User talk:Danrad1357

This is Danrad1357's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Luiza Campos has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Luiza Campos. Thanks! Gusfriend (talk) 00:37, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luiza Campos (December 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StarryGrandma was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

department faculty profile, not like an encyclopedia article, so needs much rewriting. You need to show that she is already well-known enough for her work to have an article. Her "Fellowships", are just membership levels in the societies she belongs to, and not Fellow in the sense of the criteria in WP:NPROF, so she does not qualify for an article for that reason. She has some papers with citation numbers over 100, so that may qualify her. I am concerned that Campos may not want to have an article here. Since this draft has been written her faculty web page which serves as the article's current primary source has had almost everything removed from it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luiza Campos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

StarryGrandma (talk) 19:03, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Danrad1357! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! StarryGrandma (talk) 19:03, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About Draft:Luiza Campos[edit]

Everything in the article must be supported by a reference. You are using her faculty website as your major source, but that site has been blanked. Can you explain this? You will need to find other sources to replace this. Leave out the list of roles - that does not belong in an encyclopedia article. StarryGrandma (talk) 23:02, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luiza Campos (January 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read the previous comments.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luiza Campos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 01:36, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Luiza Campos has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Luiza Campos. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 09:22, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Danrad1357. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

You have stated that you are not paid to edit, but since you are in contact with her (according to the comments you have placed on the draft page) you do need to read and adhere to the Conflict of interest guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 09:25, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luiza Campos (January 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pichemist were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luiza Campos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 09:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luiza Campos (January 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luiza Campos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 19:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luiza Campos (January 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StarryGrandma was:

Academic notability not yet established and the article is not yet a proper encyclopedia article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luiza Campos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

StarryGrandma (talk) 19:59, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Luiza Campos 19 pp-large.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Luiza Campos 19 pp-large.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not upload images under copyright to Wikipedia. Only the copyright holder can do that. StarryGrandma (talk) 17:44, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Heads-up about talk page discussions[edit]

Hi Danrad1357, just to let you know: as a general rule, talk page discussions should not be removed. There are exceptions: you are free to remove discussion threads from your user talk page, and you can also remove discussions you have started, where nobody else has participated, but if you start a discussion on a draft talk page or an article talk page and get responses from other editors, please let the thread remain on the page even if the discussion has been concluded. More info at Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines, specifically here. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 13:57, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Draft talk:Luiza Campos. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 23:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moving draft articles[edit]

Please don't move draft articles before they are approved. Any sorting out of final name will be done when the article is approved. The addition of (academic) is too vague. Something like (environmental engineer) will be better. Also, when moving article pages the associated talk page must also be moved, and usually happens automatically. Strange that it did not. StarryGrandma (talk) 17:42, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Luiza Campos has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Luiza Campos. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Luiza Campos[edit]

Hello, Danrad1357. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Luiza Campos, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Luiza Campos[edit]

Hello, Danrad1357. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Luiza Campos".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:00, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]