User:IloveUveryMuch
848
|
This User had read a lot of WP:PG :-(, in fact he had read for 2 weeks. :-(
Reference best practices[edit]
This practice is facultative neither is it a policy nor a guideline of Wikipedia or Wikimedia sister projects.
Scope[edit]
This user page gives my reference best practices that I frequently use. It ONLY discusses the process of selecting sources.
Audience[edit]
It MAY intended to anyone who is interested in citing better, and those who are wikiholic. Or who spend 500 hours of their lives on Wikipedia.
Prerequisite[edit]
There is only one prerequisite: The will of finding references for a very very loooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnggggg time (WARNING: I did that for around 200 hours).
Benefits of reading this page[edit]
It SHOULD make u more a reliable editor, as referencing is a HUGGE Part of WP.
WHy DiD i wRiTE diz?[edit]
I found that after reading WP:CS, it was disguistingly long. And many WP articles cites disguisting sources. :(
They should replace that with this simple phrase: "All that we care is the information, how did it (the source) get that information (i.e. origin)? what can influence the contents (i.e. influence)?" as simple as that.
Another is: Thou shalt find "all" primary sources even if its exhaustive.
Willfull violation[edit]
§WHy Did i wRiTE diz? is a willfull violation of MOS:HEAD sentence case rule.
Discourse format[edit]
Quid novi?[edit]
I am now learning intellectual property.