Jump to content

User talk:FloridaArmy/Archive 47

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 40←Archive 45Archive 46Archive 47Archive 48Archive 49Archive 50

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bullock County High School has been accepted

Bullock County High School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chetsford (talk) 00:37, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oft in the Silly Night has been accepted

Oft in the Silly Night, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 23:09, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Cool. Thanks User:DGG. God bless you and your family. Happy and healthy 2021 and beyond to you and yours. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:09, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Bailey (historian) (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Per WP:NAUTHOR.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 00:51, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
I agree he's borderline as far as current Wikipedia standards for authors and scholars, but I think an Ignore All the Rules inclusion might be warranted. His book on African American legislators in Alabama during Reconstruction moved the ball, made some waves, and garnered him quite a bit of attention. Hopefully someone can turn up some reviews and get him across the finish line. It's subject matter that's worth including and he did noteworthy research work. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:12, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George W. Braxdell has been accepted

George W. Braxdell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 02:57, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nimrod Snoddy has been accepted

Nimrod Snoddy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 03:03, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Datus Ensing Coon has been accepted

Datus Ensing Coon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 03:12, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: D. E. Coon has been accepted

D. E. Coon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 03:15, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Category

So I just discovered that there is a category for African-American state legislators: Category:African-American state legislators in (insert state). For example, your recent Alabama bios should be in the category Category:African-American state legislators in Alabama. You may want to consider going back and adding them to this category using HotCat. Curbon7 (talk) 03:18, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

User:Curbon7, one issue we face is how to deal with legislators innthe years after Reconstruction. Are we still categorizing them as Reconstruxtion era? Is any year too long after the end of Reconstruction to be included? Is 1876 a hard cutoff or soft? 1883? 1890? This is not a big issue for Alabama as, at least fo the legislature, only 2 were elected in 1878 and after that none. But other states continued to habe legislators for some years after 1876. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jesse Duke has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jesse Duke. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:44, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Bradwell has been accepted

William Bradwell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 07:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry Cruse has been accepted

Harry Cruse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Pahunkat (talk) 15:18, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles H. Pearce (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pahunkat was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Charles H. Pearce instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This appears to cover the same subject as the article Charles H. Pearce. Please ping me if I've got it wrong. Thanks,
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Pahunkat (talk) 17:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, FloridaArmy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pahunkat (talk) 17:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: G. Mildred Thompson has been accepted

G. Mildred Thompson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Barkeep49 (talk) 22:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seaborn Kennamer has been accepted

Seaborn Kennamer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Blablubbs|talk 22:34, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Perman has been accepted

Michael Perman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Blablubbs|talk 22:40, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Nationalist (Mobile, Alabama) has been accepted

The Nationalist (Mobile, Alabama), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 23:18, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Reconstruction era politicians

I'm not going to accept these based only a single book. If they held office, there will be an official source also. DGG ( talk ) 00:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

I don't think I submitted any with only one source? FloridaArmy (talk) 00:24, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

RE: Draft:Thomas Diggs

This draft will be accepted. The only hold-up is that there is an existing redirect, so I need to wait for an admin to delete it so I can accept your draft. This may take longer than 12 hours, so be patient. Curbon7 (talk) 12:20, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Great. Thanks User:Curbon7. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
FloridaArmy, This is redirect taking forever to be deleted. If an admin hasn't deleted it by midday tomorrow, I'll just do a copy-paste move of your draft. Curbon7 (talk) 13:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Curbon7, please don't do that. I've just deleted the redirect. In the future, it would help if you specify in the G6 template which article is intended to replace the page, as I had to figure it out by going through your recent contributions history. signed, Rosguill talk 22:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Rosguill, Ah ok sorry about that. Curbon7 (talk) 01:53, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Diggs has been accepted

Thomas Diggs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 02:10, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Gaskin has been accepted

William Gaskin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 02:47, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Theresa Pulszky (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Is potentially notable, but not in the current state.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 04:36, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederick Hill (politician) has been accepted

Frederick Hill (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 04:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Samuel Spearing

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Samuel Spearing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:00, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norris Johnson has been accepted

Norris Johnson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 10:59, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mildred Sledge has been accepted

Mildred Sledge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 11:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Louis A. Martinet has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Louis A. Martinet. Thanks! Paul ❬talk❭ 11:32, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fuller Pep has been accepted

Fuller Pep, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:27, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gregory J. W. Urwin

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gregory J. W. Urwin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:42, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zebulon Elijah has been accepted

Zebulon Elijah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 08:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah Woolfolk Wiggins has been accepted

Sarah Woolfolk Wiggins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Paul ❬talk❭ 10:16, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel C. Martin has been accepted

Daniel C. Martin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Pahunkat (talk) 16:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel Spearing has been accepted

Samuel Spearing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 23:47, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Vincent (historian) (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I'm not sure this passes either WP:NPROF or WP:AUTHOR.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 09:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Hearne Academy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hearne Academy. Thanks! -- and I think it helps if I make friendly comments and advice, even just to get my username on it. DGG ( talk ) 18:13, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jessie Arnold (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:BIO and WP:NACTOR.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Clarityfiend (talk) 05:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of African-American officeholders during the Reconstruction era, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Granville Bennett, Samuel Anderson and John Lea.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gladys Coburn has been accepted

Gladys Coburn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 09:51, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meacham Park (neighborhood) has been accepted

Meacham Park (neighborhood), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Hannibal White has been accepted

John Hannibal White, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:57, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jessie Arnold has been accepted

Jessie Arnold, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 TT me 15:22, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Journey of an African Colony has been accepted

Journey of an African Colony, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lauren Castillo has been accepted

Lauren Castillo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Politicians

Hey, I'll accept the politician stubs you have if you can show me a source that verifies they served in the legislature. (Something from the state legislature archives works) AfC reviewers get our asses chewed out by New Page Patrollers and Deletion folks all the time for letting things through before later finding out they were hoaxes or claims were unverified. Here's a source I found from the Florida Legislature. Bkissin (talk) 14:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

User:Bkissin appreciate your generous offer. Keep in mind that for the Reconstruction era there were often disputes over elections and many elected representatives were removed from office or prevented from serving in office. There seem to be some definitive books, at least for most of the Southern states, and I would think those should suffice. More recently, state legislaturea have taken to honoring the African Americans who served and have published lists. Other editors have made clear multiple sources are needed. It's always a crapshoot with AfC. Not trying to look a gift horse in the mouth, as the saying goes. Fortunately, most of the legislature submissions have been successful of late. I always try to include at least a few refs but for some of the individuals there isn't an awful lot I find off the bat. Pinning down various spellings and abbreviations of their names (common in the 19th century) also complicates.matters. Again, I appreciate your generous offer an am trying to include as many as I can with some details and references as best I can. FloridaArmy (talk) 15:20, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, for many of your South Carolina stubs I went with the motion to honor black legislators, so that'll be fine. Find what you can on this topic and leave a comment on the talk page if you run into any issues. Bkissin (talk) 15:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Great, thanks User:Bkissin. Unfortunately for South Carolina the standard text coverinf these individuals is South Carolina Negro Legislators: a Glorious Success: State and Local Officeholders; Biographies of Negro Representatives, 1868-1902 by Lawrence Chesterfield Bryant, South Carolina State College, 1974 which is out of print, only showing snippets on Google Books, and somewhat hard to come by (not widely held and not inexpensive when it can be found at online sellers). Perhaps I'll splurged. I try not to rely too heavily on the standard texts because it seems a bit unfair to use the bits these scholars found on each of these legislators. I do my best. FloridaArmy (talk) 15:35, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
And don't get me wrong, the standard texts are fine, but it just gives the case more gravitas if it can be confirmed from the source. Sourcing is the major issue with a lot of these systemic bias topics. I remember somebody submitting an article to AfC about a castle where the actual article mentioned that its location was unknown and there wasn't a lot written about it. Since Wikipedia relies on subjects having quality stuff written about them, especially stuff that can be verified (not just "my buddy Tom said that he saw a commercial for it once") these articles often fail review. Unfortunately, this also hits articles like yours. When elected politicians are effectively erased out of history, how can you find the sources to show they existed and that they were relevant, especially when we are dealing with people who lived 150 years ago and didn't have the same kind of media-heavy coverage that we have today? Reviewers are trying to straddle that line, where we are letting in articles about notable people, but keeping out articles about places and subjects unknown. Bkissin (talk) 16:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Joseph P. Skelly has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Joseph P. Skelly. Thanks! Bkissin (talk) 21:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: J. Milton Turner School has been accepted

J. Milton Turner School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

 Velella  Velella Talk   21:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
You have written probably the most Wikipedia drafts of anyone I've seen... keep up the good work! Thanoscar21talkcontributions 18:08, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks Thanoscar21!!! I'm almost done. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
FloridaArmy, you know that you don't need to go through AfC, right? Just thought that that would save time for you. You can just make a redlink in your sandbox and create the page from there. You'd probably receive the autopatrolled permission at WP:PERM if you asked. Thanks, Thanoscar21talkcontributions 22:52, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Actually, I do. My punishment for creating too many articles. Happy New Year 2021!!! FloridaArmy (talk) 23:55, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Happy new year to you, too! Thanoscar21talkcontributions 21:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Canfield (actor) has been accepted

William Canfield (actor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 00:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Joseph Seiden has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Joseph Seiden. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 05:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Soule Spencer has been accepted

George Soule Spencer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 16:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Francis L. Wing

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Francis L. Wing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Twilight, North Carolina

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Twilight".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesse Duke has been accepted

Jesse Duke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Daniel Albert Reamer

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daniel Albert Reamer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Scarborough (writer) has been accepted

George Scarborough (writer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 21:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Woodsworth, North Carolina

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Woodsworth".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Edward Renfrow

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Edward Renfrow".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Goldberg has been accepted

Jack Goldberg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 03:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Samuel Nuckles

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Samuel Nuckles".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:56, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Vincent (historian) has been accepted

Charles Vincent (historian), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Brooklyn (Charlotte, North Carolina) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Brooklyn (Charlotte, North Carolina). Thanks! Hatchens (talk) 13:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brooklyn (Charlotte, North Carolina) has been accepted

Brooklyn (Charlotte, North Carolina), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:56, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jay Samuel Stowell has been accepted

Jay Samuel Stowell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:39, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Zeinab Soleimani

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zeinab Soleimani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:59, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Queen City Drug Company has been accepted

Queen City Drug Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chetsford (talk) 08:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Elliott Stanmore Jerome Hayes

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elliott Stanmore Jerome Hayes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Darlington Memorial Cemetery

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Darlington Memorial Cemetery".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:09, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ovide Gregory (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chicdat was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel Nuckles has been accepted

Samuel Nuckles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eternal Shadow Talk 20:10, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Marcy Klauber

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marcy Klauber".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ricky Cox (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NACADEMIC, WP:MUSICIAN and WP:BIO.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Clarityfiend (talk) 23:23, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph P. Skelly (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Berrely was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Own works are primary sources, then other sources are directory listings, "Discogs", which is considered generally unreliable in WP:RSP, a non linked YouTube video which is unreliable per WP:UGC, and more directory listings. The only reliable source I can find here is the Grove Music Online listing, which I luckily have access to (there's not much else except a list of works and bibliography).
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 08:52, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otis M. Moore (January 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Clarityfiend was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Only passing mentions in the sources cited, except for a few lines in Illustrated History.
Clarityfiend (talk) 23:27, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Baltimore Association for the Moral and Intellectual Improvement of the Colored People

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Baltimore Association for the Moral and Intellectual Improvement of the Colored People".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:46, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Oliver J. Coleman

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oliver J. Coleman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: August Meier has been accepted

August Meier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 07:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Polygonella robusta

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Polygonella robusta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:04, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FloridaArmy/Archive_47&oldid=1139690159"