User talk:Esetok

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Esetok! Thank you for your contributions. I am Way2veers and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Way2veers 18:27, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emir Bayghazin

The article Emir Bayghazin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Tassedethe (talk) 23:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kazakh profanity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kazakh profanity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazakh profanity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 22:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marwazi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bindu of Bukhara

Can you please take your concerns to the talk page instead of changing the name on several articles? --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I not changed the name of several articles, only one. And i added source to article. why not read before rolling back my edits? --Esetok (talk) 20:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
how funny — it takes a few minutes to undo my edits, but you can't reply to a message on the discussion page of an article. --Esetok (talk) 20:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down, something happened. Ill get to you in a sec. HistoryofIran (talk)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:08, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, calling me 'false historian of Iran' was uncalled for. This is not the first time you have made personal attacks towards me. Do it again, and you will be reported to WP:ANI. --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:09, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are false "historian", reverting edits and adding fake information in articles. Rashid al-Din Vatvat, Bidun of Bukhara, for example. --Esetok (talk) 15:11, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm not a historian, that is indeed correct. But taking at dig at me through my username is unnecessary and frankly, childish. Please show some diffs that demonstrate that I am adding "false information", whatever that is supposed to mean. If you are right, then I apologize and won't report you. --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:13, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For example: I showed you information about Bidun of Bukhara — you just ignored and reverted edits. For you, every valuable source is wrong (except you, ofc). I've deleted fake name (WHERE IS YOUR SOURCES TO THAT NAME? SHOW ME) of Watwat Rashid al-din. And you - reverted edits. Did you want anything else? --Esetok (talk) 15:22, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you referring to the Iranica link? [1]. That's not how it works, it seems you aren't aware of WP:COMMON NAME. I reverted you there because you moved the article without any form of discussion or consensus, you know, the usual stuff in Wikipedia. No I don't want anything, see you at WP:ANI. --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:27, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:33, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i'm aware WP:COMMON NAME. No one from valuable sources calls him "Bindu" (any sources? where?). His name is "Bidun". You just occupied articles and reverting edits. True vandalism. --Esetok (talk) 15:36, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:52, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All attention! (Personal attack removed) Farewell :) --Esetok (talk) 15:56, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Had you tried to cooperate with other editors, you could have presented evidence for the change you suggested. Since you only attack other editors, you have lost your editing privileges for the sake of the project. —C.Fred (talk) 16:13, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]