Jump to content

User talk:94.119.64.15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Information icon Please refrain from changing genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. - SummerPhDv2.0 12:49, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No. They are not my point of view. They are fact. More proof is even that another guy approved. 94.119.64.15 (talk) 12:51, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is based on verifiable information, as presented in reliable sources, not "two guys agree". You will need to find a reliable source for the change. - SummerPhDv2.0 14:27, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Talib Kweli— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 20:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Talib Kweli. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 22:30, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Diane Abbott, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:16, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Music1201. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Aberford— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Music1201 talk 19:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Nick D'Aloisio— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:57, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nick D'Aloisio. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Tenant farmer— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Qzd (talk) 10:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm GoneIn60. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Wicker Man (roller coaster), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 20:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2018

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of totalitarian regimes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Craig Davison (talk) 11:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at North West England. Favonian (talk) 11:19, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Casablanca (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 12:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at The Church (1989 film), you may be blocked from editing. Zingarese talk · contribs 17:05, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Yorkshire pudding. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. XYZt (talk) 19:29, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at KCOM Stadium, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:15, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Citizen Canine. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cell biology have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Citizen Canine (talk) 11:19, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chicken Cottage have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:51, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Translation studies has been reverted.
Your edit here to Translation studies was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/Sitraduttologia/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:26, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Not a web host

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

94.119.64.15 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This IP has nothing to do with any web host. It's also blocked so that logged-in users can't even edit. There is no reason for that to be done that I can see. 94.119.64.15 (talk) 07:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see nothing to indicate that this is anything other than a webhost. Accounts can't use webhosts either. 331dot (talk) 09:16, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.