User talk:Eshwar.om/Archive 1

Disambiguation link notification for January 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bangalore Karaga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tamils in Bangalore, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tamil and Central College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Krishna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bangalore Tamils concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bangalore Tamils, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. ƬheStrike Σagle ^sorties 11:47, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to tell your opinion in English....please don't be offensive... Cheers, ƬheStrike Σagle ^sorties 11:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting[edit]

Please take care of the formatting of the article while editing it...you just destroyed the formatting of Andhra Pradesh article with that edit. Take care, ƬheStrike Σagle ^sorties 12:54, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Eshwar.om, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Tamils in Bangalore has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. and the earlier versionWikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bangalore Tamils Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 13:17, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. You have copied from several articles into Tamils in Bangalore without attribution, thus violating the copyright of the editors who created those texts. Dougweller (talk) 13:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hi all[edit]

Will be back after one month.bye all.take care with your edits .all the best.

you are sill here editing and receiving warnings? :-) Andhrawala2014 (talk) 06:52, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

~~You are WP:CHERRYPICKING from the three different sources in Andhra Pradesh page. Please stop your disruptive edits.~~Andhrawala2014 (talk) 06:30, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~You are violating the following~~

WP:NPOV (policy): Neutral point of view, by selectively presenting one point of view from a source that actually includes both

WP:OR (policy): No original research, by presenting a statement not supported by any source, not even the cited sourcing

WP:UNDUE (policy): Not giving undue weight to a view, by omitting information that shows that it is relatively unimportant

WP:FRINGE (guideline): Not giving a fringe view undue weight, by omitting information that shows that it is a fringe view

~~WP:RS (guideline): Not using a reliable source, by omitting information that would show unreliability in Andhra Pradesh Talk page~~

Andhrawala2014 (talk) 06:35, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

* Please stop editing an article or group of articles in pursuit of a certain point for an extended time despite opposition from other editors.

Please do not cite unencyclopedic sources, misrepresents reliable sources, or manufactures original research in the talk page.

Please do not disregard other editors' questions or requests for explanations concerning edits or objections to edits.

Please do not disregard other editors' explanations for their edits.

~~Please do not resist moderation and/or requests for comment, continue to edit in pursuit of a certain point despite an opposing consensus from impartial editors.~~

If you repeat this behavior, I will request admins to block you.Andhrawala2014 (talk) 06:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[1] LOL!!! What a thunderstorm! I've corrected the sentence according to the source [2]. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I dont disagree that its in the source but the thing is the existing line doesnt change the meaning or spirit of the article. He is just giving undue weight to this thing which is not the right behavior. Andhrawala2014 (talk) 07:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly has been given "undue weight"? And how does this justify your misuse of Wiki-policies? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 13:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Joshua, @Andhrawala2014:, in what way is Eshwar giving undue weight. This is a pure misinterpretation and misuse of policies. You just seem to have shot yourself in the foot. — LeoFrank ^Talk 14:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Andhrawala2014: Another one. Looks like you just want to keep reverting Eshwar without any clear and logical explanation! You need to stop this, else it will be you who would end up being blocked. — LeoFrank ^Talk 14:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Sanskrit[edit]

I have reverted your edits to the Sanskrit article: please exercise some thought and care on where you insert content. Not all the content is irrelevant to the article, but all of it was irrelevant to the places you inserted them. Shreevatsa (talk) 06:40, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sanskrit

added a link pointing to Grantha

Shaivism

added a link pointing to Tamil

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rakshasa[edit]

Please see: MOS:IMAGES and WP:IDD. Thanks JimRenge (talk) 08:08, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vishnu, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tamil and Sri Ranganathaswamy Temple. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Redtigerxyz. Your recent edit to the page Kamsa appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please refrain from removing references. Prove with WP:RS that Kamsa was an asura/rakshasa and not human before adding this erroneous statement. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:16, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Rakshasa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. JimRenge (talk) 14:42, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note that File:Vishnu CholaBronze Tamilnadu.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion. Dougweller (talk) 15:11, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And File:Vishnu chola period from Tirumalainaick palaceMadurai Tamil Nadu.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougweller (talk • contribs) 15:24, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sant Tukaram (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'''''Sant Tukaram''''' , ''Sant Tukārām'') also known as '''''Saint Tukaram''''', is a 1936 [[Marathi language|Marathi]] film, produced by [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:24, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyrights[edit]

Please stop adding cc-by-nc-sa-2.0 images which are incompatible to Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia:File copyright tags before adding any copyright violations from flickr. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:33, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Redtigerxyz[edit]

Stop leaving messages all over Wikipedia about your gripes with this editor. It's disruptive. If you persist, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:16, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Eshwar.om. You have new messages at Talk:Ganesha#Images_Removed.
Message added 04:17, 17 July 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Redtigerxyz ^Talk 04:17, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 19 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Bhakti movement page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eshwar.om, I've reverted you at the above article in part because of the issues mentioned in the note above. I'm off to bed now but I'll try to sort it all out tomorrow. Please could you note that the lead section of articles is intended to summarise all the stuff that we say later in the article, so your additions were poorly placed. Hopefully, I can sort it all out for you but I'll need to check the sources that you cited. One real positive is that you did cite sources - far too many people do not even do that! - Sitush (talk) 00:52, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it turns out that I cannot see many of the sources that you cite and, worse, you have been copying material without attribution. For example, some of this edit was previously inserted by you here and in turn that can be seen on the web at places such as this. Whether or not that is itself a copy of an older version of an article on Wikipedia is something that I've not yet figured out but I note that the words also appear at Bhakti. At best, you have added to a considerable mess; at worse, you have caused it.

I'm afraid that you are going to have to rewrite your addition using your own words. The sources themselves seem to be ok - university presses etc - but untangling what has gone on is an unfair burden to place on others. - Sitush (talk) 11:41, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Tamil Nadu. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — LeoFrank ^Talk 02:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Eshwar.om:Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tamil Nadu. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 09:27, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. — LeoFrank ^Talk 12:32, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hello LeoFrank, Personally i dont have any agitation mind set.But yes because those editors makes me to talk like this.But it is not a personal attack that is i beleive.if you believe which is seems like personal attack then Really sorry for that.Eshwar.om ^{Talk to}^me 20:43, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this and another edit summary by you at the same article, I'm not even Indian let alone from Karnataka. Stop with the nonsense, please. - Sitush (talk) 06:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Sitush,First of all thanks to use words like nonsense.because i was scared what words you suppose to use. .you used words worst like this before in your talk page.also you mentioned i have a problem in bangaloreclick here(how do know i from banglore.even i did not say where i belongs too.Note:i am not belongs to bangalore).In that conversation b/w you and user leofrank.click here.but one year back. ok.fine .i dont want talk this and all.But you said in your talk it self another.i dont want to disclose that too.because that is no need.but yes, dont worry i wont use words like what user Abishek( leofrank) mentioned already here.Eshwar.om ^{Talk to}^me 14:55, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hinduism in Sri Lanka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI July 2014[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:38, 23 July 2014 (UTC) you have to inform before you start a discussion over there.not after your discussion.I hope you know the rules.Eshwar.om ^{Talk to}^me 19:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but still a valid discussion. Dougweller (talk) 20:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

when after intimated by me overthere.?!is it?!!!I am not asking valid or not.i am saying following policy is very important?but when.i hope editor like you familiar with that.Eshwar.om ^{Talk to}^me 20:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, its my mistake to not have posted a notice on your talk page. But nothing has been harmed for you to create such a fuss about it. I posted the ANI report, you replied to it in two hours without any other editor replying to it before you, you already got the notification through WP:ECHO. Only fault was that the talk page post was not present but the main intention of notifying you was well served through other means. Now please buckle up for the ANI. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:19, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

cool Dharmadhyaksha iam not blaming anybody.i told what has happaned.:).Eshwar.om ^{Talk to}^me 05:54, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

24 July 2014[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for disruptive editing, including non-collaboration, edit warring against consensus, false representations, and retaliatory edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:

{{unblock|reason=WP:TOOLMISUSE  by admin Bbb23.I am ready to provide more 
links,diff for that.Eshwar.om^{Talk to}^me 06:50, 26 July 2014 (UTC)}}

. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 23:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eshwar.om (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

WP:TOOLMISUSE by admin Bbb23.I am ready to provide more links,diff for that.Eshwar.om ^{Talk to}^me 06:50, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Go right ahead and do that. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 13:29, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wanna collaborate?[edit]

Wikipedia is a collaborative project. The outcomes are more rewarding when users work as a team. Would you like to collaborate with me? --PeterCRames (talk) 19:16, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@PeterCRames:Sure, sharing knowledge,ideas are best thing.I am always like to do that.thank you!Eshwar.om ^{Talk to}^me 03:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thats great! I've been impressed with the progress you've been making at India-related articles. You're doing great work. My interest areas are Tech and Medicine. But really, I'm willing to assist with any article you pick. --PeterCRames (talk) 22:48, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 27[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eshwar.om (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

About me complaint starting with i am engaged with Redtigerxyz on numerous pages related to Hinduism filed by Dharmadhyaksha on WP:ANI(link1).but there i given my explanation.Plz read that((link2)).Also in this time i want to point out one thing that is one notable comment given by member of the Arbitration Committee.yes he is Newyorkbrad.He is woking wikipedia from 2005 onwards.he said regarding while i am asking help from him that is @"I'm sorry, but I don't know enough about the topics the two of you are editing to be of much help here. Regrets and regards@".Please note this point too(link3),another point also i want to point out.this user member of WikiProject India . i hope he knows very well regarding indian related topics .because he also mentioned in his point.his name is Cutest Penguin.he said at Talk:Ashta Nayika""" @Eshwar.om, Redtigerxyz: Both of you are right, I think we should find add more contents to use those removed images. What you think ?to Redtigerxyz"""(link4).but i blocked by Bbb23.after seeing Bbb23's talk page i was shocked .yes admins taking each other about me before this block.yes with out knowing my point or with out knowing what exactly going over Hinduism related articles by user redtiger,with out knowing all this, only with good faith user Dougwelle)r talking about me in Bbb23 's talk page.even he did not say that matter to me.(link 6).i wont ask why about this two admins talk. but yes iam saying.Please thing all .reconsider my unblock request.Personally i am believe that i am helpless now.Still i believe Wikipedia is realiable.Because i want to contribute more.Also i have to create some articles.so this also will going to include with my articles list.because i did't really expect this block.but time is giving more lesson for me.like all..i hope so.so said.Now no words to say more.thank you..Eshwar.om ^{Talk to}^me 19:35, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We'd love for you to contribute in the future: however, you continually have shown you have no desire to a) edit in a way that is in accordance with our policies, b) communicate in a way that is in accordance with the community nature, or even understandable at times, c) understand and take responsibility your own actions. You are rightfully blocked because of YOUR actions. Multiple community discussions have attempted to guide you, but you refuse to heed. the panda ₯’ 11:05, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Sri Muneshwara Swamy Temple[edit]

The article Sri Muneshwara Swamy Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No proof of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 18:18, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vishnu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sri Ranganathaswamy Temple. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bisrakh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ram. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits on Tamil Nadu and Hanuman[edit]

Dear Eshwar, I find that you have made changes to the above articles which did not add any value to it and you have reverted edits. Please refrain from doing so. Please read the policy of WP:STONEWALL my friend before quoting to other users. You are insisting on keeping the article the same and deleting content without consensus. The images are not promotional and hence there is no reason to remove them if they are relevant unless for copyright reasons. Only representative images are presented within the article and others are displayed in the gallery. Don't enter into an edit war (WP:EDITWAR) and please leave a message if neccesary.Magentic Manifestations (talk) 18:15, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just read your other message on my talk page my friend. You are simply quoting WP:COIADVICE without rationale and Please provide a rationale on removing the images or let us go into arbitration, report the issue and let the administrators decide. I am not doing anything against policy and you are stone walling insisting of removal of content. I will also report the same and wiki is same for you and me my friend!Magentic Manifestations (talk) 18:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Tirupati Page[edit]

Hello, I'm Agasthyathepirate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Preceding undated comment added 12:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]