User:Mkdw/sandbox

SPI[edit]

Usage Code Output

{{sockpuppet|Example|blocked}}

The account has been blocked based on WP:DUCK or behavioural evidence combined a with a possible or likely CU result (but it isn't certain).

This account is a suspected sockpuppet of Example (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

{{sockpuppet|Example|confirmed}}

A CU has

Confirmed that the accounts are related.

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Example (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

{{sockpuppeteer|blocked}}

Proven via a Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations report, blocked, SPI page given and not the name of the user being tagged. The template will automatically link to the spipage of the user being tagged if it exists.

This account has been blocked indefinitely because the account owner is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

{{sockpuppeteer|blocked|checked=yes}}

A CU has

Confirmed that the accounts are related.

This account has been blocked indefinitely because CheckUser evidence confirms that the operator has abusively used multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

{{Socksuspectnotice}} Warning N/A

{{checkuserblock-account}}

Checkuser block notice and appeal instructions

CheckUser evidence has determined that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org.

Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

OS[edit]

Usage	Code	Output
{{User:Fluffernutter/c}}	Notice to editor about suppressed contribution.	Hi Mkdw, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! Mkdw ^talk 05:10, 18 January 2017 (UTC)