Jump to content

User talk:Farhan Literary

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Farhan Literary, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Sarah (talk) 05:39, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jakarta

[edit]

Is already an oversized, over linked and cluttered article - please understand that unless something has WP:RS or cites - it will be removed SatuSuro 03:30, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Farhan, if you don't start communicating and cease your unconstructive solo style edits, you will be blocked. If you can't speak ENglish, then you shouldn't be editing English wikipedia. --Merbabu (talk) 01:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re-inserting reverted material

[edit]

you have now re-inserted material that has no WP:RS to support its inclusion - more than once.

Please read very very carefully WP:3RR - if you do not - you will be blocked if you treat the jakarta article like WP:OWN SatuSuro 03:50, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jakarta

[edit]

Please do not reinstate info that has been removed without discussion on the talk page. The removals have been explained in the edit summaries. You should also use edit summaries. You must communicate with other editors on wikipedia. If you do not, you might be blocked. thank you --Merbabu (talk) 06:34, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have made talk page comment or used the edit summaries to communicate despite the above request. Please do so. --Merbabu (talk) 08:01, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

[edit]

Please use edit summaries. see WP:ES. otherwise, if your edits are not explained, they may be reverted. thank you --Merbabu (talk) 00:50, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jakarta, you may be blocked from editing. Merbabu (talk) 01:17, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

??Huh??

[edit]

You have been reverted a number of times since you started editing- and you have shown no sign of communicating with other editors, or more importantly - you have not used edit summaries to explain your edits.

This is Wikipedia English - if you are capable of understanding and using english- you should explain your edits - otherwise you will find yourself blocked.

Kalau ada bahasa indonesia saja - mungkin tempat ini belum cocok - disini harus bercakap dalam inggeris... untuk dapat keterangan - orang harus mengerti bagaimana.... kalau tak bisa, mungkin coba pada wikipedia id - SatuSuro 11:56, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

and, jelasinnya sudah cukap banyak. :-| --Merbabu (talk) 09:20, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

[edit]

Maybe because your edits does't improve articles. Let me know if you need any help.

Salma Vian (talk) 03:15, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 

A number of editors have had to fix this editor's work (generally removal of the edits) repeatedly. Ample description in edit summaries, and talk page comments have been provided. The editor has not once be seen to even repsond, let alone address the issues. Yet, they repeatedly reinstate the changes (with no explanations).
If an editor cannot or will not communicate with other editors, then one has to question there ability to continue here. While everyone's happy to help out a new editor, this appears to be turning into a waste of editors' time in this case. --Merbabu (talk) 03:32, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as seen in Jakarta, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Merbabu (talk) 06:18, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

[edit]

Hello! I looked at your talk page and it seems that Admins and other editors think your work is unconstructive and is considered vandalism. To understand Wikipedia better click on this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tutorial. Have a great day! (:

Webclient101 (talk) 19:56, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 

Jakarta - yet again...

[edit]

You've reinstated your changes again. It's clear that wikipedia is not the place for you. You do not communicate or attempt to address the concerns of other editors. You have not used an article or editor talk page once. You have not used an edit summary. My recommendation is that you be blocked indefinitely from wikipedia. --Merbabu (talk) 07:21, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What are we to do? He just keeps reinstating without edit summaries and without using talk pages. There is no evidence that he evens knows about these messages. This is wikipedia at its worst. what a waste of time. It's been long enough. But, no doubt if he's blocked, he'll just create a sock. --Merbabu (talk) 00:26, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for ignoring consensus. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:29, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks! I never lost my faith in wikipedia. lol --Merbabu (talk) 00:30, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]