Jump to content

User talk:Awesome Aasim/Archive 11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Localizing your recent userscript

[edit]

Hi Awesome Aasim. I have WP:US/L on my watchlist and check every new script added to the list to look if I can localize them for fawiki so users can use them. Today, I noticed that you added CatMan. I was waiting for you to release that script. I made a copy of the script here and now, it doesn't work correctly on our wiki. (I removed "toLowerCase" and "toUpperCase" stuff as we don't have capital letters in Persian language) the problem is, Category namespace local name in fawiki is "رده", but wgNamespaceIds does not support that prefix; Therefore the editable category list does not appear at all. Can you please help me fix this? Thank you very much. —Jeeputer (talk) 07:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Jeeputer the script is not ready for localization. Sorry. It will require several more patches before it will even be remotely ready for this. Feel free to open an issue on GitHub to remind me of it, but I may forget. Aasim (talk) 09:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
That's ok. I'll be waiting. Meanwhile, I will try to make the necessary changes and will let you know about the results (if any). Thanks. :) —Jeeputer (talk) 09:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Friendly reminder

[edit]

A friendly reminder to be cautious when placing an A3, A7, or similar type tag. The tag on Rituraj Kishore Sinha was after the 10 minute minimum but the subsequent edits show that editor was available for further improvement. I tend to wait a minimum of 15 minutes, and often an hour or more, before placing these kinds of tags just to ensure that I'm not being bitey. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up! Aasim (talk) 16:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

[edit]

Just because a page is eligible for speedy deletion does not make it a candidate for speedy keeping the discussion. Here, the best course of action would be to leave the discussion alone and wait for an admin to come along and handle it, or tag it for U1 yourself (and linking the discussion). By closing it, it's possible that the nominator will never get the result they ask for if they aren't following the discussion and/or is unaware of how tagging pages works. Furthermore, there is a chance that the CSD may be declined, so it is best to leave the discussion open so it could then be handled "slowly" if that were to happen. I went ahead and deleted it because I caught the closed discussion, but if I didn't, there is a real chance that the page would not have been deleted. -- Tavix (talk) 18:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

New message from IR2017

[edit]
Hello, Awesome Aasim. You have new messages at IR2017's talk page.
Message added 08:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I'm not engaging in an edit war. His edit was reverse by a previous user on 10 February 2021. I'm just reverting to the original edit of that user on 10 February. His sources does not cite whatever his is claiming. Independent Airman (talk) 08:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

"IR2017" returned the contents of his User Talk to itself.

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:IR2017&action=history

This is accepted that User_talk:IR2017 is not willing to participate in Talk.--Storm598 (talk) 08:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

That user is considered a malicious user. Currently, IR2017 is not participating in the Talk:Tuesday Group that I opened.--Storm598 (talk) 08:57, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Storm598 Please assume good faith. There is already a report on the administrators' noticeboard (particularly the section on edit warring) and any other misbehavior like making accusations that the other user is not following policy is likely to land you a block or an interaction ban to protect the site. I hope the matter gets resolved there and no admin has to block you, but accusing the other editor of doing something is going to make matters worse. Aasim (talk) 09:02, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

signature tweaks

[edit]

Please don't tweak my (or anyone else's) signature, even if you don't approve of the precise formatting. It wasn't causing any errors on the page. ♠PMC(talk) 09:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Okay. No more turning into ♠ anytime soon now. Aasim (talk) 10:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

the shindo 7 ;^;

[edit]

where is the shindo 7 in 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami?- (also im now logged in) --aliza! T/C 15:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Messing with Archives

[edit]

Hi @Awesome Aasim: Don't update archives. It not a good idea and goes against the grain in preserving all the messy habits. I used to do it myself until I got warned off. scope_creepTalk 12:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

[edit]

Trout by XfDvote

[edit]

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Pls see special:diff/1012818719--Alcremie (talk) 14:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Oh, sure, you misuse the tool and suddenly it's the creator's fault... Primefac (talk) 15:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
IN How? If it is a bug then I'll look into it :) Aasim (talk) 15:51, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

[edit]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –MJLTalk 17:03, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

ROLLBACK ABUSE. –MJLTalk 17:06, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
¡ǝƃɐd ʞlɐʇ uʍop ǝpᴉsdn uɐ uo ƃuᴉʇsod ʞɔnl pooƃ 'llǝM MJL Aasim (talk) 18:11, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
˙¡ʎsɐƎ –MJLTalk 18:44, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Barnstar of Good Humor
Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2021! I hope you have a good rest of the year. Nrco0e (talk · contribs) 01:21, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Articles for deletion discussions are for deletion only, not merging. If you'd like to propose a merge, then please use the {{mergeto}} and/or {{mergefrom}} templates on the article, and then suggest a merge on the talk page, or be WP:BOLD and do the merge yourself. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 02:44, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

And please don't arbitrarily redirect the article without any discussion. If you want to propose a merge, then do so. Meters (talk) 05:33, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2021 on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:33, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 15:45, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Awesome Aasim! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 15:45, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:George Floyd protests in Minneapolis–Saint Paul on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:32, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of a joke AfD you created for April Fools' 2021

[edit]

Hi, I'm letting you know that I've nominated a joke AfD nomination you created for deletion, as it didn't get significant participation on April Fools'. You can participate in the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Unfunny AfDs from April Fools 2021. Thanks you. Elli (talk | contribs) 12:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Second Cold War on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

[edit]