Jump to content

User talk:71.197.186.255

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. Paul H. (talk) 15:19, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Paul H. (talk) 15:19, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Luboš_Motl_(4th_nomination). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. I JethroBT drop me a line 20:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Alleged admin abuse by me

[edit]

No evidence — no consideration. El_C 09:49, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you're back. El_C 10:19, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I moved your input to the suggestions box

[edit]

Thanks for your input about media coverage of the recent brouhaha. I moved your comment to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestions where we gather suggestions for coverage, rather than WT:Wikipedia Signpost where you posted. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:09, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 14:10, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
  • El_C, thank you for this link; that's plenty, with the other recent posts, to block. I suppose I am hereby complicit in this conspiracy to "#cancelwhitemales", and I look forward to receiving that group's brochure so I can consider official membership. As for "disruptive troll", IP, that shoe seems to fit, doesn't it. Drmies (talk) 14:12, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Re [1]. In case you are somehow under the delusion that I'm remotely sympathetic to your 'cause' or am somehow against feminism, social justice, etc... let me dispel that notion for you here and now. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:55, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Headbomb: Anything less than that would put you in the hotseat. Keep up the great work, and be smart about picking your battles. 71.197.186.255 (talk) 21:22, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.197.186.255 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

WMF has been getting more than $100M in donations with little to no accountability to where that is going. It is more and more obvious that that money is being directly strictly not at supporting the userbase who supply quality to this website. WMF is interested in the "correct" kind of userbase, but it has failed for a decade now to attract any sort of new, different userbase in significant numbers. If WMF request for donations would be genuine, whey would sound like "please give us another $100M so we can hire employees with personal agendas that will push away volunteers from the boradest possible spectrum, and instead, only allow for a "correct" distributon of a correct skin tone, and "correct" distribution of sexual organs -including options as forceful removal of those who are not representative nor favor of this "correct" distribution. Any energy spent on pointing out this terrible misappropriation of trust has been unwelcome, and any such efforts are tagged as "disruptive edits" even when they break absolutely no rules/pillars agreed upon by the community at large. 71.197.186.255 (talk) 21:41, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. 331dot (talk) 21:49, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.197.186.255 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No disruptive edits were done from this IP. Expressive wrongthink does not break any rules established (publicly) on wikipedia. 71.197.186.255 (talk) 21:51, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yeah, you're right, and I am one of the wicked bunch that you are complaining about, so I am declining your unblock request to stop you from telling THE TRUTH®. (Or alternatively, your claims are a load of crap, and we can do without wasting our time on such nonsense. Choose which of those two explanations you prefer.) JamesBWatson (talk) 22:57, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've removed your talk page access as it seems clear that you are here to rant and not contribute to this project. If your request is declined by someone else, that will leave you with WP:UTRS to request unblock. 331dot (talk) 22:04, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Penghu 1

[edit]

Thank you for your edit on Penghu 1 !! --Yug (talk) 11:11, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:71.197.186.255&oldid=943185784"