User talk:Acetotyce/Archive 3

Revert on Fair Use

Hey why are you deleting my update in Shirish Kunder profile? How do you say it doesnt value add. It is a big episode and the story needs to be told to people who wants to read about him. so let it be there. i have added again. Pls dont delete it now

Here is the full story

http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/shirish-kunder-apologises-to-shah-rukh-khan-on-twitter-259148

Revert on Fair Use

While it may not appear constructive, the addition of a "marking-text" to block incorrect or misleading data is constructive. My only apology is that I don't have enough time to give a full legal correction. Perhaps you can say that "this section is in contention".

No need to apologize but content like that tends to distract the reader of the article. If you want to keep the content; please put it into the talk page of the article! Cheers --PrabashWhat? 00:13, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

The purpose is to distract the reader from incorrect content. Is it better to have access to incorrect content, or to be distracted from it?

We dont want to distract the reader with comments, but if the reader wants to know any issues on the topic he/she can refer to the talk page for more info --PrabashWhat? 02:21, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Revert on uname

I don't quite understand why you chose to revert this change as "not constructive". The version of uname shipped by Sun/Oracle with Solaris 10 does not accept the -o flag as a valid option. Assuming it does will get you into trouble: https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/issues/1800.

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. That was fast! — MusikAnimal ^talk 20:05, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

• No Problem! Cheers! The Grand Cenobite (talk) 20:07, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Change of heart

Had a change of heart? Good for you. Keep trying to do the right thing, and learn from the mistakes. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

• Yeah I decided i'll keep on going, and not to lose hope! Cheers. The Grand Cenobite (talk) 21:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Georgia News Network, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Georgia News Network" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 18:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Acetotyce. You have new messages at Smtchahal's talk page.
Message added 02:09, 27 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

smtchahal^talk 02:09, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Ubuntu

I do not understand why you deleted the definition added to Ubuntu. This is a valid definiton of - Ubuntu – If it’s not good for everyone… it’s no good at all, as stated by Michael Tellinger who has created the Ubuntu Party - www.ubuntuparty.org.za the definition is appropriate and valid, just because you have a personal negative opinion is no reason to remove valid positive information from Wikipedia. Energy Of life (talk) 19:29, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Energy Of life I reverted it for two reasons; The way it was worded was inappropriate, and the fact that it was unsourced to any website proving evident vandalism or test editing.--PrabashWhat? 20:04, 8 June 2013 (UTC