User:Maile66/DYK

Category:Image with comment templates

Time update

User:DYKUpdateBot/Time Between Updates (in seconds)

My own DYK

Further information: User:Maile66/DYKs for Maile66

Nominated for other editors

Further information: User:Maile66/DYK nominated for other editors

Basic review

• The review needs more details, in accordance with. DYK review instructions please begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed. Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found at DYKReviewing guide— Maile (talk) 00:38, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Supplementary guidelines H4 Where a hook has more than one new or expanded article in it, an article-for-article quid pro quo (QPQ) is required: one article reviewed for each bolded article in the hook.

Here

Good 2 go review - click "show" for details - — Maile (talk) 15:13, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

The following has been checked in this review by Maile QPQ done by Hawkeye7 Eligibility Article created by Quill and Pen on January 23, 2012, with a pre-expansion size of 440 characters of readable prose 5X expansion began by Hawkeye7 on Januray 11, 2014 and brought it to 4,130 characters of readable prose Has not appeared on DYK previously Article is NPOV, stable, no edit wars, no dispute tags, no outstanding talk page issues Sourcing Every paragraph sourced, both online and offline No bare URLs, and no external links used as inline sources Hook Hook is NPOV, 113 characters, stated in the article and sourced offline Images No hook image, but images used in the article are sourced on Commons Tools Duplication Detector check of online sourcing found no copyvio Disambig links tool found no issues External links tool found no issues for online sourcing and for offline sourcing. Good 2 go. — Maile (talk) 15:13, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Table

Category:Image with comment templates

Basic instructions on how to promote a hook

Select a hook from the nominations page that has one of these ticks as the bottom post: . 1) Check to make sure basic review requirements were completed. a. Any outstanding issue following needs to be addressed before promoting. 2) Check the article history for any substantive changes since it was nominated or reviewed. 3) Images must be freely licensed. Fair-use images are not permitted. Images loaded on Commons that appear on the Main Page are automatically protected by KrinkleBot. 4) Hook must be stated in both the article and source (which must be cited at the end of the article sentence where stated). 5) Hook should make sense grammatically. 6) Try to vary subject matters within each prep area. 7) Try to select a funny, quirky or otherwise upbeat hook for the last or bottom hook in the set. Open the Prep area where you intend to add the hook. 1) For hooks held for specific dates, refer to "Local update times" section on DYK Queue. a. Completed Prep area number sets will be promoted by an administrator to corresponding Queue number. 2) Copy and paste the hook into a chosen slot. a. The hook should always have a space between "..." and "that", and should end in a "?" question mark. b. The hook should have a bold link to the article. 3) If it's the lead (first) hook, paste the image where indicated at the top of the template. 4) Copy and paste the credit information (the {{DYKmake}} and {{DYKnom}} templates) at the bottom. a. The same editor should not get both a DYKmake and a DYKnom for the same article; omit the DYKnom in that case b. Check the DYKmake entries in Preview mode 1. At the bottom under "Credits" to the right of the article should have the link "View nom subpage" ; if not, a subpage parameter will need to be added to the DYKmake. 5) Save the page. In the DYK nomination template 1) In the upper left hand side, replace the line {{DYKsubpage with {{subst:DYKsubpage 2) In the upper left hand side, replace |passed= with |passed=yes 3) Check in Preview mode - if it was done correctly, everything will be against a pale blue background. There should be no stray characters (like }} ) at the top or bottom, and no text outside the blue background. 4) Edit summary should indicate which Prep area you have promoted the hook to. 5) Save.

DYK review instructions please begin with one of the 6 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed. Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found at DYKReviewing guide

DYK Review Cheatsheet

Symbol Code DYK Ready? Description {{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK {{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith {{subst:DYK?}} Query DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}} {{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe DYK eligibility requires additional work. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}} {{DYK?again}} Maybe New reviewer needed for article or hook {{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}} DYK Reviews At a Glance Criteria Shortcut Details Notes QPQ DYKSG H4 Required only for self-noms with over 5 DYK credits Multi-article hooks require one QPQ for each bolded article in the hook Eligibility New - no more than 7 days old in article space (not AFC) at nom Expanded - 5X within 7 days of nom Expanded previously unsourced BLP - 2X Promoted to Good Article status within 7 days Translated article from other wiki counts as new (article history edit summary should state translation) Has not appeared on DYK previously (noted on article's talk page and/or DYK check) Has not appeared on In the News as the qualifying linked and bolded article (noted on the article's talk page) No dispute tags (should not be removed without resolving the problem) NPOV, stable, no edit wars , no outstanding talk page issues Not a Stub Per DYK Reviewing guide In addition to at least 1,500 characters of readable prose, the article must not be a stub. This requires a judgement call, since there is no mechanical stub definition. If an article is, in fact, a stub, you should temporarily reject the nomination; if the article is not a stub, ensure that it is correctly marked as a non-stub, by removing any stub template(s) in the article, and changing any talk-page assessments to start-class or higher. All categories of noms subject to identical criteria reviews DYKcheck Length 1,500 minimum characters of readable prose Excludes infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables Sourcing Check for copyvio or close paraphrasing One inline source per paragraph Direct quotations must be marked as such and sourced No bare URLs or external links used as inline sources Dup Detector at Toolserver Hook Facts must be stated and sourced in article Should not focus negative aspects of living individuals If subject is fiction, hook must involve the real world Maximum of 200 characters NPOV No redlinks or external links Image and Sounds Must be in the article Freely licensed on Commons (fair use not permitted) Sounds must be formatted with {{DYK Listen}}

Misc

• Wikipedia:Did_you_know/Onepage
• WP:DYKSG#D9 on the 5-day thing
• J8 Sounds
• D6 Dispute tags
• D2 One inline citation per paragraph
• Earwig @ Toolserver Copyvio Detector
• Duplication detector at Labs
• Dup Detector at Toolserver
• QPQ Check
• Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_DYKs
•  In progress
• Template:Isdoing
• Image with comment
• Video links

How to promote an accepted hook

• In one window, open the DYK nomination subpage of the hook you would like to promote. In a separate window, open the prep area you intend to add the hook to.
• Paste the accepted hook and the credit information (the {{DYKmake}} and {{DYKnom}} templates) into the prep area. Make sure to follow the guidelines at Wikipedia:Did you know/Preparation areas.
• In the window where the DYK nomination subpage is open, replace the line {{DYKsubpage with {{subst:DYKsubpage, and replace |passed= with |passed=yes. Then save the page. This has the effect of wrapping up the discussion on the DYK nomination subpage in a green archive box and stating that the nomination was successful, as well as adding the nomination to a category for archival purposes.
• In your edit summary, please indicate which prep area you are moving the hook to.

Reviewed

Further information: User:Maile66/DYK reviews

Congratulations!

		The 25 DYK Nomination Medal
		Congratulations for reaching this milestone of making other editors' articles visible. Thank you for your work! Oceanh (talk) 16:46, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. Every bit of encouragement these days is appreciated. — Maile (talk) 16:54, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

25 DYK Medal

		The 25 DYK Nomination Medal
		Here's a belated but much deserved congratulations for more than 25 DYK nominations! Thanks for keeping the readers on the main page happy! Best, Yoninah (talk) 17:11, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. — Maile (talk) 19:09, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK medal

		The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		It is my pleasure to recognize your first 25 DYK creations, many on notable women and interesting sites. Your contributions in this and other areas of the DYK project are duly noted and appreciated. Yoninah (talk) 14:15, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

You beat me to 25 by about 4. Well done! Matty.007 17:41, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I won't make it to the next higher up. Lack of ambition.— Maile (talk) 17:45, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Oh Id just seen that you were up for this and had created a template!!! Still well done to @Yoninah and congrats anyway on your 25 DYKs and I see you have 22 nominations so don't forget to log those too. Well done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victuallers (talk • contribs) 18:29, 30 January 2014 (UTC)