User talk:Casprings/Archive 2
Hello, this is just to let you know that your [[Wikipedia:Editor review/{{subst:BASEPAGENAME}} {{subst:#if:| ({{{number}}}}})|editor review]] has been completed, one or several editors have provided their feedback on [[Wikipedia:Editor review/{{subst:BASEPAGENAME}} {{subst:#if:| ({{{number}}}}})|your editor review page]]. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! 
Happy editing and regards, ~~~~Paymoney (talk) 20:53, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)[edit]
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:25, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Casprings, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested for the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my changes if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:12, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Done - I don't think there's anything else I can do there at the moment. I see the article's a GA candidate, so i wish you good luck with it. :-) My only suggestions might be to add an infobox and navbox, and to convert the references into a single format, preferably 'cite' format - though the latter isn't a GA requirement. I moved a lot of text onto the talk page for various reasons, listed there. I hope it's been useful; feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 05:29, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Casprings, I'm currently reviewing the article you nominated for good status (Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012) . Thank you for the nomination, I will let you know the conclusion of the review when it's completed. TotallyNotEtreo 18:40, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
- Etreo again. The article that you nominated passed the review, and is now a good article. I know you were interested in it one day reaching Featured standard, and my only recommendation would be that some more of the Republican perspective. Though admittedly it might be better to get the advice of a more experienced reviewer for Featured content than me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TotallyNotEtreo (talk • contribs) 20:57, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Casprings, After some degree of research on FA articles, I struck my previous comments. I think it is unreasonable to expect a recent news article to have the same level of scholarly research as an event that occurred decades ago. I found two examples of recent election articles that have no academic references, and are feature articles. Furthermore, I found 2 university textbooks and 2 journal articles that state that the rape and pregnancy controversies likely affected election results. Feel free to use those references or not. I have a new posting at WP:FAC, and I stand by my earlier vote of support for this article's FA status. DavidinNJ (talk) 03:17, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
- Got your messgae. That's fine if you don't want to use the refs. I don't think that it's necessary to have academic references. DavidinNJ (talk) 03:08, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
GOCE Copy Edit Request - Sandra Fluke[edit]
Hi Casprings - I just wanted to send you a quick message to inform you that your requested copy edit of the article Sandra Fluke is complete. Best of luck the continued improvements to this article! If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Cheers, Freebirdthemonk Howdy! 05:44, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 21[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Removal of Tags[edit]
Do not remove tags until the discusion is resolved. Arzel (talk) 22:40, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Concensus cannot overide WP policies. You do not seem to understand this in the least. Arzel (talk) 14:49, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- It has not been resolved. Your removal of the tags is improper. Furthermore, discussion on the talk page is now split. Please do not remove the tag again until there is resolution, especially with false edit statements like you did. Arzel (talk) 19:11, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Closing DRN case[edit]
Thanks for trying to close it yourself after you noticed that. I think it probably would have taken it off the list the next time it was updated (it's updated by a bot every half hour), but closing and archiving is the right way to do it - I've closed it for you, and it will be archived and removed from the list in 24 hours. CarrieVS (talk) 11:28, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:10, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 23[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
User RFC[edit]
Hello! Thank you for your recent inquiry about another editor, with whom I've had a long history over the years. It sounds like not much has changed, and you're running into the same behaviors that I experienced when I was more active. While I completely share your frustration, I no longer have the time to dedicate to Wikipedia as I once did. Also, I have concerns with the efficacy and methodology of the way Wikipedia deals with these sorts of issues -- essentially, I'm not sure I have faith that the community can effectively deal with his sort of behavior at all. So, all that bundled together means I'm pretty much over it... So, you're welcome to reference my past dealings if you proceed, and it's likely I will eventually weigh in if the community takes the RFC seriously, but I would prefer not to be a co-sponsor or whatever. Best of luck! //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 00:02, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
You forgot to sign[edit]
on ANI, and I can't get in there to do a sig due to ec. My connection is dog slow today. KillerChihuahua 18:58, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Looks like it passed the GA Review. Cheers. EricSerge (talk) 12:36, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012[edit]
Thank you for making the changes that I requested. I have issued my support for giving your article FA status. WP:Featured article candidates/Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012/archive1 DavidinNJ (talk) 03:09, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
Message added 16:27, 12 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
FutureTrillionaire (talk) 16:27, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Talkback: you've got messages![edit]
Message added Ushau97 talk contribs 10:50, 13 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Following me[edit]
You know that what you did could be considered WP:STALKING. Aside from that did you actually review any of the material that you put back into that article? Much of what that IP added is linked back to http://www.catskillcitizens.org/ which is an activist organization against fracking in NY. A Google search search of the first paper added by the IP shows no results. I did quite a bit of searching to find out more about that paper, but was unable to find that paper. All I was able to find was a similarly named article linking back to anti-fracking activist groups. This is enough evidence to revert what this IP did as non-RS material and NPOV activism. Arzel (talk) 15:54, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:13, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
- Please note that mass posting about your intent for an RfC/U may be considered a violation of WP:CANVASS. An RfC/U which is tainted by such canvassing may be judged under WP:False consensus dicta from ArbCom. Cheers. Collect (talk) 18:38, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- @Arzel: For what it's worth, I personally didn't perceive the notification as a suggestion that you be topic banned. — C M B J 09:31, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- @Casprings: Given the circumstances, and if this RFC should proceed, I'd like to suggest that you propose exclusion of topic bans from its designated resolutions. — C M B J 09:31, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Chin up[edit]
Casprings, Listen, you made a mistake but we all do. Don't feel bad about this in any way. You saw an opportunity to improve the editing of the project and you began the effort. I believe that your efforts were not in vain. There will be additional scrutiny of editing by Arzel and other editors who took the time to read the RFC will no doubt think harder about the issues you highlighted. Keep your. Capitalismojo (talk) 16:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
please correct your comment[edit]
I would note that the ArbCom case on the TPM does not have me as a party, and so your comment on the RfC/U is quite misleading. Please correct it. Thanks. Collect (talk) 18:52, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- That is correct. Also, I notice you've claimed that Xenophrenic is a party to the ArbCom proceeding. That is a false statement, since Xenophrenic is not listed among the named parties. [1] Please refactor your statement at Xenophrenic's RfC/U to reflect the truth of the matter. Furthermore, the ANI thread on the Tea Party movement article was pretty much wrapped up on February 26 and was limited to behavior on TPm. And I believe the main objection to sanctioning Xenophrenic at the ANI was the absence of any evidence posted by North8000. That won't be a problem this time, Casprings. I've posted a lot of evidence strictly limited to Xenophrenic's edits from April 1 to today, on articles and pages related to U.S. politics that (with the exception of one incident) are unrelated to TPm. I'll start including TPm, and working backward from April 1 on the other articles, in further evidentiary posts in the morning. regards .... Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 04:22, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- While I am not specifically listed among the initial "parties" to the case, Casprings' comments are certainly not misleadingly false. As noted by Arbiter User:SilkTork here: Xenophrenic's status in this case is that they are one of the individuals whose conduct is being examined regarding the editing of the Tea Party movement article, and the ANI incident that led to the case being opened.
- It's true that there was no support for sanctions against me at ANI because of the absence of any evidence posted by North8000, but not for his lack of trying. He posted multiple diffs that he claimed (and apparently still believes) indicated some level of inappropriate behavior, but they did not. P&W has started adding diffs now, but I haven't yet looked closely at them. A cursory glance tells me that he has indeed established that I have edited articles on Wikipedia. We'll see if his diffs show inappropriate behavior. Xenophrenic (talk) 07:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the note[edit]
I got your note regarding the RFC/U. Yes, I am aware of it. I've left a couple comments on the Talk page associated with it, but I have refrained from editing the RFC/U page while Phoenix and Winslow is assembling his information. Also, thank you for the View/Comment you left at that RFC/U. Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 07:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
question[edit]
Why did you just dump part of Xenophrenic's user page onto my talk page? [2]. Malke 2010 (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- Stop edit warring on my talk page. Don't come back to my talk page. Malke 2010 (talk) 16:41, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, just trying to notify you of a discussion.Casprings (talk) 16:43, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- And that requires you to vandalize my talk page and then edit war over it? Malke 2010 (talk) 16:51, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- I am not trying to vandalize anything. i was simply trying to give you a notification of a discussion on the Administrators talk board and I incorrectly linked to a user's page. Casprings (talk) 16:55, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yea, I've done that myself -- used {{ instead of [[. It's a bit harsh to be called a vandal for merely being mildly incompetent, isn't it? NE Ent 23:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- I am not trying to vandalize anything. i was simply trying to give you a notification of a discussion on the Administrators talk board and I incorrectly linked to a user's page. Casprings (talk) 16:55, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- And that requires you to vandalize my talk page and then edit war over it? Malke 2010 (talk) 16:51, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, just trying to notify you of a discussion.Casprings (talk) 16:43, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
AN/I WIKIHOUNDING by Collect?[edit]
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions[edit]
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
tb[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Re: moderated discussion at Tea Party movement[edit]
As a complete newcomer to the Tea Party movement moderated discussion, you are clearly unaware that many of these discussions are completed, action has already been taken if appropriate, and we have moved on. Your edit summary, in reverting the manual archiving of part of the page, indicated that you had just commented in one of the sections that was subsequently archived. The whole truth of the matter is that you had "voted" in a survey where all the other "votes" were posted roughly a month ago, and the discussion had been completed. We have moved on.
Accordingly, I am reverting your restoration of that material on the Moderated Discussion page. Please add your comments and "votes" only to discussions and surveys that are active. One of the reasons why I'm starting to manually archive this material is to any such confusion for you and any other newcomers to the page. have an issue with this procedure, please take it up with SilkTork. regards ... Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 18:00, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- I wouldn't agree that the issues addressed in those discussions have all been dealt with at this juncture. The archiving should be handled by Silk Tork, in his capacity as moderator.--Ubikwit 連絡 見学/迷惑 18:31, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- I also disagree. Let user:SilkTork handle this as moderator. I have reverted your archiving.Casprings (talk) 20:56, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Use of RfCs and requests for formal closures[edit]
Please see the notice I posed here. Regards, --RA (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- As above, Talk:Rape_and_pregnancy_controversies_in_United_States_elections,_2012#Content_dispute I've removed the RfC notice here. Please work to resolve local content and collaboration issues without repeated recourse to community RfC. --RA (✍) 22:02, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Heads up. Cheers. --Nstrauss (talk) 18:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Your AN/I thread[edit]
Hello!
I closed a portion of the discussion as it's about a different user. If you could, move all of that information over to a WP:3RR report. Dusti*poke* 00:09, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
Message added 00:35, 26 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Dusti*poke* 00:35, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Just remove a section of comments and such. I undid it. Try clicking the "Add Section" at the top of the page :) Dusti*poke* 01:21, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Reset[edit]
Look, this is spiraling out of control. The path we're going down right now is leading toward you getting fed up and frustrated with Wikipedia and retiring/leaving and no body wants that. Let's hit the reset button, close the RFCs and the ANI thread, and we'll go back and try to solve this on the article's talk page. If you feel Arzel is a POV pusher, there are only two ways to deal with that: 1) Have exemplary behavior so that only Arzel stands out when reviewing conduct at ANI, or 2) Engage with Arzel and bring him into the fold on a collaborative level. I'm willing to help you do both. All you have to do is hit the reset button, what do you say?--v/r - TP 11:50, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- I came here to say something similar. You don't need to feel that the article will go to hell if you don't do everything - it's high-traffic and the people trying to reduce its compliance with WP policy are in a minority. Let them dig themselves into their own hole. Make sure you're behaving as you should behave. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:38, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
@Casprings You are very good at this Wikipedia thing. I will nominate for administrator one day very soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.40.183.219 (talk) 18:49, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- Looks like the admin has offered excellent advice and help. You can improve the article this way. Malke 2010 (talk) 17:09, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions[edit]
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:43, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Although we don't often agree, there is a discussion about reliable sources and BLP issues related to Wayne Madsen [here] if you would like to participate. I feel that you have a firm grasp of issues, and would value your input especially if you don't agree with my edits. Thanks for bringing fresh eyes if you have time. Capitalismojo (talk) 04:19, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Casprings, I've collapsed your evidence submission because the evidence submission date has closed. Please email the Arbitration Committee or post on the evidence talk page and ask for permission to submit evidence after the closing date. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:23, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
DR/N discussion not open[edit]
Hello Casperings, and thank you for participating in the Dispute resolution Noticeboard discussion. I am Amadscientist, a regular volunteer at the Dispute Resolution noticeboard. Unfortunately, you have posted in the discussion area before the discussion has been opened. For this reason I am removing the post. If you would like, re-add the comment to your own opening, but not to another's as opening comments are not discussion either. Sorry if this is inconvenient in any way.--Amadscientist (talk) 08:23, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
Message added 13:37, 26 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I'm sorry that I've not replied sooner. TransporterMan (TALK) 13:37, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
The article Steve King cantaloupe calves comment controversy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not news.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GregJackP Boomer! 16:01, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Steve King cantaloupe calves comment controversy for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve King cantaloupe calves comment controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve King cantaloupe calves comment controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GregJackP Boomer! 18:10, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions[edit]
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
GA Nomination[edit]
Hi! It appears that we may have both completely forgotten about this nomination. Are you looking to keep working on it? --Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:39, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012[edit]
 | Hi Casprings, I've begun working on the copy-edit you requested at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page for the article Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012. Please feel free to contact me and to correct or revert my edits if necessary. I will be editing/fixing prose errors, not fixing the content or references. A GOCE copy-edit doesn't guarantee a pass at GA or FA. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:15, 12 August 2013 (UTC) |
| Hello, Casprings. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012 at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Despite my comments above I added some new text and two references; I hope they add balance to the article. Good luck with your planned FA nom, though judging by the last one I strongly suggest seeking a Peer Review first. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:50, 13 August 2013 (UTC) |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions[edit]
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:25, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 13[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tea Party movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TARP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions[edit]
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:27, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions[edit]
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:30, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, pleaseconsult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:55, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:32, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:12, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Wikinews invitation[edit]
Hi there, Casprings, I hope you are doing well !
Have you ever thought of contributing to Wikinews ?
We'd love to have you as a contributor over there !!!
Let me know if you're interested and I could help you learn the basic stuff.
Cheers,
— Cirt (talk) 03:20, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
February 2014[edit]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. DP 20:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for taking care of that. I don't know if you use Twinkle or are interested, but it makes it really easy to do a report to AIV, RPP, or ANEW, any of which would also have worked in this case. Cheers!— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 20:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review[edit]
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 21 March 2014 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:41, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics/Evidence. Please add your evidence by May 4, 2014, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, S Philbrick(Talk) 15:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
One additional note regarding parties[edit]
Your original case request included the note:
- Numerous other editors who took part in the WP:RFC/U
Per discussion with arbs and clerks, no one from this list, except those who might already be parties, or involved parties who commented, have been notified.
An arbitrator plans to enquire regarding the appropriate parties, and additional names can be added then. For the Arbitration Committee, --S Philbrick(Talk) 16:03, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Invitation join the new Physiology Wikiproject![edit]
Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.
- Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
- You can tag the talk pages of relevant articles with {{WikiProject Physiology|class=|importance=}} with your assessment of the article class and importance alongwith. Please note that WP:Physiology, WP:Physio, WP:Phy can be used interchangeably.
- You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing physiology articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
- We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
- Why not try and strive to create a good article! Physiology related articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
- Your contributions to the WikiProject page, related categories and templates is also welcome.
- To invite other editors to this WikiProject, copy and past this template (with the signature):
{{subst:WP Physiology–invite}}~~~~
- To welcome editors of physiology articles, copy and past this template (with the signature):
{{subst:WP Physiology–welcome}}~~~~
- You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.
Hoping for your cooperation! DiptanshuTalk 12:48, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors![edit]
- please help translate this message into the local language
|
The Cure Award |
| In 2013 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you so much for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date medical information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! |
We are wondering about the educational background of our top medical editors. Would you please complete a quick 5-question survey? (please only fill this out if you received the award)
Thanks again :) --Ocaasi, Doc James and the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American_politics/Evidence[edit]
Hi Casprings, I've removed a large section of text at Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American_politics/Evidence#Hail_and_Farewell, which made your subsequent edit look kind of like it came from out of left field without the context, so I removed it too. Just noting here that I had no actual problem with your post, and if you think it still needs to be said somewhere, my removal of that thread does not mean you aren't allowed to restate it independently. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:27, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Evidence[edit]
The link identified as number 1 in the Arzel list (1) does not appear to be an edit by Arzel. Am I missing something?--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:41, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
@Sphilbrick: My bad.Casprings (talk) 15:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- No problem, just want to clean things up a bit.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:55, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dave Brat may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | jfm = }} </ref>
- reform. Brat stated: "If you want to find out the smoking gun in this campaign, just go Google]] and type the STOCK Act and CNN and Eric Cantor."<ref name=Fang-11.6.14 />
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:38, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Brat and God[edit]
Thanks - normally I might have given him the courtesy of allowing him to self-revert, but my take on his history and shifting justifications suggested that it wasn't likely. I hope it will stop now, and let the process run its course. Cheers! Tvoz/talk 17:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Dave Brat[edit]
It was about 45 minutes after the polls had closed and I was watching the early returns. :) --Goobergunch|? 04:33, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:04, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Concerns over your massive deletion of properly sourced material.[edit]
You blanked several lines, but my chief concern is with your removal of this notable fact providing warranted historical perspective. A total of 52 films were scored an "A+" by CinemaScore from 1982 to 2011, as most films are usually given a lower grade.[1][2] A movie getting an A+ is a rare feat and a big deal. Your edit summary didn't explain your deletion of this segment. I can live with removing the rest (the bottom portion was a vestigial remnant first added by a liberal editor trying to play down the A+ rating; funny how it only became unacceptable after the strong second weekend reversed the point he had been trying to make), but I'll ask that you reconsider removing the sentence illustrating the A+ score's historical rarity. It's at least as pertinent to the article as the line about the film not doing as well as D'Souza's previous movie. If nothing else perhaps you could re-add it and instead start a discussion on the talk page about whether it should be removed.
I'll add that, while I agree that fans rating it high could theoretically be a function of them being conservative (like critics panning it might just reflect their liberal POV, which is even more likely), the current language should be tweaked to show that Cinemascore does poll those who saw the movie, not just "cinemagoers", since the latter doesn't specify which movie they saw. VictorD7 (talk) 19:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Ping[edit]
The ping was simply adding a belt to the suspenders. I'm already following the NPOVN and article. So I can't be canvassed. I do hope some of the personal commentary can be toned down. That's why I mentioned AGF with regards to you. I hope you'll do the same as to me by not thinking I am the most sympathetic of the commentators. (For example, I downplayed the importance of the positive audience survey material by putting it into a footnote.) Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 19:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- @Srich32977: I do.Casprings (talk) 19:13, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
RSN thread[edit]
I've asked Victor if he minds if I close the RSN thread. I assume you will not object. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 06:09, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Movie Review[edit]
Hello Casprings. WP policy is that the burden is on those who wish to include contested material. It is they who must win consensus that the material is noteworthy and well-sourced. Please consider undoing your re-insertion of material which I just removed for that reason per the concerns of editors on talk. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 18:54, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- FYI, WP:BURDEN applies to verifiability, not whether the material is "contested". (E.g., BURDEN does not talk about noteworthiness.) In the case of Avi Offer, it is verified/well-sourced. But it is a moot point. I've swapped out Avi's blog for a published review. I applaud your efforts to achieve a NPOV balance in the section. – S. Rich (talk) 19:07, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Arbitration amendment request regarding American Politics[edit]
Hi Casprings, this is a courtesy message to inform you that the Arbiitration Committee has declined to act in the instance you referred to, and deferred further such instances to arbitration enforcement for appropriate action. You can view the archived discussion on the main case talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 14:29, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Onvolo userfied[edit]
Userfied at User:Casprings/Onvolo. -- Alexf(talk) 20:53, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- Should have kept it userfied for further improvement before publishing it to main space. ~Amatulić (talk) 11:57, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ONVOLO is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ONVOLO until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Amatulić (talk) 11:57, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:25, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:30, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Arbcom amendment closed and archived[edit]
The request for amendment you initiated has been closed and archived without action here for the arbitration committee--S Philbrick(Talk) 12:57, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:24, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
A question for you[edit]
See Talk:2014 Iranian-led intervention in Iraq#Requested move December 2014 -- PBS (talk) 12:37, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Formal mediation has been requested[edit]
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "America: Imagine the World Without Her". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 24 January 2015.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 19:17, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
I'm going to respond at Talk:America: Imagine the World Without Her tomorrow. Otherwise, it is too easy to go back and forth so many times, and the talk page has already suffered plenty from that. I recommend that you do not get too caught up in that back-and-forth. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 19:41, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Note[edit]
Cwobeel violated BLP policy repeatedly by restoring an entirely unsourced page entirely under BLP. Then after having it reverted, he edit warred and was disruptive by using a single IMDB source - not even in line - as justification to reinstate all the content. The source did not even match the content in full and the material was also had multiple errors. He can appeal the restriction, but Arb Com already explicitly endorses discretionary sanctions for BLPs and Cwobeel decided to edit war and violate BLP. Just food for thought. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 21:25, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Request for mediation rejected[edit]
The request for formal mediation concerning America: Imagine the World Without Her, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 14:07, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Arbcom[edit]
I believe that arbitration deals strictly with editor behavioral issues and for them to accept a case, you have to provide specific incidents where editor behavior was addressed through formal processes, like ANI and the sort. I'm not sure about this though. I believe those are suppose to be stepping stones and if the editor continues poor behavior, then arbcom steps in. I could be mistaken though. Scoobydunk (talk) 15:23, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Casprings, I hope you can see which way the wind is blowing in this matter. Comments from the parties and from the arbitrators indicate this is simply an article content matter. Basically you have not laid out a case about Victor (or any other editor) and since Victor has not been sanctioned (or even warned) about behavior issues, the Arbcom will not take any action to "break the back" of this on-going content dispute. I am certain your request will meet a slow death as the arbitrators either "await" or "decline".
- There is (from what I see) no procedure by which the requesting party may formally withdraw an Arbcom request. But I think if you were to "
strike out" your original request and say "I hereby withdraw my Arbcom request" it would be enough to get the Arbcom to close the case. At that point you will be free to post a WP:DRN request about article content. Please take my recommendations to heart. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 06:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration request "America: Imagine the World Without Her"[edit]
Hi Casprings, this is just a courtesy note to let you know that the above case, on which you were listed as a party, has been declined. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:00, 7 February 2015 (UTC).
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:41, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:43, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:19, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration clarification request closed[edit]
Hi Casprings, the American politics arbitration clarification request, which you were listed as a party to, has been closed and archived. For the Arbitration Committee, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 12:38, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
RE: reviewing Needle's Eye[edit]
I agree, it could do with more citations and an image to illustrate how it looks. I plan to go to the area again where it's situated, and I'll bring a camera with me so I can take my own photograph for use on WP. Thanks for the feedback! – Ozankk 16:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
New question raised regarding Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton/April 2015 move request[edit]
Some opposers of this move have now contended that there is a "Critical fault in proposal evidence", which brings the opinions expressed into question. Please indicate if this assertion in any way affects your position with respect to the proposed move. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:36, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:45, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:45, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:33, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:03, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:42, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:37, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:55, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:14, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Casprings. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)