Jump to content

User talk:Euor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Euor, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 15:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cody Reeder (January 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 15:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Euor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cody Reeder has been accepted

[edit]
Cody Reeder, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creepTalk 20:48, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allegations of intellectual property theft by China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RSA. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demydivka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Propaganda in Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anti-Western.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Euor. Thank you for creating Serapio. User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the page!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Barnstar of Diligence
Thank you for creating Child abductions in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Your effort has allowed Wikipedia to have coverage of a topic of major international importance; thank you for being the first one to take the step of ensuring that Wikipedia has standalone coverage of it. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 16:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion
added links pointing to Britain, Diversity, Fairness, Identity, Disparity, Equality, Litmus test and Kyle Duncan

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of intellectual property theft by China

[edit]
  • Kelly, Liam. "China's Future Aerospace 'stole trade secrets', says Smiths (Harlow)". thetimes.co.uk. Archived from the original on 10 August 2021. Retrieved 30 March 2023.
  • <ref name="thetimes/03pg2m90j">{{cite news |last1=Kelly |first1=Liam |title=China’s Future Aerospace ‘stole trade secrets’, says Smiths (Harlow) |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/chinas-future-aerospace-stole-trade-secrets-says-smiths-harlow-03pg2m90j |access-date=30 March 2023 |work=[[thetimes.co.uk]] |archive-url=https://archive.is/9rSEc#selection-839.33-839.75 |archive-date=10 August 2021 |language=en}}</ref>
  • <ref name="cbc/47-1.6205546">{{cite news |title=The vaccine: What went wrong with the CanSino deal? |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/fifth-estate-the-vaccine-47-1.6205546 |access-date=30 March 2023 |work=[[The Fifth Estate (TV series)]] |publisher=[[CBC News]]}}</ref>
  • <ref name="cbc/1.6208241">{{cite news |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/cansino-deal-canada-nrc-fifth-estate-1.6208241 |title=How a failed deal with China to produce a made-in-Canada COVID-19 vaccine wasted months and millions |access-date=30 March 2023 |work=[[The Fifth Estate (TV series)]] |publisher=[[CBC News]]}}</ref>
....0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 19:48, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ruscism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oligarch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BTM-3 moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, BTM-3, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:39, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Jo-Jo Eumerus

[edit]
Hello, Euor. You have new messages at Talk:Desert kite.
Message added 08:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diversity, equity, and inclusion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merit.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diversity, equity, and inclusion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public school.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ruscism for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruscism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruscism (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 04:58, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Mellk (talk) 13:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also as you are not extended confirmed, you cannot make edits on articles with content about Russia-Ukraine war per WP:GS/RUSUKR. Thanks. Mellk (talk) 13:06, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Uhm @Mellk:, you do know I literally first created the page on Child abductions in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, for which I was rewarded a barnstar by @Red-tailed hawk:, among other crucial articles on this war? (It has been significantly expanded since then by a great team of editors). But whatever, if I knew there was a load of bureaucratic technicalities I guess I should have not bothered, and left it to the holy caste of extended confirmed users... All of this seems very odd. Anyways, if this is what Wiki wants, I'll stop contributing on this important topic...--Euor (talk) 14:40, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The general sanctions were placed in October 2022. You only need 500 edits to reach extended-confirmed. Mellk (talk) 14:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I seem rather stuck then, as my main drive to restart my editing was this war (I abandoned my previous user on Wiki years ago). We’ll see if I find something to edit in the meanwhile, then… I do have other edits. Thanks. Euor (talk) 14:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
From where you currently are, you need to make something like 17 copyedits before you can continue editing on topics involving the Russia-Ukraine war. Unforturnately, them's the rules, even though you've been very productive in this area before. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, thanks guys. I might have seemed a little cranky, but you are right, rules are rules! Thanks for giving me the heads up Mellk, and thanks for the details and pep-talk Red-railed hawk. Euor (talk) 15:05, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I should have elaborated more on the rules in the beginning to be fair, I did not realize you were close anyway, I can see why it would have put you off, so my fault there. Mellk (talk) 15:09, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:BTM-3

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Euor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BTM-3, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft submission

[edit]

I know you weren't technically the one to submit the draft, but since you wrote it, I thought I'd notify you, as well.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Edward-Woodrow was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Two sources present demonstrate only passing coverage. The Washington Post source is a bit borderline, given that it's fairly in depth, but even if I considered that "significant coverage", the topic still wouldn't be presumed to be notable under WP:GNG as the NYT source is definetly only passing coverage; thus, not multiple sources.

On the other hand, no concerns about source reliability!

I think this topic does have potential to be notable, and an interesting article, so I'd suggest fishing around on Google Books and so forth. I found this source from the Russian Wikipedia article that could be useful, although I'm a tad skeptical of reliability. this article could help count towards GNG.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:BTM-3

[edit]

Hello, Euor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "BTM-3".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:17, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Euor&oldid=1258293782"