User:CuriousMind01/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://smartgunlaws.org/gun-laws/state-law/colorado/

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/05/homo-naledi-human-evolution-science/?sf77322365=1

http://gameo.org/index.php?title=Winterbourne_Old_Order_Mennonite_Meetinghouse_(West_Montrose,_Ontario,_Canada)

Special:RecentChangesLinked/Wikipedia:WikiProject Firearms/Watchlist

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/world/ak-47-mass-shootings.html

[1] https://hbr.org/1958/11/management-in-the-1980s

Talk:Colt AR-15#Port Arthur massacre .28Australia.29

 Smith & Wesson M&P15‎;

Excerpt:
"Over the last decade a new technology has begun to take hold in American business, one so new that its significance is still difficult to evaluate. While many aspects of this technology are uncertain, it seems clear that it will move into the managerial scene rapidly, with definite and far-reaching impact on managerial organization. In this article we would like to speculate about these effects, especially as they apply to medium-size and large business firms of the future.

The new technology does not yet have a single established name. We shall call it information technology. It is composed of several related parts. One includes techniques for processing large amounts of information rapidly, and it is epitomized by the high-speed computer. A second part centers around the application of statistical and mathematical methods to decision-making problems; it is represented by techniques like mathematical programing, and by methodologies like operations research. A third part is in the offing, though its applications have not yet emerged very clearly; it consists of the simulation of higher-order thinking through computer programs."

Rfc: Add major incidents to Ruger Mini 14[edit]

Should the Ruger Mini 14 article add this text? CuriousMind01 (talk) 15:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

The Ruger Mini 14 was used in these incidents:

Survey[edit]

Threaded discussion[edit]

There are sources in the 2 incident articles, I repeated some sources and added additional sources here:

Sources

1986 FBI Miami shootout

École Polytechnique Massacre

Rathjen, Heidi; Montpetit, Charles (1999). December 6: From the Montreal Massacre to Gun Control. Toronto:. McClelland & Stewart. ISBN 0-7710-6125-0.

The article currently has a popular culture use.

I added criteria, the 2 results per: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Firearms#Criminal_use. I did not think it was necessary to repeat the incident details within the 2 articles.


Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Does NPOV apply to gun articles.3F

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Firearms/Archive 3#On including mentions of firearm.27s usage in crime.2C appearance in works of fiction.2C trivia.2C and so forth

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Content guide#Popular culture

WP:Firearms guideline https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Firearms#Criminal_use that has stood the test of time for many years now. The goal of that guideline is to avoid having firearm articles becoming littered with every "good use" and "bad use" mentions of day to day crime. "On January 1st, 20XX, Joe Schmo successfully used a BRRP MK II to defend himself in his garage." That guideline also states that specific firearms that become widely notorious because of their usages, and result in major changes in gun laws, should include mention of the usages in the firearm article. For example, the Carcano rifle used in the JFK assassination, the pistol used in the Columbine shooting, etc., that resulted in major changes in both gun laws and in public perceptions.

It was formed years ago, written as a guideline and policy prior to the Wikipedia Firearms interest group by many early editors to WP, who then originally formed the Firearms interest group and included the wording in what exists today.

It has stood the test of time rather well, and the guideline was put in place to avoid the addition of cruft and pop culture, and also was set in place to avoid the attempt to try to set mass killing records that would only become goals to be beaten by later shooters.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/10/12/us/handguns-gun-ownership-survey.html?emc=edit_th_20161015&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=58413496

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/theory-of-relativity-then-and-now-180956622/?no-ist https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200210/history.cfm http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/life-unbounded/early-origins-for-life-raises-major-planetary-puzzles/ http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/light-from-universe-rsquo-s-first-stars-spotted-in-hubble-photos1/ http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/extinct-tree-climbing-human-walked-with-a-swagger/ http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/10/151006-homo-naledi-human-hands-feet-science-anthropology https://www.quantamagazine.org/20151006-plague-genetic-history/ http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/goddard/shrinking-moon-tides http://www.bl.uk/magna-carta/articles/magna-carta-english-translation http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-milky-way-s-missing-mass-partially-found/ Where the US gets it oil http://www.randalolson.com/2014/08/28/where-the-u-s-gets-its-oil-from/ JScience 23:59, 27 August 2015 (UTC)jcardazzi

Magna Carta
Cotton MS. Augustus II. 106, one of only four surviving exemplifications of the 1215 text.
Created1215
LocationBritish Library and the cathedrals of Lincoln and Salisbury
Author(s)John, King of England, his barons and Stephen Langton
PurposePeace treaty

[[user:CuriousMind01]]

CuriousMind01/sandbox
URLNational Archives UK


|website = nasa.gov/hubble
hubblesite.org
spacetelescope.org

MAGNA CARTA DOCUMENTARIES http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/magna-carta-muse-and-mentor/magna-carta-and-the-us-constitution.html http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/featured_documents/magna_carta/legacy.html

Documentaries, Lectures, Discussions, Reading[edit]

Documentaries, Lectures, Discussions
Title Source Citation / Link Date Notes
Magna Carta Chapters 1-6 The National Archives (United Kingdom) [3]
Magna Carta 1215 English translation, Read aloud with the words highlighted History is Now [4]
Lecture on Magna Carta by Linda Colley at Guildhall, London BBC Parliament [5][6] 25 November 2014
Magna Carta The British Library British Library [7][8]
Magna Carta And Medieval England Ryan Reeves [9] 28, March 2015
Magna Carta Timelines.tv [10]
David Starkey's Magna Carta BBC [11][12] February 2015
Magna Carta 4 Episodes Melvyn Bragg BBC Radio [13] January 2015
Magna Carta:Myth and Meaning intelligence squared [14] 11 May 2015
Magna Carta's Legal Legacy: Conversation with Chief Justice John Roberts & Lord Judge Library of Congress [15] 14 November 2014
Magna Carta Day: Magna Carta and the American Constitution National Archives USA [16] 15 June 2015
Magna Carta & the American Constitution Library of Congress [17] 16 September 2014
The Relevance of the Magna Carta to the 21st Century-Sir Robert Worcester Dole Institute of Politics [18] 30 November 2012
Magna Carta: 800 Years After Runnymede University of Virginia School of Law [19] 30 March 2015
Magna Carta: 750 Years Of Liberty 1965, Ceremony St. Paul's Cathedral. British Pathé [20] 13 June 1965



http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/07/150717-mosaics-synagogue-israel-magness-discovery-archaeology/?

ping user:CuriousMind01

curiousmind01 (talk · contribs)

[[user|curiousmind01]]

Dark Matter map[edit]

http://www.nature.com/news/dark-matter-mapped-at-cosmic-scale-1.17311 http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dark-matter-mapped-at-cosmic-scale Jcardazzi (talk) 13:58, 19 April 2015 (UTC)jcardazzi

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine)

hair loss laser treatment https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24474647 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23970445 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24078483 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23551662 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23551662[citation needed]

<script type="text/javascript" src="http://hubblesite.org/lib/share_video.php?u=/hu/db/videos/hs-2015-24-a-flash_video_16x9.flv&t=/hu/db/2015/24/videos/a/flash_preview.jpg&w=448&h=252"></script>


http://www.vims.edu/people/latour_rj/pubs/rjl_Goldman_et_al_2004.pdf

http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2015/05/21/a-tale-of-four-supernovas/?sf9501445=1

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v521/n7552/full/nature14440.html http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v521/n7552/full/nature14455.html

<iframe width="550" height="740" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" src="http://www.climatecentral.org/wgts/WhenItRainsItPours/index.html</iframe>

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uq0H4-nvBB8&ab_channel=NewScientist Video of Laser Beam in flight]

http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/150127/ncomms7021/full/ncomms7021.html

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26861-laser-flight-path-caught-on-camera-for-the-first-time.html#.VWdkYs_BzGc

In order to observe a laser, or any other light source, photons from it must directly hit your eyes. But since laser photons travel in a tightly-focused beam, all heading in the same direction, you can only see them when the laser hits something that reflects a portion of the light and produces a visible dot.

A tiny proportion of photons scatter off air molecules, but normally these are too faint to see. You can get around this by firing a laser through smoke, giving the photons more molecules to scatter off – but that's not the effect we see in the movies.

"The challenge was to have a movie of light moving directly in air," saysGenevieve Gariepy of Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, UK. "We wanted to look at light without interacting with it, just looking at it passing by."

To make this work, she and her colleagues constructed a camera sensitive enough to pick up those few scattering photons. It is built from a 32 by 32 grid of detectors that log the time a photon arrives at them with incredible precision, equivalent to snapping around 20 billion frames a second.

Magna Carta [21]

ref>Lyall, Sarah (2015-06-14). "Magna Carta, Still Posing a Challenge at 800". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2015-06-15.</ref>

[22]Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).[23][24]

CR7 http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/08/140821-star-supernova-primordial-space-first-generation/ http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/astronomers-claim-to-make-first-glimpse-of-primordial-stars/

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/06/150622-neanderthal-dna-jawbone-ancestor-anthropology/

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/06/22/scientists-discover-hundreds-of-hidden-galaxies.html

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/06/150622-uganda-poaching-wildlife-crime-elephants-ambassador-wonekha/

http://www.txstate.edu/news/news_releases/news_archive/2015/June-2015/VJDayKiss062215.html

http://dawn.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news-detail.html?id=4633

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/06/150622-andrew-tallon-notre-dame-cathedral-laser-scan-art-history-medieval-gothic/

NASA is sending high definition videos of Earth for the ISS. http://www.ustream.tv/channel/iss-hdev-payload http://www.space.com/25797-nasa-hd-earth-from-space-video-webcasts.html NASA announced June 16 2015 that HDEV video is now available in Ultra HD, or 4K, format. A commercial Company call Urthecast release HD videos from its camera on ISS. http://www.space.com/29695-urthecast-hd-video-from-space.html

WISE brightest galaxy https://www.facebook.com/ScientificAmerican/videos/vb.22297920245/10155684758280246/?type=2&theater

Video Transmissions[edit]

The ISS does live-streaming views of Earth captured by four commercial high-definition video cameras(HDEV) installed on the exterior of the International Space Station last month. The High Definition Earth Viewing (HDEV) experiment aboard the ISS was activated April 30, 2014.

The HDEV gear was delivered by SpaceX's robotic Dragon capsule, launched April 18, 2014. Astronauts installed the cameras on the space station, which became operational on April 30, 2014.

HDEV is mounted on the External Payload Facility of the European Space Agency’s Columbus module.

This experiment includes several commercial HD video cameras aimed at the earth which are enclosed in a pressurized and temperature controlled housing.

Video from these cameras is transmitted back to earth and streamed live on this channel.

While the experiment is operational, views will typically sequence though the different cameras.

Between camera switches, a gray and then black color slate will briefly appear. Since the ISS is in darkness during part of each orbit, the images will be dark at those times.

During periods of loss of signal with the ground or when HDEV is not operating, a gray color slate or previously recorded video may be seen.

The cameras are enclosed in a temperature-specific housing and are exposed to the harsh radiation of space,"

"Analysis of the effect of space on the video quality, over the time HDEV is operational, may help engineers decide which cameras are the best types to use on future missions.

The project, known as the High Definition Earth Viewing (HDEV) experiment, aims to test how cameras perform in the space environment.

Analysis of this experiment will be conducted to assess the effects of the space environment on the equipment and video quality which may help decisions about cameras for future missions. High school students helped with the design of some of the HDEV components through the High Schools United with NASA to Create Hardware (HUNCH) program. Student teams will also help operate the experiment. To learn more about the HDEV experiment, visit here: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/917.html

The primary purpose of HDEV is to monitor the rate at which HD video camera image quality degrades when exposed to the space environment (mainly from cosmic ray damage) and verify the effectiveness of the design of the HDEV housing for thermal control.

The four cameras of the HDEV experiment are oriented in different directions and with different views relative to the ISS travel direction. They are in positioned, 1 looking forward, 1 looking nearly straight down, and 2 looking back. This provides several different viewing angles to the viewer.

The cameras are programmed to cycle from one camera to the next, and only one camera can work at a time. As they cycle, each camera must turn off and the next camera turn on before the HD video starts, taking about 8 to 10 seconds to change. Through this cycling, comparable data can be collected on each camera; while also providing, as a bonus, different Earth viewing perspectives.

The University of Bonn in partnership with the German Space Agency (DLR) is implementing the "Columbus Eye" program based on the HDEV streaming video. A webpage is in place (http://columbuseye.uni-bonn.de/ in German) that incorporates the HDEV UStream video and describes the Columbus Eye project


The Vancouver-based company UrtheCast (pronounced "Earthcast") has two HD cameras on the orbiting lab. One of them, known as Theia, takes pictures with a resolution of 16.5 feet (5 meters), while the other camera records video that can resolve details as small as 3 feet (1 m) across.

These two cameras, which cost $17 million, were installed by spacewalking cosmonauts in January. UrtheCast released the first images from Theia last month and plans to begin streaming near-realtime views of Earth from orbit soon, bringing lots of viewers to their website. http://www.ustream.tv/channel/iss-hdev-payload

http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/HDEV/ http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33226496

http://frontierfields.org/2015/06/23/galaxy-shapes-in-the-frontier-fields-observations/

http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-s-chandra-captures-x-ray-echoes-pinpointing-distant-neutron-star

Google digitally mapped the entire 3,000-foot rock climb using its spherical 360-degree panoramic photography used in the Street View technology of its road maps of: 1. Tommy Caldwell climbing the Dawn Wall; 2.)Alex Honnold climbing the NOSE, using gear and ropes, in January 2015 wearing a harness holding six high-resolution cameras, capturing images every ten vertical feet, from ground to summit.[25] Google Yosemite Climbs

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/secrets-of-the-colosseum-75827047/?no-ist http://news.discovery.com/history/rome-colosseum-unveils-wild-beasts-trapdoor-150608.htm http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/06/05/heres-how-ancient-romans-got-wild-animals-onto-the-colosseum-floor/ http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/secrets-of-the-colosseum-75827047/?no-ist http://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/how-ancient-romans-got-wild-animals-colosseum-180955580/?spMailingID=22912095&spUserID=NzU3NjY0OTQzOTMS1&spJobID=582373983&spReportId=NTgyMzczOTgzS0

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/extreme-temperatures-linked-to-changing-air-patterns/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/28/magazine/can-the-bacteria-in-your-gut-explain-your-mood.html?emc=edit_th_20150628&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=58413496

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/superconductivity-record-bolstered-by-magnetic-data/?WT.mc_id=SA_Facebook

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-100-year-debate-about-the-eardrum-comes-to-an-end/ http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/150422/ncomms7853/full/ncomms7853.html

http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-study-finds-indian-pacific-oceans-temporarily-hide-global-warming

dark matter http://iopscience.iop.org/2041-8205/807/1/L2/pdf/2041-8205_807_1_L2.pdf http://subarutelescope.org/Pressrelease/2015/06/22/index.html

Simple Application and Meaning[edit]

− Solving the equation by using the values for the physical constants on the right side of the field equation, where G=Newton's gravitational constant, c=the speed of light, the equation reduces to: G=0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002*T

− meaning to get a warp of space-time takes a large amount of mass. For example the Earth's mass at 1 M⊕ = 5.97219 × 1024 kg

− warps space-time to the strength of gravity which we experience on Earth causing an acceleration of mass of approximately 9.8 meters/second2 at the Earth's surface.[26][27]


I still believe that the section you added, Einstein field equations#Simple Application and Meaning, has no value. Presently, it says "Solving the equation by using the values for the physical constants on the right side of the field equation, where G=Newton's gravitational constant, c=the speed of light, the equation reduces to: G=0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002*T meaning to get a warp of space-time takes a large amount of mass. For example the Earth's mass at 1 M⊕ = 5.97219 × 1024 kg warps space-time to the strength of gravity which we experience on Earth causing an acceleration of mass of approximately 9.8 meters/second2 at the Earth's surface.". A long string of zeros (instead of an expression in scientific notation) is incomprehensible as most people would have difficulty even counting the number of zeros, let alone figuring out what they mean. Presumably you are assuming some system of units, but you have not identified which system. No scientist talks about "a warp of space-time"; that is straight out of fiction. The "G" in your formula is potentially confusing as some people might read it as referring to the gravitational constant rather than the Einstein tensor.

Copyright info: Just click the 'History' tab to open the article's revisions history — for example, this is a history of this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=history then find appropriate version, for example, a revision from today, 18 September 2015‎ — and the hour-and-date of a revision is a hyperlink to that revision: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&oldid=681626935 Just right-click it and choose 'Copy a link' or whatever it is called in your browser; or click it to open in a new view, then copy the URL from the browser's address bar. --CiaPan (talk) 12:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Can audiopedia articles be linked/templated into wikipedia articles? Is there a bot doing so?

I found Audiopedia videos of spoken wikipedia articles meant for the blind.

Audiopedia seems to be sponsored by the BBC. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/8865357/BBC-to-open-vast-radio-archive-online.html

There is an Audiopedia user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Audiopedia

here is an example wikipedia spoken recording. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOgcIIy4mtw&ab_channel=Audiopedia

Informati:on https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV63FScHnShoobfaENC8R_Q/about Description We provide a free service targeted to blind and visually-impaired internet users. Wikipedia is the largest database of knowledge ever known to mankind, and yet it is essentially inaccessible to individuals with limited vision. Note that all text is licensed under CC-BY-SA, and all images are also creative commons (various licenses).

Thank you,CuriousMind01 (talk) 16:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Hey CuriousMind01. That YouTube channel is unconnected with Wikipedia, and it is a copyright violation of Wikipedia, so we would certainly never properly link to them, automatically or otherwise. However, the copyright issue could be fixed to give proper attribution to Wikipedia's authors under our licenses (they do make an attempt to comply at their about page, woefully short of the mark). Wikipedia already has spoken versions of articles, and, as of now, there are 1,165 in the category for them. We also have a project dedicated to producing them. I do see some advantages to having a YouTube channel for others. For example, any normal format can be uploaded to YouTube using a billion devices, whereas there are many hoops to jump through here, because of the requirements that the upload be in a free and open-source software codec and container (see Vorbis & Ogg). Also, even though a human's reading is almost always many times better than a program's, it can be tasked with creating them 24 hours a day and allow access for people where they don't have it now. But even if we concede that, it would be better to have such a program to do so here rather than linked to off-site. I would support setting that up but as with everything here, it requires someone willing to take the time and having the know-how to do it.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 17:05, 12 September 2015 (UTC) Hi, Audiopedia doesn't seem to be in any copyright violation per the terms in: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights, because the content is offered by WP for free to all. I think what they are doing is legal, creating computer generated spoken WP text articles, offered for free for use of the blind, and citing the WP article name and an image. It would be great if WP did the same, like you wrote it takes time and skills. Thank you, CuriousMind01 (talk) 18:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi again CuriousMind01. As I said about that page "(they do make an attempt to comply at their about page, woefully short of the mark)". I actually linked for you the copyright policy page you linked back to me above, and have a quite a lot of experience in copyright enforcement, application and interpretation. I do think it's important for you to understand what the copyright issue is, so you, being involved and possibly in a position to help here – maybe even in some manner informing Audiopedia of the problem so they can become compliant and we could link their efforts – are armed with the knowledge to know what the problem actually is and how it can be fixed. Wikipedia content is not "offered by WP for free to all". There are two basic problems with this statement. First, Wikipedia does not own the copyright to (the vast majority of) its content at all, its authors do, personally, whatever they contribute, so long as it is sufficiently creative to be subject to copyright protection. Second, most of that content is co-licensed under two free copyright licenses: the 1) CC-By-SA 3.0 Unported License, and under the GFDL, which, simplifying, require that copyright attribution be given to to the authors in a "reasonable manner" to comply with the licenses. We further agree by contributing, that such copyright attribution credit to us, the authors of an article, can be provided by (in addition to stating one or more free licenses they are reusing the content under), include a direct line notice of the page at this site where its page history is available, so that a person viewing the re-used content is informed of, and can easily and directly navigate to, the page being re-used and therefore can see the identity of the content authors in its history. This can be done by posting at the reuse site a) a hyperlink (where possible) or b) URL to the Wikipedia page or pages being re-used (emphasis added as this becomes important in the next paragraph), or c) a list of all authors, which you would find in the page history/ies (generally this last option is only done where a page has very few authors).

What this means in practice is that each one of the Audiopedia files needs a clear notice stating the license and saying what specific Wikipedia page its content comes from, by the methods I've outlined. This is not provided by vague notice somewhere that all text is "is licensed under CC-BY-SA". Every one of those videos is infringing on the copyright of the authors in the content of the page being read, and will be until a compliant full and direct notice is provided for the specific Wikipedia page by one of the methods I've outlined – it's really not all that difficult to comply but they don't come close. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 19:16, 12 September 2015 (UTC)


Thanks Fuhghettaboutit. Copyright is a complicated subject(to me).

Are these statements correct? For each Audiopedia Youtube video speaking a Wikipedia article,Audiopedia would have to state they are complying with these 2 licenses: 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_the_GNU_Free_Documentation_License and write the URL the wikipedia article which is being spoken (re-used).

State the intent of the spoken re-use is to assist the blind and visually impaired to make a use of Wikipedia articles, for free from Audiopedia.

Thanks again--CuriousMind01 (talk) 17:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

CuriousMind01, close but not quite. They would need to comply with at least one of those two license, they could select either or both. In either case, they would need to provide a link to the original page history, or the original Wikipedia page, which itself has a link to the history. A permalink to the version they used would be preferable. They would also need to be clear that their content is under the same license, and that people may use it on the same conditions. They would not need to state their intent, as Wikipedia's license are not in any way conditioned upon intent (they might want to, but that would be their choice). Indeed if they chose to charge for their services, Wikipedia's license would permit it if the above conditions were complied with.DES (talk) 18:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC) Thank you. How could a link to the original page history, or the original Wikipedia page or a permalink to the version used, be provided? I can only find providing the link to an article, which contains a tab for the article history.

If someone reuses a page from the past, example from June 1 2015, how can a link to the June 1 2015 page be provided? Thank you, CuriousMind01 (talk) 11:52, 18 September 2015 (UTC) Click the highlighted link to get to the permalink. Supdiop (T🔹C) 12:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


3.6 how to get a link to a past article version[edit source]

Click to see image for more details Regarding my recent Audiopedia question.

....they would need to provide a link to the original page history, or the original Wikipedia page, which itself has a link to the history. A permalink to the version they used would be preferable....DES (talk) 18:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

How could a link to the original page history, or the original Wikipedia page or a permalink to the version used, be provided?

I can only find providing the link to the current article, which contains a tab for the article history.

If someone reuses a page from the past, example the article version from June 1 2015, how can a link to the June 1 2015 page be provided? I see articles have version #s in the history-compare differences, but the history tab list does not give the link,

Thank you, CuriousMind01 (talk) 11:52, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Just click the 'History' tab to open the article's revisions history — for example, this is a history of this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=history then find appropriate version, for example, a revision from today, 18 September 2015‎ — and the hour-and-date of a revision is a hyperlink to that revision: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&oldid=681626935 Just right-click it and choose 'Copy a link' or whatever it is called in your browser; or click it to open in a new view, then copy the URL from the browser's address bar. --CiaPan (talk) 12:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC) Click the highlighted link to get to the permalink. Supdiop (T🔹C) 12:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


Lorenz Quote
"At one point I decided to repeat some of the computations in order to examine what was happening in greater detail. I stopped the computer, typed in a line of numbers that it had printed out a while earlier, and set it running again. I went down the hall for a cup of coffee and returned after about an hour, during which time the computer had simulated about two months of weather. The numbers being printed were nothing like the old ones. I immediately suspected a weak vacuum tube or some other computer trouble, which was not uncommon, but before calling for service I decided to see just where the mistake had occurred, knowing that this could speed up the servicing process. Instead of a sudden break, I found that the new values at first repeated the old ones, but soon afterward differed by one and then several units in the last decimal place, and then began to differ in the next to the last place and then in the place before that. In fact, the differences more or less steadily doubled in size every four days or so, until all resemblance with the original output disappeared somewhere in the second month. This was enough to tell me what had happened: the numbers that I had typed in were not the exact original numbers, but were the rounded-off values that had appeared in the original printout. The initial round-off errors were the culprits; they were steadily amplifying until they dominated the solution." (reference 5, page 134)|[28]
  1. ^ "Management in the 1980's". Harvard Business Review. Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  2. ^ "Director Observes 30th Anniversary of 'Miami Shootout'". Federal Bureau of Investigation. Retrieved 2016-09-28.
  3. ^ "Magna Carta National Archives United Kingdom". {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  4. ^ "Magna Carta 215 Read aloud in English". {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  5. ^ "Linda Colley Lecture on Magna Carta November 25 2014".
  6. ^ "Linda Colley Lecture on Magna Carta November 25 2014".
  7. ^ "Magna Carta An Introduction".
  8. ^ "Magna Carta An Introduction".
  9. ^ "Magna Carta And Medieval England".
  10. ^ "Magna Carta - Timelines.tv History of Britain".
  11. ^ "David Starkey's Magna Carta".
  12. ^ "David Starkey's Magna Carta BBC".
  13. ^ "Magna Carta 4 Episodes".
  14. ^ "Magna Carta:Myth and Meaning".
  15. ^ "Magna Carta's Legal Legacy: Conversation with Chief Justice Roberts & Lord Judge".
  16. ^ "Magna Carta Day: Magna Carta and the American Constitution".
  17. ^ "Magna Carta & the American Constitution".
  18. ^ "The Relevance of the Magna Carta to the 21st Century-Sir Robert Worcester".
  19. ^ "Magna Carta: 800 Years After Runnymede".
  20. ^ "Magna Carta: 750 Years Of Liberty 1965".
  21. ^ Scott, Mark (2015-03-16). "In 'Magna Carta: Law, Liberty, Legacy,' a Document Resonates". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2015-06-15.
  22. ^ Ginsburg, Tom (2015-06-14). "Stop Revering Magna Carta". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2015-06-15.
  23. ^ "Galactic crashes fuel quasars, study finds". Retrieved 2015-06-19.
  24. ^ Glikman, Eilat; Simmons, Brooke; Mailly, Madeline; Schawinski, Kevin; Urry, C. M.; Lacy, M. (2015-04-08). "Major Mergers Host the Most Luminous Red Quasars at z ~ 2: A Hubble Space Telescope WFC3/IR Study". arXiv:1504.02111 [astro-ph].
  25. ^ "Now You Can Climb Yosemite's El Capitan Like a Rock Star—From Your Computer". Retrieved 2015-06-24.
  26. ^ Scharf, Caleb A. "Just How Resilient Is Spacetime?". Retrieved 2015-08-19.
  27. ^ "The Meaning of Einstein's Equation" (PDF).
  28. ^ "Chaos at 50".
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:CuriousMind01/sandbox&oldid=802543577"