Jump to content

User talk:142.29.217.130

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2007

[edit]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to James Cook. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caltas(talk) 18:43, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Xezbeth 17:53, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning for editing NASDAQ (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // MartinBot 17:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Robert Frost, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Katieh5584 21:29, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Robert Burns, you will be blocked from editing. Stwalkerster talk review 21:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

. dave souza, talk 21:36, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Leg, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  —SMALLJIM  19:10, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Barbra Streisand. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Ale_Jrbtalk 19:42, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Barbra Streisand, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Barbra Streisand was changed by 142.29.217.130 (u) (t) deleting 19617 characters on 2008-03-06T19:42:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:42, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

[edit]

Your recent edit to Barbra Streisand (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 19:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

[edit]

Your recent edit to Williams Lake, British Columbia (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:08, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Williams Lake Secondary School constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Antonio Lopez (talk) 02:01, 11 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Fort Nelson, British Columbia, you will be blocked from editing. Face-2-face (talk) 01:03, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Carey Price, you will be blocked from editing. -- Dbrodbeck (talk) 21:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Niels Bohr, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Old Moonraker (talk) 16:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Niels Bohr, you will be blocked from editing. BananaFiend (talk) 16:07, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Snowolf How can I help? 16:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2008

[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Carey Price has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 18:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Emotional intelligence has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 17:29, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

[edit]

Oh, you're back at school, and you've vandalized Runway (fashion).

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--Jerzyt 23:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Quick counts suggest abt 90-95% reverted edits. Next time around, i recommend a rigorous check for any constructive edits, and consideration of treating this as a vandalism-only account.
    --Jerzyt 23:17, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Sand animation, you will be blocked from editing. - Mark 04:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Durian, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Durian was changed by 142.29.217.130 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-05-13T17:50:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:50, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to H.D.. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Piano non troppo (talk) 17:08, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoygabsadds 17:20, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to H.D., did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: H.D. was changed by 142.29.217.130 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-05-19T20:14:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Francis Drake has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jozal (talk) 15:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Francis Drake. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps 15:59, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Edward de Bono, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Edward de Bono was changed by 142.29.217.130 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-05-25T21:51:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:51, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page David Livingstone. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Sitethief (talk) 21:56, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to David Livingstone. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. NorwegianBlue talk 22:11, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to David Livingstone. Sitethief (talk) 22:12, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to nicotine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:37, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Dustin the Turkey has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. ElemeshTalk 19:46, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

[edit]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Gibson Les Paul. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Manway (talk) 18:33, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tonja Walker. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. — TAnthonyTalk 02:41, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

April 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Displacement, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 18:54, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Twelve-step program has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 18:48, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Maquinna, you may be blocked from editing. Manway (talk) 19:24, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.