User talk:Davidetalg2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfC notification: Draft:Jan Owen (author) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jan Owen (author). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ask for help on your talk page

Help me![edit]

Please help me with... Hi there, and thanks in advance for your help!

I registered as a user about a year ago, and have created an article (still in draft pile) and edited several pages of interest to me.

However, my user name is still not recognised. I don't know why and, since it does not stop me doing things, not sure its a problem. That said, would like to be properly recognised!

Thanks for any advice you can offer!

David Davidetalg2 Davidetalg2 (talk) 21:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David, I'm not too sure as to what you mean by your username being recognized, are you able to elaborate on that? (Please {{ping|IVORK}} in your response)IVORK Talk 23:45, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to assume that you are confused about why your username appears as a red link. That happens when you have not created a user page. Creating a user page is entirely optional and one thing some people do is redirect it to their user talk page. If you click on the red link, you'll have a chance to create the page or redirect, whichever you want. Or you can leave it as a red link, no worries. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 02:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

— jmcgnh Have followed your advice, and gotton to 'blue':-). Thanks so much!

Help me![edit]

Hi there.

Would be weepingly grateful for any advice on how to progress from draft to published! The article, which I first submitted on 29 October, 2020, is Draft:Jan Owen (social entrepreneur).

Thanking you in advance! Davidetalg2 (talk) 01:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've submitted your draft for review - that's the next step towards getting your draft published as an article - but it may take a while. Meanwhile, you can continue to improve the draft. One thing to improve it is to try to find secondary reliable sources to replace the many primary sources that you have used. Wikipedia actually prefers secondary sources rather than primary sources. Having too many primary sources in your article makes it look like you are trying to force notability through your own original research rather than through finding the sort of reporting that does help establish notability. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 03:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For what it's worth, I fixed the citation style and removed the maintenance template. GoingBatty (talk) 04:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NoahDavid771 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noah!💬 18:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Davidetalg2! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noah!💬 18:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Owen[edit]

When I read it through, I felt like some of the terms used to describe his charitable adventures seemed slightly less than neutral and unnecessary, which was the main reason why I declined it. Noah!💬 18:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jan Owen (social entrepreneur) has been accepted[edit]

Jan Owen (social entrepreneur), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Noah 💬 02:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]