Template:Did you know nominations/Wanda Wesołowska

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 13:49, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Wanda Wesołowska

Improved to Good Article status by Simongraham (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 22:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Wanda Wesołowska; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • Article is new enough, having been promoted to good article status in the past week. Article is long enough, written neutrally, and cites sources inline. A check with Earwig detected no issues with copyright. QPQ has been done. The hook is properly formatted, interesting, and has an inline citation. Would it be accurate to change "animals" in the hook to "spiders"?; I think it would be more interesting that way. And, not a disqualifying concern, but the second sentence in the lead seems to immediately overshadow her career by mentioning the taxonomist Eugène Simon. Also, the wording "contemporary writer" is rather vague and could be replaced with zoologist or arachnologist. gobonobo + c 15:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC)