Template talk:Did you know/Approved/week-1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page transcludes a subset of the nominations found on the page of all the approved nominations for the "Did you know" section of the Main Page. It only transcludes the nominations filed under dates of the second-most recent week. The page is intended to allow editors to easily review recent nominations that may not be displaying correctly on the complete page of approved nominations if that page's contents are causing the page to hit the post-expand include size limit.

Dedie Rachim[edit]

(
)
Created by Juxlos (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 217 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Juxlos (talk) 08:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article new enough and long enough. Passes earwig, no close paraphrasing was found, and the hook is interesting, cited inline, and verified (AGF on Indonesian source). QPQ done. Image appropriately licensed. GTG. Pseud 14 (talk) 13:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ellen Oliver (suffragette)[edit]

(
)
Ellen Oliver
Ellen Oliver
Created by Lajmmoore (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 96 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Lajmmoore (talk) 16:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Great work on this article! Earwig highlighted a few words, but they just appear to be common words and phrases. Good to go!  Kentuckian |💬   15:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nxdia[edit]

(
)
Created by Launchballer (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 223 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Launchballer 14:38, 21 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new enough and long enough, it is neutral and well sourced. Earwig picks up a bit of a quote, but otherwise no close phrasing, so all OK. QPQ is done. Hook is interesting, but I couldn't see a reference to the Singles Chart in the source - could you clariy the chart part of the hook? Thanks Lajmmoore (talk) 16:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, I kept rewording the hook. Try [2].--Launchballer 18:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Launchballer - hook is good (& citation archived here), all OK Lajmmoore (talk) 09:13, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WLOS[edit]

(
)
Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 683 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Recent GA with QPQ done. No copyvio detected, hooks cited and verified. Prefer the original hook. Juxlos (talk) 03:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Silva Meehan[edit]

(
)
5x expanded by Generalissima (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 41 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 17:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • I will gladly review this! WatkynBassett (talk) 17:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • The article was expanded and nominated today (21 April 2024).
    • The article has been expanded more than fivefold (more like 20x).
    • The article is well sourced. I did one spot check and the reference checked out.
    • The article is written in a neutral and non-promotional tone.
    • Earwig did not pick up anything.
    • QPQ provided.
    • The hook has the right length and is interesting. The part of the hook on him being hired and the quote itself is well sourced. However, I struggle a bit with the part on him being "a critic of the spoils system". I think you rely here on Smith 1981 (pp. 82–83). I see that he criticized particulars of the spoils system there. But whether this elevates him to an outright critic of the system I am unsure. Maybe a weaker statement like "[...] who had criticized the political patronage system earlier [...]" would be more reflective of the source? What do you think?
    • Thank you for your great work Generalissima! I will approve this nomination if this one quibble is addressed. WatkynBassett (talk) 18:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @WatkynBassett: Fair point! Would something along the lines of "... that after criticizing the political patronage system, John Silva Meehan was hired as Librarian of Congress through "purely an act of political patronage"?" work? Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 19:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valerija Narvydaitė[edit]

(
)
Moved to mainspace by Soman (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 379 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Soman (talk) 00:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is new enough, well sourced, and long enough. I don't see any outstanding concerns as far as presentability. QPQ checks out. I'm assuming good faith on the hook, as I do not speak Lithuanian! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 17:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nama assemblage[edit]

(
)
5x expanded by Chaotic Enby (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 07:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Would you be able to clarify what is being stated in the second sentence of the "Biota" section? the middle portion regarding the 550ma seems to be out of place as currently written.--Kevmin § 21:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I agree it wasn't the clearest way to word it. The Nama Assemblage is often defined chronologically (as the fauna from ~550 to ~539 million years ago, or from the first appearance of Cloudina to the first appearance of Treptichnus), but sometimes on the basis of fauna, with holdover fauna from the previous epochs not being considered part of it, with the chronological definition then called "Terminal Ediacaran biozone". It was mostly to explain why some of the fauna isn't always considered Nama, but that could be further expanded instead in the "Definition" section. I have plans for further expansion of the article (currently in User:Chaotic Enby/sandbox), and I will be happy to reorganize the article and expand it further if needed. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 22:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kevmin: Based on the above, can this be approved? If not, what needs to happen to get approval? Z1720 (talk) 14:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The sentence in the article is still a bit hard to parse for anyone reading it for the first time, but it does conform to the sources used. The article is new enough and long enough, with reliable sourcing and no close paraphrasing identified. I think we are good to go at this point.--Kevmin § 19:51, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Live into 85[edit]

(
)
Created by Launchballer (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 224 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Launchballer 12:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • What a trainwreck!! This article had me in stitches. It also is new enough, long enough, and contains the hook fact in the article with no textual issues. A hearty thank you for the laughter, Launchballer. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 08:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song)[edit]

(
)
Boygenius performing live in 2023
Boygenius performing live in 2023
Improved to Good Article status by Dylan620 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC). Interesting song GA on many and substantial sources, no copyvio obvious. I wonder if "expresses" would be a better word than "describes". The licensed image is beautiful when large, but not captivating in stamp size. In case it is not taken, I believe that the word "song" should be added to the hook for clarity that it has to do with music. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac L. Rice Mansion[edit]

(
)
The Isaac L. Rice Mansion
The Isaac L. Rice Mansion
Created by Epicgenius (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 651 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Epicgenius (talk) 16:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: ALT2 is not really suitable in this form, since it's not clear who it's accusing of antisemitism, but any other hook would be fine. Smurrayinchester 11:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. For what it's worth, I initially didn't really think the tugboat thing was that interesting (it has to do more with people protesting Julia Rice, who just so happened to live in the house). I might consider a hook about it later, though. Epicgenius (talk) 12:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually what about this?
I'll mark this as ready, and let the admin decide which hook to use. Thanks for the quick reply! Smurrayinchester 14:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Winter wonderland[edit]

(
)
  • ... that many winter wonderland fairs have become notorious as "winter blunderlands"? Source: Walking in a winter blunderland: the tradition of the rubbish British Christmas festival in The Telegraph: "Queues for miles, outrageous prices and a melting ice sculpture: it wouldn’t be Christmas without another tale of a disastrous “winter blunderland”. [...] But like the widely derided round robin Christmas missives, these Christmas disasters have become such a satisfying British tradition we could hardly let a December go past without pictures of a muddy field, sad reindeer and crying children and their irate parents." archive URL
Moved to mainspace by Smurrayinchester (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 29 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Smurrayinchester 11:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article was new enough, long enough, and free of close paraphrasing. QPQ has been done. Both hooks are interesting; ALT0 is cited inline and verified, but ALT1 is only indirectly stated in the article rather than an explicit statement. I'm not sure how to resolve the latter given that the article supports it, just not directly, but approval is withheld for now until that's sorted out. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that should work. Promoter's choice as to what hook to promote. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samir Aït Saïd[edit]

(
)
Aït Saïd at the 2016 Olympic Test Event
Aït Saïd at the 2016 Olympic Test Event
5x expanded by Riley1012 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 28 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Riley1012 (talk) 21:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article checks out for 5x expansion, length, neutrality and sourcing. Copyvio completely checks out. Hooks are interesting and fully sourced, and present within the article. QPQ has been completed. Happy to pass this one. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 21:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oophaga solanensis[edit]

(
)
5x expanded by AryKun (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 31 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

AryKun (talk) 21:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

@AryKun: Article is new enough (per WP:DYK5X) and long enough. The article is sourced adequately and reliably, neutral, and there isn't any plagiarism. I prefer ALT1, as it's a little more interesting and the wording in ALT0 is a little unclear. I've made an alternative hook for ALT1 specifying that Colombia is their native country (just for complete clarity).
  • ALT1a: ... that Oophaga solanensis frogs can be bought for $3 in their native Colombia and sold for up to $1,000 overseas?
Looks ready. This is my first DYK review, so I'd love a second opinion. Thanks, SupremeLordBagel (talk to me) 05:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here's your second opinion. Long enough, new enough. No maintenance templates found, no neutrality issues found, Earwig is quiet. QPQ done. Both hooks would require an end-of-sentence citation. (Side note: Please consider reviewing oldest first per WP:DYKRI.)--Launchballer 22:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Launchballer added end-of-sentence cites. AryKun (talk) 03:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let's roll.--Launchballer 05:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amie Parnes[edit]

(
)
  • ... that Amie Parnes allegedly first heard about her employer, The Messenger, ceasing operations from a New York Times article? Source: "I’m a loyal person by nature and I talked to Jimmy up until the minute we found out about the shutdown from a piece in The New York Times." Vanity Fair
    • ALT1: ... that a 2013 photo of Joe Biden embracing political journalist Amie Parnes generated controversy? Source: "In a light-hearted photograph taken with The Hill’s White House correspondent Amie Parnes, Vice President Joe Biden can be seen with his hands high on the reporter’s waist — and Parnes with her hands firmly on top of Biden’s. The photo was lifted off Parnes' Facebook page, and some outlets questioned whether Parnes was trying to block Biden’s hands from moving any further." TODAY
    • Reviewed:
    • Comment: Two potential hooks. I thought both were interesting but I understand that the second might violate WP:DYKHOOKBLP. Haven't done one of these in a while so forgive me if I need to adjust some of the formatting.
Moved to mainspace by Pac-Man PHD (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Pac-Man PHD (talk) 07:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article new and long enough notwithstanding the seven month draft period (happens). QPQ not needed as this is nominator's first DYK - welcome, by the way. Original hook is more interesting, cited inline and confirmed in cited source(s), and agree about the BLP issues with ALT1. Copyvio check only flagged direct quotes, so no issues. Good to go. Juxlos (talk) 03:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Missoula Children's Theatre[edit]

(
)
MCT production of The Secret Garden
MCT production of The Secret Garden
Created by Montanabw (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 38 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Montanabw(talk) 05:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article new and long enough with no copyvio detected (Earwig only flags a direct quote). QPQ is completed. Hook fact is inline (lead section), and verified by source (audio transcript). Good to go. Juxlos (talk) 03:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Oklahoma State Question 755[edit]

(
)
Created by Elli (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 20 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Elli (talk | contribs) 04:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • I personally think the first hook is great. It certainly got my attention. The article itself is long, was moved to the mainspace just today, is based on reliable sources, and looks fully complete. My only potential concern is that the hook doesn't explicitly state that it was struck down in court, but I think that can probably be inferred as is. Pac-Man PHD (talk) 08:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Though Earwig found likely copyvio, it's basing that off of a direct quote from the contents of the proposal, an open and free document that is properly attributed to, so it shouldn't be a violation. I think this is all in order. Still, felt it should be mentioned in case the author wants to paraphrase the contents of the proposal or if an administrator takes issue with it. Pac-Man PHD (talk) 08:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yeah as the author I generally don't think quoting the direct ballot title of the proposal is a problem (and imo paraphrasing would be less informative to our readers than seeing what voters saw). Elli (talk | contribs) 09:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Tanasale[edit]

(
)
Created by Juxlos (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 225 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Juxlos (talk) 05:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough, long enough, well written, hook is verified and interesting, no plagiarism, QPQ done. I'm not entirely sure that the image is correctly licensed, but in any case it is not used with the hook. Dahn (talk) 09:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Icosian game[edit]

(
)
  • ... that although the icosian game was advertised as "a highly amusing game for the drawing room", it was too easy to play and few copies were sold?
  • Source: For quote from 1859 ad, see Turner (1987); for the claims that it was too easy and not successful see Sowell (2001), https://scholarship.claremont.edu/hmnj/vol1/iss24/14 (and note the dates of these are pre-Wikipedia, too early to be circular references)
5x expanded by David Eppstein (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 183 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

—David Eppstein (talk) 06:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Date, expansion, hook, close paraphrase check, QPQ checks out. --Soman (talk) 11:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Jacob Papilaja[edit]

(
)
Created by Juxlos (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 219 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Juxlos (talk) 08:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. QPQ pending. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BeanieFan11: QPQ added. Juxlos (talk) 17:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald Reagan and AIDS[edit]

(
)
Reagan first acknowledges AIDS, beginning at the 7:12 mark.
Moved to mainspace by Wasianpower (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

🌸wasianpower🌸 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

Image eligibility:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Thanks for writing this article (t · c) buidhe 04:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Buidhe! Article has been updated with history.com source removed and wording in lede adjusted to make it more clear which part of the article it's referring to. 🌸wasianpower🌸 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Kirchick cites the different government reactions as a reason why during the 1980s the rate of HIV infection in the Great Britain was just 10 percent of that in the United States" This sentence may still need work. I can't see the full context or what source he cites, but I looked it up and ran the numbers for 1989, at which point the number of infections was 20 times larger in the US which also has 6x greater population. That does point to a substantial difference but doesn't support Kirchick's argument. I would prefer to cite epidemiologists for claims about the causes of different prevalence rates.
Stand-alone "defense" and "criticism" is typically integrated into one reception section, maybe put the defense last since the criticism section sums up the overall view.
"In 2015, following the release of the short film When AIDS Was Funny, renewed criticism from progressive media ..." I don't see where the sources discuss progressive media. If they are being cited as examples of progressive media, this paragraph likely falls foul of WP:NOR (and UNDUE).
"However, it is controversial whether Reagan himself could be considered homophobic, or if his personal views on homosexuality affected his AIDS response." part 1 is a false dichotomy, part 2 is unprovable (and I'm not seeing anywhere the opposite argument is made). The ultimate controversy/criticism is not about what Reagan believed but what he did, the article should reflect the bulk of the legacy section.
"Timeline of the Reagan administration's AIDS response" If you keep this section everything needs an inline citation. (t · c) buidhe 17:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kirchick's source for the one-tenth figure is The Age of Reagan by Wilentz, I don't have access to this book though. The other issues have been addressed. 🌸wasianpower🌸 (talk • contribs) 19:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For now I've gone ahead and changed the 10 percent figure to a more general figure that is still in line with what Kirchick wrote, and also in line with your analysis. 🌸wasianpower🌸 (talk • contribs) 12:31, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, the hook + article probably meet the requirements now but I'm not sure if the video does. (t · c) buidhe 17:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heaven on Earth: Art from Islamic Lands[edit]

(
)
Emerald-set box from the Heaven on Earth exhibition
Emerald-set box from the Heaven on Earth exhibition
Moved to mainspace by MartinPoulter (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 33 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

MartinPoulter (talk) 14:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Date, length, hook, close paraphrase check, qpq checks out. Image free on Commons. --Soman (talk) 21:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coulrophilia[edit]

(
)
Created by Di (they-them) (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Di (they-them) (talk) 22:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Well that's a quite interesting topic. Everything checks out! Skyshiftertalk 19:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

German atrocities committed against Soviet prisoners of war[edit]

(
)
Overcrowded camp in Smolensk
Overcrowded camp in Smolensk
Created by Buidhe (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 244 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

(t · c) buidhe 23:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Nominated soon enough after GA. Meets length and citation requirements. Hook is absolutely interesting and the right length. The content of the hook is referenced in the article and a citation is appended immediately after where it appears. The image appears to come from a Nazi German government source, which means it's almost certainly in the public domain. Only concern is with the image's visibility at a smaller scale; going to just leave that up to promoter discretion. QPQ done (a quick-fail of novice nomination). Overall great work! ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:47, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Gould Stephenson[edit]

(
)
5x expanded by Generalissima (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 42 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 08:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Really lovely expansion today, long enough, no plagiarism issues, very interesting hook with a reliable source. Thanks for this! Spaghettifier (talk) 22:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vulcan Bridge[edit]

(
)
Converted from a redirect by Kentuckian (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

 Kentuckian |💬   13:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article length is good, QPQ not needed, article uses reliable sources and passes GNG, WP:EARWIG turns up with no copyvios. Hook is interesting and backed up by source. Overall, good to go in my opinion! Di (they-them) (talk) 22:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lunch (song)[edit]

(
)
Converted from a redirect by PSA (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 17 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

‍  PSA 🏕️  (talk) 03:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Generally well-written, sources are okay, hook is interesting. Just a small recommendation, links to Rolling Stone and Coachella 2024 can be added. Good to go! Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 11:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strategion[edit]

(
)
  • Source: At this time, while the Emperor Theodosious [II] was in procession to the public granaries, he was pelted with stones by a hungry populace... Westbrook (2013), p. 10
  • ALT1: ... that the merchants of sheep were allowed to sell their livestock in the Strategion in Constantinople until the first day of Lent? Source: C'est au Strategion...que les merchands de moutons peuvent vendre leurs betes, et cela jusqu'au premier jour de careme. Janin (1950), p. 96
  • Reviewed: Fang Gan
Created by Alessandro57 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 80 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Alex2006 (talk) 07:39, 27 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article was created yesterday, so is new enough. It is much more than long enough and properly uses in-line citations. AGF on proper paraphrasing of the offline sources was used. Both hooks are interesting and cited in-line, with the first one being better I think (though perhaps need some commas?). The only thing holding up this review, Alessandro57, is that the QPQ hasn't been done yet. SilverserenC 21:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see that you're still editing, Alessandro57. Were you planning on doing a QPQ review or is this nomination abandoned? SilverserenC 23:46, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • No worries, of course I am planning a QPQ. I am still recovering from last month's two QPQ per hook ... ;-) Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 03:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Josephine Kenyon[edit]

(
)
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: Feel free to share your alt blurbs.
Created by Xoak (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

X (talk) 23:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Reviewing... New enough, long enough, Earwig's copyvio <1%. Whispyhistory (talk) 04:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... Thank you for this interesting article. It reads well and follows the main refernece closely. QPQ not required. Hook is in article and referenced, but is quite general. Can you think of a more specific hook to her? Whispyhistory (talk) 15:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • ALT1: ... that editions of Josephine Kenyon's book Healthy Babies Are Happy Babies increasingly moved away from their original recommendations of rigid scheduling to "on-demand" scheduling based on the child? Source: Opitz, Donald: 'During the course of the book’s five revisions ... her trend in pediatric advice shifted from an emphasis on following rigid schedules to attending to a child’s “on-demand” schedule.' Possible Alt, 198 characters, suggested by Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 21:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you... looks good. How about a hook containing 'good housekeeping'? There may be something in this reference p. 102. Whispyhistory (talk) 20:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Approving ALT2... I don't think the quote marks are needed as it appears a common term when I searched literature on the topic. Possibly link the book. The hook is in the article and in the main source. Thank you both. Whispyhistory (talk) 14:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18×2 Beyond Youthful Days[edit]

(
)
  • ... that the 2024 film 18×2 Beyond Youthful Days was purposefully filmed in Japan in March to capture both snowfalls and cherry blossoms in the same month?
Created by Prince of Erebor (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 7 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 11:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Having read the article, I'd suggest additional hook proposals be proposed because the currently-proposed hook isn't really that interesting by itself. There's no shortage about possible hooks here, with the Production section itself being full of possible material. One possible hook could be how the original choice for cinematographer had to back out due to his wife's childbirth, but there are also other possible options. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:33, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: Hi Narutolovehinata5, thanks for reviewing the article! I actually think quite the opposite. I chose the current proposed hook because Chang Chen is a veteran actor with over 40 years of experience and has participated in numerous Hollywood projects, but this is his very first time serving as a producer. On the other hand, the cinematographers weren't really big names that would arouse anyone's interest, and dropping out of a film project sounds too common and trivial. While writing the article, I actually thought of two potential hooks (didn't include them initially as I thought the current one was better):
1. ...that the 2024 romance film 18×2 Beyond Youthful Days was purposefully filmed in Japan during March, taking advantage of the country's seasonal change to capture both snowfalls and cherry blossoms in the same month?
2. ...that Greg Hsu took a hiatus from filming the 2024 romance film 18×2 Beyond Youthful Days to attend the 59th Baeksang Arts Awards but returned to the set the very next day?
What do you think?—Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 12:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Prince of Erebor: The main concern I have about the original hook is that if the reader wasn't familiar with Chen, the significance of the information wouldn't be as obvious. He isn't a household name like say Jackie Chan. Having said that, I like the first option. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:55, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: Right, that's absolutely true. I included a description of him starring in Dune for the exact same reason. I have updated with the new hook.
Btw, I just took a look at your profile page and realized that you are the one who wrote LiSA and Attack on Titan into good articles. I am genuinely impressed by your contributions!!—Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 13:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: I have already updated the hook. Please check!—Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 08:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I like the hook fact itself, but at 214 characters it's too long since hooks should generally be a maximum of 200 characters long. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: Just copied and pasted and forgot about the hook length requirement. Now done, please check.—Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 12:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: Anything else you would like me to do?—Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 06:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Apologies for the delay in responding! I don't see the new/revised hook here so maybe you can propose it below this comment? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: Huh? I don't understand. The current hook above "...that the 2024 film 18×2 Beyond Youthful Days was purposefully filmed in Japan during March, leveraging the country's seasonal change to capture both snowfalls and cherry blossoms in the same month?" is the revised hook. It is 197 characters long. Is there a bug or something?
The nomination has been pending for nearly a week, and there are no further improvements or revisions needed. As I have exams coming up next week and am becoming busier, would you mind expediting the review process a bit? Thank you!!—Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 05:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is weird. When I copy-pasted the hook the one I copypasted was over 200 characters excluding the dots at the start. I must have copied from an old revision of the page. in any case, 197 characters, while acceptable, is still on the long side and I wonder if it could be shortened further since that length is not ideal. If not, I'll accept it as is. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 05:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: Right! I removed the mention of Japan's seasonal change. Now it is trimmed to 151 characters. Please check!—Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 07:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks! The article is new enough and free from close paraphrasing. The current hook is interesting and cited inline; it is cited to a Taiwanese source so AGF on the reliability, but the provided English translation and a Google Translate translation check out. A QPQ has been done. There's only a minor issue in that I would suggest including a sentence or two about reception in the lede for completeness sake, but as this isn't a GA that isn't really something that should prevent approval, it's just a suggestion. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ 項貽斐 (March 26, 2024). "【台日浪漫戀情3】跟著許光漢看盡一年四季　從日本雪國、櫻花到南台灣盛夏" [【Taiwan-Japan Romantic Love Story 3】Following Greg Hsu through the four seasons. From the snowy regions of Japan, cherry blossoms, and the peak of summer in southern Taiwan.] (in Chinese). Mirror Media. Archived from the original on April 5, 2024. Retrieved April 24, 2024. 為展現片中四季樣貌，去年3月先於日本拍攝，再轉往台灣取景。藤井道人表示：「因為3月是日本非常有魅力的一個月份，正好在季節轉換之際，月初還下雪、月底櫻花已綻放，能在最短的時間內分別拍到這兩種景象。日本部分殺青，剛好到台灣接著拍夏天的戲。」 [To showcase the changing seasons in the film, [18×2 Beyond Youthful Days] was first shot in Japan in March last year and then moved to Taiwan for further filming. Director Fujii Michihito stated, "March is a captivating month in Japan because it is the transition period between seasons. At the beginning of the month, there is still snowfall, while by the end of the month, cherry blossoms are in full bloom. We were able to capture these two different landscapes within a short timeframe. The filming in Japan concluded, and we seamlessly transitioned to shooting summer scenes in Taiwan."]

Hong Kong v Inter Miami[edit]

(
)
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: This is my first DYK nomination so please remind me if there is anything missing or should be improved. Thanks.
Created by Cypp0847 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

~~ J. Dann 15:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • What a ride that article was. QPQ not needed. Earwig has a high score for copyvio detection, but that's entirely due to Messi's paragraph-long statement in the "Departure and Japan trip" section, which has an inline citation to the flagged source. Referencing is adequate and length/newness criteria fulfilled. Hook is definitely interesting and cited in source, not cited inline as exact phrasing but separately so. Good to go. Juxlos (talk) 10:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ludwell–Paradise House[edit]

(
)
The Ludwell–Paradise House, Rockefeller's "antique"
The Ludwell–Paradise House, Rockefeller's "antique"
Created by Pbritti (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 48 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Pbritti (talk) 21:48, 26 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • AGF on offline book source. Article expansion is sufficient and recent, QPQ done. No copyvio is detected, Earwig flags a bibliography item and a direct quote only. Hook is good. To DYKA you go. Juxlos (talk) 17:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rosal, Sutherland[edit]

(
)
  • ... that Rosal was the largest of 49 townships in Strathnaver, shortly before it was deserted entirely?
  • Reviewed:
Created by DandelionAndBurdock (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

-- D'n'B-t -- 16:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough, long enough, and properly sourced. No QPQ needed. Earwig found no problematic copied wording. Good-enough hook, but one must synthesize a couple pieces of information in the article to obtain it: the "largest township" part is at the end of the town section, dated to the early 19th century, while the "deserted" part is at the end of the "clearance" section. In fact both facts are adjacent in the "Maverick Guide to Scotland" source, with much tighter dating (largest in 1815; cleared between 1814 and 1818) and to avoid problems with WP:SYN the article would benefit from making them adjacent somewhere within it, footnoted to that source. Also, "deserted" is maybe a euphemism for what happened. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks David. What if the sentence in the Town section said "Before the clearance, it was the largest of 49 townships in Strathnaver"? That would would be consistent with the Maverick Guide guide source and not change up the current before-during-after structure. I could also change the sentence in the Clearance section to say "completely deserted by 1818" to avoid any ambiguity.
I think "deserted" is, from a NPOV, the end result of what happened, it describes what's left. You could say "forcibly depopulated" or something but I think "deserted" is clear enough and used in the sources. -- D'n'B-t -- 18:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To me, "deserted" is an accurate and neutral description of the state of the place now, but not of the process by which it reached that state. How about
  • ALT1 ... that before its inhabitants were evicted, Rosal was the largest of 49 townships in Strathnaver?
but that would require a new reviewer as I can't both propose hooks and approve them. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be happy with that ALT1, (although with the link just saying "Rosal" for preference). -- D'n'B-t -- 19:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That was an unintentional omission. I've piped the link as you originally did now. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1 short enough, cited, and interesting, though may be worth adding "in Scotland" per WP:DYKINT. Let's roll.--Launchballer 06:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sunlight before signing[edit]

(
)
  • Reviewed:
Created by GobsPint (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

GobsPint (talk) 06:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Comment: The article is relatively short and needs further development before being highlighted; the topic is an interesting one, but the hook could do with being shorter. Perhaps,

Alt1 ... that Barack Obama promised to make bills freely available online for public consultation under Sunlight before signing? Klbrain (talk) 19:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, numerically it's over the limit, but as written, this article would deserve {{no lead}}, and one should be added.--Launchballer 19:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've reformatted the article into sections and sommething akin to a weak lead. Feeback is welcoem.GobsPint (talk) 04:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My concern is assuaged.--Launchballer 07:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!GobsPint (talk) 18:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Lots of good comments but nobody appears to have reviewed. So I guess I will take it on.4meter4 (talk) 22:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article is new enough. It's long enough even after removing the large blocks of quoted text. Earwig did flag copyright violation, but this was due to the large blocks of quoted text which have been properly attributed and are within policy. No close paraphrasing or copyright found, and the article appears to be within policy in all other measures. Hook fact and length both check out for the original and Alt1 hooks. I leave it to the promoter to decide which hook wording they prefer to promote.4meter4 (talk) 23:03, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robyn Gigl[edit]

(
)
Created by Bridget (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 17 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Bridget (talk) 15:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is long and new enough, and properly sourced. There are no BLP issues. Both hooks are interesting. ALT0 is properly cited but I'm unsure about ALT1. Waiting on that QPQ. 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 15:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi LunaEclipse, I'm definitely leaning more towards ALT0, since it's focused on the critical reception of her work featuring a trans character, rather than the focus solely on the fact that Gigl and her character are trans. I've just added a DYK that I just reviewed. Thanks for taking a look at this! Best, Bridget (talk) 00:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The facts for ALT1 are supported but the phrasing seems a little awkward. How about
  • This one is great, but I'm kind of thinking the same thing as ALT1 – maybe we can come up with a hook that is centered on her literary work (rather than her transition)? Bridget (talk) 21:56, 30 April 2024 (UTC) (edited 23:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Elizabeth Seifert[edit]

(
)
  • ... that Elizabeth Seifert quit medical school after only one year as she was denied a medical degree due to her gender, went on to publish more than 80 novels in her career?
Created by Xoak (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

X (talk) 10:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article created 27 April. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hooks are all interesting and sourced. QPQ is not required. Looks ready to go. Thriley (talk) 15:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nellie McCoy[edit]

(
)
Created by Silver seren (talk) and FloridaArmy (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 116 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

SilverserenC 22:19, 27 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Verified that the article is long enough, that there are no plagiarism concerns through the Copyvios tool and spotchecking, and that the hook is sourced in the article. Cunard (talk) 00:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know/Approved/week-1&oldid=1171758960"