User:Doktor Züm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User boxes
tyop
typo
This user is a member of the
Wikipedia Typo Team.
Wikipedia:HotCatThis user uses HotCat to work with categories.
This user has been on Wikipedia for 1 year, 8 months and 21 days.
17,500+This user has made more than 17,500 contributions to Wikipedia.
This user is a computer scientist.
This user contributes using Firefox.
This user lives in Melbourne.
en-auThis user is a native speaker of Australian English.
Useful templates for articles
{{update}} "This Wikipedia page needs to be updated."
{{missing information}} "This article is missing information about..."
{{multiple issues}} "This article has multiple issues..."
{{cleanup}} "This article may require cleanup..."
{{cleanup rewrite}} "This article may need to be rewritten..."
{{copy edit}} "This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, ..."
{{advert}} "This article contains content that is written like an advertisement..."
{{technical}} "This article may be too technical for most readers to understand..."
{{tone}} "This article's tone or style may not reflect..."
{{travel guide}} "This article is written like a travel guide..."
{{very long}} "This page may be too long to read and navigate comfortably."
{{overlinked}} "This article may have too many links to other articles..."
{{schedule}} "This article or section contains a current television or radio schedule."
{{context}} "This article provides insufficient context..."
{{generalize}} "This article describes only one highly specialized aspect..."
{{cite check}} "This article possibly contains inappropriate or misinterpreted citations..."
{{excessive citations}} "This article may contain an excessive number of citations."
{{media IMDb refimprove}} "This media article uses IMDb for verification."
{{more citations needed}} "This article needs additional citations for verification."
{{one source}} "This article relies largely or entirely on a single source."
{{original research}} "This article possibly contains original research."
{{primary sources}} "This article relies excessively on references to primary sources."
{{refexample}} "This article gives self-sourcing popular culture examples..."
{{speculation}} "This article possibly contains unsourced predictions, speculative material, or..."
{{unreferenced}} "This article does not cite any sources."
{{unreliable sources}} "Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable."
{{user-generated}} "This article may contain improper references to user-generated content."
{{confusing}} "This article may be confusing or unclear to readers."
{{contradicts other}} "This article appears to contradict another article."
{{contradicts others}} "This article appears to contradict {specific articles}..."
{{incomprehensible}} "This article may be incomprehensible or very hard to understand."
{{misleading}} "This article or section may contain misleading parts."
{{self-contradictory}} "This article or section appears to contradict itself."
{{unclear date}} "This article or section contains statements that may date quickly..."
{{unfocused}} "This article may lack focus or may be about more than one topic."
{{bad summary}} "This article may not properly summarize its corresponding main article."
{{duplication}} "This article duplicates the scope of other articles."
{{notability}} "The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline."
{{disputed}} "This article's factual accuracy is disputed."
{{pov}} "The neutrality of this article is disputed."
{{pov check}} "The neutrality of this article is disputed."
{{no footnotes}} "This article includes a list of references, ... but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations."
Useful templates for article sections
{{expand section}} "This section needs expansion."
{{multiple issues|section=yes}} "This section has multiple issues..."
{{cleanup section}} "This section may require cleanup..."
{{section rewrite}} "This section may need to be rewritten..."
{{copy edit section}} "This section may require copy editing..."
{{importance section}} "This section contains information of unclear or questionable importance..."
{{summarize section}} "This section may be too long and excessively detailed..."
{{off topic}} "This section may contain material unrelated or insufficiently related..."
{{disputed section}} "This section's factual accuracy is disputed."
{{cite check section}} "This section possibly contains inappropriate or misinterpreted citations..."
{{more citations needed section}} "This section needs additional citations for verification."
{{misleading}} "This article or section may contain misleading parts."
{{self-contradictory}} "This article or section appears to contradict itself."
{{unclear date}} "This article or section contains statements that may date quickly..."
{{unreferenced section}} "This section does not cite any sources."
{{pov section}} "The neutrality of this section is disputed."
Useful templates for article lead sections
{{improve lead}} "This article's lead section may not adequately summarize its contents..."
{{lead rewrite}} "The lead section of this article may need to be rewritten."
{{lead too long}} "This article's lead section may be too long..."
{{lead too short}} "This article's lead section may be too short..."
{{pov lead}} "The neutrality of this article's introduction is disputed."
Useful templates for article plot summary sections
{{all plot}} "This article consists almost entirely of a plot summary..."
{{long plot}} "This article's plot summary may be too long or excessively detailed..."
{{more plot}} "This article needs an improved plot summary..."
{{no plot}} "This article needs a plot summary."
Subpages
Barnstars

The Editor's Barnstar Editors Barnstar

Doktor Züm you took on a big job editing Parisutham Institute of Technology and Science. For your efforts I'm awarding you this Editors Barnstar. Keep up the good work. Karenthewriter (talk) 21:42, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

The Typo Team Barnstar
You've done a lot of great work for the Typo Team in just a short period of time. You've earned yourself a barnstar in recognition of your devotion to making Wikipedia shiny and nice. Jason Quinn (talk) 18:00, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Dear colleague,
Given that Jason has already awarded you the Typo Team Barnstar above, I am delighted to second his vote of confidence by awarding you the present Barnstar, seeing as how tirelessly you have been contributing to the efforts of our Typo Team!
Thank you so much for your amazing efforts so far, and please keep up your most excellent work.
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(become old-fashioned!) 19:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The Guestbook Barnstar
This user has signed The Master of Mayhem's guestbook and, ahem, deserves this award. You could if you wouldn't stop giggling like Jasper Carrott.