Talk:Feminism in the United Kingdom

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Gender studies Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Domestic violence in lesbian relationships · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Feminism High‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move proposal[edit]

Feminist history in the United Kingdom → Feminism in the United Kingdom — I think this article should be moved to Feminism in the United Kingdom to match the naming convention of similar articles. The article already defines its scope as including the present day, so there is no reason to limit it to historical events. Better to use the more general title and spin off a more specific article if needed later on. Kaldari (talk) 00:10, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support, I agree. It makes more sense. --Mikitei (talk) 09:47, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support This makes complete sense to me. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:11, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Good catch, well supported by nom. Andrewa (talk) 05:25, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move completed per consensus. Kaldari (talk) 05:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge. However, since the discussion started someone boldly redirected the source article, so this consensus is now outdated.NukeofEarl (talk) 17:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that we merge Feminism in 1950s Britain into the 20th century section of this article. I don't think we really need separate articles for each decade of feminism in an individual country, especially since this broader article is still so meager. Kaldari (talk) 00:25, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Ben Finn (talk) 15:08, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Intro[edit]

The intro says nothing - currently it's even incorrect so I've corrected it to say at least nothing correctly. This needs a proper intro. Ben Finn (talk) 15:08, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to clean it up a bit. Kaldari (talk) 00:19, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copied stuff from History of feminism[edit]

Text and/or other creative content from this version of History of feminism was copied or moved into Feminism in the United Kingdom with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

I've been copy editing History of feminism, and it's a mess. It currently puts undue weight on British feminist history, so I'm moving and duplicating relevant chunks into this article. czar · · 21:44, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lacking information[edit]

From 1950s Britain to 21st century there is a severe lack of information regarding feminism. Hope people can contribute — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:388:D000:1600:DC23:FF9E:94E5:3053 (talk) 18:39, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:English feminists[edit]

Category:English feminists has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page.AusLondonder (talk) 18:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Feminism in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080609074150/http://www.parliament.uk:80/about/images/historical/1918representation.cfm to http://www.parliament.uk/about/images/historical/1918representation.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Too dense[edit]

This article is at 137 kb and should be split into History of feminism in the United Kingdom and Timeline of feminism in the United Kingdom -- Jabbi (talk) 00:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]