems very unnecessary and almost intended to harm them (which I sincerely hope is not the case). Copernicus43728 (talk) 22:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

@Copernicus43728: As stated in our disclaimers, Wikipedia contains content that some may find offensive. Our goal is to provide full and accurate information for the education of all. This means that we have text and images that some may feel overly explicit or otherwise not suitable because of children.
The inclusion of explicit/controversial content has been one of the hottest debates in the Wikipedia community. Some feel that the encyclopaedia should be "work safe"; others feel equally strongly that we should present full information. As always, the content of such articles is a decision made by the editing community - there are no top-down decisions in cases such as this. Wikipedia is written by volunteers, and these volunteers make decisions on content according to consensus. For this reason, it is best discussed at the article talk page. ––FormalDude talk 00:10, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

?

Hi my name is Mark I was in the band like it which I additive machines of brace curious why you edited it back to the original do you have any affiliation with machines of grace 47.215.241.203 (talk) 06:34, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

@Markstewart666: No, I do not have any affiliation with them. Do you? ––FormalDude talk 00:18, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your close of WP:Articles for deletion/Pirtek

Hi, your closing statement says that Sources have been added that meet WP:NCORP. Which sources meet NCORP exactly? Also, an editor had just requested I prepare a table of the sources and you closed anyway? Perhaps if it had been allowed to progress a little longer, the source table may have resulted in additional editors !voting. The reasoning for the majority of the Keep !voters were absent any reasons applicable to our guidelines. HighKing++ 20:09, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

@HighKing: I think these two meet NCORP: [1] [2] ––FormalDude talk 00:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Neither of those were discussed at the AfD. Had either been brought up for discussion specifically, it would have been pointed out that the WSJ reference (notably not attributed to a journalist) relies entirely on this Press release from the Halifax Group the previous day. The AFR reference is a "puff profile" and relies entirely on information provided by the company or their execs - there is nothing in that article to suggest that the journalist has provided "Independent Content" that is "clearly attributable" to a source "unaffiliated" with the topic company. The article is written in 1993 and is a blueprint for how to write a puff profile - e.g. "State Problem, describe bad things about life-without-company, state solution, describe success story, position some vague future growth". It is lacking the almost-mandatory photo of the founders looking profound but it manages to include quotes from the founders all the same. This reference is promotional, an ad masquerading as news, fails ORGIND. Either way, I'm not sure you should have closed in that manner as its effectively using your close as a supervote to decide on matters which were not discussed at the AfD. HighKing++ 10:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
@HighKing: I've vacated the closure. ––FormalDude talk 19:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Question from Londondoc1973 on Christopher Ball (14:48, 15 April 2022)

hi there! Christopher Ball the composer was a friend of one of my close friends. He died on 7th April 2022 - she is currently trying to arrange the funeral etc etc I can't work out how to notify wikipedia of his death? i think it was probably Georgina who added the 'died 7 April' comment but his profile is still marked as being that of a living person Thanks! --Londondoc1973 (talk) 14:48, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @Londondoc1973: Where has news of his death been published in a reliable source? Wikipedia goes by published sources, not first-hand accounts. —C.Fred (talk) 18:22, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
how incredibly sensible Londondoc1973 (talk) 20:29, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Question from Jamesbigdogg (10:30, 18 April 2022)

Could you possibly help me out with some questions? --Jamesbigdogg (talk) 10:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

@Jamesbigdogg: Possibly, what are your questions? ––FormalDude talk 23:49, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:American Revolutionary War on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

guidance request from a fresher

Hello! I am new to contributing in wikipedia, I have edited several wiki pages but mostly correction and stuff. I don't know if I am able to generate new wiki page in any topic. Also, Wikipedia is so large that it is quite baffling sometime to find any page to edit. I mainly contributed to my study related topics, but there is very less to do if anything at all. I would like to know how to increase contribution and how to find topics to edit. Thank you. Hamdsain (talk) 07:08, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Hamdsain, welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions to this project. Writing a completely new article is difficult for beginners, if you think you are up for the challenge, read WP:1st. Otherwise, if you want to find more ways to contribute, see WP:TASK. Happy editing! Justiyaya 23:02, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Request for adoption

Hi! I'm TeddyBearRocker123, and I would like to request adoption. I want to be able to know all the ins and outs of the policies and guidelines, as well as understanding the most important parts of the MOS. Thank you! TeddyBearRocker123 Talk 00:36, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

@TeddyBearRocker123: I'd be happy to adopt you, however you should know that the adoption school is quite long and will take a good amount of time and effort. Are you able to commit to that? ––FormalDude talk 20:53, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Yes, I am able to commit. I've read the adoption guidelines, and I'm ready. Thanks! TeddyBearRocker123 Talk 21:09, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
@TeddyBearRocker123: Great, I've started the adoption course for you at User:FormalDude/Mentorship/TeddyBearRocker123. Get started whenever you're ready! ––FormalDude talk 22:46, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Italian Social Movement on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Question from One Nationa (00:01, 25 April 2022)

Hi, how long does it take for Wikipedia to accept my page? Mentor --One Nationa (talk) 00:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Userpage question

Hi again!! I have a random question; Is there any way you can help me with adding a Barnstar that was left for me on my talk page onto my userpage? I'd like to have it just below everything else on my page, but don't know how to code/format it. I'd like to have my userpage re-arranged but I'm reading up on that. For now, I just want to add the Barnstar for the time being :) I appreciate all of your help!! SPF121188 (talk this way) (contribs) 14:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

@Spf121188: Made an edit to your userpage, let me know if that helps. ––FormalDude talk 18:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Perfect!! Thank you for your help!! SPF121188 (talk this way) (contribs) 18:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:40, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Just sent you an email!

Want to make sure you don't miss it. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garlicbreath123 (talk • contribs) 18:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

@Garlicbreath123: Responded at the appropriate venue. ––FormalDude talk 04:39, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
If you emailed me, I don't see it unfortunately. Try me again at [email protected]? Would love to schedule an interview tomorrow Garlicbreath123 (talk) 12:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
@Garlicbreath123: I replied via email once more. It should come from [email protected]. ––FormalDude talk 00:09, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dead cat strategy on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Historicity of the Book of Mormon on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Responded at the appropriate venue. ––FormalDude talk 02:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Universal suffrage on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Responded at the appropriate venue. ––FormalDude talk 02:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Peripatetic groups of Afghanistan on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Responded at the appropriate venue. ––FormalDude talk 02:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

APPLICATION FOR MENTORSHIP

I am looking for a mentor. I see you're taking in adoptees. I wanna go through a course under your tutelage for a period of time that you determine for a counter vandalism course and/or a course on proper page creation. After which I will be given rollback and/or new page reviewer privileges. I'm reaching out to you because I wanna do this the proper way. It will be a honor to learn. Cheers Amaekuma (talk) 17:03, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

@Amaekuma: Thank you for your interest, but unfortunately I am taking a break from accepting any new adoptees right now. ––FormalDude talk 10:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Application for mentorship

Hello, I'm looking for a mentor. I want to gear my editing towards counter vandalism and I am seeking a contributor like yourself with new page reviewing expertise. I hope you accept me under your tutelage. Thanks. Amaekuma (talk) 09:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Amaekuma, you've already made a request about a week ago. Justiyaya 11:36, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dalida on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Question from Hamdydego (14:23, 18 May 2022)

i want to make a Wikipedia page about one of the best artists named Ahmed hamdy el degwy --Hamdydego (talk) 14:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Hamdydego welcome to Wikipedia! Please reconsider making the page, your friend is likely not notable and this constitutes a conflict of interest which needs to be disclosed if you do plan on starting the article. Please read the article linked on conflicts of interests and WP:1st. Justiyaya 13:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Question from Color Review (18:17, 14 May 2022)

Hello FormalDude, I submitted a draft article to be published. At that time it said it would take three months to review the article. It has been three months so I am wondering what the status is. Could you please help me? --Color Review (talk) 18:17, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

 Reviewing... Justiyaya 02:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Color Review, have you created any other accounts besides this one and do you have a conflict of interest with the subject? Justiyaya 03:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello Justiyaya, no I have not created any other accounts; and, no I do not have a conflict of interest with the subject. Do you know what the status is with the article I am trying to publish? Color Review (talk) 21:26, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
@Color Review The draft is currently pending, an AFC reviewer will review it within 4-5 months. Justiyaya 03:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:False equivalence on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Responded at the appropriate venue. ––FormalDude talk 16:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Quick question

Top of the morning to you! I see that we can add a .gif in a user box but what about video (,ogv)? Atsme 💬 📧 12:10, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

@Atsme: It looks like you can use video. ––FormalDude talk 11:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Ahhhh..thank you! Now I see what I did wrong - px size. Atsme 💬 📧 12:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Anytime :) ––FormalDude talk 15:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Question from Wiki Digital Marwar (07:13, 21 May 2022)

Hello --Wiki Digital Marwar (talk) 07:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Wiki Digital Marwar, I left a welcome message on your talk page. ––FormalDude talk 15:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Buidhe. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Max Chandler-Mather, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

(t · c) buidhe 22:34, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello FormalDude/Archive,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 813 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 859 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Question from BrownShadow89 on Mayfield, Kentucky (03:52, 24 May 2022)

Information on the December 2021 quad state tornado needs to be added. The picture of our court house is no longer correct. We made international news and I’d appreciate for that to be included. if you simply google dec 10, 2021 you’ll see what happened. --BrownShadow89 (talk) 03:52, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

@BrownShadow89: There is already a section about the tornado: Mayfield, Kentucky#December 2021 tornado outbreak. ––FormalDude talk 01:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Question from Denzil Burgon on User:Denzil Burgon (05:36, 25 May 2022)

Hello. Trying to get my personal homepage up & running but the editor just keep loading on a loop. I don't get pust the loading icon. What should I do? --Denzil Burgon (talk) 05:36, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

@Denzil Burgon: Are you talking about your userpage? ––FormalDude talk 06:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Need a public figure profile for myself

How do I do it? 196.34.35.58 (talk) 08:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Writing an autobiography on Wikipedia is an example of conflict of interest editing and is strongly discouraged. ––FormalDude talk 08:58, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Info box concern

Hello,

It doesn’t matter if the subject of an article is a public figure or not. Regardless of status, an info-box can be added within an article. 21pegedi89 (talk) 04:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

blake

my recent edit on "shooting of Jacob Blake". the previous version of that line leaves people to think that this is the only truth, although Wikipedia is reporting Blake's word. Reported lines should not be written as facts. The word "admitted" appears to tell that Blake was telling the truth. The following line about intent to use the knife has the same problem. Zeon26 (talk) 02:13, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Claire Danes on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Endwise (talk) 08:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Transphobia

I was trying to avoid inclusion of toxic material, like, "you know it was one of your sisters who killed those kids", and I also wanted to avoid pandering to the conspiracy theorists, "Other social media posts accused the parents and teachers of being crisis actors". 48Pills (talk) 08:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Page mover granted

Hello, FormalDude. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 14:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
  • The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Melodic Blue

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Melodic Blue you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Melodic Blue

The article The Melodic Blue you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Melodic Blue for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 23:02, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Interaction Design and Architecture(s)

Hi FormalDude,

I do not understand why the page has been moved to the draft space. It is perfectly consistent with all other pages devoted to open-source journals already published on Wikipedia. Please have a look at those listed on this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open-access_journals (you can click on any one and have a look at how they are composed; The main sections used by other journals have been integrated and used also for Interaction Design and Architecture(s) and only essential information provided. Could you be so kind to suggest the changes that in your opinion should be done before submitting the draft for review? Thanks in advance.

Edechiconza — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edechiconza (talk • contribs) 08:16, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Edechiconza, you have provided one citation to the draftified article, please read WP:V and WP:GNG. Additionally, please also read WP:Conflict of interest, if you have a conflict of interest to the subject, you are expected to disclose them, see the linked article for more info. Justiyaya 14:39, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
I probably should expand on the process on what you should do before submitting an article
  1. If you have a conflict of interest with the subject, please first disclose them.
  2. Make sure the subject meets our notability guidelines
  3. Ensure that all information likely to be challenged is supported by a reliable source
  4. Ensure that all information is written in a neutral tone (WP:NPOV)
  5. Submit and wait for reivew
Many articles I've looked at on the page you provided is flawed and needs to be cleaned up significantly, some possibly deleted. Writing an new article is really really challenging process for beginners, consider trying another task here, happy editing! Justiyaya 14:53, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the hints.
I have declared the conflict of interest;
all information can be verified by means of the indexing journal websites (some of them allow to link a direct page, others allow only to use the search engine and in one case (ESCI) you need an account to access the full details); I do not think that we need to add additional links to information that anyone can verify by accessing the indexing journal websites (the latter, by the way, have been linked in the article to the relevant wikipedia pages)
the text is written in complete neutral tone, hope this will be appreciated by the reviewers.
Since we don't know what we can do to improve further the article (we haven't found examples of additional wikipedia articles dedicated to similar topics from which take inspiration), we are going to submit it and wait for the review. Edechiconza (talk) 18:36, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
@Edechiconza: Please read WP:Notability (academic journals) in full. ––FormalDude talk 18:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Dear FormalDude
let's start from the two first sentences of the article you have suggested:
If an academic journal can be demonstrated to be impactful via reliable sources, we should probably have a dedicated article on it.
Being indexed in DOAJ does not demonstrate the reliability and the impact of an academic journal, but being indexed in Scopus (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scopus) and Web of Science - Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emerging_Sources_Citation_Index) yes.
I do not know how familiar are you with the reliability of the academic journals but, for example, to get indexed in Scopus it takes, often, more than two years. The journal is monitored for a long period, has to undergone a severe scrutiny by scientific committees and has to respect many strict criteria. This the reason why scholars all over the world are asked to publish their works in Scopus indexed journals.
Moreover Scimago Journal Ranking (SJR) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCImago_Journal_Rank) indicator is a measure of the scientific influence of scholarly journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where the citations come from.
According to SJR Interaction Design and Architecture(s) journal is by large more influent of many of the journals listed in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open-access_journals.
Just to give you an idea, Interaction Design and Architecture(s) journal ranks as 36th in the world for the Architecture/Design domain (first quartile) and pretty well also for all other domains of interest (2nd quartile in Media Technology and Social Science - 3rd quartile for Human Computer Interaction, Computer Science applications and Education.
Scopus, SJR and ESCI are the most reliable and noticeable third-party sources to legitimate the reliability and impact of an academic journal.
Articles on academic journals are required to be notable; that is significant, interesting, or unusual enough to be worthy of notice, as established by reliable sources.
Interaction Design and Architecture(s) journal, however, is not only notable but it is also unusual enough and worthy to be noticed for many reasons, here at least a couple:
- most of the open access Scopus indexed journals can be considered to have a "commercial" purpose since the publisher ask the authors to pay a fee to have the submitted papers published, while Interaction Design and Architecture(s) implements the diamond route with no expenses to access and publish papers. Papers are selected only on a scientific basis, after a rigorous double blind reviewing process and a check against malpractices;
- Interaction Design and Architecture(s) is one of the few (maybe no more than five) academic journals in the world that implements video presentations of the published papers (the only one in their domains of interest); of course all video are open access and available on-line.
Coming now to the listed criteria
Criterion 1: The journal is considered by reliable sources to be influential in its subject area.
Criterion 2: The journal is frequently cited by other reliable sources.
Criterion 3: The journal is historically important in its subject area.
Criterion 1 has been fully demonstrates (see above)
Criterion 2 is also fulfilled if you consider that the journal h-index is 14 (of course it could be improved but can be considered quite good for the domains of reference and in comparison to most of the open access journal (in particular those listed in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open-access_journals).
Criterium 3 should be considered in relation to the year in which the journal has been established (2005): in 17 years, thanks also to the achieved rankings can be considered quite important in the subject areas of interest (for some of them more, for some of them less; but it is well known in all domains of reference).
Note that Journal age is not a consideration, and in general a recently established journal is not necessarily disqualified by its age.
Considering all that, we do really hope that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academic_journals) could be applied with equity to all wikipedia articles, in particular those concerning open access journals and that this article can be accepted.
In any case do not hesitate to indicate any additional effort that can be done to improve further the quality of the article. Thanks.
Looking forward Edechiconza (talk) 13:48, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Question from Laban-Media (09:47, 7 June 2022)

Hello mentor . I don't see my article published. Is it deleted or should i be patient? --Laban-Media (talk) 09:47, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

AFC/R partial accept

Hey! I saw that you mentioned to follow the review instructions in your edit summary and closed the request for Logan. I had accepted 2 of the redirects out of 4, but I wanted to leave the other 2 for others who felt more comfortable reviewing them. How should I handle (or should I even handle) these partial reviews? Thanks! Skarmory (talk • contribs) 10:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Ah, I think it's fine to leave it open then. I restored your edit. ––FormalDude talk 22:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

roy hargrove article

hey, i hope this talk message finds you well and in good spirits. i wanted to ask about the earfood article redirect. was it because of notability ? if so, i found several additional publications that reviewed and analysed the album and its significance, including a New York Times column[1] and this academic publication that used the album as an important fixture in Hargrove's career and artistic development.[2] there's a few others, but i truly believe roy hargrove would benefit from having a page dedicated to this album. what notability standards or other should be met to make this happen ? all the best !! Ayyydoc (talk) 17:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi Ayyydoc. The notability standards for articles about albums can be found at WP:NALBUM. I'd suggest starting the article as a draft through the articles for creation process so that it may be reviewed by other editors. ––FormalDude talk 22:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Chinen, Nate. "CRITICS' CHOICE; New CDs". The New York Times. The New York Times Company. {{cite web}}: Text "Roy Hargrove Quartet" ignored (help)
  2. ^ Wade, Steven (August 2011). Commercial jazz trumpet style: A comparison of leading trumpeters Freddie Hubbard and Roy Hargrove. California State University, Long Beach: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. ISBN 978-1-124-99491-8.

Queenstown/Komani RM

Hi FD. Can I ask you take another look at this RM? You wrote "There is no consensus that up-to-date reliable references predominantly use one name over the other". WP:COMMONNAME talks about what to do in that situation -- apply PAGs -- and I felt that participants did that (applied PAGs like WP:MPN and WP:NAMECHANGES), but you didn't address that second part of the analysis in your close. Thanks, Levivich 02:59, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Sure, Levivich, I'm happy to elaborate.
WP:MPN is the main guideline I was referring to in my closure.
WP:NAMECHANGES states "If the reliable sources written after the change is announced routinely use the new name, Wikipedia should follow suit and change relevant titles to match. If, on the other hand, reliable sources written after the name change is announced continue to use the established name, Wikipedia should continue to do so as well, as described above in 'Use commonly recognizable names'." I closed it as no consensus because there was not agreement one way or the other in this aspect.
The only part of WP:COMMONNAME that appears to talk about what to do in this situation is "When there are multiple names for a subject, all of which are fairly common, and the most common has problems, it is perfectly reasonable to choose one of the others." I don't find this relevant as there was no substantial or persistent arguments made about potential problems with either name. ––FormalDude talk 03:31, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Thanks. "Substantial or persistent arguments"? I'm not sure I saw any arguments that were insubstantial, and persistence isn't really a requirement, right? I saw broad agreement that there were multiple common names, which allowed editors to choose from among those names. I further saw both numerical and substantive agreement to choose the newer one, with supporters pointing to a number of PAGs that suggested going with the new name. The way I read your close, it seems like unless it's proven that it's the most common name, there can be no consensus? Otherwise why not go with the majority? Were the opposers' arguments stronger than the supporters? Levivich 04:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
@Levivich: I do not at all see "broad agreement that there were multiple common names." Editors claimed that there was one clear common name, but they did not agree if it was Queenstown or Komani.
A successful move does not necessarily require proving the most common name, rather, there just has to be a policy-backed consensus that one should be used over the other. Given the differing justifications for arguments from both sides, I don't see that here.
It's not a majority vote, so I can only consider the substance of each comment. To that extent, neither side's argument was particularly stronger than the others (hence the outcome of no consensus). ––FormalDude talk 05:40, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
I'm surprised you didn't see agreement that both names were common. What did you make of the Google web search, Google scholar search, Google trends, and I think over a dozen sources that participants looked at? It seemed they all showed both names in use, and no one suggested that either of the names was not common. The whole discussion appeared to me to center around which of two common names to choose. I don't want to belabor the point, but I think participants raised a lot of ALLCAPSBLUELINKS (more than we've discussed here) in examining which of the two common names to go with, and a majority agreed that policies and guidelines backed the newer name. It seems to me that your analysis only looks at whether everyone agrees one name was more common than the other and doesn't address all those other policy reasons. I'll leave it there. Levivich 06:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Megan Huntsman

Do not delete Megan Huntsman as the article is better put together than other existing articles about serial killers and her case is notable and infamous with a YouTube video about her having 1.3 million views. Shktriib1 (talk) 00:34, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

@Shktriib1: I'm not deleting it, I merely started the discussion. Please voice your concerns at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan Huntsman. ––FormalDude talk 00:59, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Flag of the United States on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Vogue (dance) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Depp v. Heard on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Stand-alone lists on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Basel Adra

You are correct - the article had been tagged for uncontroversial deletion, as opposed to a deletion discussion. My bad hasty judgement.Blue Riband► 13:15, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

No worries. ––FormalDude talk 13:16, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Question from Khayrul247 (15:42, 20 June 2022)

Assalamualikum --Khayrul247 (talk) 15:42, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

@Khayrul247: Wa alaykumu s-salam. ––FormalDude talk 15:49, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

revdel request

The revdel request on Animals in War Memorial, Ottawa, I'm really not sure about. If this were a picture of the inscriptions I don't think there would be a copyvio as commons:COM:FOP Canada would apply. For a written transcript of the inscriptions, I'm not sure as the Canadian copyright act doesn't mention a transcript. So, for the time being, I'm declining the request but it's subject to renewal on any more information. Nthep (talk) 16:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Fair point, thanks for reviewing. ––FormalDude talk 19:01, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Censorship

 – FormalDude talk 16:10, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Ranting from blocked editor

Censorship

You were very quick to remove my edit. Censorship of truth is not acceptable.

Do I need to contact an Admin? JFC62954x33 (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

@JFC62954x33: You copied your reply exactly in three locations. As it says at the top of my talk page, if I initiate a discussion at your talk page, you should reply there (which you did). There's no need to post it here and at your userpage additionally. I linked to your reply, so there's no "censorship". Please feel free to contact an admin, here's a list of recently active ones. ––FormalDude talk 16:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Censorship

Of course it is censorship. You deleted information everyone should have access to. JFC62954x33 (talk) 16:53, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Communication

I have not used wikipedia in a long time.

Besides, it seems like there were forums where a lot of people were involved in these issues? I do not seem to be able to find them. So I posting where I hope find you. Please stop censoring Accurate History. That is not right. JFC62954x33 (talk) 16:56, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Question from News TNB (23:14, 23 June 2022)

Hello my News website is thenationalbulletin.in --News TNB (talk) 23:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Question from Milkybutter (08:21, 24 June 2022)

Hello, can you help me? --Milkybutter (talk) 08:21, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello FormalDude/Archive,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 9457 articles, as of 20:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Notes
  1. ^ not including another ~6,000 redirects
  2. ^ The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Banstrike?

Hi FormalDude, with regard to your strike here, I was wondering what policy it is based on? Is it possible that you are confusing with WP:SOCKSTRIKE (also briefly mentioned at WP:TPO)? ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 10:45, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

WP:BMB. ––FormalDude talk 23:09, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
The editor wasn't yet site-banned when they made that edit. Is there some other limited ban they were violating? If so, it would perhaps be good to clarify that at your strike (as it stands now, it looks like a mistake, even if it isn't). Thanks, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 08:57, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Question from King keudo (22:49, 24 June 2022)

Hi, sorry to bother you. I'm trying to get my toes wet in editing, and I was hoping to ask a couple questions relating to an edit I would like to do, that is hopefully accepted. The Cedarville, AR article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cedarville,_Arkansas) 1) needs a picture - I live rather close and adding a picture i take would be fairly easy. Are there policy guidelines for what a picture for a US city should feature? Then, how does one go about uploading their own photo and adding to the article? 2) I was hoping to add an insert or summary on the Harry Potter religious controversy that surrounded this small town, effectively one of the few things it is notable for. Is it better to label that subsection specifically tot he Harry Potter situation, or should a more generic subsection title be used? Again, sorry if this is all beneath you, if I need to ask someone else I will. Thanks for your time, though! --King keudo (talk) 22:49, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi @King keudo, welcome to Wikipedia!
I'm not aware of any guidelines specifically for images of cities, but, if you take a look at similar articles, you'll find photos are normally of the city center (downtown) or of a notable, historical, or otherwise prominent location in the city. Take a look at this tutorial for uploading images to Wikipedia. Once uploaded, you can add the image to the article by following these instructions.
It looks like it is probably okay to add some content about the Harry Potter censorship to the article, provided you include reliable sources. I would not give it its own entire section, but a paragraph or subsection underneath history or education seems appropriate. If you do include it as a subsection, you can give a specific title.
Let me know if you need any more help! ––FormalDude talk 23:08, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Awesome, thank you so much for the help and advice! King keudo (talk) 14:41, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:30, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Question from GG.LSO on Bamboo (03:37, 28 June 2022)

Hello! I previously edited the Bamboo entry, as I found a typo of "zzzzz" (after footnote 48). However, my correction was reverted by Aishik Rehman, with no explanation. I asked, but did not get any reply in a number of days. I have done some minor edits in the past, but it has been a number of years.

I guess things have changed a bit in the years since my first edit. I tried to see how to create a edit review, but was not successful.

Thanks in advance for your assistance. --GG.LSO (talk) 03:37, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi @GG.LSO, welcome to Wikipedia! That was probably a misclick, Formal seems to have already fixed the revert and removed the Zs. when trying to contact another editor, it's helpful to mention the other editor to make sure they'll see the message (I believe using the tool you are using now and typing "@" then typing any username should open a prompt where you can ping other users). I've also added a message on your talk page that contains a few useful links Thank you for your correction and happy editing :D Justiyaya 05:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deportation of Chinese in the Soviet Union

Hi, I am the translator of Deportation of Chinese in the Soviet Union, which is now under deletion review due to User:折毛's hoax. Although the English version differed from the Chinese version created by 折毛 from the very beginning, it contained English translation of the Chinese content created by 折毛. To eliminate the impact of her content, I have validated the sources and removed all sources if they are unverifiable. Also, I have added new content backed by new reliable sources. I am thankful for your participation in the previous discussion of the deletion review, but now that the deletion review is not being relisted, I am not sure whether you might want to take a look at the new, mostly re-written, and validated version of the article and express your opinion in the deletion review. I will be most grateful to your further comment regarding any potential improvement of the article and regarding your decision in the deletion review.

---HNlander (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Disappearance of Teresa Anne Davidson-Murphy

Information icon Hello, FormalDude. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Disappearance of Teresa Anne Davidson-Murphy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm CollectiveSolidarity. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Jaan (TV series), and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 17:29, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Ignore this, just tagging the page for CSD because it is a cut and paste move. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 17:30, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
@CollectiveSolidarity: Pretty sure G6 does not apply. ––FormalDude talk 19:56, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Yeah it does. The site requires regular moves because of attribution. (See the last talk page sections here) CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 22:57, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
That only applies when there's more than one contributor, which is not the case here. ––FormalDude talk 00:21, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
My mistake I guess. Still, if you check the authors’s talk page, the other cut and paste deletes got through. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 02:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Please share your views on Similar Article List of Bengali songs recorded by Runa Laila

You've previously voted in the discussion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Bengali_songs_recorded_by_Shreya_Ghoshal. Similar article List of Bengali songs recorded by Runa Laila is considered for deletion. Would you please share your views here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Bengali_songs_recorded_by_Runa_Laila. Abbasulu (talk) 03:43, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Notability

Hi I noticed that you tagged Tang K. Tang and Kai-Nan An as non-notable despite both being inherently notable per WP:NACADEMIC criteria 3 (and additionally criteria 3 in Kai-Nan An's case). Why? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:29, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

@Horse Eye's Back: My mistake, thank you for pointing it out. ––FormalDude talk 04:35, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2022 Muhammad remarks controversy on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).

Technical news

  • user_global_editcount is a new variable that can be used in abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (T130439)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:28, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Question from Followyoursoul (08:37, 11 July 2022)

Hi! I would like to find the code for creating a description under the image. As a reference, I attach the wiki page of Christopher Nolan. Under the image there are some bullet points with text about him. Could you help me with the code for that one, please? Thank you!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Nolan --Followyoursoul (talk) 08:37, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Followyoursoul! You're either talking about an infobox or a picture with a caption. Take a look at those links and let me know if you need any more help. ––FormalDude talk 08:59, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Face of my city

Information icon Hello, FormalDude. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Face of my city, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Failed AfD nomination

Hi, FormalDude, you nominated this article I created for deletion but the AfD was created in error because you used Page Curation, Twinkle works better when nominating an article for deletion. I'm going to remove the failed template and you can re-nominate the page if you want. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 10:52, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. ––FormalDude talk 06:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Question from 247 City News (17:45, 12 July 2022)

Hey hi there Thanks for your kind assistance appreciated. you have written some very impressive articles enjoyed reading your work. Appreciated. --247 City News (talk) 17:45, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

@Queen Ash 1: Do you have any specific questions I can help you with? ––FormalDude talk 06:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Question from LUCASBONONI (23:33, 15 July 2022)

How does a professional artist create a page? --LUCASBONONI (talk) 23:33, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, LUCASBONONI. Your very first step is to comply with the conflict of interest disclosure. This is mandatory and non-negotiable, and applies whenever you edit regarding a topic where you have a financial interest, even when you are not paid specifically to edit Wikipedia. Please read and study Your first article, and follow all of the advice you will find there. ––FormalDude talk 06:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

my wikipedia webpage...

hey

you have evaluate my wikipedia webpage and it's by a random guy dissaproved... he says it's to promotional for some reason... I tell in the included site where I life and about my family tree... I don't see what's promotional in that... can you help me?? the comment is following:

July 2022[edit] 

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:20, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

my webpage(before it's deleted): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Steenhout

I've seen on your profile page you like music, so do I :) here is some Joe Satriani (he is a guitar instrumental guitarist) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4eEvb9bC9w

thank's for your patience...

Grtz

Michaël Michael Steenhout (talk) 13:20, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Michael Steenhout, thanks for reaching out, and thank you for the music.
Jimfbleak is an administrator, and I assume they mean promotional in the sense that it seems you desire a personal webpage, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Each article must meet our policies and guidelines.
I've moved your article to draftspace at Draft:Michael Steenhout, but it is likely to be declined or deleted if you do not add significant sources that demonstrate notability. ––FormalDude talk 13:37, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
thanks for the reply...
you're maybe right, i wanted a page from my own(but hey, it's not forbidden to dream)
thanks for your understanding and hope you have a beautiful day...
sometimes you win, sometimes you lose...
grtz
michael Michael Steenhout (talk) 14:41, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Bulgaria

I have closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Bulgaria as a clusterfuck. The good news is that it's largely a procedural close, so there is no prejudice against speedy renomination either individually or in really small curated batches. The bad news is that XfDcloser can't remove all the AfD templates, so I'm politely asking you to do so since you're the one who put them all there. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:26, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Will do, thanks. ––FormalDude talk 05:29, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Much appreciated :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Greetings. Per WP:BADAFD, there are a few more which need to be done. Thanks. --Finngall talk 21:48, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, FormalDude

Thank you for creating List of countries by population in 1945.

User:Robert McClenon, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

There is also a draft with the same title, and most of the numbers in the draft and in this article are completely different.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Robert McClenon}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:32, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Question from J86G (17:24, 19 July 2022)

Hi there, I would like to write a biography for someone but the system seems to require me to do various edits beforehand? Can you tell me how many I need to do please? Also will you be able to help me with the biography if I struggle in areas? --J86G (talk) 17:24, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

@J86G: In order to create a new article, you need to have made at least 10 edits over a period of more than four days. That said, it is much better to create a draft article and submit it through Articles for creation so that you can get feedback from other editors before it is created in mainspace. ––FormalDude talk 04:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Another article about a GA Seventy has been nominated for deletion

Hello. Just wanted to be sure you were aware of the newest deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LeGrand R. Curtis Jr. (2nd nomination). His current role as Church Historian and Recorder should be sufficent support to keep the article about him, but I don't know at this point of any valid argument I could make that would lead to a determination to keep this article. So I'll hold off on weighing in on this for now. Since your opinion does seem to carry more weight here for the reasons we've previously discussed, I think I will hold off on commenting on this until you post your thoughts on it. Based on my past experience with similar discussions, that seems to be the wiser course in this case at this point. Thanks. Jgstokes (talk) 08:09, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Astrology on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Question from Metro Arts on Metro Arts Theatre (05:02, 21 July 2022)

Heya - just want to edit the address details and coordinates. --Metro Arts (talk) 05:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

@Metro Arts: I left you a message on your talk page. ––FormalDude talk 18:27, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LeGrand R. Curtis Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KSL.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Question from Faridovich1965 (17:18, 21 July 2022)

hello how to highlight in blue a reference name while editting? --Faridovich1965 (talk) 17:18, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Potential edits to biographical page

Dear FormalDude. I disclosed a conflict of interest and requested some trims to the David Baszucki page here. The trims are mostly directed to undue and promotionalism issues, such as listing trivial awards (100 most intriguing executives), discussing a blog post he wrote of no significance, and listing an event he spoke at. I was hoping you might be willing to review the changes I proposed, consider them objectively on the merits, and implement or decline based on your impartial judgment. Your time and contributions are appreciated either way. Best regards. Sspielman1 (talk) 18:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Help on American Football

Can you help me on making all the class and importance not assessed yet for the WikiProject American Football? Here is the page with all the unassesed articles:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Unassessed_American_football_articles&pageuntil=Wyoming+Mustangs#mw-pages. Sportsfangnome (talk) 17:43, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

@Sportsfangnome: Sure, I can help out a little. You should install WP:RATER if you haven't already. ––FormalDude talk 01:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment, and at User:Fyunck(click)/sandbox-rfc on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:31, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GTA Online The Contract - Dr. Dre album cover.jpg

⚠
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:GTA Online The Contract - Dr. Dre album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Capitalism and genocide

Information icon Hello, FormalDude. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Capitalism and genocide, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:05, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cannabis in New Zealand on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Mentoring

Your work is really impressive and I am looking for a Wiki-Mentor. Would you be interested? --Melchior2006 (talk) 15:28, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

@Melchior2006: Yes, I'd be happy to mentor/adopt you. I offer my adoptees two options for mentorship. The first is a hands-on step-by-step approach to guiding you through the various elements of working on Wikipedia, and is not unlike a school course with assignments. The second option is more informal. I can simply steer you through key areas you're having difficulty with, and answer questions whenever you encounter problems. Please let me know which work best for you. ––FormalDude talk 21:01, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Elizabeth II on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Respect for Marriage Act on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Help with HomeLight article?

Hi there. I noticed that you seem to be pretty actively involved with the Business WikiProject, so I was wondering if you might be willing to take a look at some suggestions that were proposed back in May for the HomeLight article. (I’d love to make edits myself, but I can’t because I’m a HomeLight employee and therefore have a COI.) Thanks very much. Ilovecats9669 (talk) 18:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

 Done. ––FormalDude talk 04:43, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Username policy on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP drive award

The New Page Patrol Medal of Merit
This award is given to FormalDude for 236 reviews and 17 in the July NPP backlog reduction drive. Your contributions played a part in the 9895 reviews that took place during the drive. Thank you for your contributions. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 08:11, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

i would like to be adopted.

i know it’s a weird subject, but i’m still new here in wikipedia. i have created some articles, some of them aren’t that great, but i would like to have advice and help. currently i am feeling frustrated when i create drafts for the mainspace but then some random user created the article that i wrote and ended up being useless. here’s an example: Born Pink (someone else created it in the mainspace) - Draft:Born Pink (i created in the draftspace)

but anyways, i hope you consider to adopt me in wikipedia.

JuanGLP (talk) 00:43, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi @JuanGLP! I can certainly adopt you. I offer my adoptees two options for mentorship.
The first is an intensive program that covers many Wikipedia editing topics, including AfD, PROP, CSD, sources, GNG, SNG, copyvio tagging and etc., civility, and copyediting. It does require a lot of your time in reading the material/guidelines and working on the assignments. There is no time limit on completing the program, but most participants take around 3 months or more.
The second option is more informal. I can simply steer you through key areas you're having difficulty with, and answer questions whenever you encounter problems. We can do this for as long as you need.
Please let me know which works best for you. ––FormalDude talk 01:08, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
@FormalDude! i think the second option would be best since i am starting school in two weeks.
if you’re okay with the answer i choose, then that’s amazing! — JuanGLP (talk) 03:23, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
@JuanGLP: Sounds good. We'll use this page to communicate. ––FormalDude talk 03:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Tao of the Devil

Can you please explain why all of my work on said article was reverted without any reasoning? XXCochiseXx (talk) 04:16, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

@XXCochiseXx: I don't believe the article passed WP:NALBUM. ––FormalDude talk 04:36, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

@FormalDude: Apologies, but I don't understand. Are you referring to when the article was originally created that it didn't initially meet notability requirements according to WP:NALBUM? The sources I used were adequate and reliable, considering the rest of Bjork's album articles are lacking in references and/or are considered to be stubs. Would I need to create a duplicate article for Tao of the Devil by sending a draft through the AfC Submission process and replacing the existing redirect page? Any help is appreciated. XXCochiseXx (talk) 04:51, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

@XXCochiseXx: A standalone album article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; and that has not been accomplished here, thus it should be merged/redirected into the artist's article or discography. ––FormalDude talk 05:41, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Untitled

Comments from banned user
  • Surely US president ordered you cancel our Vietnam ? You are so blind that you dont want I can work ?
  • US people always like racist, dont you ? So when you see Vietnamese texts, you want to cancel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Betabum (talk • contribs) 01:41, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
    @Betabum: Retract your personal attack or you'll be reported. ––FormalDude talk 01:43, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
  • You blasphemed Vietnam and you had better to have a confession. Why I must served you while you blasphemed my country ?
  • US invaded Vietnam twice and killed good people, but we forgave. However, today young Americans still see us as enemies that must be eliminated from the universe. He saw that I had bad English and attacked me.

Your recent close of the BI RSN discussion

Hey man, I just wanted to add a few more words about what I said in closure review. I think, when it comes to discussions which are really contentious, and have lots of really strong opinionated voices, especially on a side I am considering closing against, but it's a grey area, I think I am (like many editors) inclined to either avoid closing it altogether or closing it as no-con rather than against those other participants. Because I would be fearful of the possibility that I get called out in the future in closure review. I say this knowing full well it makes me a chicken-shit lily-livered coward. I would avoid closing it, or give it hella hella more time, so that the consensus is robust against future challenges. Or I would send that hot potato firmly into somebody else's pocket. I don't think it reflects badly on you to be more BOLD with closes, absolutely I applaud you for being willing to close things like that. But I think I just personally wouldn't have done it because when it comes to wiki, I am very conservative about when I close things and how I close them, lol. Not necessarily a reflection on how you should close things. Just that maybe it would benefit you to protect against activists who disagree with your closures, even if it is a good thing to do controversial closures, do it in a way that makes it possible for you to keep doing controversial closures in a helpful and unimpeded way.

I hope everything is well with you in meatspace and I think back very fondly of what me and you and everyone were able to accomplish in the COVID-19 space! On my end: I'm prepping my applications to residency (hence my recent procrastination streak around here, as per usual) and just got back from a few different month-long stints working at hospitals in Boston and Seattle and San Diego! A lil sad to be back in the midwest, but so it goes.

Also here's the earworms I've had infecting me recently: [3] [4] — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 00:00, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, Shibbolethink, that's good advice. I don't think there are many discussions that I would avoid closing because of the risk of blowback from its participants, but there are certainly ones that I wouldn't close because of their controversy. I also don't really find too much of an impediment to my closure abilities from this, on the contrary, I expect my closures to be evaluated by other editors and occasionally challenged–it's a great way to learn and improve. I can respect your approach to closures though and I presume that is a more standard approach to controversial NACs than what I practice.
I am doing fine in meatspace. Those COVID times were quite productive, it was enjoyable. I know what you mean when you say it's a little sad to be back in the midwest, lol. And thank you for the tunes! ––FormalDude talk 00:47, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, FormalDude/Archive. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 03:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HouseBlastertalk 03:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Edit Revert

Can you revert this edit please it is constructive and valid. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1991_Austin_yogurt_shop_killings&type=revision&diff=1105116280&oldid=1105112023 2601:206:301:4A90:BD82:7493:843A:4A4 (talk) 19:21, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

I respect your revert. But I wanted you to know that this IP is a sock of prolific sockmaster Cadeken. See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Cadeken/Archive, who has created dozens of accounts and used even more IPs. The editing pattern is identical. IPs in southern California always pop up when a registered sock is blocked. Sundayclose (talk) 23:13, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
@Sundayclose: Yes I saw your edit summary mentioning that, but this account has not yet been banned, and the edit was constructive. Feel free to report them to a checkuser or start an SPI though. ––FormalDude talk 23:49, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
I do report registered accounts to SPI. It's pointless to report an IP because they are rarely blocked for sockpuppetry. But thanks for your reply. If I may suggest, check the location of an IP that asks you to revert in an article that is about mass killings or other violent crimes. If it's located in southern California, it's almost certainly a sock of Cadeken. Sundayclose (talk) 01:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

2023 Nigerian general election

I believed the discussion close was in error, there has been a ton of recent discussion on the subject. Watercheetah99 (talk) 04:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

@Watercheetah99: Where has there been "a ton of recent discussion"? I'm not seeing anything on the talk page within the last month. ––FormalDude talk 04:30, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, I should’ve linked it. The discussion was mainly on talk pages, most formally on the WikiProject Politics talk page. Watercheetah99 (talk) 04:34, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
@Watercheetah99: Ah, I see, thanks. I've undone my closure of the RfC. You might consider adding two options at the top of the RfC in bold in order to make clear what it is people are being asked to choose between. Also, don't forget to notify the relevant WikiProjects of your RfC. ––FormalDude talk 04:46, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Question from Mishraabhay480 on Darknet market (06:59, 25 August 2022)

Hello --Mishraabhay480 (talk) 06:59, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

@Mishraabhay480: Hi! Do you have a question I can help you with? ––FormalDude talk 07:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Not a serial killer

Ryan Scott Blinston is not a serial killer as he murdered three people but he did not kill anyone with a month gap between any of the murders and as a matter of fact his entire spree did not even last one month so he can’t be a serial killer, usually in service of abnormal psychological gratification, with the murders taking place over more than a month and including a significant period of time between them. but this idiot named Dev1357 keeps changing him to serial killer. --2601:206:301:4A90:3EA:7083:65E7:F899 (talk) 16:42, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

The article does not currently call him a serial killer, though I don't think that would be a problem as I see multiple reliable sources that call him that. ––FormalDude talk 03:09, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Redirect Geoff Young

Hi @FormalDude, I had been editing Geoff Young's page for a few weeks, largely trying to reduce its reliance on WP:SPS and trying to keep it in line with WP:BLP. You blanked the page and redirected it today with the comment "Non-notable political candidate", and while I'm not sure he meets WP:NPOL, I'm not convinced he hasn't fulfilled the general notability guidelines through being a perennial candidate for a decade in Kentucky. Anyway, my main question was whether an AfD would be more appropriate than a blanking and redirect without discussion. I think there is enough sourcing to write a decent article on the guy, there was something like 30 WP:RS on the article and it seems odd to delete it without discussion. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 23:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @TulsaPoliticsFan it's a WP:BOLD move, which you are welcome to then revert as per WP:BRD. The proper action for FormalDude would be to then open a formal redirect/deletion discussion. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 23:24, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
I don't think I'm going to revert the change. While I do think he is close to meeting WP:GNG and if there was an AFD I'd probably vote keep, I'm very tired of reverting the same edits on the page everyday because other editors keep trying to add his YouTube channel and the Ballotpedia candidate survey as sources (which I think violates WP:SPS). Also, @Shibbolethink is definitely right on 30 being too high on the WP:RS count, I just glanced at the total number of sources when the article was blanked for that number. I think the actual WP:RS count is closer to a dozen sources on closer inspection. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 15:59, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes, what Shibbole said, per WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT. If you restore the article I will most likely nominate it for AfD, as I do not believe that it meets notability guidelines. ––FormalDude talk 23:28, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
As an aside, I would say I think this guy actually does meet Wikipedia:GNG via articles like these: [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]. Are there a lot of bad non-RS cruft sources on that page also? Absolutely yes. but cruft sources in and of themselves do not mean a subject is non-notable, if there are high-quality RSes which have significant coverage. I definitely don't agree with @TulsaPoliticsFan that there were "30 RS" on the page. A lot of those are non-reliable e.g. ballotpedia, just facts, links to election results, etc. All that said, I think this is clearly a questionable article, I see why you blank/redirected it, and I would be curious to see the results of an AfD. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 23:35, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, I did not see before reverting that there was already a discussion on this on a personal talk page. I thought all the discussion had been on the Talk:Geoff Young page. I had restored FormalDude's redirect (which by the way, was reverted by a Moscow IP with similarities to another Moscow IP editing the page). Although I see more points in support of the page here by TulsaPoliticsFan, who did good work on reducing WP:SPS, I would also support Shibbolethink's suggestion to have an AfD (with redirect as an option). -- Rauisuchian (talk) 18:55, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
@TulsaPoliticsFan, Shibbolethink, and Rauisuchian: The redirect was reverted again, so I've opened an AfD. ––FormalDude talk 11:36, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Question from Followyoursoul (07:57, 26 August 2022)

Hello! My draft about 'Cristina Jacob - film director' was declined based on the reason that the subject is not qualified for a Wikipedia article. I used many reliable sources that are independent of the subject. On the other hand, Cristina Jacob is a well-known film director, with several box office records of her films, so the subject qualifies for Wikipedia. I would like this dispute to be solved and the article to be published, as it respects Wikipedia guidelines. I would appreciate a third opinion or review on my article. Thank you! --Followyoursoul (talk) 07:57, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

@Followyoursoul: Overall it looks like a notable topic. The main issue I see right now is WP:COPYQUOTE, as the article uses several long quotes. A long quotation should not be used where a shorter quotation would express the same information. An article should also not be made up of mostly quotes–consider paraphrasing the quotes in your own words instead. I made an edit to the article where I changed one quote into a paraphrase as an example. Lastly, the prose in the lead section may be better presented as a list in other sections. If you can address these issues, I'd probably accept the draft. ––FormalDude talk 08:47, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Thank you very much! I will edit according to your indications and resubmit the article asap. Followyoursoul (talk) 10:11, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello again! I edited my draft (Cristina Jacob - Film Director) following your indications and I resubmitted it. Please, can you check it and if everything is ok, accept it? Thank you very much for your help! Followyoursoul (talk) 13:58, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
@Followyoursoul: Accepted. Left a message on your talk page too. ––FormalDude talk 03:16, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Hilary Clinton at FAR

Hi, regarding your notification on my Talk Page. I have not contributed to this article. Perhaps you have mistaken me for another editor? Graham Beards (talk) 10:50, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

@Graham Beards: I just notified you because you were the one to accept/promote the article to FA status. ––FormalDude talk 10:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I have promoted hundred's of FACs. There is no need to notify the FA delegates about articles at FAR; they have enough to do already. FAC is not like GA noms. Graham Beards (talk) 11:00, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Sounds good, thanks for the info. ––FormalDude talk 11:06, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).

CheckUser changes

removed TheresNoTime

Oversight changes

removed TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Adoption

I saw on the Adoptees page (Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Adopters) That you are accepting new adoptees. I would like to be adopted to learn the ins and outs of editing. I've mostly done copy edits, but have added 1 citation on Transport Scotland, and have added Links to other articles on a few occasions. If you are willing to accept me, I live on the east coast and use EDT at the moment. I am available 5PM to 10PM on Weekdays and 10AM-10PM on weekends unless I say otherwise, which I don't often do. I have edited 27 articles last I checked. Random Editor135 (talk) 19:51, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi Random Editor135. I typically don't accept editors as new as you for adoption, but since you are willing to devote a significant amount of time, I may make an exception. What are your reasons for wanting to edit Wikipedia? What do you want to learn more about specifically? ––FormalDude (talk) 02:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I am a tech nerd and Floridian, so I can do articles about Florida and consumer electronics. I am in school still, so I am able to do articles about language arts and science, as those are my best classes. But I am unable to start until Friday as I have family coming over this week. Random Editor135 (talk) 16:36, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
@Random Editor135: If you're still interested let me know and I'll setup your adoption program. ––FormalDude (talk) 00:33, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Sure thing! Random Editor135 (talk) 15:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC) Random Editor135 (talk) 15:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
@Random Editor135: Great, you can get started at User:FormalDude/Mentorship/Random Editor135 whenever you're ready. ––FormalDude (talk) 04:02, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
I have read and taken notes on User:FormalDude/Mentorship/Random Editor135, and I think I understand everything, so I am ready for the test whenever you are. Random Editor135 (talk) 16:57, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
@Random Editor135: The test is up. Ping me on that page when you're done. ––FormalDude (talk) 22:18, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

What happens when an RfC expires and nobody has closed it?

What to do about the Tudor Dixon RfC? Seems that is has expired, without closure. Cheers! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 19:29, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Now we wait. ––FormalDude (talk) 23:37, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Ah okay, so we're in the queue somewhere. :)
Just wanted to be sure the RfC didn't disappear into the ether.
Thanks! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 01:36, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Oh! Just noticed that it was closed with no consensus. Cheers! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 01:57, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
We weren't in any queue, and it can just disappear into the ether occasionally, per WP:RFCCLOSE. If we had had to wait longer I would've listed it at WP:Closure requests. ––FormalDude (talk) 03:39, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Cool, thanks! Nice knowing better about how this works. 98.155.8.5 (talk) 05:35, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi

Hi sir/ma'am can you held me about Toddst1 (talk · contribs) he/she removing my edits about tge page Jam Agarao. — Einahr (talk) 04:25, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

@Einahr: The subject's birthday needs to be verified by a reliable, published source. Original research is not permitted. ––FormalDude (talk) 04:31, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Bluevine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bluevine, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bluevine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Edit notices and restrictions

Hi. So, look, you're not in fact permitted to create edit notices that impose restrictions, as you did with Template:Editnotices/Page/Hunter Biden laptop controversy, nor choose the type of restriction (naked 1RR, CR, or EBRD). In future, please leave these decisions with admins. Thanks. El_C 06:24, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the information, El C. That's the only DS edit notice I've ever created, and I did it because someone complained at AE that they didn't know DS applied because there was no edit notice, and because DS enforcing administrators must add an editnotice to restricted pages and this was not done despite an administrator declaring the page restricted. It was bad luck that I happened to incorrectly classify the type of restriction, but I wouldn't have done it in any other circumstance. ––FormalDude (talk) 06:39, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Sure np. It probably wouldn't even had been noticed by anyone had you not chose the more arcane EBRD over normal WP:1RR. Anyway, next time, just ask at WP:AN or whatever. Cheers! El_C 06:43, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
@El C: Now I'm a bit confused. It appears Doug Weller applied EBRD with this edit rather than 1RR. Was that a mistake by them? ––FormalDude (talk) 06:49, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Yes, it was. All due respect to Doug, EBRD is too complicated and has too many moving pieces (and unlike the other beyond-1RR restriction, WP:CRP, there isn't even a project page for it). Which is why no one was adhering to it. Outside of very small groups, it would really take an admin dedicated to that page for it to work. And those are hard to come by. El_C 07:01, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
@El C: I've left a note about this on the article talk page. I strongly disagree that the 24-BRD is a bad restriction. I also do not see "nobody adhering to it". Do you have any specifics? I know that a few editors have been making undocumented allegations on user talk pages, but they don't provide diffs, and the only case I can find among those is the reinstatement of an inline article improvement template that arguably shouldn't have been removed. This 24-BRD has been in effect for quite some time on our most active AP articles, and it's worked very well and with few enforcement issues rising to require Admin attention. I really hope you'll reinstate the page restriction as it stood. SPECIFICO talk 14:23, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
SPECIFICO, it is a bad restriction. Splitting the discussion will not work to alleviate that. And the fact is that a single admin creating this custom WP:ACDS page restriction, then adding it to multiple WP:AP2 pages, was done without ArbCom's consent. By all means, take it to WP:ARCA and ask them. El_C 17:35, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
@El C: Thanks for you reply. Could you explain what you mean by splitting the discussion? Would you prefer I not respond on this page? Actually, in the recently completed review, Arbcom codified 24-BRD alongside 1RR and CR as one of three greenlit page restrictions. As I said on the article talk page and above, it has been highly effective at minimizing conflict and Admin intervention at our most active AP articles. The restriction on that page was not added by @Awilley:. In his earlier days in the DS area, Awilley had many missteps and made a few errors, some of which was discussed in the DS review and specifically deprecated. But hats off to him for devising this sanction, about which I've never heard any complaint. If you didn't want me to post this here, one of us can move it to the article page or whatever other location you prefer. Also I wonder whether you have the impression that this restriction was widely violated or caused problems at that page. I'm not aware of any except for the template glitch that FormalDude correcte. SPECIFICO talk 18:32, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
The discussion is on the article talk page, where it belongs. You are splitting it by having it in two places at once. Please stop. Again, appeal at WP:ARCA, if you wish to see EBRD restored to that page. That's it. El_C 18:35, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
You are aware, I hope, that I only posted here because you did. If you had not split your own engagement, I would not have come to a random user talk page. SPECIFICO talk 18:43, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
I posted here, to FormalDude's talk page, about not creating WP:ACDS edit notices, SPECIFICO. Nothing to do with you. You've inserted yourself here, not the other way around. El_C 18:47, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Actually, in the recently completed review, Arbcom codified 24-BRD alongside 1RR and CR as one of three greenlit page restrictions. @SPECIFICO Do you have a link to this case? A search of the archives turned up nothing. PhotogenicScientist (talk) 19:36, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
[11] there's associated discussion, I believe in the long archive of this year-long review process. SPECIFICO talk 19:43, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of touch ArbCom operating by inertia, okay, what else is new. But the fact is years ago there was overwhelming consensus among admins to pull the breaks on it. I guess lobbying for this arcane, user unfriendly restriction worked. Oh well. El_C 19:57, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
@SPECIFICO I see no discussion at the link you provided. I do see discussion after following a link back one page, to here, but there was not substantial discussion of the sanctions themselves - merely that codifying them was a good idea. That seems like tacit endorsement to me, at best.
@El C when/where was the discussion where admins reached consensus to "pull the breaks on it?" PhotogenicScientist (talk) 21:13, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
There was a lengthy discussion about beyond-1RR sanctions at WP:AN. I think it was back in 2019. I don't know how to easily find it right now. But it did set the tone for future AE practices in a significant way is the point. El_C 21:18, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
@El C Might it be this one? PhotogenicScientist (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Yes. El_C 21:34, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Feminist views on transgender topics on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Black children as alligator bait for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black children as alligator bait is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black children as alligator bait until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Yngvadottir (talk) 23:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Beekeeping

@Baffle gab1978:  Thank you very much! ––FormalDude (talk) 07:28, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Overflow from Talk:Kanye West § Removing "most influential" from the lede

Extended content

You did not actually cite that reason in your first revert. Make sure to cite your reasons the first time in order not to give off the appearance of WP:STATUSQUOSTONEWALLING. Citing the protection of the status quo as the sole reason for reverting when the edit has not yet been disputed is insufficient. I am glad to see that you're now participating in discussion. Throast {{ping}} me! (talk | contribs) 06:42, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

FormalDude, your edits are disruptive. You cited WP:STATUSQUO but have selectively ignored the first exception, you failed to add appropriate inline tags indicating the text is under discussion, and you ignore WP:SQS. There is clear consensus in the talk currently, to remove that unverifiable statement. — hako9 (talk) 09:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

@Hako9: So instead of adding the inline tags yourself, you decide to just continue edit warring? And there's no consensus on the talk page at all. I suggest you self revert. ––FormalDude (talk) 10:20, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
No consensus "at all"? There are two editors in full agreement with a third, and a fourth who reluctantly conceded that "most influential" is not adequately supported. Right now, there is consensus that "influential" is inappropriate; an alternative has not yet been agreed upon. Throast {{ping}} me! (talk | contribs) 10:28, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
I suggest you tone your language down, dude. Adding the inline tags was your job. Not "someone like me". I also suggest you to not edit articles in which you are so emotionally invested in. — hako9 (talk) 10:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Never said "someone like you" to you, but if you want to keep trying to victimize yourself I guess I can't stop you. If adding the inline tags was my job and I forgot, that's a reason to add them yourself, not continue edit warring. ––FormalDude (talk) 02:33, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
The only one edit warring is you. What's with your comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shera Bechard? The first thing you curiously did after replying to me here, is hop on there to make a point? — hako9 (talk) 13:58, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Read the policies

You might like to read Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars and WP:BATTLEGROUND. — hako9 (talk) 00:54, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

If you edit war you're gonna get templated for it, doesn't matter how experienced you may be, a warning notification is a requirement. ––FormalDude (talk) 02:33, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefan Machel

Hello, FormalDude,

Is there a reason you relisted this AFD discussion a half a day early? It was relisted like 10 hours ahead of time. There is no need to close AFDs early or rush the process. There is no hurry to do these steps. Liz Read! Talk! 07:44, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

My mistake, won't happen again. Thanks Liz. ––FormalDude (talk) 09:09, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

ANI

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — hako9 (talk) 12:17, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FormalDude/Archive/_9&oldid=1147479376"