Template:Did you know nominations/Somali rape controversy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Somali rape controversy's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 17:21, 4 March 2013 (UTC).

Somali rape controversy[edit]

Moved to mainspace by Cryptic C62 (talk). Self nominated at 18:14, 22 February 2013 (UTC).

  • Article is new enough and long enough. Topic is covered in a neutral manner, is well-sourced, and is free of copyright violations. I've added a {{BLP others}} template to the talk page as the content seemed to warrant it. Looks to be compliant with the BLP policy. The hook is sourced within the article and is interesting as well as neutral. QPQ has been met and the sole image in the article is properly licensed. Looks to be good to go. Gobōnobō + c 01:06, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
  • How about:
  • ALT 1: ... that in early 2013, a Somali journalist was arrested for reporting on an alleged rape by government security forces?--Carabinieri (talk) 04:39, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
I wouldn't mind that at all. I've linked "Somali". --Cryptic C62 · Talk 13:34, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
  • ALT1 hook looks good as well. Gobōnobō + c 16:47, 4 March 2013 (UTC)