User talk:Archi4683

January 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Diane Guerrero. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me that understanding clearing where the problem is and how to add external link in right place. Archi4683 (talk) 06:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Eva Pinkelnig. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me that How can i add my link through Wikipedia's external links guidelines and where did mistake happen while adding the link. Archi4683 (talk) 06:36, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 17:29, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Archi4683 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not done advertising or self-promoting but you blocked my username. Archi4683 (talk) 05:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your only purpose in being here seems to be to spam links to what I assume is your blog. Leaving aside the conflict of interest that presents, blogs are almost never considered reliable sources here as they usually lack fact checking and editorial control. As you seem to have no other purpose here, there are no grounds to remove the block. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.