User:CuriousKurti

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Curious Kurti's Profile Page


I cannot teach anyone anything. I can only make them think. -Socrates

Current Projects

Broadcom Biography Articles
Biographies of notable STEM figures created by my CIS classes.

Spring 2024

[Kandis Abdul-Aziz]

This is my first year working with WikiEdu and I'm loving it! Recently I was asked a few questions about my involvement so instead of posting something new, I'll just copy my responses here.

This is your first time teaching with the Wikipedia assignment, and you knocked it out of the park! Why did you decide to incorporate the assignment into your class?

Thank you! Incorporating the Wikipedia assignment was a decision inspired by attending a workshop at the Open Education Conference last fall. With nearly three decades of experience teaching Computer Information Systems and a background in linguistics, my focus has always been on exploring technology's impact on communication, fostering creativity, facilitating knowledge sharing, and cultivating communities of practice across diverse contexts. The WikiEdu project seamlessly integrated into my curriculum, offering a real-world application using a resource I'm personally passionate about. After engaging with the WikiEdu team, I was convinced it was an opportunity I wanted to take advantage of. I am glad that I did!

Your students' work is part of a larger initiative to increase the representation/diversity of biographies of notable figures working in STEM -- what about this specific goal called to you?

As a woman in technology, I am keenly aware of the underrepresentation of women and minorities in STEM fields. For years, I have named my class groups after women and BIPOC notables, just to get students curious about who these people are and why I might have chosen them. Amazing advances across all sorts of STEM fields have been done by people whose names we should know!

How would you describe the power of Wikipedia in shaping people's awareness and understanding of notable figures?

When I was a kid, I had a set (or two) of encyclopedias that I would read just for fun (yes, I was THAT kid) or when I was curious about a subject. Wikipedia is a modern version of that, a first-line knowledge source that people go to when they wonder about something. It is usually the top search result when looking for information about someone. Wikipedia is more accessible than my old set of Britannicas because most people have a cell phone in their pockets and access to the internet. They can use that to find out what they need to, and want to, know. The power of Wikipedia lies in the credibility of the sources used to create the knowledgebase and in the transparency of the process where anyone can verify and validate the information presented.

What are your biggest takeaways from the experience?

This project confirmed what I already believed about Wikipedia and increased my level of respect for the resource by an order of magnitude. Because of my background in linguistics and CIS, I really enjoyed getting a “behind the scenes” look at how articles are created and the entire editorial process. I was extremely impressed with the WikiEdu team and the underlying process-oriented educational philosophy driving the organization. Honestly, in an era of standards-based, testing-focused, high-stakes learning environments, working with WikiEdu was a breath of fresh air. They put the focus squarely where I strongly believe it belongs - collaborative, open-source knowledge creation and sharing.  

Was the support from your Wikipedia Expert (Brianda) helpful? How so?

Absolutely! Brianda is the bomb! Aside from being exceptionally open and helpful, she was just fun to work with. She was open to ideas I wanted to try and available anytime I needed clarification on a process. Students who participated in her office hours consistently reported back that it was one of the best things they could have done. They came away with increased understanding and practical strategies to move their project forward.

Would you recommend other higher education instructors to teach with Wikipedia? If so, why?

This is a cross-curricular project that has applications in any discipline and can be customized to any subject area. On a practical level, students will develop baseline digital literacy skills with a relevant outcome. They will learn how to find, validate, and use information to create content that informs others in a neutral and unbiased manner. Their work jumps outside the classroom walls and into the real world of readers and editors that will see what they do, add on to what they do, and maybe even edit what they do. They learn that no matter how hard they work, sometimes another editor sees something they missed and reverts their efforts pending more supporting evidence. The ability to participate in distributed work environments while collaborating with classmates and mentors is a valuable skill that will benefit students in very real ways in the world of work we find ourselves in today.

What do you think are the biggest learning outcomes for your students from this experience?

Outcome #1 - My students learned that they can be valuable contributors to the global knowledgebase and not just passive consumers of information. They learned project management skills and how to break a large project into attainable, measurable goals. Students learned what a reliable source looks like and how to make a case for notability in a professional and unbiased manner. They were equipped with knowledge and the ability to respond intelligently to the question 'Why use Wikipedia?'. Most importantly, however, they gained the capacity to critically analyze the content they encounter, discerning its authenticity, truthfulness, and relevance.

Outcome #2 - Students found inspiration in the chance to showcase influential figures who mirrored their own identities. Early in the semester a student shared her frustration with the lack of positive role models for her daughters. She felt disheartened by the narrow portrayals of Latinx individuals in mainstream media, often confined to stereotypes of crime or poverty. The Wikipedia project sparked her excitement as it directly addressed this issue close to her heart. As she immersed herself in her assigned biographies, her confidence grew, empowering her to reach out directly to her subjects. I believe that their responses affirmed her belief in her capacity to make a tangible impact, fostered a sense of empowerment, and provided validation in her ability to enact positive change for her community.