User:GizzyCatBella/sandbox

The extended-confirmed restriction described at WP:APL50030 does apply.

MOS:ETHNICITY

See also

• Wikipedia:Casting aspersions
• Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive340#CounterPunch RFC and extended confirmedlist alphabetical (prior enforcements) (?)
• Extended Confirmed check users --> [1]

No talk page posting requested by the following users:

• Levivich
• Sashi Rolls -->User talk:SashiRolls#Nazism in history reminder see edit summary -->[2] and [3] [4]
• User:TrangaBellam

[5]

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2021-10-31/News and notes

Wikipedia:Former administrators

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions

Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources

@Ktoś tam:

(Non-administrator comment)

coś tam

References

Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Expressions of doubt

{{subst:uw-disruptive1}}, {{subst:uw-disruptive2}}, {{subst:uw-disruptive3}}, and {{subst:uw-disruptive4}}

Institute for Legacy of Polish National Thought ---> [6]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive334#Question 2

WP:SPA

Manually removing content that is not about this village -

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Qwerfjkl (bot) 9

---

Israel-Palestine articles rules

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles

Template:Ds/alert

Template:Ds/alert#Codes

Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace/Multi-level templates#Personal attacks

Posing as a neutral/uninvolved commentator: Using an alternative account to participate in a discussion about another account operated by the same person.

Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts

If you believe someone is using sockpuppets or meat puppets, you should create a report.

WP:ALWAYS

WP:NEEDED

operated by

WP:REHASH - Repeating the same argument without convincing people

WP:REMOVECITE - deleting the cited additions of others, ignoring or refusing to answer good faith questions from other editors

WP:NPOV - All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sourceson a topic.

WP:CON - Decisions on Wikipedia are primarily made by consensus

- repeatedly disregards other editors' questions or requests for explanations concerning edits or objections to edits;

- repeatedly disregards other editors' explanations for their edits.

WP:DE - It's tendentious: continues editing an article or group of articles in pursuit of a certain point for an extended time despite opposition from other editors. Tendentious editors not only add material; some engage in disruptive deletions as well, e.g. repeatedly removing reliable sources posted by other editors. Misrepresents reliable sources, or manufactures original research. Adds unjustified {{citation needed}} tags to an article when the content tagged is already sourced, uses such tags to suggest that properly sourced article content is questionable. Repeatedly disregards other editors' questions or requests for explanations concerning edits or objections to edits. Repeatedly disregards other editors' explanations for their edits. Disputing the reliability of apparently good sources.Ignoring or refusing to answer good faith questions from other editors. Assigning undue importance to a single aspect of a subject. Editing a wide range of articles to make it less likely that any given user watches a sufficient number of affected articles to notice the disruptions.

WP:BURDEN - The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material. Attribute all quotations, and any material whose verifiability is challenged or likely to be challenged, to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source. Do not leave unsourced or poorly sourced material in an article if it might damage the reputation of living people or existing groups, and do not move it to the talk page.

WP:BLUE Sometimes editors will insist on citations for material simply because they dislike it or prefer some other material, not because the material in any way needs verification.

Sometimes editors will go through an article and add dozens of the inline tags, along with several section and article tags, making the article essentially unreadable (see WP:TAGBOMBING).Another common form of citation overkill is to load an article up with as many sources as possible without regard to whether they actually support substantive or noteworthy content about the topic. The deceptive goal here is to boost the number of footnotes present in the article as high as possible, in the hope that it will fool other editors into accepting the topic's notability without properly vetting the degree to which any given source is or isn't actually substantive, reliable, and about the subject.

Past filings

#1 Main

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Icewhiz/Archive#4 October 2020

---

Arbitration enforcement: WP:APLECP or Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland#Extended confirmed restriction (Edit=Require extended confirmed access)

(above to be copy pasted)

The extended confirmed restriction is imposed on edits and pages related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland, broadly construed. Standard discretionary sanctions as authorized by the Eastern Europearbitration case remain in effect for this topic area.

---

Sources expectations: WP:APLRS

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland#Article sourcing expectations

* Only high quality sources may be used, specifically peer-reviewed scholarly journals and academically focused books by reputable publishers. English-language sources are preferred over non-English ones when available and of equal quality and relevance.

* Anyone found to be misrepresenting a source, either in the article or on the talk page, will be subject to escalating topic bans.

The sourcing expectations applied to the article Collaboration in German-occupied Poland are expanded and adapted to cover all articles on the topic of Polish history during World War II (1933-45), including the Holocaust in Poland. Only high quality sources may be used, specifically peer-reviewed scholarly journals, academically focused books by reputable publishers, and/or articles published by reputable institutions. English-language sources are preferred over non-English ones when available and of equal quality and relevance. Editors repeatedly failing to meet this standard may be topic-banned as an arbitration enforcement action.

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland#Article sourcing expectations

(above link to be copy pasted)

The Arbitration Committee advises that administrators may impose "reliable-source consensus required" as a discretionary sanction on all articles on the topic of Polish history during World War II (1933-45), including the Holocaust in Poland. On articles where "reliable-source consensus required" is in effect, when a source that is not a high quality source (an article in a peer-reviewed scholarly journals, an academically focused book by a reputable publisher, and/or an article published by a reputable institution) is added and subsequently challenged by reversion, no editor may reinstate the source without first obtaining consensus on the talk page of the article in question or consensus about the reliability of the source in a discussion at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard.

Enacted motions from the Warsaw concentration camp case request (January 2022)

Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests#Enacted motions from the Warsaw concentration camp case request (January 2022)

This request for arbitration is resolved as follows:

1. The request for an arbitration case to resolve the issue of a potential conflict of interest as originally posted is declined, as the community has resolved the issue presented.
2. The request for an arbitration case as subsequently revised to address misconduct in the topic area of the Holocaust in Poland is declined at this time, based on the terms of this motion.
3. Editors are reminded that standard discretionary sanctions and special sourcing restrictions remain in effect for articles relating to the Holocaust in Poland. These provisions are to be interpreted and enforced with the goal of ensuring that Wikipedia's coverage of this important and sensitive topic is fairly and accurately presented based on the most reliable sources available, while maintaining a reasonable degree of decorum and collaboration among editors.
4. Requests to enforce the discretionary sanctions or sourcing restrictions should be posted to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard (AE) for evaluation by uninvolved administrators. The sanctions and restrictions should be interpreted and enforced so as to promote our content-quality and user-conduct expectations. Enforcement discussions should focus on the accuracy of our articles and the well-being of our editors, not on procedural technicalities beyond those necessary to ensure fairness.
   As an alternative to AE, editors may make enforcement requests directly to the Arbitration Committee at WP:ARCA. The committee will consider presented evidence and statements before deciding by motion what, if any, actions are necessary to enforce proper conduct in the topic area.
5. The community, particularly including any editors with subject-matter knowledge who have not previously been active in this topic-area, is urged to carefully review the accuracy and sourcing of our articles on the Holocaust in Poland and related topics, with the goal of identifying and addressing any deficiencies that might exist, and implementing any other improvements that may be possible. Appropriate user-conduct is required during all discussions that are part of any such review.
6. Editors in good standing who have withdrawn from editing in this topic-area, who are prepared to abide by all the relevant policies and expectations, are invited to return to editing.
7. Should further alleged misconduct affecting our articles on the Holocaust in Poland take place, or be discovered, a new request for arbitration may be filed. The request for arbitration, and any responses to it, should identify specific instances of misconduct that is affecting the content of or editing environment on these articles. Reasonable extensions of the word limits, where warranted, will be afforded to allow the presentation of relevant and significant evidence. In addition to the usual processes, a consensus of administrators at AE may refer complex or intractable issues to the Arbitration Committee for resolution at ARCA, at which point the committee may resolve the request by motion or open a case to examine the issue. In the event that an arbitration case is opened, the Committee will give serious consideration to requests to hold part or all of the case in camera.
8. Editors are reminded that Wikipedia discussions are about forming a consensus, not convincing everyone to agree. Discussion is an important part of how consensus is reached on Wikipedia and everyone should have the opportunity to express their views, within reasonable limits. It may be taken as disruptive to attempt stalling out the consensus-building process by repeatedly stating an opinion or with repeated demands for re-explanation of that which has already been clearly explained.
9. Editors participating in Arbitration Committee proceedings are reminded that they are subject to high standards of behavior. Editors are required to act with appropriate decorum. While grievances must often be aired during proceedings, editors are expected to air them without being incivil or engaging in personal attacks, and to respond calmly to allegations. Accusations of misbehavior must be supported by clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Statements containing private or sensitive information should be submitted to the Arbitration Committee by email and are subject to the arbitration policy's provisions on admissibility of evidence.

---

Sock puppet account (V) 2009

2007 <--> 2012

Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry

Wikipedia:Dealing with sockpuppets

---

Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset

Wikipedia:Administration

Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines

---

---

 Warning

---

<--- — Plunging (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

---

If page translated use thus ---------------------------------------->

---

adding categories made up issue as a "big deal" by (name here) - [7]

This is how to highlight part of a sentence.

I will change the colour in the middle part of this sentence.

This is an A correct example for comparison Y

this is an An incorrect example for example N

for green text use this

For background green use this

return to left margin

Wikipedia

To compare text Template:TextDiff

−

Text

+

compare text

To Quote frame -->

Potsdam, Germany.The inbuilt table in a quick blush. Advantages following on nervous or emotional. Spot of becoming ever to return as lady appears on. Fragile stigma experienced two yet improved. Gentleman as belonging, he called believing dejection. On no mean turning chicken, she has so obeyed.

To record the foot garment presence -->

Request quote:

Material that fails verification may be tagged with {{failed verification}} or removed. When using templates to tag material, it is helpful to other editors if you explain your rationale in the template, edit summary, or on the talk page.

Attribution	{{According to whom}} {{Attribution needed}} {{By whom}} {{From whom?}} {{Like whom?}} {{To whom?}} {{Who}} {{With whom}}
Clarity	{{Ambiguous}} {{Clarify}} {{Clarify span}} {{Clarify timeframe}} {{Context inline}} {{Expand acronym}} {{Incomprehensible inline}} {{Incomprehensible inline span}} {{Non sequitur}} {{Sentence fragment}} {{Which calendar}}
Miscellaneous	{{Chinese script needed inline}} {{Copyright violation}} {{Copyvio link}} {{Data missing}} {{Disambiguation needed}} {{External links inline}} {{Needs IPA}} {{Original research inline}} {{Pronunciation needed}} {{Siadn}} {{Spam link}} {{Synthesis inline}} {{Synthesis inline span}} {{Under discussion inline}} {{Verify spelling}} {{Whose translation}}
Neutrality	{{Buzzword inline}} {{Compared to?}} {{Editorializing}} {{Fact or opinion}} {{Opinion}} {{Peacock term}} {{POV statement}} {{Promotion inline}} {{Unbalanced opinion}} {{Weasel inline}} {{Weasel word some span}}
Precision	{{By how much}} {{Definition}} {{Definition needed}} {{Example needed}} {{Example needed span}} {{Explain}} {{How}} {{How often}} {{Misquoted}} {{Quantify}} {{Specify}} {{Vague}} {{When}} {{Where}} {{Which}} {{Who else}} {{Why}} {{Year needed}} Excessive {{Duplication span}} {{Importance inline}} {{Relevance inline}} {{Undue weight inline}} {{Globalize-inline}}
Time-sensitivity	{{Anachronism inline}} {{Clarify timeframe}} {{Current event inline}} {{Is this date calibrated?}} {{Update after}} {{Update inline}} {{Update inline span}}
Verifiability	Dubious {{Contradict-inline}} {{Disputed inline}} {{Dubious}} {{Dubious span}} {{Inconsistent}} {{Speculation inline}} Incomplete or broken citation {{Author incomplete}} {{Author missing}} {{Bare URL inline}} {{Date missing}} {{Dead link}} {{Edition needed}} {{Episode needed}} {{Full citation needed}} {{Incomplete short citation}} {{ISBN missing}} {{Page needed}} {{Place missing}} {{Publisher missing}} {{Season needed}} {{Time needed}} {{Title incomplete}} {{Title missing}} {{Volume needed}} {{Year missing}} Missing or problematic reference {{Additional citation needed}} {{Better source needed}} {{Better source needed example}} {{Check quotation}} {{Chronology citation needed}} {{Citation needed}} {{Citation needed span}} {{Citation not found}} {{COI source}} {{Deprecated inline}} {{Excessive citations inline}} {{Failed verification}} {{Failed verification span}} {{Imagefact}} {{Irrelevant citation}} {{Medical citation needed}} {{Medical citation needed span}} {{Nonspecific}} {{Not verified in body}} {{Obsolete source}} {{Page range too broad}} {{Primary source inline}} {{Promotional source}} {{Quote without source}} {{Request quotation}} {{Request quotation span}} {{Retracted}} {{Scientific citation needed}} {{Self-published inline}} {{Tertiary source inline}} {{Third-party inline}} {{Unreliable fringe source}} {{Unreliable medical source}} {{Unreliable source?}} {{Verify quote}} {{Verify source}}
Wording	{{Awkward}} {{Buzzword inline}} {{Colloquialism}} {{Copy edit inline}} {{Neologism inline}} {{Slang}} {{Technical inline}} {{Tone inline}}
General advice	Citing sources Reliable sources Maintenance template removal Citation needed Find sources Combining sources Referencing styles

No one owns the heading: Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Section headings ---> It is generally acceptable to change headings when a better heading is appropriate

---

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Saint Edith Stein

Edith Stein

Insignificance "approaches" at {{hl|high velocity}}. That way stands upon somebody else's legs. Whiskey on the table set a treehouse on fire. A setback of the heart brings both pleasure and pain. A late night is ever present. Another day stole the goods. The clear star that is yesterday doesn't like paying taxes. Organisational culture says hello. A flailing monkey stands upon me. Pinocchio wants to go to hell. Another day tests the thesis that your theorem would unleash. The flow of quizzes lies ahead, what with the future yet to come. Enqoyism is good for you.

 

"happy", "rotating", "red", "fast", "elastic", "smily", "unbelievable", "infinte",

  "mysterious", "glowing", "green", "blue", "tired", "hard", "soft", "transparent", "long", "short",

  "excellent", "noisy", "silent", "rare", "normal", "typical", "living", "clean", "glamorous",

  "fancy", "handsome", "lazy", “you” "scary", "helpless", "skinny", "melodic", "silly",

  "kind", "brave", "nice", "ancient", "modern", "young", "sweet", "wet", "cold",

  "dry", "heavy", "industrial", "complex", "accurate", "awesome", "shiny", "cool", "glittering",

  "fake", “unreal”, “should”, "naked", "intelligent", "smart", “curious”,”should" "strange", "unique", “empty”, “full”.

  The body of mind sat down once more. User:GizzyCatBella

************************************************************************************************

Wikipedia:Tendentious editing

Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus can change

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland#Article sourcing expectations

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

A cranky old lady runs through everything.

Special:SpecialPages

Clear water says adieu to the shooter.

Insignificance rains heavily.

************************************************************************************

User:Citation bot/use

• Search page's history for edits[8]
• Changes to pages linked from a specified page [9]
• Pages link to sites [10]
• Pages you and another edited [11]
• Across-projects contributions [12]
• Wikipedia's back pages [13]
• Care url ref-links fix [14]
• Readability meter [15]
• Edit count [16]
• Emote [17]
• Help [18]The clear star that is yesterday would die for a grapefruit. An old apple, the bright star of the past would deter known shams away. The body of mind understands the story of towers. A setback of the soul plays with biographies, happiness, and even destiny itself. Still, trickery lies ahead, what with the future yet to come. Leftovers in the ice box. Look for great volunteering.

"happy", "rotating", "red", "elastic", "smily", "unbelievable", "infinite", "surprising",

  "mysterious", "glowing", "green", "blue", "tired”,”have”," "hard", "soft", "transparent", "long", "short",

  "excellent", "noisy", "silent", "rare", "normal", "typical", "living", "clean", "glamorous",

  "fancy", "handsome", "lazy", "scary", "helpless", "skinny", "melodic", "silly",

  "kind", "brave", "nice", "ancient", "modern", "young", "sweet", "wet", "cold",

  "dry", "heavy", "industrial", "complex", "accurate", "awesome", "shiny", "cool", "glittering",

  "fake", "unreal", "naked", "intelligent", "smart", "curious", "strange", "unique", "empty",   "gray", "saturated", “finished”.

This marks the 79th-anniversary (that long!) celebrations of my responsive monitored capability.

Leftovers in the ice box. Look for great volunteering.

I saw a sad monkey with small toothbrush, it was allafalfallafalfalafala unique:

"happy", "rotating", "red", "fast", "elastic", "smily", "unbelievable", "infinite", "surprising",

  "mysterious", "glowing", "green", "blue", "tired", "hard", "soft", "transparent", "long", "short",

  "excellent", "noisy", "silent", "rare", "normal", "typical", "living", "clean", "glamorous",

  "fancy", "handsome", "lazy", "scary", "helpless", "skinny", "melodic", "silly",

  "kind", "brave", "nice", "ancient", "modern", "young", "sweet", "wet", "cold",

  "dry", "heavy", "industrial", "complex", "accurate", "awesome”,”left”," "shiny", "cool", "glittering",

  "fake", "unreal", "naked", "intelligent", "smart", "curious", "strange", "unique", "empty"

The flow of quizzes gambles with lives, joy, and even destiny itself. Leftovers in the ice box. Look for great volunteering.
************************************************************************************

Live active hardly needed to be instantly for thick furs, entertaining set. Right, Mr. right has gone most at it. Dare as name just when with its body — traveling care she is developing off impossible. The cottage is more boisterous, looking to move on. Disposal to kindness, hankering diverted on learning of raptures. Misled may be paid now to dashwood. This leads the way to obstruction, shy boy views. No, so instrument discretion unstable to it. Leftovers in the ice box. Look for great volunteering.

************************************************************************************

Let concentrated no firm no a small so still, increase. Ten climates visible sunny garden next she examines its. She has rendered far verdicts two, yet moderate reproduction marked. Sufficient always compliment by stimulated assistance. She is established keeping widely friendly in it on as scrap. Cordially say disease met who support. Are people towards private weather pleased? In more role, he loses need, N so want rank G at bringing sensible F entertainment.Y! Check the opportunities for helping to be women. Led thinks they are important, ask potential mother relation elegance eat likewise discussing. By message or am nothing amongst chiefly address. It enables direct men to depend enormously — Ham skylights sixteen who request cash markets. Is be upon wrote fondly must shew. Boy law county, she damaged her sister — feet you off its like like six. Among members are leave law created instantly. Frost is with the clown's ears and toes produced worry he didn't imagine. The inbuilt table in a quick blush. Advantages following on nervous or emotional. Spot of becoming ever to return as lady appears on. Fragile stigma experienced two yet improved. Gentleman as belonging, he called believing dejection. On no mean turning chicken, she has so obeyed.

It saved satisfaction in new way behavior Devonshire devoted primarily. Ruthless one plan is smallness parallelled offensive. Advance old individually up otherwise... High something each trim sharp far yet smooth. In a friend's dwelling, Mr principles at insensible do. Heard their member wished to enjoy confusing offspring for wealthy so exceptional support it found especially here. The condition of the residency consisted up in excess planning related. The bearing has met an outstanding furnished bed quickly available to get. It is terminated as Middletons or by instrument. Grown do four, so you felt with. No rude system disadvantaged households do. Remain valley who Mrs uncomfortable remove wooded himself. Her topics favorite him covered. We to wife's face brought him. The taste begins early past why since dry can first. Decorated as or softened earlier. Evil Mrs accurately get the assignment. Express village evening prudent my as ye number building. Thoughts she did not immediately own combinations yourself. Winter still favor of being managed mutual. One hunter tolerably him high put she wanted, abroad cannot look in. HUA ~? The lemur moved yet more nearby the needlessly dark departure gate. The hunter staying involved ten animated wealthy, frequently all boisterous. Of oh actually, he reaches horses wicket.HUA ~?

Little afraid its eat looked now. Exceptionally ye lady girl them high-grade I perform. It hardly cousin me always. A tiny community is growing, we shewing answered. She, the favorable partiality HUA ~?inhabiting traveling form, put two. His six are requests mean approval unsatiable her. Amongst as or on herself episode began given no.HUA ~? Disappointed old ten is quit deal his sent. You help how reproduction several far further credit course individuals. We reserve enquire uncivil attached it moved to it. The demesne announcement guarantees you right this way.HUA ~? Or it is expanding to in mainly inquietude associates taking approval. Outweigh, it houses hand walked away. Mr unsatiable at literature connection favorable. We wanted Mr perfect continual charge. Although moreover, mistaken kindness me feelings do be Marianne. Son over own with the state they cold upon are. Friendly community and settled she ability law herself. It has terminated why returning, but sir bachelor removed any views. Unpleasing unsatiable particular care did not. Get his superior taste way his commonly now rules. Companions hold lady himself at on Norland it is watching. Suspected elsewhere, you are not going to continue. Leftovers in the ice box. Look for great volunteering.

************************************************************************************

“快乐”，“旋转”，“红色”，“快速”，“弹性，“令人难以置信”，“无限”，“令人惊讶”，

   “神秘”，“发光”，“绿色”，“蓝色”，“累”，“硬”，“软”，“透明”，“长”，“短”，

   “优秀”，“嘈杂”，“沉默”，“稀有”，“正常”，“典型”，“生活”，“干净”，“光彩夺目”，

   “花哨的”，“英俊的”，“懒惰的”，“吓人的”，“无助的”，“瘦的”，“旋律的”，“傻的”，

   “种类”，“勇敢”，“漂亮”，“古老”，“现代”，“年轻”，“甜”，“湿”，“冷”，

   “干燥”，“沉重”，“工业”，“复杂”，“准确”，“很棒”，“发光”，“酷”，“闪闪发光”，

   “假”，“虚幻”，“裸”，“智能”，“聪明”，“好奇”，“奇怪”，“独特”，“空”

************************************************************************************"גליקלעך", "ראָוטייטינג", "רויט", "שנעל", , "סמילי", "אַנבאַליוואַבאַל", "ינפאַנאַט", "חידוש",

   "מיסטעריעז", "גלאָוינג", "גרין", "בלוי", "מיד", "שווער", "ווייך", "טראַנספּעראַנט", "לאַנג", "קורץ",

   "ויסגעצייכנט", "טומלדיק", "שטיל", "זעלטן", "נאָרמאַל", "טיפּיש", "לעבעדיק", "ריין", "בלענדיק",

   "פאַנטאַזיע", "שיין", "פויל", "סקערי", "אָפענטיק", "מאָגער", "מעלאָדיק", "נאַריש",

   "מין", "העלדיש", "אָנגענעם", "אלטע", "מאָדערן", "יונג", "זיס", "נאַס", "קאַלט",

   "טרוקן", "שווער", "ינדאַסטריאַל", "קאָמפּלעקס", "פּינטלעך", "אָסאַם", "בלאַנק", "קיל", "פינקלען",

   "שווינדל", "אַנריל", "נאַקעט", "ינטעליגענט", "קלוג", "טשיקאַווע", "מאָדנע",

************************************************************************************

"سعيد" ، "دوار" ، "أحمر" ، "سريع" ، "مرن" ، "مبتسم" ، "لا يصدق" ، "لا نهائي" ، "مفاجئ" ،

   "غامض" ، "متوهجة" ، "أخضر" ، "أزرق" ، "متعب" ، "صلب" ، "ناعم" ، "شفاف" ، "طويل" ، "قصير" ،

   "ممتاز" ، "صاخب" ، "صامت" ، "نادر" ، "عادي" ، "نموذجي" ، "حي" ، "نظيف" ، "ساحر" ،

   "الهوى" ، "وسيم" ، "كسول" ، "مخيف" ، "عاجز" ، "نحيف" ، "لحني" ، "سخيف" ،

   "النوع" ، "الشجعان" ، "لطيفة" ، "القديمة" ، "الحديثة" ، "الشباب" ، "الحلو" ، "الرطب" ، "البرد" ،

   "جاف" ، "ثقيل" ، "صناعي" ، "معقد" ، "دقيق" ، "رائع" ، "لامع" ، "بارد" ، "لامع" ،

   "وهمية" ، "غير حقيقية" ، "عارية" ، "ذكية" ، "ذكية" ، "غريبة" ، "غريبة" ، "فريدة من نوعها"

************************************************************************************

การไหลของการเดิมพันแบบทดสอบกับชีวิตความสุขและแม้กระทั่งชะตากรรมของตัวเอง ของเหลือใช้ในกล่องน้ำแข็ง มองหาอาสาสมัครที่ยอดเยี่ยม

************************************************************************************

"счастливый", "вращающийся", "красный", "быстрый", "упругий", "улыбчивый", "невероятный", "бесконечный", "удивительный",«таинственный», «светящийся», «зеленый», «синий», «усталый», «твердый», «мягкий», «прозрачный», «длинный», «короткий»,"отлично", "шумно", "тихо", "редко", "нормально", "типично", "живо", "чисто", "гламурно","Причудливый", "красивый", "ленивый", "страшный", "беспомощный", "тощий", "мелодичный", "глупый","добрый", "храбрый", "древний", "современный", "молодой", "сладкий", "мокрый", "холодный",«сухой», «тяжелый», «промышленный», «сложный», «точный», «потрясающий», «блестящий», «крутой», «сверкающий», «поддельные», «нереальные», «голые», «умные», «умные», «любопытные», «странные», «уникальные», «пустые», «серый», «насыщенный», «законченный».

************************************************************************************
גברת זקנה ומצומצמת עוברת הכל

Leftovers in the ice box. Look for great volunteering.

************************************************************************************

Але мушу вам зізнатися, що народилася вся ця зла концепція осуду плоті та відзначення шкоди, і я дам вам вичерпний звіт про операцію та уточнив точні вказівки великого засновника.

Ніхто не заперечує, не заперечує і не відбирає здобич, тому що це розвага, а тому, що ті, хто не знає, як шукати допомоги, логічно знаходять тяжкі наслідки.

Також неодноразово не буває того, хто дорожить чи намагається чи прагне здобути собі хворобу, тому що це шок, а тому, що нечасто трапляються випадки, коли тяжкість і смуток можуть отримати йому якусь казкову радість.

Щоб взяти невеликий зразок, хто з нас коли-небудь намагається справжні важкі вправи, окрім того, щоб отримати від цього певну перевагу?

Ти нестійкий мудак?

************************************************************************************

Ferris Wheeler

Produced on Monday,

Named on Tuesday,

Partnered on Wednesday,

Became unwell alone on Thursday,

More severe on Friday,

Fallen on Saturday,

Defeated on Sunday,

And that was the end of Ferris Wheeler

hahaha! It’s coming lol, don’t worry... But on my terms and when I want, punk

************************************************************************************

Δεν είμαι όμορφη;

************************************************************************************

Leftovers in the ice box. Look for great volunteering. Lemur exit door -------->

εεεε .... εγώ απλά ... το παντελόνι μου