User:Quadell/scrap2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following #Unhandled section lists species articles that were asserted by User:Polbot to be monotypic within their genera. However, this statement has not been independently evaluated, and may not be correct. See User talk:Quadell#Polbot and monotypy for more information.

Here's how you can help. If the species below can be confirmed to be monotypic, then simply move the entry to the #Confirmed monotypic section below. (You may also want to add a source to the article confirming the fact, like this.) If the species can be shown to not be monotypic, please remove the statement from the article like this and change the genus article from a redirect to a proper article like this. Then move the entry to the #Confirmed polytypic section below. Finally, if you cannot confirm one way or the other, it would still help if you could add {{Citation needed}} to the statement in the article like this, and move the entry to the #Citation needed section. Thanks for helping.

Unhandled[edit]

Citation needed[edit]

Confirmed monotypic[edit]

Confirmed polytypic[edit]