User talk:Ethank76
Welcome, Ethank76!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions!
You might like to check out our tutorial, a resource created especially for new users like yourself.
You also may want to introduce yourself to the community at the new user log.
If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or at our questions forum.
I hope very much you enjoy being here with us, and I wish you luck with your contributions.
Greenwich: 3rd February not January[edit]
Hello... think you may have jumped the gun a bit. According to the council and every source i've seeen Greenwich becomes a royal borough on 3rd Feb, not 3rd Jan.
"There’s been a short delay in converting Greenwich from a dowdy old London borough to a shiny new royal borough, councillors heard last night – with the changeover now due to take place on Friday 3 February, a month later than previously expected." [1]
- "Greenwich to become Royal Borough on 3 February". Greenwich Council. 9 January 2012. Retrieved 14 January 2012.
- "Greenwich becomes Royal Borough on Friday 3rd February 2012". Eltham Association for Commerce. Retrieved 14 January 2012.
- "Greenwich Council leader Councillor Chris Roberts unveils royal borough designation celebration details". News Shopper. 8 January 2012. Retrieved 14 January 2012.
- Powell, Rob. "New coat of arms for Royal Greenwich revealed". greenwich.co.uk. Retrieved 14 January 2012.
Lozleader (talk) 13:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Ooops. I don't know how to change back. Thanks. Ethank76 (talk) 13:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Think I've sorted it out... have to move it again in a couple fo weeks :-) Lozleader (talk) 15:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi!
I've tweaked the article a little bit. I saw that you used multiple references using the same website so I did something called <ref name="FCC Enviornment" /> which allows you to put multiple references in different locations using the same reference name. It's a useful tool especially if you plan on using one website citation for multiple locations.
I've also tweaked it with some format codes that will make the overall article look cleaner and more up to Wikistandard.
Good Editing! --A Wild Abigail Appears! Capture me. Moves. 20:35, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your help! Ethank76 (talk) 20:46, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 10 May[edit]
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Denbigh, Milton Keynes page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 13[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Bletchley Landfill Site (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Arable
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Bletchley Landfill Site[edit]
Hello, Ethank76,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Bletchley Landfill Site should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bletchley Landfill Site .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, McDoobAU93 18:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Newton Longville Brickworks[edit]
Hello, Ethank76,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Newton Longville Brickworks should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newton Longville Brickworks .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, McDoobAU93 18:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
A page you started (Newton Leys Primary School) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating Newton Leys Primary School, Ethank76!
Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I've done a bit of general cleanup. I've moved references so all follow straight after a full stop and then have a space after before the next sentence. I've put a break after every address line, added a references section and a category. I've also removed a frame around the logo, which isn't necessary. Hope that's OK.
To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Orphaned non-free image File:UKCCA logo.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:UKCCA logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 19 June 2020 (UTC)