Template:Did you know nominations/William L. Sullivan (author)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
William L. Sullivan (author)[edit]
- ... that in 2005, the Oregon Cultural Heritage Commission selected Listening for Coyote by William L. Sullivan as one of the 100 most significant books in Oregon history? Source: The Oregonian, 20 Feb 2005, p. D7, "Oregon Lit: 200 Years, 100 Books": “Oregon Cultural Heritage Commission selected 100 books that best define the state and its people … Listening for Coyote: A Walk Across Oregon's Wilderness by William L. Sullivan …” (subscription required); or check Oregon Cultural Heritage Commission web-site "Literary Oregon List of One Hundred Books"; see p. 2, bottom of middle column
- Reviewed: Quercus hiholensis
Created by Orygun (talk). Self-nominated at 00:17, 8 January 2017 (UTC).
Apologies if I'm missing something, but per WP:DYKRULES this article doesn't appear eligible for DYK as it hasn't been recently expanded (it was last updated in November). It needs to be 5x expanded within a week span, or attain GA status in order for it to appear on the main page as a DYK.
- Ah, I just noticed that you have the wrong article linked. I will complete my review. Ruby 2010/2013 04:05, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
AGF on the hook (the work is listed on this page, but AGF on it being "one of the 100 most significant books in Oregon history" – the accessible source doesn't seem to specify the point of the list, but the Oregonian source appears to). The article was created on January 6 and is certainly long enough (with 7783 characters). The Earwig tool came back with 30% confidence but this mainly appears to be due to usage of book and organization titles. Everything looks good to me. Ruby 2010/2013 04:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
