User talk:CarTick/Archive 13

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Tamil Nadu legislative assembly election, 2011

CarTick, I would like to change the flag of AIADMK to its original form of showing ANNA in the middle. So I was trying to find within Wikipedia and I found one as well (made by Wiki San Roze) as showing ANNA in the middle. But when I was trying to insert in the page the size was not matching with the DMK flag. So I made new flags for both parties matching with sizes by myself by editing the AIADMK’s flag made by Wiki San Roze (I hope it doesn’t violate any rules, please let me know about that as well). Now I want to upload both of them both to Wikipedia, Please help me with that, because I don’t know to upload the images here at all.{{help me}} -(Kathamarai (talk) 20:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC))

RE: Tamil Nadu legislative assembly election, 2011

not sure which part your talking about, but for the nost part i seem to be in agreement with you.(Lihaas (talk) 05:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC)).

u can roll back ny umwanted edits right.sum1 is includin the same sentences again n again in the nadar main page.roll back pleaseMayan302 (talk) 08:15, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

i did roll back. but i am having trouble to understand what you imply. --CarTick (talk) 13:46, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

understand what??Mayan302 (talk) 01:03, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

never mind, please. --CarTick (talk) 01:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi CarTick first thanks for your extensive coverage . Yes i will add all references possible for inline verificatins . Regarding undecided parties i have put a tag on top so that it shows Current Event , this can be moved out once coalition is decided . I will take note of this. Im a long time reader but a new editor and my contributions include Palayakarars in Madurai Nayak dynasty . Thanks Raj.. --Rajkumarth (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:44, 1 February 2011 (UTC). Thanks ! im happy to be of some help. Im here to stay .Always been a reader now more happy to contribute.--Rajkumarth (talk) — —Preceding undated comment added 03:48, 23 February 2011 (UTC). ===Constituencies Ok i will take a look . Let me know how the head - head info need to be added . Rajkumarth (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:48, 15 March 2011 (UTC).

தமிழ் விக்கிப்பீடியா

வணக்கம் CarTick

Did you know?
Our target demographic wondering what in the world is WP:ENGVAR A large majority of the Tamil population is more comfortable with Tamil than English Tamil Wikipedia, with 25,000 articles is one of the leading Indic language wikipedias It is easy to type to in Tamil using transliteration tools like E-Kalappai, NHM Writer and Suratha Tamil Wikipedia needs experienced wiki contributors like you to expand exponentially எனவே வாருங்கள்! தமிழ் விக்கிப்பீடியாவில் உங்கள் கட்டுரைகளை மொழிபெயருங்கள். உங்களுக்கு பிடித்தவற்றைப் பற்றி தமிழ் விக்கியில் புதிதாய் எழுதுங்கள். ஏற்கனவே, சுந்தர், சோடாபாட்டில், லாஜிக் விக்கி போன்ற பல ஆங்கில விக்கிப்பயனர்களின் வரவு தமிழ் விக்கிப்பீடியாவை வளர்க்க உதவி வருகிறது. நீங்களும் எங்களுடன் இணைந்தால் தமிழர்களுக்காக தமிழிலேயே கட்டற்ற அறிவுக் களஞ்சியத்தை உருவாக்கி விடலாம்.
இப்படிக்கு, தமிழ் விக்கிப்பீடியர்கள்

--Surya Prakash.S.A. (talk) 17:59, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I have been informed of this before. --CarTick (talk) 11:30, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Sneak in

Maybe you don't understand the meaning of "sneak in." But now that I've explained it to you on the Talk:India page, you need to withdraw it. Otherwise, as I've said, I'll take you to ANI and they will then explain the meaning to you all over again. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 17:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

When you take some one to ANI, admins will scrutinize your behavior as well. I will not hesitate presenting ample diffs to show what you did with King Zebu, your disruptive behavior on Talk:India and several other long-pending issues. Zuggernaut (talk) 17:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Gee, I didn't see Mr. Zuggernaut's edit here. You can bring up whatever you want, but CarTick will still have to withdraw the "sneaking in." Fowler&fowler«Talk» 17:59, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

CarTick, Again, now that I have explained what the British Empire in India was and what "incorporate," means, you need to withdraw "sneaking in" otherwise, as I have explained, I will take you to ANI, and they will explain the meaning of the three words all at once to you. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 17:55, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Paravar

Thanks for your support. I do not want to see the talk page semi-protected as it stifles debate etc which could improve the article. But it is just getting a bit silly at the moment. FWIW, I'm from Manchester, UK & can trace my own family back here at least 500 years, to a place called Tushingham_cum_Grindley - not a sign of anything other than the odd (very odd!) Welsh person in the English mix. - Sitush (talk) 18:47, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

thanks again for the work. i have faced similar accusations and insults while cleaning up Nadar (caste) article which is still far from perfect. when i added the info that Nairs practiced polyandry, it was even worse. these guys apparently recruit men in social networking sites to fight in wikipedia. --CarTick (talk) 20:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Really? Ganging up like that? A serious business, then.- Sitush (talk) 16:58, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Indian editors often stay away from these articles mainly due to these reasons. i am glad you are taking up the job. one better article is better than nothing. --CarTick (talk) 17:00, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism

Thanks for reverting, erm, whatever it said on my talk page! I presume that it was connected in some way with either the Kongu list or Kaniyar Panicker article. - Sitush (talk) 06:42, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

... and now I see that it was probably the translation you gave in the section above. Weird. - Sitush (talk) 06:44, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

he wrote a little different on your page. i am glad he is blocked. :) --CarTick (talk) 10:36, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Another one - Mukkulam (talk · contribs)--Sodabottle (talk) 10:51, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Ganga and India pages full of POV ignorant pushers

Hi, I was wondering how the page is with the guys like Fowlerx2 & rgpk, who have no idea whatsoever that India is called Bharata. Wikipedia is going to the pits. These people are throwing 'factually incorrect assertions', on this discussion - [| pushing for no consensus]. Why are these people deleting stuff with excuses like 'nationalists' and so on, when the fact is it is Bharata and nationalists should have a say in these. What a bunch of loosers, who don't even know that Bharata is another name of country India, and that Sanskrit is phonetic, all phonetics perhaps could be explained by a page full of explanation - "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_Sutra#Text".

I am watching this user Fawlerx2 s activity in Hinduism section, and he is not going to understand Hindu symbolism at all, instead keeps on replacing stuff from British sources. Pathetic! Apparently, his sources are all authentic British sources, and surprisingly Baptists are writing books of Hindu Religion (which would be as good as a brilliant Hindu writing a book on Baptism as per his understnading)! The women, who heads Sanskrit division in Harvard, he mentioned somewhere, does not even know that Sanskrit is phonetic and you write what you speak! There are no silent letters and so on. Man the Sanskrit dept. in Harvard is not going anywhere anytime. ..असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर | असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म.. Humour Thisthat2011 07:17, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Vote on article name

Hello. You are invited to take part in a 'Gordion knot vote' with three options on the future title of List of Indian inventions and discoveries. Regards Gun Powder Ma (talk) 09:49, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Assam elections

theres not page on that. Were clearly not going to do it today with all the activity, but sometim e week we should worl on it.

ps- nice username ;)Lihaas (talk) 00:12, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

thanks for the compliment. it is sad that we dont have many assamese wikipedians around. User:Nader85021 used to edit election articles from various Indian states. will see. :) --CarTick (talk) 03:17, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

I am also surprised that there isn't a page for that. I will start creating the 2011 election soon enough. I have nothing to do this summer, so I am hoping that I can create all the election articles that I possibly can for all the states so we don't have this issue.--Nader85021 (talk) 05:37, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Need comments on this RFC - [| discussion]

Need your views and comments. One should also go through ['no consensus' discussion]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.89.52.81 (talk) 11:06, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

2006 Tamil Nadu assembly election - Margin of votes

If you have time can you put in the margins of votes on the const.-wise results table. ECI decided not give detailed statistical report for this election, but luckily rediff published those results online. Here is the link.--Nader85021 (talk) 00:32, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

ok. good. could you please add edit link to the constituency wise results template from the article. --CarTick (talk) 02:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

couldn't get the link to be formatted properly on the top left of the table, so instead it is on the top right of the table.--Nader85021 (talk) 06:46, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

no problem — as long as it is somewhere. --CarTick (talk) 00:29, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Impressive # of new articles

Hey CarTick:

I am no N. Ram! Just an occasional lurker here.

1. I hope the personal things you mention in your userpage are taken care of, since you are here now.
2. How do you manage to edit/create so many new pages? Do you use WikEd, or some other automated tool for editing?

Impressed with your edits. Thanks, Ram —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramnarasimhan (talk • contribs) 04:55, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

thanks for the complimenet. no, i dont use any automated tool. just wasting a huge amount of time in what very few in the world really care. --CarTick (talk) 11:53, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Orkut

If you happen to use Orkut and see anything about the article then let me know. I'm not going to register for it but I may be able to see the relevant "recruitment" anyway, although it probably will not be in English. There will be something that can be done, I'm sure. - Sitush (talk) 21:05, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

as a matter of fact, i am not a member of any social networking sites. i was informed of Orkut recruiting by one of the users — cant remember the name — last time when i was battling them for the mention of polyandry. the same thing happened when I resisted Nadar article editors claiming Pandyan history for themselves and creating this article Upper cloth controversy. i was informed on both occasions, it was either Sodabottle or SpacemanSpiff or both. i am kind of anti-social networking in internet. :) i hope some of the watchers of this page can look out for it. --CarTick (talk) 21:15, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

I am familiar with, Nadar groups in Orkut but not with Nair groups. For some months there is no wikipedia related recruiting going on there (they are busy with talking about elections i guess and also indian users are migrating to facebook in droves and orkut activity is going down)--Sodabottle (talk) 03:02, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

thank you, my memory sucks. that is interesting that indians are leaving orkut. google must be pretty upset as Indians and brazilians make up the big chunk of their users. --CarTick (talk) 03:09, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Addition of Indian language scripts for places

Hi! Can you weigh in your opinion here-The Enforcer_{Office of the secret service} 17:43, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Madras Legislative Council (1861–1891)

Have you checked whether the names in the list Madras Legislative Council (1861–1891) are correct. Sources claim that V. Sadagopacharlu was the first Indian to be nominated to the Madras Legislative Council but he finds no mention here.-The Enforcer_{Office of the secret service} 03:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

it is possible i have made a mistake. i dont have the reference at home; took it from library and gave it back. i will make sure to check it next time i go again. --CarTick (talk) 04:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Raja Raja Chola Award

		Raja Raja Chola Award
		For your extremely valuable contributions to Wikipedia:WikiProject Tamil Nadu

-The Enforcer_{Office of the secret service} 12:02, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

A. Nesamony

Wrong way round with the redundancy: lists are discouraged, text is preferred. i should be happy as i was the one who added the information in the first place. - Sitush (talk) 15:19, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

ok. please feel free to revert it back. --CarTick (talk) 15:20, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

I cannot. I'm on three reverts there today. - Sitush (talk) 15:22, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

ok. i will. i should be happy to do so as i was the one who added it long time ago. --CarTick (talk) 15:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Yes, and you cited it. Which is more than the silly person did today, with whom I got in a war (see his/her talk page, where you, me and others have all warned him/her in the past about this). - Sitush (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your 'warnings'. Please tell me they are for whose mistakes?--Kumaripriya (talk) 16:21, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Your mistakes - that should be blindingly obvious. Which bit of WP:V and WP:CITE are you having trouble understanding? We don't mind helping people but you need to show a willingness to learn and, so far, your 500-odd edits have shown no willingness & a fair bit of arrogance. - Sitush (talk) 16:46, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Just want to make you aware of User:Kumaripriya's personal tirade in Devasahayam Pillai article labelling fellow Wikipedians as "anti-Christian fanatic elements"-The Enforcer_{Office of the secret service} 17:14, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Also, please have a look at this-The Enforcer_{Office of the secret service} 17:17, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

he is "hyper-sensitive" and thinks that all Hindus are out to get him. i hope he will learn some objectivity over time. --CarTick (talk) 17:25, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

On the contrary, I think he/she hates non-Christians. I very much doubt whether this sort of tirade is due to hyper-sensitiveness alone. The attacks are almost racist.-The Enforcer_{Office of the secret service} 17:29, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Anyway, I've filed an ANI-The Enforcer_{Office of the secret service} 17:51, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Foot - gun

Unfortunately for M, he has rather shot himself in the foot with the source he added six hours ago at Tamil Kshatriya. I have reviewed it on the TP. I am pretty sure that it is not what he wants to see, but it is what the thing says. - Sitush (talk) 17:21, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

i am looking forward to an end to this. i am also sorry to have to put you through this because you started reviewing the notability of the page only upon User:Qwyrxian's request which was a result of my interaction with him. --CarTick (talk) 17:41, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Don't be sorry. Whatever happens with the article (keep/delete/present both views), the process will by then have been so thorough that no-one should be in a position to contest the outcome for quite some time. Pretty much what happened at Paravar, in other words. - Sitush (talk) 17:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Correction to talk page post

I have taken the liberty of correcting what I am sure was a mistake in a talk page post of yours. Normally I don't refactor other editors' comments even when there seem to be mistakes, but this one seemed totally uncontroversial. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

thanks. i noticed it, not a problem. appreciate informing me though. --CarTick (talk) 12:29, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

AN/I for Manorathan

Hello CarTick, I have closed this AN/I which may seem premature to you but I wanted to explain my reasons. I think it was premature of you to raise it again less than 24 hours after two AN/I discussions which generated much more heat than light. Manorathan had a short block for disruptive editing and I agree that the first few edits after the block were not encouraging. But I don't think they are enough to justify further immediate admin action (which is what AN/I is for.) If Manorathan persists in being disruptive then a few more days of evidence of his/her behaviour will not hurt. On the other hand, having blown off steam s/he may return to more productive editing, and a few more days will give the chance for this to happen. A number of admins have eyes on this situation, there is no emergency here yet, so I hope you will accept this AN/I closure for the time being. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 12:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

List of contributors to Wikiproject Tamil Nadu by number of edits

Do have a look at this-The Enforcer_{Office of the secret service} 14:38, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

great. i hope someone will take note of this and give me a better job. :) --CarTick (talk) 14:47, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Hey!how r u??This sitush guy is damn good.Is he a malayalee??r there any other articles in wikipedia which is suitable for me to edit.I can help.I am getting used to the rules of wiki.Mayan302 (talk) 10:22, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

yes, he is good and he is not a malayalee, he is an englishman. i am planning to stay away from these caste articles and may be even from wikipedia for a while. i might continue to do some minor edits now and then. if i will need your help in non-caste related articles in the future, i will ping you. if you would like a suggestion, please improve Tirunelveli district, which i believe is the district you are from. cheers. --CarTick (talk) 14:59, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

k. i ll see wat i can do..Mayan302 (talk) 03:12, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Tamil nadu legislature

User:Sivanesh has an interesting proposal at Talk:Tamil Nadu Legislature to restructure the legislature articles. Can you take a look and comment.--Sodabottle (talk) 19:50, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

hi

how did u know navaneetha kr — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.137.28.189 (talk) 19:25, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sitush for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. The Tiger's Tail Caught By The Dog (talk) 03:34, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Good luck

I saw that you kept a watch on the Indian discoveries list, thanks. Good luck with the personal stuff and hope you are back soon. Zuggernaut (talk) 16:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. --CarTick (talk) 01:14, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi!Yogesh Khandke (talk) 14:25, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Yogesh, welcome back. hope everything is ok with you. --CarTick (talk) 12:16, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Actually I fractured my scaphoid, which is giving me time for Wiki. Thanks for the welcome!Yogesh Khandke (talk) 15:36, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

sorry to hear that. wish you a fast recovery. --CarTick (talk) 13:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Param Vir Chakra

	Award for defending various India related articles
	I would like to award you this medal for defending numerous articles from the system. Zuggernaut (talk) 13:48, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Z. i really appreciate that. --CarTick (talk) 12:10, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

ANI

You may want to see WP:ANI#Muckraking by new user? and the link [1]. Dougweller (talk) 06:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

thanks for letting me know. that is some wild imagination. :) --CarTick (talk) 12:10, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	CarTick, I am sorry to see you leave, but we had unfinnished work from Feb, I am ready now but you are gone. Hopefully everything with you and your family is OK. May god bless you and your family. Kanatonian (talk) 07:08, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello CarTick/Archive 13! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

A barnstar for you!

	The Real Life Barnstar
	Your edits especially Birds of Singanallur Lake are priceless. Sincerely hoping you'd come back some day ... -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:24, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Tamil Nadu legislative assembly-secretariat complex

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Tamil Nadu legislative assembly-secretariat complex. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Chennai secretariat. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Chennai secretariat – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. BabuOnWiki (talk) 11:33, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Both appear to be about the same topic. I, however, am not sure if either of the titlez would be appropriate now. as far as i can remember, annai jaya was not interested in the building. dont know what happened afterwards. --CarTick (talk) 01:09, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

YGM

Yes, ygm. - Sitush (talk) 01:20, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi! how are you? happy to see you hanging around! --CarTick (talk) 02:44, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm about to sign off for the night. Nothing has changed - I'm in a POV fight at Talk:Persecution of Hazara people in Quetta#Imran Khan and am (yet again) not long since out of a spell in hospital on a ventilator thingy! But life goes one, and it is great to see your sig appearing every now and then. Sodabottle and Spiffy are, I think, concentrating more on ta-WP but I suspect that they are watching here still. Joyson has gone quiet and that is causing some concern, but this is not the place to discuss it. If you should know anything about him then I would appreciate an email. - Sitush (talk) 02:52, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

sorry about that! hope things will get better for you!! I dont have any on/off wiki relationship with Joyson! --CarTick (talk) 03:17, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

No big deal. I sent you an email earlier and am now signing off. Have a good evening/morning/afternoon, as appropriate. And do call in again as and when you are comfortable doing so. Quality is always appreciated! - Sitush (talk) 03:34, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Saravana Stores logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saravana Stores logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Praveen Kumar (administrator)

The article Praveen Kumar (administrator) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non Notable bureaucrat

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Uncletomwood (talk) 12:02, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Periyasamy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Periyasamy, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  GILO   A&E⇑  13:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of A. V. Thomas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A. V. Thomas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. V. Thomas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mark the train^Discuss 17:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2011 Tamil Nadu election results by constituency

Template:2011 Tamil Nadu election results by constituency has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of K. Maya Thevar

The article K. Maya Thevar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of K. Jeyakumar

The article K. Jeyakumar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jmertel23 (talk) 18:44, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Uma Maheswari

The article Uma Maheswari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:37, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Politiquera

The article Politiquera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary definition. Already has an entry in Wiktionary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 07:13, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for H. Vasanthakumar

On 29 August 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article H. Vasanthakumar, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.  — Amakuru (talk) 22:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Udayam Theatre

The article Udayam Theatre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable cinema building.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 06:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Chinnathambi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chinnathambi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinnathambi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kailash29792 (talk) 05:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of R. Mahendran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article R. Mahendran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. Mahendran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Clarityfiend (talk) 19:33, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Roy Sekoff

The article Roy Sekoff has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 15:54, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gold Winner

The article Gold Winner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:15, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Chettinad Health City for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chettinad Health City is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chettinad Health City until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GermanKity (talk) 04:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of P. Kolandaivelu

The article P. Kolandaivelu has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:59, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo saravana.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo saravana.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vasanth & Co

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vasanth & Co, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexf^(talk) 11:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of M. Meenakshi Sundaram

The article M. Meenakshi Sundaram has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 04:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of M. Muthukrishnan

The article M. Muthukrishnan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 17:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of M. Muthukrishnan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M. Muthukrishnan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. Muthukrishnan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jax 0677 (talk) 15:44, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of S. Muthukrishnan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S. Muthukrishnan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Muthukrishnan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jax 0677 (talk) 15:50, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kaveri–Vaigai Link Canal

The article Kaveri–Vaigai Link Canal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:59, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Kaveri–Vaigai Link Canal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kaveri–Vaigai Link Canal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaveri–Vaigai Link Canal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 03:57, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo saravana.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo saravana.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)